T
Trad_Julia
Guest
I’ve been quite guilty of dressing improperly, as someone put it upthread, in sneakers, jeans and a turtleneck or similar high-collared, waist-length shirt which exposes only the hands, but I’ve never understood why even that outfit would be considered immodest. Inappropriately casual, sure, but immodest? I know about Bishop Williamson’s and Padre Pio’s ordinances against women wearing pants and slacks (as such aren’t properly feminine and will potentially arouse the passions of men), but if that were the case, wouldn’t a summer skirt, which exposes more of one’s legs to view, be frowned upon more highly than a pair of loose jeans, which may hold the shape of the legs, but not actually allow the skin to be seen?
Just a thought.
Just a thought.