Are Some People Afraid Of The Latin Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seamus_L
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
brotherrolf, what on earth are you talking about?! LexKnight referred to a couple of people he/she had spoken with, and then wondered whether there might be differences of opinion from preV2 folks on the matter. As far as I can read, he/she never generalized that all preV2 felt that way, nor did he/she mention your name. Releasing your venom on LexKnight sniffs of egocentrism.

Back to the topic at hand, I am not afraid of the Latin mass, and with the Pope’s actions toward the SSPX this week, I may need to get used to the idea of changes that may be coming. So, following your example, I guess as soon as I’m done with my doctorate I will enroll in a four-year Latin program so I can pray the TLM instead of offering up having to endure constantly translating a foreign language into a language in which I can actually pray.

I don’t remember ever reading such a condemning post by you… If our Holy Father can extend the hand of reconciliation to the SSPX, perhaps we can put aside our own differences and just love and serve Christ in each moment. Here’s hoping…

Gertie
Condemning? Egocentric? SSPX? What??? All of that because I said that I understood what I was saying in 1960 as a NINE YEAR OLD??? I was 41 years old when the Cardinal Archbishop of Lyons, France departed from the script and gave the Apolstolic Blessing in Latin at the bicentennial celebration of my cathedral. You mean a) I didn’t recognize the Apostolic Blessing in Latin and b) I wasn’t capable of responding in responding? I sure did a better job that the majority of our clergy assembled.

Look, Gertie…all across this forum I have made it crystal clear for years that I attend a reverent NO cathedral parish. I have not been to a TLM or EF, as you prefer, since 1978 much less the SSPX. We have one indult Low Mass in my diocese. I made no perjorative comments about the OF or NO, if you prefer.

I am simply tired of repeating myself ad infinitum that this “baloney” that we didn’t understand the Latin is just that…“baloney” or to put it more strongly in a vocabulary approved by the Brothers who taught me - taurine foecal matter.
Egocentrism? Hardly. I lived the life. I went to Catholic schools during the entire period. I don’t need someone to totally negate my father’s sacrifice to work two jobs to put me through Catholic school to tell me I didn’t know what I was saying.

Some may have been taking Mr. O’Leary’s LSD in the 60s or Mr. O’Reilly’s kool aid but it wasn’t me. When I tell you I understood (indeed, understand) the Mass in Latin it is not perjorative, egocentrical, ethnocentric, or any other derisive, condescending, pejorative or puerile term you care to come up with.

It was and is the unvarnished truth. And I am more than sick and tired of people insinuating that we were all on the “magic kool aid” and deceiving ourselves because we did not speak fluent Latin.

I am an anthropologist. In 1965 my Irish, Scot, German, French and English ancestors could celebrate Mass with my wife’s Scot, German, and French ancestors. The Cubans came to Louisiana along with Phillipinos, Guatamalens, Nicaraguans, Costa Ricans, Panamanians, Columbians, Puerto Ricans, and Venezuelans. We all had no trouble following along at Mass in Latin.

There was no influx of Eastern Europeans here but in 1975 our Vietnamese brothers and sisters came and in the words of Gomer Pyle “surprise, surprise” they could respond in Latin too.

You can take your PhD but the reality is that my mother with her high school education in the 50s is the one who taught me to understand the Latin Mass. I made my First Communion in 1958 and it was my mother who pointed out the Latin and the English during the next year which prepared me to become an altar boy.

I’ve never said anything about it, but perhaps your PhD could shed some light upon the fact that I am the first person on either side of my family to get a baccalaureate degree much less go on for an MA.

I am a product of a mixed marriage. My father was not Catholic and he worked two jobs well into the 1970s to put me, my sister and my brother through Catholic school. It was my father who woke me up and drove me to serve Mass at 6am. When our new parish was formed in 1964, I rode my bike to the rectory to serve Mass at 6am. My pastor, Fr. B., was a WWII combat veteran who parachuted into Normandy in WWII. Until the sisters came in 1967 (and, yes, I’m still in contact with some of the sisters), six am Mass was just Father and I.

It grieves me to even have to go here. I affirm and attest that I served way too many six am Masses with just Father and I present between 1964 and 1967 until the sisters came and a convent was opened. I was never molested and I affirm and attest that I did know what I was saying and that there was only Father and I at that Mass.

What more do you folks who so hate the TLM want?

You wanna know the truth? I have always wanted to be an archaeolgist. Fr. B. encouraged me and sent me home with his Time-Life books on Greece, Rome, etc. We lived hand to mouth because because of a Catholic school education.

I’m 57 years old. Eternal rest grant unto my father. My father was not Catholic when I was growing up but he honored his pledge to raise his kids Catholic when he married my mother in the sacristy of my mother’s church in 1947.

I am more than aware of what it was to grow up Catholic just before Vatican II. There are far too many of us alive today who consistently tell y’all that we did know what we were saying and we did know what that Latin meant.

Unless you have the “been there, done that” award how can you make such sweeping statements.
 
So, following your example, I guess as soon as I’m done with my doctorate I will enroll in a four-year Latin program so I can pray the TLM instead of offering up having to endure constantly translating a foreign language into a language in which I can actually pray.
That’s good but did you know that for most science doctorates awarded back in the 60’s, a proficient reading knowledge of at least two foreign languages (French, German, Russian) was required? I’ve heard that they have now relaxed those rules as well.
 
Well said…

I would not want to go to Mass, and feel like others were watching me and waiting for me to make a mistake so they can either talk about me behind my back, or insult me to my face. That, among other- similar- reasons, is why I no longer go to the Tridentine Mass (even though I still love it- and prefer it…the liturgy itself anyway).
Oh, without a doubt. There’s definitely a demonstrable correlation between TLM/EF and uncharitable behavior. Funny thing, one usually hears about it from charitable NO/OF folk.

ASD​

Traditional Latin Mass: Translation and Grammar
 
That’s good but did you know that for most science doctorates awarded back in the 60’s, a proficient reading knowledge of at least two foreign languages (French, German, Russian) was required? I’ve heard that they have now relaxed those rules as well.
We are not talking about proficieny in languages! OK, folks, let’s take it upon another level. Latin was a sacred language from an anthropological viewpoint.
 
I am more than aware of what it was to grow up Catholic just before Vatican II. There are far too many of us alive today who consistently tell y’all that we did know what we were saying and we did know what that Latin meant.
Amen.

Enough with the party line. It’s time to put up some numbers.

I move that we have a moratorium on unsubstantiated assertions about how bad it was before VII and how great it is now.

I propose that from now on, all claims about how well people understand the vernacular Mass celebrated versus populum should be backed up with evidence.

After being told for 40 years that it’s all perfectly clear to everybody now, I would like somebody to give us some numbers. E.g.,
  • How many NO/OF Catholics can name the basic parts of the Mass?
  • How many of them can explain what it means to say the Mass is a sacrifice?
  • How many of them could explain in persona Christi or English equivalent?
Who really thinks that anybody can produce fact-based numbers that show that those things, or any comparable list, are understood better by people who participate in NO/OF vernacular Mass celebrated versus populum than by people who assist at TLM/EF. :rolleyes:

ASD​

Traditional Latin Mass: Translation and Grammar
 
I am jumping in here. I think it would be the people at the EF that would scare me more than anything. Much of what I read here on the forum is so critical, condemning and bitter sounding that I would have a hard time concentrating on what is happening. I would feel judged for not covering my head or not wearing a skirt…I love the Lord and the OF that I attend is reverent. What saddens me most is what seems to be a holier than thou attitude from people of both rites. I really wish there was only one way to celebrate the Mass and that it would be celebrated the same way everywhere. I think having the OF and EF has brought division among Catholics and has perpetuated uncharitable attitudes. I probably would really love the EF, but need to get past my own prejudices and hurt feelings brought about by those who are critical and condemning of the OF Mass.
Well, read what some prominent Churchmen have said about the matter…
ad2000.com.au/articles/2005/feb2005p15_1853.html

When those in the Hierarchy are making these kinds of statements, it’s easy to see that the trads are not making this stuff up 🤷
 
We are not talking about proficieny in languages!
I apologize. My note was a “by the way” note, had nothing to do with Latin proficiency, which, by the way, I wish I had. 🙂

I’m working on it, though, and my missal helps. I try not to read the English side as I feel it’s only a crutch.
 
id love to go, but im afraid id get thrown out if i showed up in a tucked in dress shirt, khakis, and dress shoes.
It’s not a fashion show. It’s the EF. Unless you’re planning to go barefoot in cutoffs and a muscle shirt, you won’t get “thrown out” by the priest. (That outfit might get you thrown out of the OF, too, at least if it was a “reform of the reform” celebration.) The opinions of other congregants are like lint: just dust them off and move on.

Your garb should be at the bottom of your list. At the top of the list should be the desire to pray the EF and commune with the Creator of All.
 
Oh, without a doubt. There’s definitely a demonstrable correlation between TLM/EF and uncharitable behavior. Funny thing, one usually hears about it from charitable NO/OF folk.
Oh, but that is sooo true! 😉 👍
 
Then what about me? . My native language isn’t English. So I suppose that I am unable to pray along because not only is the Priest reading in a foreign language to me then , I have to translate in my mind from English into my own language and then translate back into English to pray along.:eek:

So I suppose that all things being equal , I am frozen out, right?
Since the Priest is speaking in a language not my own, I cannot actively participate in the worship/ At least that seems to be what you are saying…

There is a flaw in the kind of ethnocentric statement that you made. It may be fine for you, but what about everybody else for whom English isn’t their native language?. Is it equally fine for them or do they matter? Or maybe we shouldn’t be at YOUR Mass at all. Maybe we should try to find a Mass with our own kind. And to take it further, what if I can’t find a Mass in my own language? What do I do then?

You see that is what the use of Latin did. It put everyone on the same page so to speak.
Yes, I can see from your near-illiteracy in the English language that you must have a terrible time understanding a mass in English :rolleyes:

Look, it’s been interesting and, um, a learning experience to post here in the traditional forums, but it’s time for me to leave. I disagree with the opinions of those who posit that Latin is the “higher way” for the mass, that it’s a matter of laziness for those of us who prefer mass in a language in which we can communicate, and that the TLM must return in exclusivity or the Holy Roman Catholic Church, against whom the gates of hell will not prevail, we dissolve into dust.

So long as the Holy Father himself allows for the mass in the vernacular, the only point of this discussion (as it now stands) is to pat each other on the back for being right, or to condemn those with different (and clearly inferior) opinions. If and when the Holy Father decrees the TLM as the sole expression of the mass, this single mom will start teaching my son the Latin he needs to fully participate in the mass. (Incidentally, the Catholic school he’ll start kindergarten in next fall has a TLM once a month, and the parish’s altar servers are taught how to assist at these masses as well as the OF masses.)

My needing to work on a doctorate to support my son may make me a hundred steps below the likes of brotherrolf’s beloved mother, but I know where my salvation lies regardless. And I’m not about to go around thinking I know better than the Holy Father, nor that I can read his heart or anticipate his actions.

If I don’t see y’all on the other forums, I pray we meet in the Lord’s Kingdom 👍

Gertie
 
It’s not a fashion show. It’s the EF. Unless you’re planning to go barefoot in cutoffs and a muscle shirt, you won’t get “thrown out” by the priest. (That outfit might get you thrown out of the OF, too, at least if it was a “reform of the reform” celebration.) The opinions of other congregants are like lint: just dust them off and move on.

Your garb should be at the bottom of your list. At the top of the list should be the desire to pray the EF and commune with the Creator of All.
your right, im gonna go for it. either next week or the week after.
how should i prepare for it without investing in a 60 dollar missal yet?

🙂
 
your right, im gonna go for it. either next week or the week after.
how should i prepare for it without investing in a 60 dollar missal yet?

🙂
The Church should have a “mini-missal” in the vestibule; a small paperback booklet that has the Ordinary of the Mass in it, in both Latin and English. If not you can get the Angelus Press one for about 7-8 USD (it costs 12.95 here in Australia). You’ll also be able to find the Propers for the Day there (the vestibule) as well.

When I first started going in Sept last year, I sat about 2/3 of the way into the church. Far enough forward to see what was going on, far enough back to get the cues of when to sit/stand/kneel. IF you take Communion, Go to kneel at the rail and don’t say “Amen”.

Introduce yourself and talk to folks after the Mass. You may be surprised how welcoming they are (particularly after reading some of the previous posts!!) 👍

Hope I’ve helped a little. Oh you might find this site most helpful too: sanctamissa.com/en/

God Bless and good on you!
 
😉
The Church should have a “mini-missal” in the vestibule; a small paperback booklet that has the Ordinary of the Mass in it, in both Latin and English. If not you can get the Angelus Press one for about 7-8 USD (it costs 12.95 here in Australia). You’ll also be able to find the Propers for the Day there (the vestibule) as well.

When I first started going in Sept last year, I sat about 2/3 of the way into the church. Far enough forward to see what was going on, far enough back to get the cues of when to sit/stand/kneel. IF you take Communion, Go to kneel at the rail and don’t say “Amen”.

Introduce yourself and talk to folks after the Mass. You may be surprised how welcoming they are (particularly after reading some of the previous posts!!) 👍

Hope I’ve helped a little. Oh you might find this site most helpful too: sanctamissa.com/en/

God Bless and good on you!
Good advice, and yes, sanctamissa is the cat’s meow
 
your right, im gonna go for it. either next week or the week after.
how should i prepare for it without investing in a 60 dollar missal yet?

🙂
Good for you! 🙂 👍

Follow the links the other posters suggested and you should be fine. 😉
 
Hi. If anyone is interested in learning the Latin it is pretty easy. I just said a part of the rosary every day in English and then repeated it in Latin. It probably helped that my husband had a lot of Latin grammar book lying around but then again they are about classical Latin which is a bit different so I find myself with a different pronunciation. Once you have a working knowledge of Latin from praying the rosary you can pick out a lot in the Latin Mass. Translations are always horrible in any language (If you know some German and can read Freud that is a great example of snarling meaning) so you are missing something.
I am interested in Catholic mysticism and spirituality and I feel strongly that, all things being equal, the Latin Mass has a greater spiritual impact. Of course, of course, of course everyone should do what they feel most comfortable with. I just feel that the Latin Mass is so much more powerful that I would so like to have it more readily available. I hope it becomes more popular !
 
Before I begin replying I think I’ll preface my remarks with a quick statement: I do not think there is anything inherently wrong with a Latin Mass, I don’t think it’s “bad” or anything like that. I just have a personal preference for the Mass in the vernacular.

(Beginning with this part because it seems like the best place to continue the discussion):
I am getting really tired of the condescension. I am a live human being who is not dead yet. I grew up a Catholic before Vatican II. It is extremely insulting to have someone tell me that I didn’t know what I was saying…My personal observation…I went to Catholic school from primer to 12th grade. In all that time, the only classmates of mine who objected to the Latin Mass, Gregorian Chant, etc. and who didn’t “understand” the Latin Mass were jocks for the most part. Go figure.
First I wanted to say that you’re finding a lot in my post that wasn’t actually in there. I was just asking for opinions; I admitted that I hadn’t been there and I asked if anyone pre-Vatican II wanted to share their own experience. I’m new to the forum so I haven’t heard your previous talks on the subject.

I also said that the experience of the people I was talking to was their own, meaning it doesn’t necessarily reflect the experiences of others. Also these aren’t the kind of people who were really “jocky” at school either. These are people who loved (and still love) the Church and know what they are talking about. I can’t remember exactly who was there but I remember two - one of whom trained for seven years in the seminary before he discerned that the priesthood wasn’t his true calling – he still works for the Church (though not as a priest obviously), and the other who was actually a priest (and not even a bleeding-heart liberal priest that many people here seem to dislike). Also, from reading your posts, these people are about the same age as you (give or take a few years) and their pre-Vatican II experiences weren’t entirely positive.
You have been fed “propaganda” by those of my generation and you ignore the plethora of testimonies from those of us who “walked the walk” and “talked the talk”.
It’s very easy to brand the experiences of people on the other side “propaganda” – I’m very glad that you had generally positive experiences but that doesn’t mean that everyone did. You sound like you were lucky enough to have an amazing priest.
Do you any of you realize how you denigrate me, marginalize me, and trivialize me and my contemporaries when you say we “didn’t know what was going on and we didn’t know what we were saying”?
It’s good that I didn’t say that then. I was just saying that by having the Mass not in the vernacular provides another barrier (admittedly, not an insurmountable one) to being included in the experience and that many (not all) people don’t have a good enough grasp of the language for it to be a non-issue.

Thank you Gertabelle for your comments, also I’m a he; Lex (in my case) is an abbreviation for Alexander.

40.png
palmas85:
All you are praying are the translations anyway. So whats the big deal?
Ironically that’s kind of my point. Why pray in Latin when we have a perfectly good vernacular that we can speak in? Why complicate things and, as said before, create a barrier to inclusivity by saying it in a dead language?
And in Brotherolfs defense, he and I and several others have constantly posted on here of our experiences prior to Vatican II and no one seems to accept them as being truthful. We constantly hear the exact same detrimental things brought up over and over and over again. And when we point out that the reality was much different our statements are ignored completely in the majority of cases. It is frustrating to have to respond repeatedly to people who weren’t there telling us who were there what is was like.
Again, I wasn’t telling you what it was like; I was actually quoting someone who, like you walked the walk and talked the talk, speculating based on this evidence and the admitting that I do not know before asking if other people could discuss their experiences.
 
40.png
ASD:
That’s the conventional line these days. In fact, it’s the party line. It’s been asserted over and over again for 40 years, like a drum beat. And, it’s plausible enough, right? So, we’re all just supposed to accept it uncritically.

However, I’m skeptical. Personally, I wish I had some evidence. E.g., how about a poll or some other kind of empirical evidence showing that Catholics these days understand the Mass better than people did before Vatican II?
I think there’s a difference between understanding the Mass (ie. having an idea of what’s going on, on a practical level) and understanding the Mass (ie. the mystery etc.). I hope that makes sense… I think people would definitely have a better understanding of the first, and it certainly couldn’t hurt with peoples (italicised :P) understanding of the Mass.
Really? I’ll go explain that to my 4th grader, who does pretty durn well.
You must have a very talented son/daughter then. That said, you sound like a very intelligent person and I don’t know if every John or Jane would be able to raise their child to have such a complex understanding of what’s going on.
So it seems to boil down to this:

  1. *]You’re very familiar with the conventional wisdom about how much better things are now, although you don’t have any evidence to bring forward.
    *]You don’t know, but you’ve been told that TLM used to stink; just an old guy mumbling with his back to us.
    *]However, you think the TLM/EF now is rather different.
    *]Nevertheless, you’re certainly not going to exert yourself to learn a little elementary Latin, or otherwise give the EF a fair try.

  1. Like brotherhrolf I think it may be possible you have misunderstood me (maybe I wasn’t clear enough?). Please allow me to clarify:

    I’m not saying that things are “better” now and that the old days used to “stink”. In fact, if you read my post I point out that many (I was being nice, I do actually believe it’s the majority, not just many) of Masses in the vernacular are done to a poor or average standard. I was speculating, based on the experience of some people I know, that this may have also been the case when the TLM was the norm. I didn’t claim it as fact. I then, in fact, asked people if they’d mind discussing it because I’d like to know if maybe this was the case, or if the people I know were just incredibly unlucky.

    I also didn’t say I hate the Latin Mass, just that I have no desire to go out of my way to attend one (particularly because there’s only one of them in my city).
    BTW, since you’re concerned about being “inclusive,” I hope you’ll take brotherhrolf’s post to heart. Consider it sensitivity training. 😃
    I still assert that I wasn’t insensitive in my post – brotherhrolf was getting a lot more out of my post than was put into it. Although I do understand his frustration, I imagine he has to deal with a lot of people who say the things he mentioned. I’m just not one of them.
 
I’m not sure I understand all the venom here. People like the OF Mass very much. I’m one of them. Its the Mass that this generation has grown up with. Very often, it seems like people want talk about the OF Mass like its a bad thing and should go away. That will very naturally make people who know the OF Mass and appreciate it a little defensive, just as someone ripping the EF Mass will make an appreciator of that Mass very defensive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top