L
Liberalsaved
Guest
This falls firmly into the realm of libel. I did not say that. Never said it, never will.Historical fact then the pope is the anti christ in your eyes
This falls firmly into the realm of libel. I did not say that. Never said it, never will.Historical fact then the pope is the anti christ in your eyes
I’m not entirely sure I’m following. I noted what some people think. Whether or not it means anything doesn;t change the translation.Liberalsaved
you say that 666 "Nero Caesar"is a historical fact I
say It is ,not where is the libel.?I say that a lot of historical facts are miss. interp.Is there libel in that?
OK, now I’m really lost. I think I’m going to leave it be before I end up being quoted as the guy who said Popes were Satan’s Tools.If you say that all historicl facts are true and I say they are not is that liabel
Historical fact then, the pope is the anti christ in your eyes?You don’t think that do you?
walt2000 said:6= man ,under the curse of sin
666 is a reprducetion of Man the father man the son and man the holy ghost
777 = God the father,and god the son god the holy ghost
walt2000 said:6= man ,under the curse of sin
666 is a reprducetion of Man the father man the son and man the holy ghost
777 = God the father,and god the son god the holy ghost
Hi Walt…can you expand your thoughts giving the reference in Revelations. I have Father Michael’s book here on my computer desk…but I do find your thinking hard to follow and apologize. But if you can expand your thinking and connect it to passages in Revs. with details, perhaps I can follow you.I put in a tripwire in there see if you can find it?Surely one of you guys can find it.