C
concretecamper1
Guest
The good thief was saved under the Old Covenant not the New. Baptism by water is necessary for salvation under the New Covenant.The good thief.
The good thief was saved under the Old Covenant not the New. Baptism by water is necessary for salvation under the New Covenant.The good thief.
I enjoyed our discourse yesterday. You brought up many good points and have a sharp sense of understanding Scripture.Tis_Bearself:![]()
Watch out – this is where I got into trouble with @AugustTherese!Baptism as a sacrament was NOT instituted prior to Pentecost.
Do you mean instituted as in “instituted by Christ”? Or do you mean celebrated as in “celebrated by the Church as a sacrament”? I think you and I would hold to both of these claims, but some would claim both instituted and celebrated prior to Pentecost, and that’s where the disagreement lies.![]()
This thread has somehow derailed. The Catechism clearly states,
Notice the words ‘celebrated’ and ‘administered’. Christ instituted the Sacrament of Holy Baptism in the Trinitarian Rite when the Holy Spirit annointed Him in His Baptism.1226 From the very day of Pentecost the Church has celebrated and administered holy Baptism.
On the contrary, Augustine says in a sermon on the Epiphany (Append. Serm., clxxxv): “As soon as Christ was plunged into the waters, the waters washed away the sins of all.” But this was before Christ’s Passion. Therefore Baptism was instituted before Christ’s Passion.
Wow, I have no idea if that qualifies but what an inspiring story. I would think he was in Gods Grace’s though!Perhaps the Muslim man who was rounded up with a bunch of Christians by ISIS and when they were all being killed he had the opportunity to say that he was a Muslim, but instead decided that he wanted to receive execution because he was inspired by the faith of the Christians who were dying and said that he wanted to have the faith they had.
I am in agreement with you, and to my knowledge, the Magisterium is in agreement with us both, so to me, that’s the end of it…o you mean instituted as in “instituted by Christ”? Or do you mean celebrated as in “celebrated by the Church as a sacrament”? I think you and I would hold to both of these claims, but some would claim both instituted and celebrated prior to Pentecost, and that’s where the disagreement lies.![]()
This is the guy…phil19034:![]()
Wow, I have no idea if that qualifies but what an inspiring story. I would think he was in Gods Grace’s though!Perhaps the Muslim man who was rounded up with a bunch of Christians by ISIS and when they were all being killed he had the opportunity to say that he was a Muslim, but instead decided that he wanted to receive execution because he was inspired by the faith of the Christians who were dying and said that he wanted to have the faith they had.
I think I remember hearing about this story, can you send a link so I can learn more about it?
Well, what I learned in this discussion, to my surprise, is that there were folks who made the assertion that ‘real’ baptism was celebrated prior to Pentecost. That’s something that I was never taught, AFAIK!I am in agreement with you, and to my knowledge, the Magisterium is in agreement with us both, so to me, that’s the end of it…
Isn’t that a lovely thought; to visualize these Holy Innocents rejoicing around the new born babe lying in a manger!The Church venerates these children as martyrs (flores martyrum); they are the first buds of the Church killed by the frost of persecution; they died not only for Christ, but in his stead (St. Aug., “Sermo 10us de sanctis”)
…and these first flowers of the Church (martyrs by blood alone) accompany the Holy Child Jesus entering this world on Christmas day.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07419a.htm
I guess you might be rightThat would be baptism of blood.
It could well be that an exception was made for the Holy Innocents because of the circumstances causing their slaughter. They did die “for the faith” – for Jesus, albeit unknowingly.Yet, it was only by degrees, in the course of the first age of the Church, that the term martyr came to be exclusively applied to those who had died for the faith.
So, as it turns out, I was looking through the canons of Trent (for the sake of an answer in another thread), and I ran across one that’s relevant to this conversation. I thought I’d share it with ya’ll:Tis_Bearself:![]()
Well, what I learned in this discussion, to my surprise, is that there were folks who made the assertion that ‘real’ baptism was celebrated prior to Pentecost. That’s something that I was never taught, AFAIK!I am in agreement with you, and to my knowledge, the Magisterium is in agreement with us both, so to me, that’s the end of it…
Interesting, no? (I hadn’t remembered that this was one of the Reformation-era controversies that were out there!)If any one saith, that the baptism of John had the same force as the baptism of Christ; let him be anathema.