OK then if you can’t do it by accident, is there any fear whatsoever that you will die in a state of mortal sin? I don’t think it counts if it’s done “in passion” insofar as that implies incomplete consent?
One of my customers used to say, “we are in violent agreement.”
Thank you simple soul for pointing that out. I am trying to parse minor shades of meaning, and it can elicit this sort of response. It doesn’t have to, and usually once people get to know me better they know that I’m trying to draw them out, and understand. Even if I disagree, understanding the other view is my desire.
I think thistle is very careful to dot every I and cross every T. But what I like about thistle is this is not in the spirit of being scrupulous, just being accurate. And consistent.
I like to pick at characters to see what they are really saying rather than my approximation based on presumed understanding of their first stating of their idea. That said, I admire thistle for sticking to the system, without becoming bitter or particularly defensive. Logical consistency is important to me, and if I hear something that doesn’t make sense, I can call it out and we can pin it down. I don’t see this as being defensive so much as wanting to be clear about what thistle is saying and is not. I feed back in a different form so that it may be sliced another way – eventually I’ll see what distinctions matter and what don’t so I have a better feel all the way around.
Some people like to hear one way of something explained; I’m not. I like hearing from all points and kind of triangulating to see what I can see through their collective eyes. But only recently have I gotten to the point where I don’t feel defensive. I do tend to poke at what seem to be persona, and that’s prolly a personal problem.
MS