Are we too self-absorbed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JReducation
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Getting back to the OP.

In “Evangelii Gaudium” Pope Francis writes in Paragraph 94.

Emphasis Mine

I remember being shocked when someone on this forum or a comment in a catholic blog stated that the EF objectively conferred more grace than the OF. Now I can see how a person felt more open to God’s grace at one form of the Mass or the other but, how one form was objectively more efficacious. Could such an attitude be an example of self-absorbed promethean neopelagianism?
There is a danger though not for everyone, because we’re not all cut out of the same bolt of cloth. There is a danger of saying that because I feel or I believe this it must be truth. In such a situation the focus shifts onto the self rather than on to the Church. Sacraments must always be looked at a communal gifts to the individual. They come to us through the Church. Therefore, it is the Church who has the final word on their efficiency not the individual. The individual can certainly feel closer to God in situation X rather than situation Y. But he cannot say that this is how God chooses to communicate his grace to the Body. Only the Church can say this. If we become so focused on our experience that we try to make it a universal law, then we are self-absorbed.
 
Someone posted this on Facebook. I hope that I’m not violating any copyright law by posting it here again. Talk about a culture that is self-absorbed.
View attachment 18916
 
I’m reminded of how Mary is absorbed in God rather than herself. The Angel greets her
Hail, full of grace
rather than using her given name.

Elizabeth identifies her
Mother of My Lord
Her whole being is absorbed in God.
My soul magnifies the Lord.
47My spirit rejoices in God my Saviour.
 
T
I head a very big pro-life ministry in a large archdiocese. I need more volunteers, but I do not accept any volunteer who is not willing to learn while on the job. This means working one hour a week with pro-life and taking classes for two hours per week for 40 weeks per year for two years. He must study moral theology, Evangelium Vitae, Franciscan Theology, Franciscan methods in pastoral care, the Rule of St. Francis, the Life of St. Francis,the life and work of St. Maximilian Kolbe, Humanae Vitea and Sacred Scripture.
That is a great approach. One that I could, in good conscience, embrace and be part of…

Those that I know in my own parish and archdiocese when it comes to pro-life tend to be like what you previously described and that approach pushes me away/turns me off (however one wants to describe it)…It strikes me as very militant and less about healing and hope.
 
That is a great approach. One that I could, in good conscience, embrace and be part of…

Those that I know in my own parish and archdiocese when it comes to pro-life tend to be like what you previously described and that approach pushes me away/turns me off (however one wants to describe it)…It strikes me as very militant and less about healing and hope.
You can quote me on this.

If you want to win a man’s heart, why are you in his face?
 
You can quote me on this.

If you want to win a man’s heart, why are you in his face?
I have much respect for “Forty Days of Life” pro-life prayerful efforts. Much good fruit has come from that movement.
 
I have much respect for “Forty Days of Life” pro-life prayerful efforts. Much good fruit has come from that movement.
The beautiful thing about that movement and why it works is because they pray. They’re not in people’s faces., at least not the 40-Days for Life in which I have participated. I think that to know that others are praying for you as you approach an abortion mill must make some kind of impression on people.
 
The beautiful thing about that movement and why it works is because they pray. They’re not in people’s faces., at least not the 40-Days for Life in which I have participated. I think that to know that others are praying for you as you approach an abortion mill must make some kind of impression on people.
Yes! And that is why Abby Johnson wrote the book “Unplanned”. (the former assistant to abortions who is now a Catholic and excellent pro-lifer!)

I have been a small part of the prayerful presence that prays for the people who go to the abortion mill, and those who work inside along with the doctors. We mustn’t forget them in our prayers! A peaceful prayer vigil with our bishop has taken place twice.
 
It seems to me that the Holy Father is asking us to go out and journey with people. We are not out there to judge them, rather to find the good and bond with them over that. That is the kind of evangelization that can help lead others to Christ. We do a little too much finger pointing and finger shaking from both the liberal and conservative adherents of our faith. Perhaps most of all at each other! That is part of what the charge of being self-absorbed is all about.

It seems to me to be really important to be nonjudgmental with others. Yes, we still make moral judgements for ourselves, but do not need to impose them on those we journey with. Nonjudgemental acceptance of the person seems to me to best way to provide the safety for the other to question, seek and grow in their own pilgrimage through this life.
 
We do a little too much finger pointing and finger shaking from both the liberal and conservative adherents of our faith. Perhaps most of all at each other! That is part of what the charge of being self-absorbed is all about.
A picture is worth a thousand words.
 
A picture is worth a thousand words.
And Jesus is God’s only word, made flesh.
151 For a Christian, believing in God cannot be separated from believing in the One he sent, his “beloved Son”,
Yes Virginia, there is a real person at the core of our faith.

Merry Christmas to you Sirach2
 
Recently, Pope Francis was quoted as having said that the Church tends to obsess.
. . .

I can’t legislate love. Faith without love is dead. I have to stimulate love. To do this, I can’t be at odds with the person whose faith I’m trying to strengthen.

Are we too self-absorbed for our own good and the good of the Church?
Any amount of self-absorption is definitely too much. The reason is simple: love is not about self. Love is about the Beloved.

This Pope knows what time it is. This Pope treats the whole wide world as the Catholic Church, which is precisely what it is, by the Will of the Father and the Work of the Holy Spirit. The time of divisions is over. It is a New Aeon, and the operative word is Unity, not Division. The only division happening now is between the Sheep and the Goats. All else is illusion.

So yeah. Too much focus on whether one is a liberal or a conservative entirely misses the point. The New Religion is Love. This Pope is a member in good standing.

Peace! And Love!

Joe.
 
So is the Pope referring to the institutional church when he says it is “too self-absorbed”? At least partly? I’m getting a little confused reading all this. It sure seems to me that reading here at CAF forums that some things are out of whack, what with all the emphasis on “liturgical abuse” and “canon law says this and that”, etc. I’ve sometimes wondered where the Love of Christ is in all that. I hear Brother saying that some application is needed-there is some subjectivity. But people here have jumped down my throat when I’ve tried to express that in other threads–that sometimes there IS such a thing as being pastoral in approach with people.

One thing that I struggle to grasp is HOW do I deal lovingly with all the New Age, homosexual, cohabitating, cheating, politically correct people I interact with every day? What does it mean to love them? Obviously I treat them with respect but am I just supposed to pray for them if they are living sinful lives (not saying I don’t have sin either). Does it matter if they come to know Christ? Or will God just accept them in heaven because they are so influenced by the culture? Help me understand.
 
So is the Pope referring to the institutional church when he says it is “too self-absorbed”? At least partly? I’m getting a little confused reading all this. It sure seems to me that reading here at CAF forums that some things are out of whack, what with all the emphasis on “liturgical abuse” and “canon law says this and that”, etc. I’ve sometimes wondered where the Love of Christ is in all that. I hear Brother saying that some application is needed-there is some subjectivity. But people here have jumped down my throat when I’ve tried to express that in other threads–that sometimes there IS such a thing as being pastoral in approach with people.

One thing that I struggle to grasp is HOW do I deal lovingly with all the New Age, homosexual, cohabitating, cheating, politically correct people I interact with every day? What does it mean to love them? Obviously I treat them with respect but am I just supposed to pray for them if they are living sinful lives (not saying I don’t have sin either). Does it matter if they come to know Christ? Or will God just accept them in heaven because they are so influenced by the culture? Help me understand.
I just reread this… I didn’t mean it to sound so judgemental of others. What I mean to say is do I just let it go when others live obviously sinful lifestyles? I think rereading this, the answer is “yes”… leave it to God to judge. I don’t know how God will judge them and maybe I don’t need to worry or even think about that.

It sure is a challenge living in this culture sometimes! Wish I could erase my comment!
 
So is the Pope referring to the institutional church when he says it is “too self-absorbed”? At least partly? I’m getting a little confused reading all this. It sure seems to me that reading here at CAF forums that some things are out of whack, what with all the emphasis on “liturgical abuse” and “canon law says this and that”, etc. I’ve sometimes wondered where the Love of Christ is in all that. I hear Brother saying that some application is needed-there is some subjectivity. But people here have jumped down my throat when I’ve tried to express that in other threads–that sometimes there IS such a thing as being pastoral in approach with people.

One thing that I struggle to grasp is HOW do I deal lovingly with all the New Age, homosexual, cohabitating, cheating, politically correct people I interact with every day? What does it mean to love them? Obviously I treat them with respect but am I just supposed to pray for them if they are living sinful lives (not saying I don’t have sin either). Does it matter if they come to know Christ? Or will God just accept them in heaven because they are so influenced by the culture? Help me understand.
I just reread this… I didn’t mean it to sound so judgemental of others. What I mean to say is do I just let it go when others live obviously sinful lifestyles? I think rereading this, the answer is “yes”… leave it to God to judge. I don’t know how God will judge them and maybe I don’t need to worry or even think about that.

It sure is a challenge living in this culture sometimes! Wish I could erase my comment!
AnneTeresa,
I am glad you didn’t delete them, because I ask myself the same questions daily. In fact, I discussed these same struggles with my confessor today! :o

I wish I had an answer, and I hope it helps to know that you are not alone. 🙂 :console:

Peace be with you on your journey, and Merry Christmas! 😃
 
So is the Pope referring to the institutional church when he says it is “too self-absorbed”? At least partly? I’m getting a little confused reading all this. It sure seems to me that reading here at CAF forums that some things are out of whack, what with all the emphasis on “liturgical abuse” and “canon law says this and that”, etc. I’ve sometimes wondered where the Love of Christ is in all that. I hear Brother saying that some application is needed-there is some subjectivity. But people here have jumped down my throat when I’ve tried to express that in other threads–that sometimes there IS such a thing as being pastoral in approach with people.

One thing that I struggle to grasp is HOW do I deal lovingly with all the New Age, homosexual, cohabitating, cheating, politically correct people I interact with every day? What does it mean to love them? Obviously I treat them with respect but am I just supposed to pray for them if they are living sinful lives (not saying I don’t have sin either). Does it matter if they come to know Christ? Or will God just accept them in heaven because they are so influenced by the culture? Help me understand.
I just reread this… I didn’t mean it to sound so judgemental of others. What I mean to say is do I just let it go when others live obviously sinful lifestyles? I think rereading this, the answer is “yes”… leave it to God to judge. I don’t know how God will judge them and maybe I don’t need to worry or even think about that.

It sure is a challenge living in this culture sometimes! Wish I could erase my comment!
I believe that the Church is trying to tell us several things.
  1. These are sins. There is to be no confusion about it.
  2. We cannot and should not deny that X is good and Y is bad. The Holy Father does it all the time.
  3. The Church also wants us to remember that we who are allegedly Catholics are no better than any other sinner. This is where we have often fallen into a pothole as I call it. I have often read blogs on the Internet and posts on forums that leave my jaw on the ground. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Here you have a Catholic calling another person a sinner, sometimes by name, sometimes in a very rude and aggressive manner and justifying himself by invoking names such as St. Catherine of Siena or St. Paul.
The truth is that neither Catherine nor Paul were arrogant. They were very discreet. Their letters were for specific people and they were not made public to the world until long after they were dead. The Pauline Letters were not readily available at the local Catholic Book Store as they are today. We sin by presumption. Those letters made it to the hands of their intended audiences without the rest of the world being made aware that there was a problem in Corinth, Ephesus or Rome. We, on the other hand, make sure that the world knows who sins and what sin they committed. We post it in blogs, bulletin boards, chat room, newspapers and magazines, newsletters. and bathroom walls.

This is morally wrong. A sinner has not right to reduce another sinner to dust and cover his or her rear end.

One of the most beautiful practices that we have in my community is the Chapter of Faults. In the Chapter of Faults each brother gets up before the community and proclaims his faults. There is no room to make another feel badly or guilty, because you’re admitting that you’re the scum of the earth and the other sinner, is a saint by comparison to you. We admit our faults and then we prostrate on the floor for the other brothers to pass judgment on us. However, the rule says that no one may do so. Everyone must look the other way. Only the superior may judge and punish, because he speaks in the name of Christ who is the lawgiver and the unblemished lamb.

It think that this is what the Holy Father is calling us to do.

Remember, this is easy for him and for me to understand, much easier than it is for most of you. He and I come from religious orders where this had been our custom for centuries and where commenting on the sins of another can get you one week eating your meals on your knees in the middle of the dining room. You had better keep your mouth shut can make your comments only to those who need to know. This is why he comes down so hard on gossip. This finger pointing business is starting to become gossip.

Very often, the people pointing fingers are mean and ugly. They have nothing kind to say about those whom they find to be sinful. Just browse the internet and you’ll see. This is morally wrong. This is worse than abortion, homosexuality, adultery, contraception and sending your kids to bed without supper.

The tongue is the strongest muscle in the body and it can do the most harm. Because much of what rolls off the tongue is intentional. It is with full knowledge that it’s going to do harm rather than good.

When people are absorbed in their own goodness, they don’t see this or if they do, they minimize it or even justify it in the name of “honesty” or “frankness.”

Hell is full of so called honest and frank people.
  1. We are to guide people away from sin. Guide and drag are not the same thing. Imagine a child who does something wrong. You grab his ears and drag him across the room in the presence of others. How humiliating is this?
Is humiliation a form of charity? Did Christ ever humiliate anyone? He corrected. At times he even scolded. But he never treated anyone beneath their dignity.
 
  1. Christ did not provoke sinners. He invited them. He seduced them. He charmed his way into their lives. This is what drove hardened sinners, like some of the Pharisees, crazy. They provoked, insulted, rejected, scoffed, avoided, and at times even humiliated sinners in the hope of making sinners repent. They got very few followers.
Jesus, on the other hand, charmed them with his warmth. Made the feel safe with his patience. And he made them feel loved with his compassion and admonition to sin no more. But he did not ignore them, criticize them, or make them feel that all eyes were on them.
  1. The Church also wants us to remember that there are many serious sins. We can’t narrow sin down to three or four. That’s absurd. The truth is that the number of people who are hurt by consumerism is far greater than the number of people hurt by the big three: abortion, homosexuality and contraception. There is a disproportionate amount of attention to one set of sins over another set.
It’s not the John Paul or Benedict got it wrong. It’s that we got John Paul and Benedict wrong. If one reads Evangelium Vitae, abortion is not mentioned until the middle of the document. The entire first 20 pages of the document are about human dignity and the violations to human dignity. The last of the document is about the culture of death. So there is this very powerful message about abortion, in the middle of this document. It’s there for a reason. Because there is a moral hierarchy.

Abortion is a heinous crime. But take it from one who works with people involved in abortion. More often than not, those who are involved in abortion, especially the client, are not culpable of grave sin. They have no clue. They are frightened. They are coerced and threatened. They are lonely without guidance or they are lied to by the culture of death.

I cannot say the same thing about the person who attacks the good name of another. Is he frightened? Is he ignorant? Is he coerced or threatened into ruining another person’s reputation? Is he lonely and without guidance or lied to by a culture of gossip?

To close, is Christianity about being in opposition to something or about being in search of someone?

To oppose these sins, but failure to introduce Christ is not virtuous. This was the law of the OT. It was the law of Observances. "Thou shall not . . . " But when the covenant is fulfilled, the law becomes the law of love as St. James and St. John remind us. The call is not just to “not do this or that” but to “remain in His love” by “conforming to him in all things.” Too often, we don’t invite people to meet Jesus.

The first encounter with Christ has to be with me. I am the receptionist.

When you walk into a business, your first impression comes from the receptionist. If those who meet me outside of an abortion mill can’t see Christ, then they have not seen anything or anyone worth seeing.
 
Thank you for the post Br Jay. It is easy to say “hate the sin but love the sinner” but sometimes it is difficult to keep reason and one loses the word love.

Quite a while before reading your post, I was thinking about sin today and gradually began to realise that if you hear the words “it is a sin” and see it in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, there is an assumption that you are in possession of full knowledge of the sin. Yet, I wonder, whether full knowledge is when mind connects to an open heart, so that the Truth is revealed and that mortifying feeling of doing wrong, hurting, offending or letting God down, arrives. This leads to remorse, repentance and an overwhelming desire to reunite with God. Without the latter, one could not receive the Sacrament of Reconciliation.

This would in some way explain to me how we can be blind, not only to some of our own shortcomings but in how we wrongly judge others, even though we know that what they say or do is contrary to the teachings of Jesus. Maybe that is why some people with a cause or attitude contrary to the Church’s teachings, become beguiled by their self perception and in their blindness that they become absorbed in their self-belief without realising how far they strayed?

Or have I gone to another planet on this one?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top