Are you a Star Trek fan?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marilena
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
qmvsimp:
“Voyager: The one about species 459 (?), The one where the Borg Homeworld gets destroyed, and the final episode”

That would be : Species 8472
 
40.png
vz71:
Perhaps her father?

He was in Endgame, where unimatrix 001 is destroyed.

Z
“One” is not her father! “One” is her son. Please go to startrek.com
and look for the episode where “One” was in it.
 
Here is the proof: Episode Name: “Drone”

Link: startrek.com/startrek/view/series/VOY/episode/103571.html

Seven determines that when she and the Doctor were transported, some of her nanoprobes infected his emitter. It was assimilated, and the Borg used Mulcahey’s genetic code to create a lifeform. As it continues to mature at a rapid rate, the drone is observed to be mostly human, with many implants. The emitter is part of his central nervous system and gives him 29th-century technology. His connection with the Collective is dampened, and Seven attempts a neural interface to give him instructions. Instead, he tries to assimilate her knowledge.
 
Found it, “Drone”

Not 7 of 9’s son, but a reproduction of DNA from a spare Ensign.
Always a red shirt around when you need it.

Seems to me it would be more related to the Doctor then to 7.

Z
 
40.png
vz71:
Found it, “Drone”

Not 7 of 9’s son, but a reproduction of DNA from a spare Ensign.
Always a red shirt around when you need it.

Seems to me it would be more related to the Doctor then to 7.

Z
I thought Janeway referred to One as her son? I’ll have to go back and re read it.
 
Marilena,

I think you are correct. It’s been a while since I saw that one too but if Janeway didn’t directly refer to ‘One’ as her son then it was heavily implied.

You do know your Star Trek! 🙂

Lisa
 
40.png
Marilena:
I thought Janeway referred to One as her son? I’ll have to go back and re read it.
What was the story behind that other former Borg named Elam (Ethan)? That’s who I thought we were talking about.
 
TOS and even-numbered motion pictures for me. 👍
(Oh, and *Enterprise *wasn’t too shabby. Especially Subcommander T’Pol (rowr))

“Live long, and prosper”,
tee
Hey, if you cross your eyes, this smiley :tsktsk: could almost be “Live long and prosper” 😛
 
40.png
Marilena:
her nanoprobes infected his emitter. It was assimilated, and the Borg used Mulcahey’s genetic code to create a lifeform.
Hardly a ‘son’ in any normal use of the word.
In any instance, I was always a DS9 fan.
Never could get into Voyager, they broke too many rules, and there did not seem to be any overall story arc.

Z
 
40.png
qmvsimp:
I love Star Trek. It’s what liberalism would be like if it actually worked. No need for money. No poverty. Government takes care of everybody. Everyone is a productive member of society. Nobody over eats. Society progresses without economic incentives. Marriage isn’t needed. Sexual freedom. Absence of God or religion. Respect for all cultures. Etc.

In the fantasy world, it’s great to look at.
Yeah, you never saw any of the series have a “Christmas” program.
They did celebrate character’s birthdays…fine but whatabout what really matters?
:confused:
 
Favorite episodes:
The final episodes of all the show except Enterprise (I lost interest after season one).

ANY episode with Q (John DeLance)! Those to me are comedic classics! :rotfl:

When Data has a daughter in TNG.
When the DS9 cast is playing baseball! 👍
When the TNG cast are in the holodeck and deal with the Sherlock Holmes characters.
When the TNG crew are befallen with the 'De-evolution" and regress into primative species…always wondered why Data didn’t 'de-evolutionize"…into a Pong Video Game… :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
40.png
Edwin1961:
When Data has a daughter in TNG.
That was a good one. I got teary eyed at the end when Lal died.
40.png
Edwin1961:
When the TNG crew are befallen with the 'De-evolution" and regress into primative species…always wondered why Data didn’t 'de-evolutionize"…into a Pong Video Game… :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Because it only affected biological life forms not mechanical life forms. 😉
 
40.png
tee_eff_em:
Hey, if you cross your eyes, this smiley :tsktsk: could almost be “Live long and prosper” 😛
Ooh! Ooh! I got another one:

:ehh: “Fascinating…”,
tee
:rotfl: ( ← Not a Vulcan smiley )
 
I’m a big fan of the original series, TNG, and DS9. I can take or leave much of Voyager and much of Enterprise (although the 4th Season was really good, IMHO).

Alas, I now have a new Sci-Fi addiction: Ron Moore’s reimagining of Battlestar Galactica. Staying home on Friday night’s hasn’t been this hip since The X-Files.
 
40.png
qmvsimp:
That was a good one. I got teary eyed at the end when Lal died.

Because it only affected biological life forms not mechanical life forms. 😉
I knew that, I was just trying to make a joke! 😉
 
40.png
Edwin1961:
Yeah, you never saw any of the series have a “Christmas” program.
They did celebrate character’s birthdays…fine but whatabout what really matters?
:confused:
Probably because they didn’t want to offend any non-Christians who were watching. But just because we never saw them celebrate Christmas doesn’t mean they never did!
 
They didn’t celebrate Christmas, because Gene Roddenberry believed that by the 23rd(24th) Century, humanity would grow beyond religion. Gene was very anti-religion, and didn’t want it incorporated into his show. He was so anti-religion, that when Jonathan Frakes got married during TNG’s run, Gene refused to attend the ceremony.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top