Arguing About Abortion

  • Thread starter Thread starter VanitasVanitatum
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Its immediately contradictory.

A woman is bodily free, but not.

But hey, whatever makes life the only rational choice, right? Even if nonsensical 😅
 
Its immediately contradictory.

A woman is bodily free, but not.

But hey, whatever makes life the only rational choice, right? Even if nonsensical
Then make an argument against it. If people are free to do whatever they want, then why not take away certain “freedoms.”
 
Last edited:
But hey, whatever makes life the only rational choice, right? Even if nonsensical
This is your default without arbitrary additions so there is an equilibrium.
 
Last edited:
You’ll know tyranny when you see it! And it is the absence of freedom, in my estimation!
 
You made an argument and I rejected an underlying premise.

Happens all the time. Don’t take it so hard.
 
? Tyranny is tyranny… it’s cruel, heartless, suppression, evil. Freedom is lifting, honorable, hope! How can you use the words together in the same sentence?
 
Last edited:
Abortion isn’t freedom…which is the original topic, I think. Abortion is murder. Murder is tyranny!
 
Liberty is the default state and we only constrain with good reason.

The first is the default, no proof needed and the second is how collectives create their rules.

“Ok, we all agree to stop at stop signs and we agree to not murder each other. Anyone breaking the rules will be punished”.

What is there to prove? That collectives like government are necessary?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top