P
Potato1237
Guest
Thanks Edwin. Those are good points and I need to grow my faith.
That is certainly true.I’m not joking when I say this: The devil is fond of moving Christians away from God, and the Internet has been a great tool for that.
Not to mention that you’d still have the same problem if you left Catholicism.Why does this get you nervous?
Didn’t you know, already, that lots of people disagree with Catholicism?
You’re absolutely right and there are plenty of social media out there that host posters who would be more than happy to take a Christian’s faith away for the sake of what passes as knowledge in today’s society. That’s why we need to put on the whole armor of God that St. Paul speaks of in his Epistle to the Ephesians ( Ephesians 6:10-18) so we can meet these challenges to our faith and emerge victorious, by the grace of God.I’m not joking when I say this: The devil is fond of moving Christians away from God, and the Internet has been a great tool for that.
What about those who do it in the name of religion?You’re absolutely right and there are plenty of social media out there that host posters who would be more than happy to take a Christian’s faith away for the sake of what passes as knowledge in today’s society.
Because the context of that quote is very simple: certain things will not occur unless people pray the Rosary and Mary intercedes with God.How can any good Christian (Catholics included) accept Mary saying “only I can help you.” ??
What else are people going to say when they have an *a priori *commitment to reject Fatima?On this forum, I have seen people say it was a “sun dog” and not a true miracle.
I’m indifferent on Fatima. I guess if i had a gun held to my head i would say I’m not buying into it.I just can’t accept some things. Fatima for example all seems contrary to the gospel. How can any good Christian (Catholics included) accept Mary saying “only I can help you.” ??
On top of that, all of the predictions and prophecies of Fatima turned out false. Plus they were released after the claimed events. I just don’t know anymore. I want to believe in Fatima, but I just can’t seem to.
I think Fatima is a difficulty for many people. All the more so if they don’t get the idea of it being “approved” (as opposed to Catholics being *required *to believe in it). Or perhaps in your case you realize that but have not fully taken it to heart?I just can’t accept some things. Fatima for example all seems contrary to the gospel. How can any good Christian (Catholics included) accept Mary saying “only I can help you.” ??
On top of that, all of the predictions and prophecies of Fatima turned out false. Plus they were released after the claimed events. I just don’t know anymore. I want to believe in Fatima, but I just can’t seem to.
This may not help, but regardless here is what en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_F%C3%A1tima#Official_position_of_the_Catholic_Church says:Right. I Understand that they are not a requirement for belief, I just don’t see why it was approved. Wouldn’t former apparitions warn about false ones? Then again, maybe I’m looking at it from an overly Protestant point of view.
I believe that many people see the fact that it had millions of followers before being approved as assurance that the decision was right, but that many other people see it in just the opposite way.Private revelations do not form part of the deposit of faith of the Catholic Church, and its members are not bound to believe in any of them. (Assent may be given based on the discernment of the Church and its judgment that an apparition is probable and worthy of pious credence.)[22] With millions of followers and Roman Catholic believers, the reported visions at Fátima gathered widespread attention. After a canonical inquiry, the visions of Fátima were officially declared “worthy of belief” in October 1930 by the Bishop of Leiria-Fátima.[23]
That’s why it’s confusing though. So God knows what we want but we can only receive the graces unless we ask for the intercession of Mary?Because the context of that quote is very simple: certain things will not occur unless people pray the Rosary and Mary intercedes with God.
The only rationale for praying at all is that God wills to give certain graces only if they are asked for. This is because He desires to work with His creation in order to give His gifts. We cooperate with God to do everything from telling people the Gospel, to having children, to raising them as Christians, to praying for each other. God created us as a society. Like Pope St. John XXIII said, “We are saved like grapes—in bunches.”
So given that, why isn’t it reasonable to conclude that the very vessel through whom the Second Person of the Most Holy Trinity was incarnated should have a special role in praying for others?
If God will only give graces if people ask for them, and if the prayer of a righteous man avails much, then is it unreasonable that the Mother of God would be given a role to intercede for certain things—such as peace and an end of World War I? Of course that’s not unreasonable. It fits everything we already know about the nature of prayer and intercession.
So yes, I consider myself a Catholic Christian, and I’m not at all confused by the notion that God wants people to pray the Rosary and to ask Mary for her intercession.
True. There is much speculation on whether the woman clothed with the sun is Mary or Israel. And yes, we are awful in this day and age.I’m indifferent on Fatima. I guess if i had a gun held to my head i would say I’m not buying into it.
It’s not part of the deposit of the faith so not really concerned about it.
But let’s just look at it for a moment.
If Jesus is the head of the body of Christ, then you would have to say that Mary is the neck…nobody on this planet was/is closer to him than she is. Read John 2, when Mary asks, Jesus responds, even if it’s inconvenient. .
The scriptures say that the prayer of the righteous availeth much ( James 5:16 ) Tell me what created being is/was more righteous than she is? The answer is NOBODY.
Mary’s petitions mean quite a bit to God. Just look at Revelation 12…if that is her like we think it is, then it actually sort of coincides with Fatima(woman clothed with the sun)
When you read the full context of what is said, she is begging and pleading for humanity to stop offending God. Well, she has occupied heaven for 2000 years so she would know the situation there.
And just a side note…this was 100 years ago…a time when the earth was much more moral than we are. I think Mary must be slamming her head against the wall in disgust with how immoral we are and how much we offend God in this age.
My friends were not behind it this time lol.Has your friend read the Fathers or the Mystics? If he criticises them he should be able to say he has given them a fair hearing.
Could also be a symbolic reference to Israel . But consider the fact that no where in scripture is Israel referred to as a woman giving birth to Messiah.True. There is much speculation on whether the woman clothed with the sun is Mary or Israel. And yes, we are awful in this day and age.
I see you have done some homework potato, very good!!!Lenten ashes I agree. Also, the references in the old and New Testament comparing Mary to the ark is profound. In terms of revelation 12, I feel like the Israel arguement is a good one considering in a way, Israel did bring forth or give birth to Jesus. Also, we know that revelation is filled with symbolism meaning the woman would not necessarily be an actually woman. I have heard that the crown of 12 stars symbolizes the 12 tribes of Israel. On the other hand, John’s vision included the woman crying out with the pangs of birth and the child being taken up to heaven. It can certainly be argued that the birth pangs were the life of Jesus and how Mary suffered during the times of his life; especially of course, when he was crucified. I’d say that both sides could be correct.
Also important to note that in the New Testament, Mary is addressed as woman which we see the “woman” in genesis and revelation.
I have heard the arguement that the woman is Sarah from the old testement which is quite faulty. I have also heard the the woman symbolizes the invisible church that fundamentalist like to talk about. This is also a bad arguement.
Revelation 11:19New International Version (NIV)
Now remember, chapter divisions were not part of the bible. They were added in the 12th century.19 Then God’s temple in heaven was opened, and within his temple was seen the ark of his covenant. And there came flashes of lightning, rumblings, peals of thunder, an earthquake and a severe hailstorm.