Arguments against reincarnation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cirdan_XII
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No one has to get sick, age, and die? Where may I obtain this knowledge you say will prevent me from undergoing those things?
It is a gift to the righteous. Our bodies have been changed now that the life energy is used up. That can be reversed. Sin did it all. The fathers in the OT did it. and lived “900 and died” Died! Hah. They usually faked deaths and lived more like 10,000 years and disappeared. But I don’t want to get into that because you would see and hear things and judge them before you knew what they were. Jesus did many things not mentioned in the books.
 
. . . there are billions of other people in this world who are not me. That is strange that they all exist and have their own experiences, yet none of them are shared. I don’t share their experience and they don’t share mine. They force me to consider my own life in relation to theirs. I am forced to question why or how it is that I exist as opposed to some other possible person. And what is it that distinguishes me from every other person. What is it that makes me me, and makes them them? Why do I know these experiences and not those? Why don’t i experience and know what they feel, and why don’t they know what i experience? All I can say is, “I” exist. That is at once the most personal, rational, and emotional idea.

There has to be some way to explain on the one hand the fact that I didn’t live and experience life at one time, and in a short period of time, presumably, I won’t live and exist any longer. . .

The other possibility is that consciousness is simply a natural property of the univers and human life is the product of the universe’s yearning toward self consciousness. So I am just an expression of the universe, and it is all my memories and experiences that combine to form my self. It is my brain anatomy and chemistry that distinguishes me from every other person. My anatomy is the source of my experiences and thoughts, so that is the source of me. On the other hand, our sense of self as opposed to others is just an illusion. We are all just expressions of the universe. All my life is just a momentary instance of the universe. So since consciousness is simply a property of the universe, reincarnation is possible, and even likely. We are all just an expression of a property of the universe, so it is possible that sometime after I die, I will live, experience, and know again. But since my anatomy and brain are the source of my memories, I wouldn’t remember this life. It would appear to be completely independent.
:twocents: (keeping it brief without citing sources)

We exist as a wholeness, a unity of spirit and soul.
In a way, we can be said to be all incarnations of Adam, each of us individual and irreplaceable expressions of human nature in a fallen state.

We exist as finite beings, centred in eternity, which it intersects time right here, right now.

With His word, God brings everything into being.
As part of the universe created by God, we do not exist as expressions of a property of the universe; rather we are persons, conceived as part of it, in His image.
We are more than our psychology and the biochemical processes that correlate to them; at our depths, it is our individual soul, created by God, our soul who exists beyond physical death, that is our truest reality.
The memory of who we are is expressed in this world as a cognitive phenomenon, linked to brain activity, but it is not limited to this world.

The above quote suggests that we are expressions of a universe ignorant of its true nature, repeatedly returning until it reaches that realization; Eastern religions indicate that what is realized is the dependent, illusory (i.e. not God) nature of the self, as it is surrendered to the one true supreme Identity. Reincarnation would then be as much an illusion as the individual self: conditions of desirous ignorance existing within the universe creating a chain of illusory selves. Nothing is being reincarnated.

As an aside, Vishnu is not referred to as one’s Father and the Buddha-nature is not personal. These do not describe God as revealed in scripture and the teachings of the Church, which also do not teach reincarnation.
 
I don’t think reincarnationism specifies that it is just this world. I think reincarnation is a solution to the “problem of death.” I don’t think it’s the best, or a real, solution, but it has philosophical appeal.
The literal and typical meaning of reincarnation is a continuation of life “in the flesh” generally associated with this world, notably a cycle of births and rebirths.
 
The literal and typical meaning of reincarnation is a continuation of life “in the flesh” generally associated with this world, notably a cycle of births and rebirths.
Not specifically this planet. There are supposedly other inhabited planets in the universe, perhaps even one to which Jesus ascended and from which He will visit us in the near future to judge this planet. There are purported to be heaven planets and hell planets.
 
I am looking for good arguments agiants reincranation. Not biblical ones please as the person isn’t convinced by that. Are there any sound arguments drawing on philosophy? Sort of the equivalent of Pascal’s Wager maybe?
**
If the metaphysics that presumes reincarnation is actually true, many other things should be possible, like clairvoyance, perfect precognition etc. Because these abilities should be high and well developed in the person who remembers his past life and has offered evidence of it socially**, get him or her to guess a deck of shuffled cards. There you will have your test.
 
**
If the metaphysics that presumes reincarnation is actually true, many other things should be possible, like clairvoyance, perfect precognition etc. Because these abilities should be high and well developed in the person who remembers his past life and has offered evidence of it socially**, get him or her to guess a deck of shuffled cards. There you will have your test.
I think this “test” relies on some unsupported assumptions, and wouldn’t be conclusive. For example, having lived a past life would not necessarily guarantee full memory of it in this life. So your test wouldn’t rule out past lives, only (possibly) full memory of them, which is not a necessary consequence of a past life.
 
Not specifically this planet. There are supposedly other inhabited planets in the universe, perhaps even one to which Jesus ascended and from which He will visit us in the near future to judge this planet. There are purported to be heaven planets and hell planets.
Even if such planets harbouring reincarnated persons exist - for which there is not one of evidence - it is still necessary to explain why one life isn’t sufficient. The only reason I can think of is that they haven’t had sufficient time to develop spiritually in this world. The idea that they are being punished for their sins seems primitive because it isn’t necessary to have a body in order to suffer.
 
Even if such planets harbouring reincarnated persons exist - for which there is not one of evidence - it is still necessary to explain why one life isn’t sufficient. The only reason I can think of is that they haven’t had sufficient time to develop spiritually in this world. The idea that they are being punished for their sins seems primitive because it isn’t necessary to have a body in order to suffer.
To reiterate my answer to your question of why isn’t one life sufficient, the obvious answer is, we die. Thus one life is not eternal. If we were immortal, then one life would be sufficient. But since we die, the question comes up, what happens to us after we die? You seem to be advocating a kind of theory that says we are no longer physical but purely spiritual. But that isn’t a human being, that would be an angel. We are not angels, we are humans. The Resurrection of the Body is Catholic Doctrine. Eternal life for a human being includes the body, because that is what a human being is, a living body.
 
If “you” are not in “your right mind” then “you” didn’t do it. I’m not interested, at least in this thread, of treating the Fallacy of Psychiatry. (Psychiatry in its entirety rests on a fallacy.) If you want to discuss that more, we can start a new thread.

Suicide committed with full knowledge and consent is a mortal sin, and if one succeeds, there is no possibility of repentance before death, ergo, suicide leads to hell. One cannot blanketly excuse all suicides as not sinful just because one does not understand malice. The Sin against the Holy Ghost is malice. It is not so much “believing you haven’t been forgiven” as it is rejection of contrition for sin. According to the Church it takes six forms. One of the forms is willful rejection of the known truth. So if a person knows murder is a mortal sin, and commits suicide anyway (murdering the self) then how is there forgiveness?
What about a cancer Patient dying in their last stages and because they are in that much pain are given free access to Morphine. But as they increase the morphine to try and control the pain the Morphine actually kills them.
 
I am looking for good arguments agiants reincranation. Not biblical ones please as the person isn’t convinced by that. Are there any sound arguments drawing on philosophy? Sort of the equivalent of Pascal’s Wager maybe?
Issues with Reincarnation:
  1. What is the objective of reincarnation? To be a better person in the next life? However, there is no evidence that:
a) a reincarnated person live as a better person in the next life
b) he has no memory of his previous lives and he doesn’t know how good/bad he was and therefore he need to improve. Except for the very few, most people have no memory of previous lives.
c) improve to what level? Decided by who? When will it stop? What happens when you reach the “ultimate” level? Do you start all over again? Why do I have to improve? Doesn’t that takes away my free will if “I have to” be a better person in the next life? Can’t I want to be bad and enjoy life?

d) after working off the karmic debt over the centuries, there is no evidence that society has progressed morally and reach an even higher enlightened level.
  1. If we are all reincarnated souls, where did the souls come from? So no new ones are created? The world’s population is higher than say, 5000 yrs ago. Where did the new souls come from since we are 6 billion headcount strong and rising? The other planets solution only pushes the question back a notch as long as population continue to increase in other planets as well. The other living thing solution says souls can come from bacteria and plants. So one bacteria split into 2 then 4 etc. So where did the souls from bacteria come from? How can bacteria/trees/insects etc make mistakes leading to bad karma or do good deeds to lead them to good karma?
  2. Morally wrong. Let me do all the immoral things now. I’ll be good the next life.
  3. Karma excuse. It is that person’s karma to suffer and this person’s karma to enjoy life. Hence you shouldn’t help that suffering person because you are interfering with that person’s karma debt which need to be paid off. However, how did all these started? If you do a time travel back to t=0 where the karma wheel haven’t start rolling, then everything should be “neutral” as there is no karmic debt/reward then. So what would cause the karmic debt/reward to exist? If the souls are from bacteria/trees/insects see point 3 again.
  4. Not sure how karma works out. If it is my karma to enjoy life and it is your karma to destroy my life, who has the upper hand?
  5. Pascal wager. If you do not know whether a) you will be reincarnated b) reincarnated as a better person ie you may be the next Hitler/Stalin why take a chance on 2nd chances? Take your current life and try to make sure you are saved eternally. So if you bet right, you are saved. If you are wrong ie there are 2nd chances, you can aim to be an even better person than the current person. You are still ahead. Unless you plan to be an amoeba.
 
To reiterate my answer to your question of why isn’t one life sufficient, the obvious answer is, we die. Thus one life is not eternal. If we were immortal, then one life would be sufficient. But since we die, the question comes up, what happens to us after we die? You seem to be advocating a kind of theory that says we are no longer physical but purely spiritual. But that isn’t a human being, that would be an angel. We are not angels, we are humans. The Resurrection of the Body is Catholic Doctrine. Eternal life for a human being includes the body, because that is what a human being is, a living body.
The topic is not whether one life is sufficient but “Arguments against reincarnation”! In other words reincarnation is unnecessary if one believes in the Christian view of life after death with the same glorified body, not with a different body we had in a previous existence in this world.

Belief in reincarnation is ultimately based on belief in cosmic justice but - as I pointed out - it infringes the principle of economy. No one has explained why is it necessary to have more than one body,
 
Re: Arguments against reincarnation;

nobody remembers their past lives.
past lives serve a purpose,
their purpose is to be part of a life’s journey
a journey to some destination
reaching which requires that we learn and improve from past lives
but, nobody remembers their past lives.

so nobody can improve or learn from them
nobody can reach the destination.
 
The West does not really understand the Eastern idea of incarnation and reincarnation. In a subtle sense we reincarnate every day when we get up out of bed and carry on our daily work from the day before. This is very much the basis of the idea of reincarnation. We have daily tasks to perform (and a daily personality we create, with a job, family, a wife, a lover) – we can choose not to reincarnate, not to carry this day-time story further each day. We can quite our job, leave town, leave our family, etc. Or we can reincarnate, and carry our work, and the work of evolution of the material world, one step further, before resting.

Hindu philosophy and its Buddhist reformers tell us that the history of the world comes in Day Cycles (Manvantara) followed by Night-Cycles (Pralaya). Reincarnation is about the Day-Cycles, carrying on our task in the Day-World, carrying the world another step into the future.

Asian philosophy carries this obvious metaphor into the other world also. Death is a pralaya, a Night, a time of rest and dreaming. Do we come back after we die and go to our rest in the heavenly or hellish palaces of rest?

The Christian idea of resurrection is very much a similar idea as reincarnation. Christ is resurrected after his death and his descent into the Underworld, Pralaya. Christ’s re-incarnation carries him back into heaven. Rebirth or reincarnation also carries the new-born soul into the expansion of Heaven, power, Youth, a New Life. A clear different is that the Western theology views rebirth or resurrection as a reward; and the Eastern Buddhist usually views rebirth as something to be avoided, since anyone born again also much die again. And Death is the agony of Hell, a fear of loss, the Night-Cycle descent into the Dark Country of Material Emptiness, which becomes eventually Spiritual Fullness.

Eastern philosophy tends to view resurrection/reincarnation as a sin, because reincarnation is nearly always accompanied by violence and warfare, and by the enslavement of the Mother Principle by the Father Principle, which also often includes violent racism and racial murder (white over black) which then is rediscovered during the Death process and leads to Karmic Retribution (the black or the Female Principle getting even with the Male Principle) for the crimes committed during reincarnation.

The Western theologies view resurrection as a reward, because the West suffers horribly during the Death Process – and the Judgment, which does not understand the brutal violence the White Principle used against the Black Principle during the reincarnation. The East IS the Mother Principle; the West IS the Father Principle. It is the Father Principle that reincarnates – and this is viewed by the West as a reward, because it puts the Father Principle back in power – and it is viewed by the East as a sin or ‘as to be avoided’ since the White Princple will be sent to hell again at the end of the Day-Cycle period of reincarnation.

It is my premise that history moves through these cycles of Day-Cycle Reincarnation of the Father Principle and Night-Cycle Deconstruction of the Father Principle – as the City-bulding, Empire-building, Civilization-building Father Principle eventually falls and the cities vanish and the world comes back down to Nature, the Mother Principle. The Day-Cycle always ends in the Pride of Man being punished by God through a Tower of Babel experience, which kills the Ego and inaugurates the Return to Nature and the ‘death’ of the civilization or empire. The Empire does not die easily. At the end of each Night-Cycle, the two principles fight for power. The Empire will almost always choose to reincarnate, since it wants to stay alive. In a very real sense the fueld for the reincarnation of the Day-Cycle Empire is DEBT. The reincarnation is a MORE DEBT choice, since to live on top of the world requires financial debt increase and moral debt increase. SIN. We are close to God in Death; but the Tree of Life expands AWAY FROM GOD, toward the humanism that ends in Man coming to believe he is God – and the Tower of Babel experience again, which is the sign of the beginning Death of the Ego.

The 9/11 Twin Towers experience in America IS the Tower of Babel Experience in our time. We are now going down inthe chaos of Death and Judgment.

See SECOND PART BELOW
 
PART TWO

It is my premise also that these cycles of experience run in historical cycles of 36-years. I have written a book on American Day-Cycles and Night-Cycles, and have taken these cycles back into the 1700s. This may be hard for people to believe. But if you study the idea, you will see the truth of it.

During the Cycle of incarnation, the unified Patriarchal force (Fascist in its extreme) leads the world into higher and higher forms of order, law, science, traditional values, global civilization, empire, for this force is the Primary Force of Materialism. The Mother Principle rules the Night-Cycle, the time of Death, the Eastern Hemisphere. This Force attempts fo even out the world, find balalnce, reduced the gap between the rich and poor, justice being more important to the Mother Principle than Willful Triumph. The Mother Principle, in its extreme, becomes Communistic.

The White Principle is the Principle of Matter and Light (Light is matter) – and the building during the Day-Cycles are concrete building projects, physical building. The Black Principle is the Principle of Anti-Matter or Spirit (Black Light is anti-matter). Hence, what the White Principle Builds during the Day-Cycles, the Black Principle deconstructs during the Night-Cycle. The Night-Cycle reduces the human back to a small particle so he can get through the eye of the camel and find his God again.

The Day-Cycle is the Inflated Ego, the Man; and the Night-Cycle is the Deflated Ego, the Angel inside of the Man.

US Historical Cycles 20th Century

1911-1929: Reincarnation of the Ego
1929-1947: Death of the Ego
1947: Spiritual Resurrection and Rebirth
1947-1965: Reincarnation of the Ego
1965-1983: Death of the Ego
1983: Spiritual Resurrection and Rebirth
1983-2001: Reincarnation of the Ego
2001-2019: Death of the Ego
2019: Spiritual Resurrection and Rebirth…Will Americans choose to reincarnate, to take on my karmic debt and more financial debt, to try to rule the world? To try to maintain their identity as America, the Ruler of the World?

Eventually, America will not have enough energy to reincarnate and rule the world; and will return to Nature. The cities will empty out. This will begin a long period fo what history calls the Dark Ages. 1,400 years of monasticism, poverty, punishment for the sins of the empire, plagues, etc. This is a gestation period. The seeds of the fallen fruit of the American Empire will be scatter to the wind by God’s whirlwind and will be replanted in the Earth. Eventually America will get a renaissance, very much like the city-states of Europe in the Renaissance, which were the seeds of the Roman Empire scattered by the winds of the whilpool of barbarian invasion.
 
What about a cancer Patient dying in their last stages and because they are in that much pain are given free access to Morphine. But as they increase the morphine to try and control the pain the Morphine actually kills them.
What is the intent? It is not suicide to do something foolish and accidentally die.

And, to be perfectly clear, I hold that suicides are almost always committed by demons. It is contrary to our survival impulse, to actually kill oneself. Demonic influence can and does often override this impulse, but for a human being to consciously will and choose, with full unencumbered consent, to kill themselves, I think would be rare.
 
Our Lord would have been familiar with the teachings of gilgul concerning reincarnation. There is a part that reincarnates and a part that stays at rest “hopefully” with the body. There were only so many original souls 120,000 or 600,000 or so. Souls split and shatter to get many souls.
 
What is the intent? It is not suicide to do something foolish and accidentally die.

And, to be perfectly clear, I hold that suicides are almost always committed by demons. It is contrary to our survival impulse, to actually kill oneself. Demonic influence can and does often override this impulse, but for a human being to consciously will and choose, with full unencumbered consent, to kill themselves, I think would be rare.
Two impulses: the Life Impulse and the Death Impulse. To dismiss the Death Impulse as a function of demons is just to quantify all negative (anti-life) impulses as demonic. I agree that a person who commits suicide is clearly besieged by demons…demons being one’s fears, dreads, horrible visions of the future.

Is Hopelessness a sin against God? Or is it experience as a man or woman’s being abandoned by God? Jesus counseled his followers to turn their back on the World, on life as they knew it, with its smallness and sin and corruption – some gnostics argue that the Life Impulse is the Father tempting the angels to fall and sin. For the Life-impulse is often violent, and often leads to war and killing.

What we call life-in-the-body is the Sin; and Death is the return to God. The Spiritual Life is really anti-material.

In the Book of Revelations, John writes about the gifts to the Seven Churches, ‘if they hold out’…I think this is allegorically also about the individuals spiritual challenge that comes when the individual moves into the Dark Age, when God is not seen, when Death is very close, when the Fear of Death and Diminishment and Poverty and Powerlessness beseige the human soul…If one holds out to the end, one will be saved by Jesus Christ and will be carried into a new life, resurrected into an expansive heaven.
 
:twocents: (keeping it brief without citing sources)

We exist as a wholeness, a unity of spirit and soul.
In a way, we can be said to be all incarnations of Adam, each of us individual and irreplaceable expressions of human nature in a fallen state.

We exist as finite beings, centred in eternity, which it intersects time right here, right now.

With His word, God brings everything into being.
As part of the universe created by God, we do not exist as expressions of a property of the universe; rather we are persons, conceived as part of it, in His image.
We are more than our psychology and the biochemical processes that correlate to them; at our depths, it is our individual soul, created by God, our soul who exists beyond physical death, that is our truest reality.
The memory of who we are is expressed in this world as a cognitive phenomenon, linked to brain activity, but it is not limited to this world.

The above quote suggests that we are expressions of a universe ignorant of its true nature, repeatedly returning until it reaches that realization; Eastern religions indicate that what is realized is the dependent, illusory (i.e. not God) nature of the self, as it is surrendered to the one true supreme Identity. Reincarnation would then be as much an illusion as the individual self: conditions of desirous ignorance existing within the universe creating a chain of illusory selves. Nothing is being reincarnated.

As an aside, Vishnu is not referred to as one’s Father and the Buddha-nature is not personal. These do not describe God as revealed in scripture and the teachings of the Church, which also do not teach reincarnation.
Hindu’s believe that the Monad is what reincarnates – the Monad is, also, a trinity, when incarnating: Atma-Buddhi-Manas – Spirit-Soul-Abstract Mind. The Manas is the Son, and the Son dies. The Atma (Father) and the Buddhi (Mother) suriive the Flood. When Manvantara returns, the Active Day-Cycle, Manas is the first born and is the force that drives reincarnation and Life. Manas is Life. Manas embraces the Life-Instinct Principle and is the principle of Prana, what the Hindus call the Vital Body. The Monad itself does not reincarnate, but drives the reincarnation forward through the powr of its Will. Manas is a force of electricity that animates the whole existence back to life.

You are correct – and your post is very interesting – the reincarnating jiva is not the personality, but the highr principles, Spirit-Soul-Mind, Father-Mother-Son.
 
Two impulses: the Life Impulse and the Death Impulse. To dismiss the Death Impulse as a function of demons is just to quantify all negative (anti-life) impulses as demonic. I agree that a person who commits suicide is clearly besieged by demons…demons being one’s fears, dreads, horrible visions of the future.

Is Hopelessness a sin against God? Or is it experience as a man or woman’s being abandoned by God? Jesus counseled his followers to turn their back on the World, on life as they knew it, with its smallness and sin and corruption – some gnostics argue that the Life Impulse is the Father tempting the angels to fall and sin. For the Life-impulse is often violent, and often leads to war and killing.

What we call life-in-the-body is the Sin; and Death is the return to God. The Spiritual Life is really anti-material.

In the Book of Revelations, John writes about the gifts to the Seven Churches, ‘if they hold out’…I think this is allegorically also about the individuals spiritual challenge that comes when the individual moves into the Dark Age, when God is not seen, when Death is very close, when the Fear of Death and Diminishment and Poverty and Powerlessness beseige the human soul…If one holds out to the end, one will be saved by Jesus Christ and will be carried into a new life, resurrected into an expansive heaven.
“God did not make death, neither takes He delight in the destruction of the living.” — Wisdom 1:13.

The Word was made Flesh, and dwelt among us, to save us. God created both the spiritual and the material. Therefore the material is not to be despised, but to be used to honor God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top