C
CHRISTINE77
Guest
How do you know?How do you know?
How do you know?How do you know?
It is worse than insanity. It is pure evil.I am very concerned as well. The right to die will very quickly become a “duty” to die.
Suffering will become a capital offence.
Our lives belong to God. Our lives not belong to ourselves. We did not create ourselves we must not destroy ourselves. If there were no suffering there would be no compassion. The thought that we can end suffering by killing the sufferer is the same as the pro-choice people who believe that can get rid of poverty by killing the babies of the poor.
It is insanity.
How would you know?There are times that nothing can really help you, even believing in God.
Look my friend, either you do it which means that you surpass your potential considering all factors including believing in God, or you don’t.How would you know?
You are full of nonsense my friend. I don’t like to talk nonsense.Look my friend, either you do it which means that you surpass your potential considering all factors including believing in God, or you don’t.
Have you ever sinned?You are full of nonsense my friend. I don’t like to talk nonsense.
I used the word “may”.How do you know?
Who would these fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death-
The undiscover’d country, from whose bourn
No traveller returns- puzzles the will,
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Sovereignty is not the only factor nor is it the most important unless we are utterly selfish.We are not isolated individuals but members of a community deeply affected by the behaviour of others.
We are still not isolated individuals but members of a community deeply affected by the behaviour of others. Suppose a person you love or like is going to commit suicide. Will you be unmoved and do nothing?
How dare you tell the children not to play in the road, wash their hands, not run with scissors, etc.We are not isolated individuals but members of a community deeply affected by the behaviour of others. People’s wishes are not always in their own interests or those of their family or society in which they live…
Everyone sins.Have you ever sinned?
Yes you are right and it is obvious that the only ones in this thread that are supporting euthanasia are the atheists.I apologize for not reading all the posts, so what I say might be already said.
If you support voluntary euthanasia, do you support suicide?
Maybe someone is in a situation that they cannot escape from/will never escape from. Maybe a really huge debt, mentally traumatized etc.
Would you support their decision if they tell you that they want to die?
Usually the people that support euthanasia are usually liberals who are oh so politically correct in anything, they are also the ones who are soooo focused on helping mentally ill people and talking people out of suicide and cutting etc…they will never support suicide.
Voluntary euthanasia is a fancy term for suicide to me. Just my 2 cents.
What we are talking about is arguments about legalized voluntary euthanasia. You are sovereign if you commit suicide. No one can stop that. But should it be legal to assist in that?When it comes to your life, it is your decision that counts, and not anyone else’s. You would not want others make decisions for you, would you? And if you wish to claim sovereignty over your decisions, grant the same sovereignty to others.
Of course.If you support voluntary euthanasia, do you support suicide?
Sure. Or maybe they have a frivolous reason, which sounds totally “crazy” for the outsiders. It is their life, their body, and I would not dare to assume that I know what is better for them.Maybe someone is in a situation that they cannot escape from/will never escape from. Maybe a really huge debt, mentally traumatized etc.
Would you support their decision if they tell you that they want to die?
If I can achieve my goal, using my own devices, then everything is fine. But if I am unable to achieve my goals, then I ask for help. What is wrong with it? If the person who is being asked is willing to help, that is no one else’s business (provided that no outsider is being harmed in the process). If he declines to help, that is his prerogative.What we are talking about is arguments about legalized voluntary euthanasia. You are sovereign if you commit suicide. No one can stop that. But should it be legal to assist in that?
Certainly. But these are all measurable, objective “potential” harms.You have the sovereignty to make your own decisions. From a secular legal standpoint, you have the right to do harmful things to yourself, but you do not have the right to do those things when they potentially harm others. You are perfectly free to get drunk, but you are not free to drink and drive. You have the right drive a car, but you do not have the right to drive 50 mph in a school zone.
It is a subjective, “emotional” harm and they have to deal with it. My first and foremost duty and obligation is to myself. The alleged quote from Cain still stands: “I am not my brother’s keeper”.In at least some places emotional abuse is a criminal act because it harms others. What is the harm done by voluntary euthanasia to loved ones?
So the whole world of human beings consists of autonomous units? There is no such thing as collective individualism. I would call this kind of respect indifference.Of course.
Sure. Or maybe they have a frivolous reason, which sounds totally “crazy” for the outsiders. It is their life, their body, and I would not dare to assume that I know what is better for them.
Oh, and I am as politically INcorrect as they come. And therefore I respect other people’s decisions. If someone wishes to extend their own suffering and wishes to offer up that suffering to God, I would not stand in their way and force my opinion on him. That is called respect.
Suicide also is a sin. You just need to be pressed more to reach to the point of your breakdown and performs sin/suicide.Everyone sins.
I am talking about sane adults, who are lucid and can present their preferences.So the whole world of human beings consists of autonomous units?
I have no idea what that means.There is no such thing as collective individualism.
You are free to call it whatever you want.I would call this kind of respect indifference.
If someone asks for advice or help, then it is just fine to help them. But I was talking about those people, who interfere with other people’s life, unasked and unbidden, just because they think they know what is “good for you”. I asked a few times already, and received no answer: “What would your reaction to be, if someone would forcefully take over you body, and prevent you from having autonomy over your life?” I am talking about some “nanny-state”, or “do-gooders”. Would you welcome them?There are people everyday who are telling other people what is good for them, like doctors, police officers and parents, but that “every man is an island” attitude is an old one.