Article: Marijuana: Legal Doesn't Mean Right

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tramadol is a very mild synthetic opioid, its usually the first thing pain management doctors will give to someone, I used it for a few years, it did work OK at first, but after time my tolerance built up and I even blacked out a few times from it.

And really codeine is not a strong opioid, There are MUCH stronger meds, like Oxycontin, MS Contin, Oxymorphone (opana), these were the pain pills most abused here in the US, at one time a single Oxycontin 80 mg sold for $130. on the street.
Tramadol is horrendously addictive. I “sat” with someone trying to get off it… And as you know with some odd side effects. Every time I went to OPD re the wrist they have me something different for pain so I knew a lot when I finished,

Codeine thankfully helps so I would nto go any higher up the scale!
 
I’m wondering to myself how many who are strongly opposed to marijuana ever tried it. I used it medically and found that it greatly reduced stress and emotional distress. There was also a longitudinal study done at UCLA that found that those who experimented with drugs for a short period of time were more well-balanced as adults than those who never experimented. I’m in no way suggesting that people use marijuana, but merely want to say that it has some good effects, as well as some negative effects. To be honest, those who never used pot should say so, and admit that it may have some beneficial effects. If I ever had another severe panic attack, I would not hesitate to vape it until the panic subsided.
 
I’m wondering to myself how many who are strongly opposed to marijuana ever tried it. I used it medically and found that it greatly reduced stress and emotional distress. There was also a longitudinal study done at UCLA that found that those who experimented with drugs for a short period of time were more well-balanced as adults than those who never experimented. I’m in no way suggesting that people use marijuana, but merely want to say that it has some good effects, as well as some negative effects. To be honest, those who never used pot should say so, and admit that it may have some beneficial effects. If I ever had another severe panic attack, I would not hesitate to vape it until the panic subsided.
Medically is a different topic altogether,
 
Medically is a different topic altogether,
Even using it recreationally has some important positive effects such as reducing aggression. From past experiences, I would much rather be around people high on pot than drunkards.
 
Even using it recreationally has some important positive effects such as reducing aggression. From past experiences, I would much rather be around people high on pot than drunkards.
I do not find that argument relevant or convincing!

A world where healthy folk are artifically mellowed out? A facet of hell. to me Escapism

Was writing earlier fighting a vicious migraine and would have tried anything but NOT for emotional effect…Thankfully the Imigran worked!
 
Even using it recreationally has some important positive effects such as reducing aggression. From past experiences, I would much rather be around people high on pot than drunkards.
I will tell you what I observed over a couple decades about pot.
It deadens inhibitions. A group of weed takers came to my house many years ago and brought with them an infant who should have been in diapers. Instead, he was allowed to do his business anywhere as he did in their own place of residence and probably any place they took him. Related to that is denial that this substance cannot be harmful (since it feels good). Such an attitude does lead to other more potent drugs.
I know of a person who had severe depression most likely from his over indulgence. The unmetabolized substances accumulate in the liver. So years later, one can have effects.
All in all, it is bad except like opioids, that should be regulated for medical purposes ONLY.
 
I will tell you what I observed over a couple decades about pot.
It deadens inhibitions. A group of weed takers came to my house many years ago and brought with them an infant who should have been in diapers. Instead, he was allowed to do his business anywhere as he did in their own place of residence and probably any place they took him. Related to that is denial that this substance cannot be harmful (since it feels good). Such an attitude does lead to other more potent drugs.
I know of a person who had severe depression most likely from his over indulgence. The unmetabolized substances accumulate in the liver. So years later, one can have effects.
All in all, it is bad except like opioids, that should be regulated for medical purposes ONLY.
Yes, I would have to agree that it has a tendency to deaden some inhibitions, but seldom to the degree that it would lead to something physically harmful, such as a fist fight. The disinhibition is much more likely to be something like becoming sexually promiscuous. This can be seen as a negative outcome of pot.

Over indulgence is always a problem, but this goes for many things, including water.
 
Yes, I would have to agree that it has a tendency to deaden some inhibitions, but seldom to the degree that it would lead to something physically harmful, such as a fist fight. The disinhibition is much more likely to be something like becoming sexually promiscuous. This can be seen as a negative outcome of pot.

Over indulgence is always a problem, but this goes for many things, including water.
Water leaves harmlessly. Inconvenient but that is all . And you were not talking OVER indulgence but indulgence.
 
I will tell you what I observed over a couple decades about pot.
It deadens inhibitions. A group of weed takers came to my house many years ago and brought with them an infant who should have been in diapers. Instead, he was allowed to do his business anywhere as he did in their own place of residence and probably any place they took him. Related to that is denial that this substance cannot be harmful (since it feels good). Such an attitude does lead to other more potent drugs.
I know of a person who had severe depression most likely from his over indulgence. The unmetabolized substances accumulate in the liver. So years later, one can have effects.
All in all, it is bad except like opioids, that should be regulated for medical purposes ONLY.
Thanks. Wise and experienced words,
 
Thanks. Wise and experienced words,
A wise lady told me many years ago, “You pay to learn”.
In other words, knowledge doesn’t come except with a price.
Some people can age, but it doesn’t guarantee wisdom or maturity.
 
A wise lady told me many years ago, “You pay to learn”.
In other words, knowledge doesn’t come except with a price.
Some people can age, but it doesn’t guarantee wisdom or maturity.
Indeed yes. Love costs whether love of people or love of God. I have aged and matured this last while at tremendous cost; still paying. But accepting the maturity and the wisdom also has a high cost.
 
Some social issues, like abortion, are black and white, but many other social issues, like the legalization of marijuana, contain shades of gray, having both negative and positive qualities. To think otherwise is to live in denial of the facts.
 
Indeed yes. Love costs whether love of people or love of God. I have aged and matured this last while at tremendous cost; still paying. But accepting the maturity and the wisdom also has a high cost.
I’ll address this to you since you seem to understand.
I think the law should protect people from making mistakes that can have long term severe consequences. This was the basis, I believe for restrictions against abortion and drug use. It’s not that young people without experience should try something known to be harmful and it’s their own lookout if it turns out to be devastating.
No, that’s where collective wisdom comes in, or should.
 
Marijuana is another device used by the New World Order. They want to push as much immorality on society as possible.
 
Your logic is faulty/incomplete.
You compare people who’ve never tried drugs to those who experimented, BUT YOU IGNORED the group who became regular and frequent users, maybe even addicted the the various drugs.

You should really compare those who never inhaled with those who ’get baked’ daily. Only this comparison would provide useful insights.
I’m wondering to myself how many who are strongly opposed to marijuana ever tried it. I used it medically and found that it greatly reduced stress and emotional distress. There was also a longitudinal study done at UCLA that found that those who experimented with drugs for a short period of time were more well-balanced as adults than those who never experimented. I’m in no way suggesting that people use marijuana, but merely want to say that it has some good effects, as well as some negative effects. To be honest, those who never used pot should say so, and admit that it may have some beneficial effects. If I ever had another severe panic attack, I would not hesitate to vape it until the panic subsided.
 
I’m wondering to myself how many who are strongly opposed to marijuana ever tried it. I used it medically and found that it greatly reduced stress and emotional distress. There was also a longitudinal study done at UCLA that found that those who experimented with drugs for a short period of time were more well-balanced as adults than those who never experimented. I’m in no way suggesting that people use marijuana, but merely want to say that it has some good effects, as well as some negative effects. To be honest, those who never used pot should say so, and admit that it may have some beneficial effects. If I ever had another severe panic attack, I would not hesitate to vape it until the panic subsided.
Stress, emotional distress, panic attacks…? It sounds to me like your problems are psychological in nature. Fix the root of the problem and you’ll no longer feel the need to get “baked.” That is, unless you really enjoy getting high.
 
Your logic is faulty/incomplete.
You compare people who’ve never tried drugs to those who experimented, BUT YOU IGNORED the group who became regular and frequent users, maybe even addicted the the various drugs.

You should really compare those who never inhaled with those who ’get baked’ daily. Only this comparison would provide useful insights.
Now you’re talking about overindulging. It does not take a genius to say that such use will likely lead to negative outcomes. But even the overindulging of plain water will have negative outcomes. Again, legalizing marijuana will likely have some positive effects and some negative effects.
 
Stress, emotional distress, panic attacks…? It sounds to me like your problems are psychological in nature. Fix the root of the problem and you’ll no longer feel the need to get “baked.” That is, unless you really enjoy getting high.
No kidding!!! I do not use pot!!!
 
Now you’re talking about overindulging. It does not take a genius to say that such use will likely lead to negative outcomes. But even the overindulging of plain water will have negative outcomes. Again, legalizing marijuana will likely have some positive effects and some negative effects.
Plain water? Please explain!

There is no way of telling who will become addicted, Robert, It is not worth the risk, really it is not. I am careful with codeine and well aware I may be using too much at times and that I m vulnerable as I was wrongly and carelessly prescribed quantitites of benzoz for many years. I got off them slowly and very painfully. Addiction can happen fast and especially if you are using as a calming effect when things are hard.

Legalising would be giving permisssion to experiment, with a toxic and unnecessary substance,. BAD.
 
I’ll address this to you since you seem to understand.
I think the law should protect people from making mistakes that can have long term severe consequences. This was the basis, I believe for restrictions against abortion and drug use. It’s not that young people without experience should try something known to be harmful and it’s their own lookout if it turns out to be devastating.
No, that’s where collective wisdom comes in, or should.
Agree totally. ALways though there are those who just will not believe fire burns unless they get burned and they are then scarred for life.

I can bleat re the dangers of tranx addiction till the cows come home but still some will defend them.

Abortion is different in that for the baby the consequences are terminal . Just seen the headline of news item here in Ireland from women on the way to the UK to get abortions. See breaking news.ie ireland news. Not opening it.

Been so many young deaths here from teenagers experimenting; and always the pushers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top