S
Skadi
Guest
Iteresting, you are entirely correct about Murrays work, however I hadnt heard about this evidence regarding the original NF practitioners. That would surely help explain the elements of ceremonial magic in Wicca.I’d like to add to this. Gardner spoke of encountering a small group of witches in the New Forest area of England. It was not that they were the last witches, depending on the source, there were either 3 or 4 covens total in the area, not just the one he was initiated into. Rather the coven’s practices were in danger of dying out as the practitioners were older (Gardner too was in his senior years).
There is scholarly research on the topic, most notably has been Ronald Hutton’s “Triumph of the Moon”. Hutton does not dismiss the existence of the coven. Gardner stated the New Forest ways were fragmented and he endeavored to create a sustainable means of continuing it - resulting in what has since become known as “Wicca” (or more precisely in today’s terms, “Traditional Wicca”). The cause of the fragmentation is speculation, whether it was the loose remnants of some actual waning folk beliefs or one that was something begun during that esoteric renaissance that began in the 1800s. Researchers like Hutton and Philip Heselton tend to land on the side of the latter (as, I think, most people in general), postulating that the New Forest coven had formed in the early 1900s, which falls within that esotericism time frame. Doreen Valiente published research in the 1980s regarding Gardner’s initiation, finding vital records and locating the residence in which Gardner stated his initiation took place. Ronald Hutton does not discount the plausibility of the coven’s existence and Philip Heselton identified members of the NF coven.
No one educated today adheres to the notion of Wicca being thousands of years old, especially not Trad Wiccans. In the early 1900s there was a witch cult hypothesis that many thought to be true, including Gardner. It was popularized by anthropologist Margaret Murray but it did not originate with her. It arose in the 19th century, first put forth by scholars like Jules Michelet and Karl Jarcke. It subsequently gained popularity when Murray published her book, “Witch Cult in Western Europe”. The hypothesis is deemed the romanticizing of witchcraft, having come on the heals of centuries of anti-witch propaganda of the European witchcraft trials, and arose during a time when there was an esoteric renaissance in Europe. At the time it was considered to be sound and Gardner was certainly not the only person to have accepted it. Nor is it the only hypothesis to have been accepted at one point then later refuted by subsequent decades of scholarly research.