S
sedonaman
Guest
Who has the Islamic authority to issue a legitimate, binding [on Muslims] fatwa? Any Muslim?…following fatwa issued by Sheikh M. S. Al-Munajjid, a prominent Saudi Islamic lecturer and author…
Who has the Islamic authority to issue a legitimate, binding [on Muslims] fatwa? Any Muslim?…following fatwa issued by Sheikh M. S. Al-Munajjid, a prominent Saudi Islamic lecturer and author…
Normally scholars/ religious leaders are supposed to give Fatwa. They can’t force anyone to follow it .Who has the Islamic authority to issue a legitimate, binding [on Muslims] fatwa? Any Muslim?
B L, when Muslims do not consider Muhammad as god how can they worship him. Do they call him for help. Do they bow before him. Muhammad knew all about the serious mistake of the church. So he made sure that he was not to be made a diety. he told every one to call him the servant and messenger of God. Do you see that B L???Muslims worship him! They have to emulate him in everything. Everything has to be done they way he did it. Good grief, they even followed him around when he went to defecate in order to see how he did it, so they could copy him. Sick, sick, sick!
Vickie
How could he know? He was illiterate.Muhammad knew all about the serious mistake of the church.
**dzhereme, you are taking the wrong route on a difficult road. Why not believe Muhammad that all was told to Him by Allah care of an angel of God?. Why not believe that? Because angels had always been coming and telling things to mankind (see your bible)…Obviously the gnostics that he got his information from told him so…because, you know, if there’s anyone that I would trust to get accurate information from about orthodox Christianity from, it would be the gnostics!![]()
What are you, some kind of glutton for punishment? Samaan provided an answer to this question in post #842 of this thread, and you completely refused to answer.Why not believe Muhammad that all was told to Him by Allah care of an angel of God?. Why not believe that? Because angels had always been coming and telling things to mankind (see your bible).
Let’s apply the same logic to some other scenarios:
David Koresh said he was the Messiah. David Koresh said it so it must be true.
Charles Manson said he was God. Charles Manson said it so it must be true.
The man on infomercial TV said I needed a new steak knife set. The man on the TV said it so it must be true.
Planten, you cannot say something is true because X said it. [As the advocate,] [y]ou need to provide proof, examples, logical reasoning that are supplemented by referenced sources so you can support your beliefs.
The reason I question Mohammed is same reason why I don’t believe what you say, Planten- you persistently refuse to provide proof, logical reasoning, sources, and examples for your statements other than yourself.
We’ve also shot down this statement as a logical fallacy a number of times. Following samaan’s example, let’s apply the same logic to another scenario:If you do not believe in Muhammad then you cannot believe in anything about angels in the bibleNT.
Because of, among other things, the warning given to us in Galatians 1:8 that we are not to accept other gospels, even if they claim to come from an angel from heaven. This is precisely the method by which Muhammad claimed to receive the Qur’an, isn’t it? That alone makes it suspect to us, and leads us to remember Galatians and reject Muhammad. But even if that verse had never been written, we could still look at the Qur’an and compare it with the Bible and see whether or not Muhammad’s message matched the messages from God in the Bible, We would find that in many important ways, the message of Muhammad is different and contradictory with the message of the Bible. So, my friend, it is precisely because I do read my Bible and believe the holy tradition that the Bible forms an integral part of that I reject Muhammad and Islam. The answer to your question is in your question.dzhereme, you are taking the wrong route on a difficult road. Why not believe Muhammad that all was told to Him by Allah care of an angel of God?. Why not believe that? Because angels had always been coming and telling things to mankind (see your bible).
Because the angel who came to Mary did not come to bring another gospel that contradicted what had been established, but to bring her good news of her place in the salvation of mankind through her acceptance of God’s plan for His only begotten son, Jesus Christ. If the angel had come to claim false things about God, then we would be right to question it. We do not just accept the message of anyone who claims to have conversed with the angels. Plenty of people have claimed that. I could claim that, and so could you. That would NOT mean that what we said the “angel” told us was true. Testing the truth of alleged spiritual encounters is necessary so that we can preserve our holy faith against those who wish to pervert or destroy it. The way that is most often done is by comparing the “new” revelation against past revelations that have been accepted as true. Think of it like a “strong” (accepted) hadith vs. a “weak” (doubtful) hadith. Muhammad’s entire story and the Qur’an are for us like the doubtful hadith, because they are not verifiable and they do not match up with what we know to be truth from the reliable histories (found for us in Church tradition, including the Bible as it is used by the Catholics and Orthodox).In your bibleNT (Luke) is written all about an angel coming to Mary and telling her that she should be happy that she is going to have a son and… Quite a long story from the angel. When you people believe in that then why do you not believe in the angel visiting Muhammad?
As I have just explained, God can do whatever He wants. He could send an angel to whoever He wants, but not to charge corruption against the people when He previously guaranteed His promises to them. That is not the nature of God. God is not untruth. So anyone who claims to receive a message from God must allow that message to be scrutinized. This is not possible in Islam, correct? You are not allowed to doubt the truth of the Qur’an, because it is claimed to be the literal word of God. We do not believe that, so we ask, as St. John Damascene did hundreds of years ago: Where is your proof? Your message contradicts ours, so we are not inclined to believe it. We wait for proof, as our forefathers did across the Christian world 1400 years ago.Is the angel not allowed to come to MUhammad? Is God not allowed to send an angel with His message to Muhammad?
This is false. I can (and do) believe in the angels and their interactions with humans as written in the Bible. I do not believe in Muhammad and his (alone) interaction with something representing the angel Gabriel. That is not a double standard. That is consistent with my strong belief in my own faith. If Muhammad is correct, it is up to HIM to show how his religion is what he says it is, some sort of “restoration” of the original religion he claims has been corrupted by the Jews and the Christians. Since he cannot show this corruption (and neither can you or any Muslim), and more importantly since our scriptures contain the promises of GOD against such corruption, it is incumbent upon us to always and forever reject the lies of Islam. To do otherwise would be wrong. Muhammad cannot challenge God while pretending to serve him. Even simple humans such as myself can see that Muhammad’s message is contradictory and not of God.If you do not believe in Muhammad then you cannot believe in anything about angels in the bibleNT. Why do you have double standard? You know that you are wrong.
I could ask you the same thing about hundreds of events recorded in Islamic writings, but what would be the point? I believe in the Bible because it is the written record of the faith that has been handed down since the days of the Apostles, who followed Jesus Christ and bore witness to the miracle of His glorious resurrection and other miracles. Would Mary’s word before me personally change this at all? Certainly not. I come before the Theotokos in prayer quite often, as there is an icon of her in my local church where I will often go to pray. Should she ever come to me, I would hope it would be there. But, unlike you, I am content that she offer my petitions before the Lord. I do not need literal visions of her to know of her place as the handmaiden of the Lord. Catholics are quite strong in their Marian devotions, as you may or may not know. We have no doubt, no matter what you say. Go be a Protestant somewhere else.Mary did not tell you that an angel visited her with good news. She did not say any such thing in the bible. Yet some one writes about it. WE do not know who wrote that. And you believe it. Why do you believe that when Mary did not say it? Perhaps she did not know about the angel at all.
You are entitled to your opinion. I am sorry that you feel this way, as I am trying to have a genuine conversation with you, that does not obscure or apologize for our differences but instead gives you a clear answer to your questions. If you do not wish to have such a conversation, fine. I am done with discussing things with you that you do not wish to discuss. I would rather remain silent than placate you with false answers just so that you’ll like me more. It’s not about how you and I get along or what you think I’m trying to do or not do. It’s about standing up for the truth in the best way that I can.You people are just trying to be playing with Muslims and just trying to be difficult.
Planten, my friend this is very difficult if not impossible to believe because our problem is not about believing the NT but about believing Muhammed. You are trying to tell us that the stone is a leaf, because you see it as a leaf while all of us know you are referring to a stone. How can that be? Muhammed does not belong in the NT and his story are all lies. We have proven this to you and knocked the stone on your head but you still want to call it a leaf.**dzhereme, you are taking the wrong route on a difficult road. Why not believe Muhammad that all was told to Him by Allah care of an angel of God?. Why not believe that? Because angels had always been coming and telling things to mankind (see your bible)…
In your bibleNT (Luke) is written all about an angel coming to Mary and telling her that she should be happy that she is going to have a son and… Quite a long story from the angel. When you people believe in that then why do you not believe in the angel visiting Muhammad? Is the angel not allowed to come to MUhammad? Is God not allowed to send an angel with His message to Muhammad?
If you do not believe in Muhammad then you cannot believe in anything about angels in the bibleNT. Why do you have double standard? You know that you are wrong.
Mary did not tell you that an angel visited her with good news. She did not say any such thing in the bible. Yet some one writes about it. WE do not know who wrote that. And you believe it. Why do you believe that when Mary did not say it? Perhaps she did not know about the angel at all.
You people are just trying to be playing with Muslims and just trying to be difficult.
**
** Which other gospels you were forbidden? And which gospels were allowed to you? Can you name any please? What is galatians? Who taught it, wrote it? Did Jesus have to do anything with it? No.Because of, among other things, the warning given to us in Galatians 1:8 that we are not to accept other gospels, even if they claim to come from an angel from heaven.
Are you sure that angel came to Mary? Did she tell any one? Show me fromt he bible that she told any one.Because the angel who came to Mary did not come to bring another gospel that contradicted what had been established, but to bring her good news of her place in the salvation of mankind through her acceptance of God’s plan
His begotten son or her begotten son?for His only begotten son, Jesus Christ.
.If the angel had come to claim false things about God, then we would be right to question it. We do not just accept the message of anyone who claims to have conversed with the angels. Plenty of people have claimed that. I could claim that, and so could you
.That would NOT mean that what we said the “angel” told us was true. Testing the truth of alleged spiritual encounters is necessary so that we can preserve our holy faith against those who wish to pervert or destroy it
The way that is most often done is by comparing the “new” revelation against past revelations that have been accepted as true. Think of it like a “strong” (accepted) hadith vs. a “weak” (doubtful) hadith. Muhammad’s entire story and the Qur’an are for us like the doubtful hadith, because they are not verifiable and they do not match up with what we know to be truth from the reliable histories (found for us in Church tradition, including the Bible as it is used by the Catholics and Orthodox).
You go ahead with your plans of passing judgements. But do not set the Quran aside. Try to read part of it daily, as we are reading the bible.(continued below)
** Belief, belief, belief. That is not enough. It has to be rational. Otherwise the pagans also believe in somethings. So they worship the idols. I am ready to along with you for all your good and sound beliefs. But if I find something wrong then please, I am sorry. I would not follow you**.Planten, my friend this is very difficult if not impossible to believe because our problem is not about believing the NT but about believing Muhammed. You are trying to tell us that the stone is a leaf, because you see it as a leaf while all of us know you are referring to a stone. How can that be? Muhammed does not belong in the NT and his story are all lies. We have proven this to you and knocked the stone on your head but you still want to call it a leaf.
** I think you are not right. I will believe what I find to be right. You will believe what you find to be right. There is no harm in my telling you what I believe because you are also permitted to make your beliefs known to every one peacefully.**So, which one do you think is believable, the story in the OT and NT or Muhammed? The evidences are overwhelming and the story of Muhammed is not even worthy to be compared to the Holy Bible. So if you keep on insisting that Muhammed has the right to be believed, then you have to deal with it and keep it within yourself.
.Insisting upon us that his story is worthy to be in parallel with the Bible is like telling us to believe a lunatic who made up a story then tries to discredit the Bible because he claimed to be more believable
Could you disregard the bible and rely on your intellect alone? I hope not. Of course Muhammd could not be openly mentioned in the bible. Same as Jesus was not mentioned in the Torah openly.Our intellect tells us that there is no way it is comparable because we know how to find the truth, and the truth leads us to what it is written in the Holy Bible and no where in the Bible that Muhammed is a part of it.
.We have no intention to disrespect your belief but you are insisting the wrong argument, my friend. The angels that are in the Bible are not the same as the one with Muhammed because their characteristics are not the same, besides, even though the story of the angel in Mary is mentioned by someone, it still represent a true account because the story is supported by the whole story in the Bible
If Muhammad was not supported by the bible then we know that Muhammad supported the bible as true book given to Jesus which the followers could not preserve..Is Muhammed supported by the Bible? Of course not! So, Muhammed distorted your mind and that his story tells deceptions based on the accounts of his own followers and himself proving that everything he did had no divine interventions but a mere work of a person who has other agenda in mind. It means that he is not to be reckoned with as a man worthy to be believed because the evidences prove otherwise.
** It is good to believe and support the truth and I am trying to do that. Thanks. I am trying to look for any truth in the teachings of the Catholics.**So, the question is, why not believe the truth that is already there, and is perfect in every way? Why do you have to insist on Muhammed if you think that his works is part of the Bible? It is a waste of your wisdom.
Why do you keep posting this same foolish claim? We have been over this before, Belief, true belief, can come only from understanding. Memorization by itself does not constitute understanding, nor is a text’s capability to be memorized, whether by one person or 1.3 billion, proof of anything other than it can be memorized.Is It Obligatory to Learn Arabic to Be a Muslim?
…
What is required of every Muslim is to be able to read surat Al-Fatihah and some other passages of the Qur’an in Arabic to enable him/her to offer his/her prayers.
In the end, we are stuck with one question you refuse to answer: Why would a god reveal his “perfect word for all mankind for all time” in a language only seventh century Arabic speakers could ever understand? Because there is no answer to this question.However, it is to the advantage of every Muslim to understand Arabic, because that would enable him to have a better insight into his faith.
There is not ’ a god’ . God is only one.… Why would a god reveal his “perfect word for all mankind for all time” in a language only seventh century Arabic speakers could ever understand?
This just re-enforces my point. If the Qur’an is in Arabic so the messenger could relay Allah’s message so that it is understandable, how does the message become understandable to those who do not speak Arabic?Had We sent this as a Qur’an (in the language) other than Arabic, they would have said: “Why are not its verses explained in detail? **What! (a Book) not in Arabic and (a Messenger an Arab?” ** 41: 44