Hi. I know this wasn’t addressed to me, but if you wouldn’t mind, I’d like to comment on it briefly, because I have asked this very same question of Sister Amy, another Muslim who posts here, and she has said the exact opposite of what you have said: that those who declare that music is halal are the minority, and in the wrong at that. So who is right? I don’t think either of you are presenting false information knowingly, but this interesting given that my conversation with her happened because she rejected my idea that the Muslim world is divided on the issue of the permissability of music! You can see now, perhaps, why non-Muslims like me are confused about this issue? I have asked some Muslim friends about this too and gotten three answers: 1) it is forbidden; 2) it is not forbidden; 3) only music with instruments other than drum is forbidden. How a yes or no question can illicit yes, no, and maybe is beyond me…
You ask Thomas, Luther and Calvin what is happening in the Lord’s Supper and what happens? You get three different answers. In some ways this is what I was trying to point out in the last paragraph of the post of mine you quoted. Islam is a very rich and diverse tradition. You ask me and you ask another Sister and you get different answers (without suggesting that I am on the level of an Aquinas, etc…or the Muslim equivalents…Ghazali, Suhrawardi, etc.). You ask me who is right…and, well, who do you think I am going to say? And I mean that with no disrespect to the other sister. That is just the reality.
In practice and throughout the tradition within Islam music has remained a vibrant part of Muslims lives, and it is specifically a part of many a Sufi tariqah (school, order, path). This can be seen both in the rich folk musical (and dance) traditions found in southeast Asia, Persia, North Africa, etc., and the popularity of contemporary music, much of which is in Arabic or Urdu, etc. throughout the Muslim world.
Many of those who believe that music is haram also think the various Sufis (and often the Shi’a, etc.) are outside Islam. If that is their position they pretty much have to gut massive parts of the Islamic tradition, but I do not consider that a justifiable or fruitful path.
I also presume that those who argue that music is haram must also argue that the story about the Prophet (pbuh) and Aisha is not legitimate.
I do not understand. Aren’t we constantly reminded of the difference between us and God whenever we pray, or go to religious services, or thank God for our food, or anything like that, whether we are Muslim or not? How is the singling out of one animal supposed to remind us of that more than any of the above activities which are specifically designed to turn our attention towards God?
Of course, you ought always to be conscious of God, but you still do certain things, certain kinds of ritual action, to teach, reinforce and practice that. Certain practices that we engage in repeatedly, certain acts by which we explicitly enact taqwa, so that it becomes an attitude that we possess out of habit. The Bible, e.g., talks about the fact that you should pray without ceasing, but most groups still have certain ritual prayers. Along similar lines, we ought always to be God-conscious, but there are certain things we do to ritually express, repeat, remind and reinforce what ought always to be the case: conscious that we are beings and God is Being.
While Saudis do not represent all of Islam, the Saudis I know have mostly said that music is forbidden (even the ones who admit to listening to it sometimes themselves). These guys are not radicals in any outward way. Just students. Again, who is right?
You and others seem to expect that Muslims are all going to say one thing on each topic. This no more likely to be the case than it is with Christians. I have answered this question, and I hope it helps.
wa Allahu alam.