Assurance of Salvation (Part II)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fhansen
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
pocohombre:
Originally Posted by paul c;10443091

You can’t know what is correct without an authoritative interpretation.
Ouch , Jesus is the teacher .Every neighbor shall teach his neighbor was the promise. We are all priests is the promise. We are indwelt is the promise . Are the Lord’s indwelling hands tied that he can not interpret for us ?
Poco…how can you be sure that what you are teaching your neighbor is the correct gospel, the one that came from the Apostles?

Don’t you think you should meditate and apply this passage to yourself before you go on teaching your neighbor:

Then from 1John 4…6 We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit[a] of truth and the spirit of falsehood.
As fro God leading a church to correct discernment, he did that with the original One, Holy, CAtholic and Apostolic Church. the 30,000 branches off that are all in error when they deviate from the truth as taught by God to the Catholic Church. Everyone of those fractures resulted from someone putting their own ideas in place of Gods truth.
Fact is all of Christendom owes at least something to the reformers, for it was much needed. Rome did reform, because she had to, iron sharpening iron. Part of what the CC is today is because of protestant reformers that were Catholic. Is counter reformation an OK term ?

There were reformers in the Church prior to Luther and Calvin…like Catherine of Sienna…I would suggest that you read something about her. She reformed the Church without the need to split the Church.

Here is my question to you…how is causing a split in the Church considered reforming?

The Church would have reformed, even without the Reformation.
am not a defender of 5 point Calvinism, but I am also sure a slight move toward that end would benefit many folk, including many Catholic, if not in teaching at least in practice.
Is the 5 point from the Apostles? Can you be assured it is without error? Canyou assure us it is without error?

WE does the CC need to move to it? The CC have saints throughout her history…how their live their lives and gave them to Christ, as examples…without the need for the 5 points…so why would the CC need this?
 
Q
uote:
The new testament books were written by Catholic authors and if the Catholic Church had not testified to their divine inspiration, no one would believe them today.
Its more than Catholic dogma. Its the historic truth. As for the Way or Christian, those are other names that the Catholic church was and is called.
Quote:
what are you talking about? The ascension is in Acts 1. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are all discussed in scripture
Okay, scripture is silent on the assumption of Mary, but it doesn’t exclude its reality either. Everything in scripture is true, but not all truth is in scripture.
Quote:
Jesus states in the last super discourses that the bread is his body and the wine is his blood and St. Paul reiterates this in 1Corinthians
Those other communion theories deny the clear teaching of Jesus that the bread IS his body and the wine IS his blood. Just because people claim things counter to this, doesn’t make them true.
Quote:
Nothing in Catholic teaching is contrary to scripture,
eternal truths are defined by popular vote.
 
Poco …

When I first had awakening via HS as adult …I instantly felt 100 % clean, all sins forgiven, fully graced. But, within a month or so, I committed PS. Now, the HS convicted me off it, and need to confess …which I did, and again felt fully graced.
It was only later, that I fell under spell of OSAS teaching, and began to think confession of such sin was not essential. That was my downfall…and I was soon to slide away down slippery slope into secular lifestyle, where I remained for many years. Only the Catholic Church & her doctrines …brought me back from the brink of abyss.

So, we can believe our theories …or we can learn the truth from real world experience.
OSAS is errant, a deadly trap for some…as scripture teaches.
Thanks for sharing. Testifying is sometimes strongest persuasion.Not sure what your first awaking was. Was it real birth or a planted seed beginning it’s incubation. Quite a few peolple make altar calls, cry alot, feel great spiritually but don’t "pan 'out.So the question is were they truly born again, or was it seeds not going to full maturity (which to me is the rebirth ) . Some of the admonisions here that are applied to believers to maintain, persevere, I read as warnings as to nonbelievers to make sure they are indeed born again…My real world experience was that I was not born again when I thought I was, after all I had several rites behind me, and I knew all about Jesus etc.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul c;10443091You can’t know what is correct without an authoritative interpretation.
This argument doesn’t withstand any scrutiny. If scripture could be interpreted the way you say, why do born again Christians have so many different interpretation of the same scriptural versus. Jesus told the Apostles how to interpret scripture, they told their successors (the bishops), who passed it on to their successors and ultimately to us. That is the only way we can know what was meant. Your interpretations can’t be trusted because you have no credibility. I.e, what have you done that we should believe you are uniquely inspired by the Holy Spirit?
Quote:
You can believe the Church that created those scriptures
Don’t you think its a bit presumptuous to quote VAtican 2 to us. It said no such thing. Its an historical fact that the New testament books were written by Catholic authors and the Bible canon was defined by Pope. St. DAmasus in 382 AD
Quote:
or you can believe someone else.
Of course its either or. Only one interpretation of the scriptures is correct. The problem with the pharisees and scribes is that they believed their own interpretation of scripture, not what was really being said. That same problem exists today.
Quote:
But to believe someone other than the author of the book is foolishness don’t you think
The Holy spirit inspired the sacred authors to write their books and He also inspired the church to pick the right books for the canon. But note, the Catholic Church WAS and IS the instrument chosen by God to communicate those truths to the nations.
Quote:
As for God leading a church to correct discernment, he did that with the original One, Holy, CAtholic and Apostolic Church. the 30,000 branches off that are all in error when they deviate from the truth as taught by God to the Catholic Church. Everyone of those fractures resulted from someone putting their own ideas in place of Gods truth.
There was and is corruption in the Church, which is afterall, a hospital for sinners. Rejecting corruption is one thing, but the Protestant reformers did far more than that, they rejected the Catholic doctrines that lead to salvation and by doing so, they have unwittingly led many to their condemnation. The counter -Reformation, particularly at the Council of Trent, did it the right way, addressing the corruption while embracing the doctrines of the Apostles that the Catholic Church has always taught.
Quote:
of course it is. New and innovative is by definition different from what came before it
There are no new dogmas. Just clarification and re-application to new realities. This includes the Immaculate conception, which was clearly believed in antiquity and papal infallibility, which has also been a guiding principle fo the church since St. Peter was given the keys to the kingdom.
Quote:
I’ve never seen any proof point to show that they knew anything about TULIP in apostolic days.
what part of the 5 points do you think would be helpful? I’d appreciate your perspective.
 
Thanks for sharing. Testifying is sometimes strongest persuasion.Not sure what your first awaking was. Was it real birth or a planted seed beginning it’s incubation. Quite a few peolple make altar calls, cry alot, feel great spiritually but don’t "pan 'out.So the question is were they truly born again, or was it seeds not going to full maturity (which to me is the rebirth ) .

Some of the admonisions here that are applied to believers to maintain, persevere, I read as warnings as to nonbelievers to make sure they are indeed born again…etc.
Poco…from Heb 10:

26 If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth,

Who do you think are those who have received the knowledge of truth that this passage is referring to?

no sacrifice for sins is left, 27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God.

And if those who received the knowledge of truth keep on sinning…what would they expect based on this passage?

From Rom 11:

17 If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root,

Who are the the wild olive shoots that have been grafted is referred to in this passage?

21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either.

Will God then not spare those grafted in, like those of the natural branches?

22 Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off.

What mus the ingrafted branches do so that they will not be cut off?
 
Thanks for sharing. Testifying is sometimes strongest persuasion.Not sure what your first awaking was. Was it real birth or a planted seed beginning it’s incubation. Quite a few peolple make altar calls, cry alot, feel great spiritually but don’t "pan 'out.So the question is were they truly born again, or was it seeds not going to full maturity (which to me is the rebirth ) . Some of the admonisions here that are applied to believers to maintain, persevere, I read as warnings as to nonbelievers to make sure they are indeed born again…My real world experience was that I was not born again when I thought I was, after all I had several rites behind me, and I knew all about Jesus etc.
Poco …I can relate to all u say above. And, I too put a lot of stock in personal testimonials. Because, as you note above…scripture is very clear on the essential needed that we be unified/bonded to Christ via the awakening/enlightenment of receipt of HS. Christ and John could not of been more definitive about this point.

In my case, my Trinitarian baptism as 3rd grader, didn’t enlighten me…to the degree I expected. But, at that early age I really didn’t have a lot of PS…not like I did later at age 18, when I rededicated my life, and was Confirmed in HS, when elders laid hands on me and prayed that I receive HS. It was a life changing event, a Supernatural awakening, for first time in my life I felt God’s personal love and the infused Indwelling of HS. Before this, I never could truly say I had every had a prayer answered…or had perceived Christ in personal way. My prior faith/beliefs were purely theoretical ideas of God, based on scripture. But, I couldn’t testify to Christ or God in personal way …I only knew what scripture said. And, that bothered me tremendously !! I wanted same proof the Apostles had …and scripture said we could have it, but I didn’t !! Just had my theories !!

So, that’s why I’m fanatical about need for Confirmation in HS !!! Unless, we are later in life Confirmed, and have our young-age Baptisms COMPLETED by enlightenment of Paraclete, we are unable to perceive God, and are incomplete new creations. Confirmation completes Baptism…no if, ands or buts.

Nevertheless, I discovered within 4-5 years thereafter, that I could & did fall back into Mortal sins, lost the Indwelling HS, and fell in love with Prodigal lifestyle, somehow convincing myself that I was OSAS, just unchurched, and no different from any other Protestant Christian. I assumed God had infinite mercy, and had covered all my current defects back at time of my Enlightenment. Yet, I. knew I had lost my first love & was making shipwreck of my potentials/talents. But, again Satan had me under his thumb, and convinced me I was still the Apple of God’s eye, bombproof saved, just not exercising my talents and not gaining potential heavenly rewards. I’d be there, I was guaranteed heaven…just w/o a lot of stars or medals.

And, then God sent some misery my way, PAIN I COULDN’T EXPLAIN. I had trials of Job, and that woke me up. God, sent me trials/penance…that brought me to repentance via Catholic Church…which had all the truth on scripture I was ignorant of. And, its been a beautiful 4 years !!! The CC is amazing …its that church that I always wanted & at long last discovered!! W/O it, I’d still be twisting in the wind, confused, and under Satan’s thumb !!

I’ve much more SA now as Catholic …than before as unrepentant Protestant. Christ gave us the Catholic Church … to help us persevere & make the Kingdom !! 👍
 
All we can do is respond to his grace in faith.
" 20.When Catholics say that persons “cooperate” in preparing for and accepting justification by consenting to God’s justifying action, they see such personal consent as itself an effect of grace, not as an action arising from innate human abilities.", from your site URL=“http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/p..._31101999_cath-luth-joint-declaration_en.html”. Even your positive responding, use of free will is pure grace.
The difference between what the Apostles taught and what the Reformers taught is that human beings have complete freedom to ultimately choose to reject God.
“Lutherans do not deny that a person can reject the working of grace”, line 20 from your site above
This doxology:
Jude 24-25
Now to him who is able to keep you from falling, and to make you stand without blemish in the presence of his glory with rejoicing, 25 to the only God our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, power, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen.
Was written by a Catholic, for Catholics, as was the rest of the New Testament. There is nothing in it that is not Catholic.
Those verses that you understand as “assurance of salvation” are also part of the Catholic faith. We understand them differently because we interpret them in the light of the faith that produced them, while you interpret them through the lens of the Reformers.
Understand thanks. read quickly your site - interesting. Yes, others here have quoted assurance scripture.This is good. I wonder if sometimes there is a disparity between what could be taught and what is taught in “balance” ( like be sure but not too sure) and what is actually practiced.
 
Poco …I can relate to all u say above. And, I too put a lot of stock in personal testimonials. Because, as you note above…scripture is very clear on the essential needed that we be unified/bonded to Christ via the awakening/enlightenment of receipt of HS. Christ and John could not of been more definitive about this point.

In my case, my Trinitarian baptism as 3rd grader, didn’t enlighten me…to the degree I expected. But, at that early age I really didn’t have a lot of PS…not like I did later at age 18, when I rededicated my life, and was Confirmed in HS, when elders laid hands on me and prayed that I receive HS. It was a life changing event, a Supernatural awakening, for first time in my life I felt God’s personal love and the infused Indwelling of HS. Before this, I never could truly say I had every had a prayer answered…or had perceived Christ in personal way. My prior faith/beliefs were purely theoretical ideas of God, based on scripture. But, I couldn’t testify to Christ or God in personal way …I only knew what scripture said. And, that bothered me tremendously !! I wanted same proof the Apostles had …and scripture said we could have it, but I didn’t !! Just had my theories !!

So, that’s why I’m fanatical about need for Confirmation in HS !!! Unless, we are later in life Confirmed, and have our young-age Baptisms COMPLETED by enlightenment of Paraclete, we are unable to perceive God, and are incomplete new creations. Confirmation completes Baptism…no if, ands or buts.

Nevertheless, I discovered within 4-5 years thereafter, that I could & did fall back into Mortal sins, lost the Indwelling HS, and fell in love with Prodigal lifestyle, somehow convincing myself that I was OSAS, just unchurched, and no different from any other Protestant Christian. I assumed God had infinite mercy, and had covered all my current defects back at time of my Enlightenment. Yet, I. knew I had lost my first love & was making shipwreck of my potentials/talents. But, again Satan had me under his thumb, and convinced me I was still the Apple of God’s eye, bombproof saved, just not exercising my talents and not gaining potential heavenly rewards. I’d be there, I was guaranteed heaven…just w/o a lot of stars or medals.

And, then God sent some misery my way, PAIN I COULDN’T EXPLAIN. I had trials of Job, and that woke me up. God, sent me trials/penance…that brought me to repentance via Catholic Church…which had all the truth on scripture I was ignorant of. And, its been a beautiful 4 years !!! The CC is amazing …its that church that I always wanted & at long last discovered!! W/O it, I’d still be twisting in the wind, confused, and under Satan’s thumb !!

I’ve much more SA now as Catholic …than before as unrepentant Protestant. Christ gave us the Catholic Church … to help us persevere & make the Kingdom !! 👍
Interesting thanks .Does OSAS mean never falling sinning? If so ,does it mention to what extent or how long ? How do you know that you are not proof of God’s keeping power (which is the impetus behind OSAS) ? I mean you say you were saved at 18,fell away but are back .This does not contradict OSAS. Maybe I was saved at 10 years old, watching Billy Ghaham .I certainly “fell” but am in fellowship now . Isn’t that OSAS ? That is He remained faithful to me .That you feel you were out of grace is immaterial , for you didn’t die, and are back on track, in grace. Repentance is repentance, whether you do it cause you think you are saved or cause you think you need to be saved…You could have repented with or without OSAS. I don’t think OSAS says we sin for grace to expound ,as Paul said heaven forbid. Interesting that you say CC teaching helped set you free from Protestant error and my experience is that Protestant teaching help set me free from CC error.
 
Code:
 " 20.When Catholics say that persons "cooperate" in preparing for and accepting justification by consenting to God's justifying action, they see such personal consent as itself an effect of grace, not as an action arising from innate human abilities.", from your site  URL="http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/documents/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_31101999_cath-luth-joint-declaration_en.html". Even your positive responding, use of free will is pure grace.
“Lutherans do not deny that a person can reject the working of grace”, line 20 from your site above
Thank you for reading the declaration poco. There are some on CAF who are not willing to engage at that level. Yes, God has fashioned us to seek Him, but we cannot find Him without His grace, which is constantly drawing us to Himself. Latin Catholics call this “prevenient” or drawing grace. When we respond to that grace, He gives more grace. The only reason we don’t all it “grace alone” is because it is not alone. It always mixes with the faith of the individual to produce salvific effects.
Code:
Understand thanks. read quickly your site - interesting. Yes, others here have quoted assurance scripture.This is good. I wonder if sometimes there is a disparity between what could be taught and what is taught in "balance" ( like be sure but not too sure) and what is actually practiced.
I can assure you that there is a very great disparity for many Catholics. I was not well catechized myself, and did not understand my faith, or practice what I claimed to believe. I would not be surprised that a majority of Catholics had trouble wtih the Joint Declaration, since they don’t understand what the Church really believes and teaches. I cannot count the number of Catholics who believe they will get to heaven by "trying to be a good person’.
 
Interesting that you say CC teaching helped set you free from Protestant error and my experience is that Protestant teaching help set me free from CC error.
How so? Maybe I missed this in an earlier post.
 
and if the earlier date, Clement wrote for the council, not as head bishop ( for he was not at that early date), but as an ambassador for the church in Rome, as Hermas suggests a century later.
He wrote with the authority of a bishop. He also wrote, interestingly enough, about obedience to bishops and presbyters. Protestants have literally no obedience to any bishops. Even members in sects with ‘bishops’ break off into schismatic groups (“High” Anglican Church versus the more heterodox Anglicans that have emerged). Ignatius also wrote about this extensively. The position of bishop was firmly established.

Irenaeus wrote on the importance of the bishops of Rome in more depth in “Against Heresies” Book III, Chapter 3:

“Since, however, it would be very tedious, in such a volume as this, to reckon up the successions of all the Churches, we do put to confusion all those who, in whatever manner, whether by an evil self-pleasing, by vainglory, or by blindness and perverse opinion, assemble in unauthorized meetings; [we do this, I say,] by indicating that tradition derived from the apostles, of the very great, the very ancient, and universally known Church founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul; as also [by pointing out] the faith preached to men, which comes down to our time by means of the successions of the bishops. For it is a matter of necessity that every Church should agree with this Church, on account of its preeminent authority, that is, the faithful everywhere, inasmuch as the tradition has been preserved continuously by those [faithful men] who exist everywhere.”

Feel free to read the whole chapter, or indeed the whole book, and attempt to nitpick Protestant ‘dogma’ (as though there is such a thing), and ignore two-thousand years of counsels that determined the Truth. “Every man his own priest…” :rolleyes:

newadvent.org/fathers/0103303.htm
 
Interesting thanks .Does OSAS mean never falling sinning? If so ,does it mention to what extent or how long ? How do you know that you are not proof of God’s keeping power (which is the impetus behind OSAS) ? I mean you say you were saved at 18,fell away but are back .This does not contradict OSAS. Maybe I was saved at 10 years old, watching Billy Ghaham .I certainly “fell” but am in fellowship now . Isn’t that OSAS ? That is He remained faithful to me .That you feel you were out of grace is immaterial , for you didn’t die, and are back on track, in grace. Repentance is repentance, whether you do it cause you think you are saved or cause you think you need to be saved…You could have repented with or without OSAS. I don’t think OSAS says we sin for grace to expound ,as Paul said heaven forbid. Interesting that you say CC teaching helped set you free from Protestant error and my experience is that Protestant teaching help set me free from CC error.
Pocohombre,

For some, like BRB, the Protestant churches lead them to the fullness of faith and truth that resides in the Catholic Church. Afterall, most protestant churches have more in common with the Catholic Church than they have differences and by giving their followers some of the truth and some of the grace, it can lead them to seek ALL of the truth and All of the grace that abounds in the Catholic Church.

For others, the Protestant churches lead them away from the Church and ultimately away from Christ. This is because while they teach some of the truth, they also teach some error and if the individual latches on to the error, rather than the truth, they are lost. And this is particularly true of those individuals who think they are serving God by denigrating his One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. If you find yourself in a denomination that
preaches love of God and love of neighbor, that’s good. But if you find yourself in a denomination that spends time contrasting itself with the Catholic Church, it should be raise significant red flags for you because hate doesn’t come from God.

Follow where the Holy Spirit leads you. It will always lead you to love if you truly follow it because God is love. Have you considered that fact that the Holy Spirit led you to this website? Do you think it was to convert Catholics? Or maybe it was to expose you to the fullness of truth. Do you think of us as adversaries or as advocates trying to help you discern the truth? I know I hope we come across as your advocates because that is what we intend but often the discussions unfortunately can become twisted into more adversarial ones. When that happens, try to remember that the purpose of this website is to give Catholic Answers to those with questions about what the faith really teaches.
It is meant ultimately to give you an accurate view of what the Catholic church teaches and why so that you can decide for yourself whether it indeed teaches the truth about salvation handed down by the Apostles.
 
Interesting thanks .Does OSAS mean never falling sinning? If so ,does it mention to what extent or how long ? How do you know that you are not proof of God’s keeping power (which is the impetus behind OSAS) ? I mean you say you were saved at 18,fell away but are back .This does not contradict OSAS. Maybe I was saved at 10 years old, watching Billy Ghaham .I certainly “fell” but am in fellowship now . Isn’t that OSAS ? That is He remained faithful to me .That you feel you were out of grace is immaterial , for you didn’t die, and are back on track, in grace. Repentance is repentance, whether you do it cause you think you are saved or cause you think you need to be saved…You could have repented with or without OSAS. I don’t think OSAS says we sin for grace to expound ,as Paul said heaven forbid. Interesting that you say CC teaching helped set you free from Protestant error and my experience is that Protestant teaching help set me free from CC error.
No, OSAS means once enlightened by Christ via confirmation in HS, we will always be recovered no matter what. It means the Good Shepherd never loses a wandering sheep. And, when I was first recovered, I tended to believe this true … except, I saw scripture saying Christ won’t force us against our free-will to return. As long as the pleasure of the Prodigal life remains, we won’t return. I need pain to wake me up. Christ can/does provide us PENANCE, in this life, to get our attention. If, we respond to that wakeup call … then there is hope for us. I could of just as easily got mad at God and cursed him for bringing so much misery to me. Recall Job’s wife told him to curse his ills and go die. We can also do that … and that would be suicide for us, the last, final straw.

So, when I was first recovered by the Catholic Church, I argued for OSAS here at CAF, for about a year. And the brethren here showed me the fuller truth on error of OSAS. I will tell you one thing that I strongly believe in that is scriptural … that is if we pray daily for SA, and love the Church of Christ and its life-giving Sacraments [esp. Eucharist] … we won’t go Prodigal route and wander away. So, we are to persevere always … and the CC makes this possible and almost guarantees us the Kingdom !! I’m a firm believer in serving our penance down here now … so as not to have to do so later !! I intend to remain fully-graced, and upon death go straight to bosom of the Lord. And, w/o the CC to help us … that’s an impossibility… IMO !! 🙂 Based on my ‘experience’ w/o the CC in my earlier lifetime.
 
Interesting thanks .Does OSAS mean never falling sinning? If so ,does it mention to what extent or how long ? How do you know that you are not proof of God’s keeping power (which is the impetus behind OSAS) ? I mean you say you were saved at 18,fell away but are back .This does not contradict OSAS. Maybe I was saved at 10 years old, watching Billy Ghaham .I certainly “fell” but am in fellowship now . Isn’t that OSAS ? That is He remained faithful to me .That you feel you were out of grace is immaterial , for you didn’t die, and are back on track, in grace. Repentance is repentance, whether you do it cause you think you are saved or cause you think you need to be saved…You could have repented with or without OSAS. I don’t think OSAS says we sin for grace to expound ,as Paul said heaven forbid. Interesting that you say CC teaching helped set you free from Protestant error and my experience is that Protestant teaching help set me free from CC error.
CC error ? As in what doctrines ?

After 4 years of taking on most all of them, here and elsewhere, … everytime, my Protestant, evangelical, teachings those 8-10 big ones that were opposed to the CC] were found to be deficient or totally wrong. Although Protestants know our bible verses, we weren’t taught proper interpretation thereof. The CC is far superior, almost inerrant, in its understanding of scriptures. Because, they believe what the Apostles passed down to them, and they know the ECF’s par excellance’ !! As evangelicals … we only knew a tiny bit of Augustine’s works, and practically nothing of the rest … til the rebel priest Luther came along. That’s where our history began. Ha !!

Your journey with the CC has just begun …you have much to learn, and much more to give up as errant prior teachings … in coming year or so to come.

Make your job easy … Get the Vaticano ed. , 803 page, 1992 yr ed., CCC… and in 2-3 weeks you will be back on Apostolic track … if you were once a Catholic, who went off in search of another better church. Re-read Exodus on Korah’s rebellion … that will explain error of Reformation priests and otherwise.
 
Code:
He wrote with the authority of a bishop. He also wrote, interestingly enough, about obedience to bishops and presbyters. Protestants have literally no obedience to any bishops.
If you are speaking about obeying Catholic bishops, why would they?

But I think you are painting with too broad of a brush here. Many of the world’s Protetants have bishops or elders and do practice some submission and obedience to them. Of course, since they all subject their performance to Scripture, there is always an “out” when the particular bishop or elder does not appear to be congruent with Scripture.

One of the biggest hot button topics now is the ordination of women to these roles, and how that departs from the Apsotolic practice.

Some Protestants are so “obedient” to their pastors and teachers that they are led far astray by their doing so. They may call them Pastors or elders, but they certainly do still hold sway.
Code:
 Ignatius also wrote about this extensively. The position of bishop was firmly established.
Irenaeus wrote on the importance of the bishops of Rome in more depth in “Against Heresies” Book III, Chapter 3:

newadvent.org/fathers/0103303.htm
To be fair, what the Reformers were looking at in the successors of the Apostles in their day and age would have abhorred the Apostles themselves. The wretched materialism of the Bishops in Europe prior to the Reformation itself was sufficient cause for the rebellion that ensued.

I agree that, though men are always in need of reform, the doctrines of Christ are not. In reacting against a corrupt Bishop, it is not prudent to disavow the bishopric itself.
 
Thank you for reading the declaration poco. There are some on CAF who are not willing to engage at that level. Yes, God has fashioned us to seek Him, but we cannot find Him without His grace, which is constantly drawing us to Himself. Latin Catholics call this “prevenient” or drawing grace. When we respond to that grace, He gives more grace. The only reason we don’t all it “grace alone” is because it is not alone. It always mixes with the faith of the individual to produce salvific effects.
I did not read that at all in the site.In fact they sounded like they agreed on the total depravity of man ( free will but depraved). The individual has no faith. If he has any it is what ? A gift, the document read. When we are fashioned to seek him do you mean there is a void in us that only he can fill or do you mean there is something good in us desiring God ? I thought the article denied that, for “no one seeks after God”.
I
can assure you that there is a very great disparity for many Catholics. I was not well catechized myself, and did not understand my faith, or practice what I claimed to believe. I would not be surprised that a majority of Catholics had trouble wtih the Joint Declaration, since they don’t understand what the Church really believes and teaches. I cannot count the number of Catholics who believe they will get to heaven by "trying to be a good person’
Same in any church, professing or rather “practicing” but I would say not really born again (baptized or unbaptized). Why is it so in yours, I mean why the poor catechesis ? Does knowing that cause they (Catholic parishioners) are baptized, and probably are decent people (hence not committing mortal sins left and right), probably going to heaven/purgatory, assurity just a confession away, dampen the motivation to teach otherwise ?
 
I did not read that at all in the site.In fact they sounded like they agreed on the total depravity of man ( free will but depraved). The individual has no faith. If he has any it is what ? A gift, the document read. When we are fashioned to seek him do you mean there is a void in us that only he can fill or do you mean there is something good in us desiring God ? I thought the article denied that, for “no one seeks after God”.
I Same in any church, professing or rather “practicing” but I would say not really born again (baptized or unbaptized). Why is it so in yours, I mean why the poor catechesis ? Does knowing that cause they (Catholic parishioners) are baptized, and probably are decent people (hence not committing mortal sins left and right), probably going to heaven/purgatory, assurity just a confession away, dampen the motivation to teach otherwise ?
Some blame it on Vatican 2 …but, thats not the real cause. Parents are loath to discipline their children since mid 60’s, and liberalism & secularists in schools & society are major contributor to poor religious ed. The sins of the parents are falling upon their offspring. We are entering the great Apostasy period, when many will fall away from the Church.

IMO !! Having lived thru much of this time, and quickly seen values & morals decline to near pagan levels.
 
If you are speaking about obeying Catholic bishops, why would they?

But I think you are painting with too broad of a brush here. Many of the world’s Protetants have bishops or elders and do practice some submission and obedience to them. Of course, since they all subject their performance to Scripture, there is always an “out” when the particular bishop or elder does not appear to be congruent with Scripture.

One of the biggest hot button topics now is the ordination of women to these roles, and how that departs from the Apsotolic practice.

Some Protestants are so “obedient” to their pastors and teachers that they are led far astray by their doing so. They may call them Pastors or elders, but they certainly do still hold sway.

To be fair, what the Reformers were looking at in the successors of the Apostles in their day and age would have abhorred the Apostles themselves. The wretched materialism of the Bishops in Europe prior to the Reformation itself was sufficient cause for the rebellion that ensued.

I agree that, though men are always in need of reform, the doctrines of Christ are not. In reacting against a corrupt Bishop, it is not prudent to disavow the bishopric itself.
Thank you, very fair and generous. There does come a point though where a doctrine or practice can corrupt even a good man, and where a bad man can corrupt even a good doctrine and practice. This applies to all churches, sects, denominations.
 
No, OSAS means once enlightened by Christ via confirmation in HS, we will always be recovered no matter what. It means the Good Shepherd never loses a wandering sheep. And, when I was first recovered, I tended to believe this true … except, I saw scripture saying Christ won’t force us against our free-will to return. As long as the pleasure of the Prodigal life remains, we won’t return. I need pain to wake me up. Christ can/does provide us PENANCE, in this life, to get our attention. If, we respond to that wakeup call … then there is hope for us. I could of just as easily got mad at God and cursed him for bringing so much misery to me. Recall Job’s wife told him to curse his ills and go die. We can also do that … and that would be suicide for us, the last, final straw.

So, when I was first recovered by the Catholic Church, I argued for OSAS here at CAF, for about a year. And the brethren here showed me the fuller truth on error of OSAS. I will tell you one thing that I strongly believe in that is scriptural … that is if we pray daily for SA, and love the Church of Christ and its life-giving Sacraments [esp. Eucharist] … we won’t go Prodigal route and wander away. So, we are to persevere always … and the CC makes this possible and almost guarantees us the Kingdom !! I’m a firm believer in serving our penance down here now … so as not to have to do so later !! I intend to remain fully-graced, and upon death go straight to bosom of the Lord. And, w/o the CC to help us … that’s an impossibility… IMO !! 🙂 Based on my ‘experience’ w/o the CC in my earlier lifetime.
That is true. If you seek/live in and by the spirit, you won’t seek/live in the flesh. I agree CC pretty much guarantees the way to the kingdom for it’s adherents. Really. I just don’t buy it all ,as you do buy Prot.guarantees. Just as OSAS can be abused so can CC teaching, as stated two threads earleir, about lack of motivation to properly catechize beyond the basics, cause you are all set, if not, you’re just a confessional away etc.
 
Thank you, very fair and generous. There does come a point though where** a doctrine **or practice can corrupt even a good man, and where a bad man can corrupt even a good doctrine and practice. This applies to all churches, sects, denominations.
If the truth can corrupt then it is not he truth.
The truth can only set a man free of his coruption.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top