Assurance of Salvation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oumashta
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Angel, I appreciate your response. I’ve been trying to stay on the subject of assurance, kind of hone in on that specific doctrine to see if my understanding is in error, and therefore I have not been “rejecting or ignoring everything else” as you say. I hope the Holy Spirit enlightens me too! 😉 If the RCC is the true church, I want in. But if it needed reform back to a biblical foundation for correct doctrine (i.e. eternal security, assurance of salvation), then the Holy Spirit has already told me some of the doctrines I need to embrace.

Blessings, OldProf
…you miss understand… I am still speaking on the subject of “assurance.”

…take a look at this:
12 So, my dear friends, you have always been obedient; your obedience must not be limited to times when I am present. Now that I am absent it must be more in evidence, so work out your salvation in fear and trembling. 13 It is God who, for his own generous purpose, gives you the intention and the powers to act. 14 Let your behaviour be free of murmuring and complaining 15 so that you remain faultless and pure, unspoilt children of God surrounded by a deceitful and underhand brood, shining out among them like bright stars in the world, (Philippians 2:12-15)
…St. Paul is hardly pronouncing “be ye all assured of your Salvation!” Rather, he is adminishing the Believers that they must at all times (not just when he is physically present amongst them) be obedient to the Word; that they must work on their Salvation (Jesus puts it in this term: “…if you Love Me, Obey My Commandments…”); it is God Who Grants you the Power and Will’s your Salvation so you must remain faultless and pure, unspoiled children of God (this is rather difficult to do since we know that all sin and none can claim that in him/her there’s no sin or that he/she is not a sinner since that would make God a liar)…

…you see now what I mean about rejecting or ignoring other passages?

…here’s another example:
22 You were to put aside your old self, which belongs to your old way of life and is corrupted by following illusory desires. 23 Your mind was to be renewed in spirit 24 so that you could put on the New Man that has been created on God’s principles, in the uprightness and holiness of the truth… never let the sun set on your anger 27 or else you will give the devil a foothold… 29 …let your words be for the improvement of others, as occasion offers, and do good to your listeners; 30 do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God who has marked you with his seal, ready for the day when we shall be set free. 31 Any bitterness or bad temper or anger or shouting or abuse must be far removed from you – as must every kind of malice. 32 …forgiving each other as readily as God forgave you in Christ. (Ephisians 4:22-32–edited due to site’s limit)
…is St. Paul giving “assurance” of Salvation to the Believers? No! He is cautioning the Believers that we must removed the old (flesh) and put on the new (spirit)… he warns that if we, the Believers, retain the malice (wickedness) of the past the devil will gain access (sin) to us… further, St. Paul admonishes us not to grieve the Holy Spirit (by returning to the old self) as our freedom (Salvation) will be gained only if we do as Christ Command: “Stand!”

Christ clarifies this “assurance” thing this way:
14 as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so must the Son of man be lifted up 15 so that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him. 16 For this is how God loved the world: he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life. 17 For God sent his Son into the world not to judge the world, but so that through him the world might be saved. 18 No one who believes in him will be judged; but whoever does not believe is judged already, because that person does not believe in the Name of God’s only Son. 19 And the judgement is this: though the light has come into the world people have preferred darkness to the light because their deeds were evil. 20 And indeed, everybody who does wrong hates the light and avoids it, to prevent his actions from being shown up; 21 but whoever does the truth comes out into the light, so that what he is doing may plainly appear as done in God.’ (St. John 3:14-21)
…you see… Jesus did not come so that all have Eternal Life (Salvation); He came so that those who Believe in Him/His Name may not perish but gain Salvation… the problem lies in the fact that to Believe in Jesus/Jesus’ Name is not a matter of reciting a clause or holding Bible studies that shows that there’s this or that guarantee… look again at the very last verse:
21 but whoever does the truth comes out into the light, so that what he is doing may plainly appear as done in God.’
…you see… there’s action taking place… Believing in Jesus/Jesus Name means doing what He Commands!:

“15 If you love me you will keep my commandments.” (St. John 14:15)

…this is the difference between the two groups of followers (St. Matthew 24:31-46 and St. Luke 6:26)… one group did Believe in Jesus because they did as He Commanded; while the other group had believed (assurance) they were Saved because they thought they knew Jesus and they believed what they thought Jesus meant for them to be/do.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Okay, thank-you for the levity - enjoyed it!

Was I confused? Well, Paul indicates our “will” is not toward God nor are we even capable of doing righteous works. We don’t seek after God. We don’t do any good works. This is the plight of the “natural man” of Romans 3:10-28 I’ve discussed before. We are dead in sins, thus we have total inability to seek God or do good works. However, if God regenerates us, then yes, we will seek Him and find Him. We see that in the gift of faith in Eph 2:1-9, with good works to follow, Eph 2:10.

Or am I still confused, or maybe I missed your point. If so, please clarify.

In God’s grace, OldProf
…let’s see… God gave His Son to sinners (Lamb of God) while enemies of God… the Son Came in the Flesh… died for all… not… died so that those who Believe would be Granted Life… each person choses to Believe or not in Christ… each Believer choses to remain in Christ or, as Lucifer did, strike on his/her own… nope, God does not force Salvation on anyone!

…the confusion you have is that you believe that since God grants us the ability to go to Jesus (regeneration of the flesh) once in fellowship God will remove our abilities to reject Christ’s Authority and forever remain locked in fellowship against our wills…

…it is totally contrary… our awakening (regeneration) compels us to Christ and through the Holy Spirit we gain a fuller fellowship and knowledge of Christ (the Triune God, as a matter of fact) and, as Believers, our wills humbly submit to God’s Will–yet, any time that we chose to do so, we can exercise our freedom to not only not stay in fellowship with God but to challange God’s Authority (something that society has been working on, with Satan’s assistance, since Adam and Eve); when Yahweh God said “you are gods” and “be perfect for I am perfect,” He meant it! …an automaton cannot be considered to be a creature of will nor a child of God… as God’s children we are Granted our free will… as a child of God, each Believer chooses God instead of self (ego)… and as in the parable of the “Prodigal Son,” God allows us to choose to exist away from Him–it is not assurance that ultimatedly saves those who reject God but their conversion, repentence and return to the Fold!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Thank-you, James. I’m sure we would have a good time over coffee!🙂

But I have to stop you here to ask a question. It is because I had this similar discussion 15 years ago with a RC Priest. He was a very good RC Theologian.

This person who commits the mortal sin you mention. They were a good RC in a state of grace, meaning they were “saved” or “born again” and they had at least some sanctifying grace. So, death to that person at that moment would put them in purgatory. Did God not begin a good work in them? (Php 1:6) It seems like He must have for them to be saved or born again, which would also mean they are one of Jesus’ sheep. So, since he doesn’t die then and commits a mortal sin, and he doesn’t repent or do penance, and then he dies and goes to hell, this proves he was not ever really a sheep of Jesus.

So God did not begin a good work in him that God could complete, even though he was “born again” or “saved”? And, even though he had passed from death to life (to be born again), he did not have eternal life (John 5:24). Is that correct?

Please help me follow this logic.

Peace to you, OldProf
…as concise as it can be done:

I = Believer (born again)
God = Grants me Salvation in Christ
I turn to ego = reject God’s Gift of Salvation
Christ = He still offers Salvation
I rely on self in spite of Christ’s Gift = no Eternal Life = God’s Gift - me.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Old Prof…
I have to say that yes you are incorrect in your understanding, but it stems from a VERY common misunderstanding, even among many Catholics, concerning mortal sin. That is - a “true sheep” will never commit a mortal sin. He will not deny God and God’s Lordship which, if one examines the the conditions that make a sin mortal, MUST precede any act that might normally be considered mortal.
If a person DOES commit a mortal sin they have, by definition, cut themselves off from God and done so with knowledge and voluntary consent.

There are three conditions for a sin to be Mortal: Grave Matter, full knowledge of the sinful nature of the act, and full consent of the will. The pertinent paragraph in the Catechism says:
1859 Mortal sin requires full knowledge and complete consent. It presupposes knowledge of the sinful character of the act, of its opposition to God’s law. It also implies a consent sufficiently deliberate to be a personal choice. Feigned ignorance and hardness of heart do not diminish, but rather increase, the voluntary character of a sin.

Clip…

Hope this helps.

Peace
James
James, I’m looking back and trying to answer some of the responses in chronological order and not skip anyone. Regarding sin. Sin leads to death.

Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Seems clear enough. How about this:

Rom 6:23 For the wages of venial sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Rom 6:23 For the wages of mortal sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

This muddies the waters a bit, because venial sin doesn’t destroy sanctifying grace.

My question is, do RC minimize sin? Isn’t it true and ANY sin is a mortal sin and we very much need to take all sin seriously?

If we don’t, we might, for example, think that our sins are venial sins that are minor, not really in need of confession, and maybe we SHOULD go to church on Easter and Christmas, but it isn’t really necessary otherwise because we are a member of the Church.

You do NOT minimize any sin if you believe, as I do, that “sin” leads to “death.”

So, for you to understand, I cannot view sin in less than a worse case, because of Romans 6:23. But, if God begins a good work in me (Php 1:6), and I’ve moved from death to life (John 5:24) to become a sheep of the Good Shepherd Jesus (John 10) and will never perish, because God will hold me in His hand and complete His work, and I can know that we have eternal life (1 John 5:13) - then this is a blessed assurance!

Then, with eternal life, I can sin all I want. Since I’ll NEVER want to sin, because that would make me miserable, I will strive not to sin, strive to bring glory to God, and strive tell others about my Lord and Savior and the gift of eternal life. If I do sin, the Holy Spirit corrects me and I repent and try hard not to repeat that sin again.

Need to get back to work now!

Peace to you, OldProf
 
James, I’m looking back and trying to answer some of the responses in chronological order and not skip anyone. Regarding sin. Sin leads to death.

Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Seems clear enough. How about this:

Rom 6:23 For the wages of venial sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Rom 6:23 For the wages of mortal sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

This muddies the waters a bit, because venial sin doesn’t destroy sanctifying grace.

My question is, do RC minimize sin?
If your asking does the Church, in her teaching, minimize sin the answer is no she does not. If you are asking if some Catholics tend to minimize sin - then the answer is most certainly yes, some do.
Isn’t it true and ANY sin is a mortal sin and we very much need to take all sin seriously?
Yes we need to take all sin seriously.
As for whether ANY sin is a mortal sin, this begins to get more deeply into the theology of sin and truthfully I may not be the best one to guide you on this. The reason I say this is because it gets into matters of gravity of matter as well as the voluntary or involuntary nature of a given act.
I will say this. ANY sin that is voluntarily committed is a grave sin. For me personally, I tend to agree with you that any sin committed with knowledge and consent of will is a mortal sin and needs to be confessed. Others in the Church take a somewhat different view…They might be able to guide you more thoroughly in these things.
If we don’t, we might, for example, think that our sins are venial sins that are minor, not really in need of confession. (snip)
Yes this is a possibility. At the other end of the spectrum is the person who suffers from scrupulosity. For them everything is a mortal sin…It can become very problematic.
You do NOT minimize any sin if you believe, as I do, that “sin” leads to “death.”
I think that this is a fine position so long as it does not lead to scrupulosity.
So, for you to understand, I cannot view sin in less than a worse case, because of Romans 6:23. But, if God begins a good work in me (Php 1:6), and I’ve moved from death to life (John 5:24) to become a sheep of the Good Shepherd Jesus (John 10) and will never perish, because God will hold me in His hand and complete His work, and I can know that we have eternal life (1 John 5:13) - then this is a blessed assurance!
Then, with eternal life, I can sin all I want. Since I’ll NEVER want to sin, because that would make me miserable, I will strive not to sin, strive to bring glory to God, and strive tell others about my Lord and Savior and the gift of eternal life. If I do sin, the Holy Spirit corrects me and I repent and try hard not to repeat that sin again.
To a large extent I think you sound very Catholic here - Except that I don’t think any Catholic would use the phrase, “sin as much as I want”. I recognize that what you are saying is that you will never WANT to sin so, for the Christian sinning as much as you want means zero sin.
However - since we recognize that we have not been perfected, we will occasionally fall, either by habit or through some trial or other. When we recognize our error or, as you rightly put it, the Holy spirit corrects us, we immediately repent and make correction (and restitution if necessary) and seek to grow in holiness.
As I say - this is very much a proper Catholic viewpoint.

Peace
James
 
I agree, because the truth is that were all simultaneously saints and sinners-even hypocrisy will strive to survive in some form- and until we finally, thoroughly, unwaveringly love God with our whole heart, soul, mind, and strength, and our neighbor as ourselves we’re still not fully just, we’re still apparently attracted by things other than God first above all else. And for me this means that we can’t know, with perfect certainty, just who the true sheep are and who they aren’t, which is exactly why Trent calls on us to refrain from over-confidence. And this renders the question of who the true sheep are-who the elect are-an academic one, with perfect assurance only achievable in the end.
The analogy you agree with seems to lend itself to my understanding of RC theology. As a baptized RC, you work to become more pure and store up merit. The goal? You die in a state of grace, which means you have some level of sanctifying grace at your death, and you go to purgatory (almost certainly) to complete the purification process (refinement where all venial sins are washed away) so you can go to heaven as a pure vessel. In heaven you receive glorification based upon your level of merit stored up when you were alive.

What I have described is a “nutshell” version of a much more expounded upon RC theology of the afterlife of a Christian, but I believe it describes the basic framework. But is it biblical? I think not, as will be explained below.
And at the end of the day Protestantism, generally speaking, isn’t without this tension/anticipation either. If a believer insists that his faith/trust in Jesus is solely what saves him, while still acknowledging that fruits must be present in order for that faith to be the kind that saves, then he’s still faced with the question, ‘Have I really done enough, have I truly or sufficiently done Gods’ will, was my faith really the right kind?’ Am I right in my self-assessment or ‘self-checks’? And I think that’s just an honest understanding of our human nature and situation here on earth, as well as a biblical one.
Well, “Protestantism” usually says “sola fide” or faith alone saves. Forget works – they clearly are not necessary to be “born again” (Titus 3:5, in context 3:1-11). God justifies the ungodly (Rom 4:5). You ask about self-checks. Yes, we are to examine ourselves (2 Cor 13:5). We DO NOT want to hear Jesus say, “I never knew you” (per Matt 7:21-23). 2 Cor 13:5 is the focal point of a list I gave earlier of our actions that can result in REAL biblical assurance (Evidence List 2, post #72). We really can have a peace that passes all understanding (Php 4:4-7 wonderful verses) and assurance (1 John 5:13) since Christ is the author and finisher of our faith (Heb 12:2).

Let’s do a quick biblical analysis of who we are from God’s vantage point. The verses I give are systematic theology – a cohesion of biblical verses regarding the salvation of a true Christian.

What we are is clear. We are sinners with no interest in righteousness or desire to know the true God (Rom 3:10-20, 23). As sinners, we have the free will to sin however we want to, but we know we won’t do anything righteous because we cannot. We do not have that ability. That is biblical, and that is the human dilemma. We are in desperate need of a Savior and under the wrath of a Holy God. Yet, we are completely incapable of doing ANYTHING about it because we are dead in sins (Eph 2:1), and even slaves to sin (Rom 6:17, context 6:15-23, and we’re thankful God changes our heart). Is God in any way happy with us? No (Ps 5:5-6; 7:11; Rom 1:18). So the natural man, the walking dead (Rom 5:12), will never, on his own, realize his standing before his creator/sustainer. He simply does not have Christ and is under God’s righteous and holy wrath (John 3:18, 36; 1 John 5:12).

What about the “elect” of God? Chosen long ago (Eph 1:4, context Eph 1:3-14), Christians (the elect) are sinners saved by faith in Jesus Christ, and this faith is a gift from God (Eph 2:8-9). They are born of God (John 1:13), justified by faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior (Rom 5:1, full context is Rom 5:1-11). Christ is the author and finisher (or perfecter) of this faith (Heb 12:2), which is why He has His sheep from the Father (John 6:37-40, 44), and they will NEVER perish (John 10:28, full context as I emphasized earlier is John 9:35 to 10:30). Jesus is the Good Shepherd who doesn’t lose any sheep. They have eternal life, a gift of God (Rom 6:23). It is not about human free will. It IS about God’s sovereign choice and God’s ability to “save His people from their sins” (Matt 1:21).

Was that done? Yes. Jesus cried, “It is finished” (John 19:30). His work accomplished it all. Notice a very important section of Scripture that pertains to this, Romans 8. Camp there for awhile since it is such a powerful theological statement. Paul tells us Christians are already glorified in God’s sight. In Rom 8:30, “these He also glorified,” we see Paul uses the past tense for a future event with the Greek. Note how it is stated in the amplified Bible, “And those whom He thus foreordained, He also called; and those whom He called, He also justified (acquitted, made righteous, putting them into right standing with Himself). And those whom He justified, He also glorified [raising them to a heavenly dignity and condition or state of being].”

The Christian has moved from death to life, meaning he has, past tense, eternal life never to be under condemnation (John 5:24; Rom 8:1; Col 1:13) and has the righteousness of Christ (Php 3:9) and is therefore, glorified (Rom 8:30). How can we not celebrate and look forward for our Great God and Savior, Jesus Christ (Titus 2:13)?

What a wonderful assurance we have!

Sincerely, OldProf
 
…sin against God is separation from God; refusal to admit that you are a sinner/have sinned and refuse to repent 'cause Salvation is “assured” to you is Death: the wages of sin is death–not the wages of the unbeliever’s sin is death!

It would be wonderful for me to hit a few of the local banks, take my neighbors’ possessions and beat/kill those who oppose me and have complete assurance that God has no power to keep me from entering the New Jerusalem because I know that once I became one of the sheeps I have acquired full immunity! :eek: :banghead:

Maran atha!

Angel
Clearly a Christian, one with the mind of Christ, one “in Christ,” who has the Holy Spirit to guide them isn’t going to do what you say. This argument against eternal security will go no where. You need some verses that show how a sheep of Jesus can be lost.

Regards, OldProf
 
The analogy you agree with seems to lend itself to my understanding of RC theology. As a baptized RC, you work to become more pure and store up merit. The goal? You die in a state of grace, which means you have some level of sanctifying grace at your death, and you go to purgatory (almost certainly) to complete the purification process (refinement where all venial sins are washed away) so you can go to heaven as a pure vessel. In heaven you receive glorification based upon your level of merit stored up when you were alive.

What I have described is a “nutshell” version of a much more expounded upon RC theology of the afterlife of a Christian, but I believe it describes the basic framework. But is it biblical? I think not, as will be explained below.

Well, “Protestantism” usually says “sola fide” or faith alone saves. Forget works – they clearly are not necessary to be “born again” (Titus 3:5, in context 3:1-11). God justifies the ungodly (Rom 4:5). You ask about self-checks. Yes, we are to examine ourselves (2 Cor 13:5). We DO NOT want to hear Jesus say, “I never knew you” (per Matt 7:21-23). 2 Cor 13:5 is the focal point of a list I gave earlier of our actions that can result in REAL biblical assurance (Evidence List 2, post #72). We really can have a peace that passes all understanding (Php 4:4-7 wonderful verses) and assurance (1 John 5:13) since Christ is the author and finisher of our faith (Heb 12:2).

Let’s do a quick biblical analysis of who we are from God’s vantage point. The verses I give are systematic theology – a cohesion of biblical verses regarding the salvation of a true Christian.

What we are is clear. We are sinners with no interest in righteousness or desire to know the true God (Rom 3:10-20, 23). As sinners, we have the free will to sin however we want to, but we know we won’t do anything righteous because we cannot. We do not have that ability. That is biblical, and that is the human dilemma. We are in desperate need of a Savior and under the wrath of a Holy God. Yet, we are completely incapable of doing ANYTHING about it because we are dead in sins (Eph 2:1), and even slaves to sin (Rom 6:17, context 6:15-23, and we’re thankful God changes our heart). Is God in any way happy with us? No (Ps 5:5-6; 7:11; Rom 1:18). So the natural man, the walking dead (Rom 5:12), will never, on his own, realize his standing before his creator/sustainer. He simply does not have Christ and is under God’s righteous and holy wrath (John 3:18, 36; 1 John 5:12).

What about the “elect” of God? Chosen long ago (Eph 1:4, context Eph 1:3-14), Christians (the elect) are sinners saved by faith in Jesus Christ, and this faith is a gift from God (Eph 2:8-9). They are born of God (John 1:13), justified by faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior (Rom 5:1, full context is Rom 5:1-11). Christ is the author and finisher (or perfecter) of this faith (Heb 12:2), which is why He has His sheep from the Father (John 6:37-40, 44), and they will NEVER perish (John 10:28, full context as I emphasized earlier is John 9:35 to 10:30). Jesus is the Good Shepherd who doesn’t lose any sheep. They have eternal life, a gift of God (Rom 6:23). It is not about human free will. It IS about God’s sovereign choice and God’s ability to “save His people from their sins” (Matt 1:21).

Was that done? Yes. Jesus cried, “It is finished” (John 19:30). His work accomplished it all. Notice a very important section of Scripture that pertains to this, Romans 8. Camp there for awhile since it is such a powerful theological statement. Paul tells us Christians are already glorified in God’s sight. In Rom 8:30, “these He also glorified,” we see Paul uses the past tense for a future event with the Greek. Note how it is stated in the amplified Bible, “And those whom He thus foreordained, He also called; and those whom He called, He also justified (acquitted, made righteous, putting them into right standing with Himself). And those whom He justified, He also glorified [raising them to a heavenly dignity and condition or state of being].”

The Christian has moved from death to life, meaning he has, past tense, eternal life never to be under condemnation (John 5:24; Rom 8:1; Col 1:13) and has the righteousness of Christ (Php 3:9) and is therefore, glorified (Rom 8:30). How can we not celebrate and look forward for our Great God and Savior, Jesus Christ (Titus 2:13)?

What a wonderful assurance we have!
Spoken like someone who knows scripture fairly well, which, as pointed out in this thread and others, can easily be misinterpreted or interpreted in various ways- but doesn’t know God particularly well. The Church knows the heart of God better than anyone else and her understanding of scripture serves to under gird that knowledge. Continue to seek true understanding more earnestly and He will reveal Himself and His will with greater depth. Right now your understanding is a rather simple academic or intellectual one.
 
Did he give you a good answer?
No. He knew a person would become a sheep of Jesus as soon as they received sanctifying grace. He couldn’t show how they could fall away, but assumed man’s free will with the ability to make sinful choices could cause them to perish. This is a problem for the RC theologian.
If this person dies in a state of grace then yes - they will be saved. Clip …

Frankly - for me, a sinner, I have enough to deal with just trying to do God’s will each day. To see to it that I am one who perseveres and not one who falls away. I do not know the future - what trials and sorrows may befall me, and how well I will weather them. I do know that I am committed to being Christian and to follow my Lord to the best of my ability…the rest I can only leave up to Him and not spin my wheels over things outside of my ability to understand or do anything about.

If you are right and I am already guaranteed a place in heaven - great.
If you are NOT right and my place in heaven is NOT guaranteed, then I guess I am doing well to not presume.

Happy Easter

Peace
James
I think a lot about “the elect” – I’ve given some verses from Eph 1 in another response, but I also like Acts 13:48 as a demonstration of God’s sovereignty. If I have been given the gift of faith and eternal life (Eph 2:8-9; Rom 6:23), I should have peace and assurance (Php 4:7; 1 John 5:13). My life should reflect 1 Thess 5:12-22 and the List 2 evidences given earlier. It seems God has changed my life to go from ignoring the Bible to accepting the Bible as His Word, inerrant, and being the bread of life to me (Matt 4:4).

I leave the worries to God, and I love Him and study to know Him and strive to bring Glory to Him in my actions. If I was not one of the elect, I highly doubt I would have the passion I do regarding systematic theology and biblical theology and evangelism (Acts 17:10-11; 2 Tim 2:15; 1 Pet 3:15; Jude 3). Let’s do Him the honor of striving to know Him through his revealed word. Iron sharpens iron (Prov 27:17).

In Christ, OldProf
 
No. He knew a person would become a sheep of Jesus as soon as they received sanctifying grace. He couldn’t show how they could fall away, but assumed man’s free will with the ability to make sinful choices could cause them to perish. This is a problem for the RC theologian.
This strikes me as odd since I have no problem seeing this possibility in Scripture and I am by no means a scholar of any type. Sometimes I think that those who are “highly trained” (like theologians) have lost a certain ability to see the simpler things. 🤷
Jesus did say that God hid from the “wise” and revealed to the “simple”.

I pointed out in my post several places in the Gospels where Jesus himself speaks of those who fall away. I’m sure that you did not “snip” that section above for any reason other than space, but when we discuss assurance, these passages must be taken into account. For that reason, I repeat what I posted in my earlier post.

Scripture supports that there are people in the world today who believe they are good Christians and are “saved” etc, but who are going to wind up being condemned even though they prophesied and cast our demons and cry Lord Lord (Mt 7:21-23). There are those who are going to receive the word with joy but then fall away (Mt 13:20-21). There are those who will seek to enter and will not be able (Luke 13:24).
So - while we can easily say that the “Lord Lord” crowd might be the deceivers, what of those who receive the word with joy but have no root? What of those who try to enter the narrow door but are unable? Did God not start a good work in them? Did they not believe that they were “saved” and “born again”?

Now - as a systematic theology type, - and I want to emphasize this part strongly - **I have no doubt but that you realize that when two seemingly contradictory views can produce Scriptural evidence to support their case, it is necessary to take ALL of the factors into account - not to prove one or the other right or wrong, but rather to arrive together at a fuller understanding of Truth. **

So - allow me to propose this. Jesus said that the path is narrow that leads to salvation. In this image we can see the possibility, if we are not careful, of getting too far off line to the right or to the left. the person who puts too little trust in God’s promises (assurances) runs the risk of falling into the despair, of failing to see God as ever being able to forgive them, or that they are ever “good enough” to get into heaven so they give up ever trying. On the other hand, the person who puts too much emphasis on “assurance” runs the risk of becoming complacent and fail to bear fruit and so end up being among those who are condemned crying, “Lord lord, did we not…”, or asking, “Lord when did we see you…”

Two extremes - either one of which can get one off of the narrow path and into the ditch.
For this reason Scripture provides evidences to engender both Joy AND Perseverance, Confidence AND Caution.

Oh how wise and understanding is our God.
I think a lot about “the elect” – I’ve given some verses from Eph 1 in another response, but I also like Acts 13:48 as a demonstration of God’s sovereignty. If I have been given the gift of faith and eternal life (Eph 2:8-9; Rom 6:23), I should have peace and assurance (Php 4:7; 1 John 5:13). My life should reflect 1 Thess 5:12-22 and the List 2 evidences given earlier. It seems God has changed my life to go from ignoring the Bible to accepting the Bible as His Word, inerrant, and being the bread of life to me (Matt 4:4).
I leave the worries to God, and I love Him and study to know Him and strive to bring Glory to Him in my actions.
So much of this sounds so Catholic. 👍
Of course we recognize an even more significant aspect to the “bread of Life” but that’s another thread…😃
I wish that more Catholics - more Christians in general would have this attitude - which I share with you - of leaving the worry to God and simply do all I can (in my very small way) to “bring Glory to Him in my actions”.
If I was not one of the elect, I highly doubt I would have the passion I do regarding systematic theology and biblical theology and evangelism (Acts 17:10-11; 2 Tim 2:15; 1 Pet 3:15; Jude 3). Let’s do Him the honor of striving to know Him through his revealed word. Iron sharpens iron (Prov 27:17).
It could be my friend it very well could be…Of course the only way we will ever know for positive sure is if you (and I) are able to say, with Paul, at the end of our earthly life, “I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith”. (2 Tim 4:7)

May God continue to advance you in Holiness

Peace
James
 
snip…
What I have described is a “nutshell” version of a much more expounded upon RC theology of the afterlife of a Christian, but I believe it describes the basic framework. But is it biblical? I think not, as will be explained below.
You make the claim that Jesus did it all. yes He did it all in what He had to do. Yet we all must pick up our cross daily. We are still working, Jesus’s work is finished and ours is just beginning.

I ask do you repent of your sins after committing them. What purpose is there in repenting?
 
Clearly a Christian, one with the mind of Christ, one “in Christ,” who has the Holy Spirit to guide them isn’t going to do what you say. This argument against eternal security will go no where. You need some verses that show how a sheep of Jesus can be lost.

Regards, OldProf
I do not intend to respond for JCriscton…but these should give you a head start…

Rom 11:

20 Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but tremble. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either.

22 Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off.

Heb 10:

26 If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God…29 How much more severely do you think someone deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified them, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace?

36 You need to persevere so that when you have done the will of God, you will receive what he has promised.

Heb 6:

4 It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age 6 and who have fallen[c] away, to be brought back to repentance. To their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace. 7 Land that drinks in the rain often falling on it and that produces a crop useful to those for whom it is farmed receives the blessing of God. 8 But land that produces thorns and thistles is worthless and is in danger of being cursed. In the end it will be burned…11 We want each of you to show this same diligence to the very end, so that what you hope for may be fully realized. 12 We do not want you to become lazy, but to imitate those who through faith and patience inherit what has been promised.
 
The analogy you agree with seems to lend itself to my understanding of RC theology. As a baptized RC, you work to become more pure and store up merit. The goal? You die in a state of grace, which means you have some level of sanctifying grace at your death, and you go to purgatory (almost certainly) to complete the purification process (refinement where all venial sins are washed away) so you can go to heaven as a pure vessel. In heaven you receive glorification based upon your level of merit stored up when you were alive.

What I have described is a “nutshell” version of a much more expounded upon RC theology of the afterlife of a Christian, but I believe it describes the basic framework. But is it biblical? I think not, as will be explained below.

Well, “Protestantism” usually says “sola fide” or faith alone saves. Forget works – they clearly are not necessary to be “born again” (Titus 3:5, in context 3:1-11). God justifies the ungodly (Rom 4:5). You ask about self-checks. Yes, we are to examine ourselves (2 Cor 13:5). We DO NOT want to hear Jesus say, “I never knew you” (per Matt 7:21-23). 2 Cor 13:5 is the focal point of a list I gave earlier of our actions that can result in REAL biblical assurance (Evidence List 2, post #72). We really can have a peace that passes all understanding (Php 4:4-7 wonderful verses) and assurance (1 John 5:13) since Christ is the author and finisher of our faith (Heb 12:2).

Let’s do a quick biblical analysis of who we are from God’s vantage point. The verses I give are systematic theology – a cohesion of biblical verses regarding the salvation of a true Christian.

What we are is clear. We are sinners with no interest in righteousness or desire to know the true God (Rom 3:10-20, 23). As sinners, we have the free will to sin however we want to, but we know we won’t do anything righteous because we cannot. We do not have that ability. That is biblical, and that is the human dilemma. We are in desperate need of a Savior and under the wrath of a Holy God. Yet, we are completely incapable of doing ANYTHING about it because we are dead in sins (Eph 2:1), and even slaves to sin (Rom 6:17, context 6:15-23, and we’re thankful God changes our heart). Is God in any way happy with us? No (Ps 5:5-6; 7:11; Rom 1:18). So the natural man, the walking dead (Rom 5:12), will never, on his own, realize his standing before his creator/sustainer. He simply does not have Christ and is under God’s righteous and holy wrath (John 3:18, 36; 1 John 5:12).

What about the “elect” of God? Chosen long ago (Eph 1:4, context Eph 1:3-14), Christians (the elect) are sinners saved by faith in Jesus Christ, and this faith is a gift from God (Eph 2:8-9). They are born of God (John 1:13), justified by faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior (Rom 5:1, full context is Rom 5:1-11). Christ is the author and finisher (or perfecter) of this faith (Heb 12:2), which is why He has His sheep from the Father (John 6:37-40, 44), and they will NEVER perish (John 10:28, full context as I emphasized earlier is John 9:35 to 10:30). Jesus is the Good Shepherd who doesn’t lose any sheep. They have eternal life, a gift of God (Rom 6:23). It is not about human free will. It IS about God’s sovereign choice and God’s ability to “save His people from their sins” (Matt 1:21).

Was that done? Yes. Jesus cried, “It is finished” (John 19:30). His work accomplished it all. Notice a very important section of Scripture that pertains to this, Romans 8. Camp there for awhile since it is such a powerful theological statement. Paul tells us Christians are already glorified in God’s sight. In Rom 8:30, “these He also glorified,” we see Paul uses the past tense for a future event with the Greek. Note how it is stated in the amplified Bible, “And those whom He thus foreordained, He also called; and those whom He called, He also justified (acquitted, made righteous, putting them into right standing with Himself). And those whom He justified, He also glorified [raising them to a heavenly dignity and condition or state of being].”

The Christian has moved from death to life, meaning he has, past tense, eternal life never to be under condemnation (John 5:24; Rom 8:1; Col 1:13) and has the righteousness of Christ (Php 3:9) and is therefore, glorified (Rom 8:30). How can we not celebrate and look forward for our Great God and Savior, Jesus Christ (Titus 2:13)?

What a wonderful assurance we have!

Sincerely, OldProf
The problem with your theological conclusion is that the Apostles did not Teach “always saved” theology. Salvation is Eternal only because Christ is Eternal and He Grants Salvation; once in the Hand of the Father none can take the sheep away because God is Omnipotent–this is not in anyway expressing that the sheep lose their autonomy… anytime any of the sheep can, and in deed do, remove themselves from the protection and care of the Might Hand of God… those that chose to do so will not be forced into submission by God!

Your theology is flawed because it makes God co-conspirator every time a Believer choses to reject God’s Authority and re-engage sin (unrightousness) or a sinful life… it is as though man determines, for God, who enters the New Jerusalem–a wretched person would grab a Bible and beat God over His Head with it as he/she would claim Salvation while holding on to a wicked and godless life… :bigyikes::banghead::banghead::banghead:

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Clearly a Christian, one with the mind of Christ, one “in Christ,” who has the Holy Spirit to guide them isn’t going to do what you say. This argument against eternal security will go no where. You need some verses that show how a sheep of Jesus can be lost.

Regards, OldProf
…but that is circular… Scriptures state that none can claim to be free of sin and that none can claim to not commit sin… the difference between a non-Believer and a Believer is null when both person decide to sin and embrace the sin instead of repenting and turning/returning to God.

…unless you are claiming that only non-Christians sin (a theology that is anti-Biblical)–which is a philosophy that is as erroneous as “once Saved, always Saved!”

Maran atha!

Angel
 
No. He knew a person would become a sheep of Jesus as soon as they received sanctifying grace. He couldn’t show how they could fall away, but assumed man’s free will with the ability to make sinful choices could cause them to perish. This is a problem for the RC theologian.

I think a lot about “the elect” – I’ve given some verses from Eph 1 in another response, but I also like Acts 13:48 as a demonstration of God’s sovereignty. If I have been given the gift of faith and eternal life (Eph 2:8-9; Rom 6:23), I should have peace and assurance (Php 4:7; 1 John 5:13). My life should reflect 1 Thess 5:12-22 and the List 2 evidences given earlier. It seems God has changed my life to go from ignoring the Bible to accepting the Bible as His Word, inerrant, and being the bread of life to me (Matt 4:4).

I leave the worries to God, and I love Him and study to know Him and strive to bring Glory to Him in my actions. If I was not one of the elect, I highly doubt I would have the passion I do regarding systematic theology and biblical theology and evangelism (Acts 17:10-11; 2 Tim 2:15; 1 Pet 3:15; Jude 3). Let’s do Him the honor of striving to know Him through his revealed word. Iron sharpens iron (Prov 27:17).

In Christ, OldProf
…again a false premise… the elect are those who Believe in Jesus… yet, to Believe in Jesus it is not enough to call Him “Lord, Lord;” we must Obey Him and humbly submit to doing His Will: “…if you Love Me Obey My Commandments;” the second a Believer rejects God’s Authority and follows his ego he/she is no longer abiding in Christ and none are anything but a mere branch… without Jesus you, I, the whole world, both Believers and none Believers can do/be nothing!

Salvation consist in abiding in Jesus so that He may Abide in us and thus Grant us that Eternal Life:
20 For in him is found the Yes to all God’s promises and therefore it is ‘through him’ that we answer ‘Amen’ to give praise to God. 21 It is God who gives us, with you, a sure place in Christ 22 and has both anointed us and marked us with his seal, giving us as pledge the Spirit in our hearts. (2 Corinthians 1:20-22)
Notice how St. Paul does not boast about being Saved? He boasts about being in Jesus!

Notice how he does not praise the Believers at Corinth for being Saved? He speaks of their efforts of standing firm for Jesus (Faith) and having received, in pledge, the Holy Spirit–which does not translate to ‘you are eternally saved!’ God’s Promise is for the Believers and while death and Life are given as choice… we must chose Life!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
This thread underscores the fallacy of the sola scriptura doctrine-the idea that scripture, alone, can serve as the norm for determining the gospel truth. The Catholic Church knows that scripture can’t interpret itself, that the Church is the pillar and foundation of truth, that the Church was established for the purpose of receiving, understanding, preserving, and proclaiming the gospel intact.

Many like to make the assertion that the meaning of scripture is plain-JWs, for example, make this claim. And most also hold to the notion that the Holy Spirit is aiding them in their exegesis. Likewise, Baptists have plausible arguments for supporting believer-only baptism and Anglicans and maybe Lutherans for baptismal regeneration, Evangelicals for the non-importance of baptism at all for regeneration and it’s still argued what Calvin believed regarding this. Arminians argue for the importance of man’s free will in playing a role in his salvation and Calvinists for the importance of the sovereign will of God alone in man’s salvation, Lutherans and Anglicans for their version of the Real Presence and others for their understanding of the Eucharist as purely a memorial service, and the list goes on. And we can take it a step further and pose our favorite erudite theologian/exegete/biblical language scholar against our oppositions’ equally credentialed peer and they, too, will have very different interpretations from each other.

It can become sort of amusing to see people, myself included, go round and round debating various issues, such as the topic of this thread, which were never even up for debate for the most part prior to the Reformation. Anyway, this thread, as other threads have done, proves the fallacy of sola scriptura, the absolute insufficiency of scripture alone to serve as a norm for determining the gospel truth.
**
 
This thread underscores the fallacy of the sola scriptura doctrine-the idea that scripture, alone, can serve as the norm for determining the gospel truth. The Catholic Church knows that scripture can’t interpret itself, that the Church** is the pillar and foundation of truth, that the Church was established for the purpose of receiving, understanding, preserving, and proclaiming the gospel intact.

Many like to make the assertion that the meaning of scripture is plain-JWs, for example, make this claim. And most also hold to the notion that the Holy Spirit is aiding them in their exegesis. Likewise, Baptists have plausible arguments for supporting believer-only baptism and Anglicans and maybe Lutherans for baptismal regeneration, Evangelicals for the non-importance of baptism at all for regeneration and it’s still argued what Calvin believed regarding this. Arminians argue for the importance of man’s free will in playing a role in his salvation and Calvinists for the importance of the sovereign will of God alone in man’s salvation, Lutherans and Anglicans for their version of the Real Presence and others for their understanding of the Eucharist as purely a memorial service, and the list goes on. And we can take it a step further and pose our favorite erudite theologian/exegete/biblical language scholar against our oppositions’ equally credentialed peer and they, too, will have very different interpretations from each other.

It can become sort of amusing to see people, myself included, go round and round debating various issues, such as the topic of this thread, which were never even up for debate for the most part prior to the Reformation. Anyway, this thread, as other threads have done, proves the fallacy of sola scriptura, the absolute insufficiency of scripture alone to serve as a norm for determining the gospel truth.
You are so right. We (Catholics) get pulled into this argument using the bible alone as our source evidence. And perhaps that is OK but eventually it boils down to Authority. If we can not be successful in this issue we will win none other. All the converts I have met, including me, eventually decided because of this issue- Authority .
 
You are so right. We (Catholics) get pulled into this argument using the bible alone as our source evidence. And perhaps that is OK but eventually it boils down to Authority. If we can not be successful in this issue we will win none other. All the converts I have met, including me, eventually decided because of this issue- Authority .
Amen - Amen - Amen…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top