N
Namesake
Guest
You move away from apostasy.Namesake,
How do you elevate into divisions?
Tomster
You move away from apostasy.Namesake,
How do you elevate into divisions?
Tomster
To “move away from apostasy” is to return to the Catholic Church.You move away from apostasy.
Seems like we disagree.To “move away from apostasy” is to return to the Catholic Church.
To deny ONE dogma of the Church makes one a heretic.At what point does cafeteria Catholicism become material Protestantism?
How many or which doctrinal and/or binding disciplinary matters can a self-professed Catholic knowingly and willingly disregard before sinking into de facto Protestantism?
Where is the line drawn?![]()
Fr. Charles Conner will be starting a new series on EWTN very soon on this very topic. Can’t wait.
We sure do.Seems like we disagree.
Which sect of Protestantism did you elevate to?You don’t sink into Protestantism, you elevate!
You don’t sink into Protestantism, you elevate!
I’d like to hear the answer to Tomster’s question too.Which sect of Protestantism did you elevate to?
It’s not a matter of sects. It’s just that if one believes the Catholic church became apostatized because of non scriptural doctrine and dogma it can be viewed as a step up to leave the RCC behind and find salvation in a different denomination.I’d like to hear the answer to Tomster’s question too.
In which way(s)?The reason is that the teachings of the RCC is anachronistic.
Well, it’s a long list. Start with birth control. Celibacy for priests. Papal infallibility. Purgatory. Ordination of women. The one true church. In no particular order.In which way(s)?
Thanks.Well, it’s a long list. Start with birth control. Celibacy for priests. Papal infallibility. Purgatory. Ordination of women. The one true church. In no particular order.
There was no particular order. The first one they talked about was celibacy. They both think it is a ridiculous thing.Thanks.
I see birth control leads the list.
So the doctrine of sunstantiation doesn’t matter? In any case. many 'good"people do things you wouldn’t approve of if you knew about them, things that are objectively evil.Lots of cafeteria Catholics that I know don’t believe in transubstantiation, and many that I know don’t respect the authority of Rome.
And that’s just fine with me because they are very good people. If they weren’t Catholic and instead were Jewish they would be assured of heaven. But the Roman Church insists on excluding them.
I go along with the Jews. They really do accept most everyone even if they aren’t Jewish.
For me and a whole lot of people, Catholics included, do not believe that transubstantiation matters at all.So the doctrine of sunstantiation doesn’t matter? In any case. many 'good"people do things you wouldn’t approve of if you knew about them, things that are objectively evil.
Priestly celebacy is a Roman discipline, not a universally Catholic one. Its not doctrine like the rest.There was no particular order. The first one they talked about was celibacy. They both think it is a ridiculous thing.
Couple points.It’s not a matter of sects. It’s just that if one believes the Catholic church became apostatized because of non scriptural doctrine and dogma it can be viewed as a step up to leave the RCC behind and find salvation in a different denomination.
But if you insist on names of denominations I would offer that the Lutherans, Methodists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, etc are reasonable alternatives.
Of course this assumes that one really believes that the RCC is not valid in her teachings, which is what I believe.
I had an interesting conversation today with two people who call themselves Catholics. They both said they don’t accept all the teachings of the RCC. I told them that if they refuse to believe even one dogma of the RCC they can’t be Catholic. I got slammed pretty hard and I just left it at that. They both said that the RCC is changing a lot. I told them that as far as dogma is concerned that isn’t true, but they didn’t agree with me at all.
I don’t want to beat on Catholics, but I hear that sort of reasoning a lot. These people don’t believe a whole bunch of what the RCC teaches but they still go to Mass and receive the Eucharist. I know they are wrong, but they are convinced what they are doinbg is just fine. They are actually Protestants but don’t understand that.
The reason is that the teachings of the RCC is anachronistic. These are very good people who just do not believe that the RCC could teach things they don’t accept at all, in any way. There are a lot of people like them too.
So it makes a lot more sense to get honest and look for a denomination closer to what one really believes instead of making a mockery of Roman Catholic teachings by going through the motions even though one does not believe that the RCC is valid.
Maybe that didn’t make much sense, but I think it does.
Birth ControlWell, it’s a long list. Start with birth control. Celibacy for priests. Papal infallibility. Purgatory. Ordination of women. The one true church. In no particular order.