Atheism, Religion, and Crime

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlemagne_II
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
j1akey

On the same token if we were to be able to somehow go back in time with our technology to say a 2 or 3 thousand years ago would we appear as gods to the people of that time with out cars, computer, jets, and whatever else we could bring?

Thank you for so succinctly making the point … that science is the newest God on the block. And that’s for atheists, not for people who lived three thousand years ago.
 
You know, I hate to say it but you’re probably right. There probably isn’t anything that can make me believe in any kind of god no matter what was presented to me. I don’t know why but you made remember a character from Star Trek: TNG named Q. All powerful? All knowing? For all intents and purposes yes. Creator of all that is? Nope. It just makes me think that if we were to encounter a race of sufficiently advanced beings other than ourselves, would we label them as gods because they’re so far advanced beyond ourselves that we couldn’t tell the difference? I know I’m straying off course here a bit with all the sci-fi alien stuff but that’s kind of how I look at it.

On the same token if we were to be able to somehow go back in time with our technology to say a 2 or 3 thousand years ago would we appear as gods to the people of that time with out cars, computer, jets, and whatever else we could bring?
Not really, they would just realize it as advanced Tech. we both look Human, there is no difference. The Colonists that came to the new world, were not G-d to the Indians. Just foreigners. with Guns,
 
The Catholic Church is not moved by “Magic”. It’s Called Faith.
If Paranormal Activity moves you, Research the Marian apparitions at Fatima Portugal.
The Great Aurora of 1939 that was the Sign of WW2. The Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate heart of Mary, where 1 year later, Communist Russia soon Collapsed, and over 70 dictatorships worldwide fell in that year. (in 1980’s)
There are plenty of Miracles. The Sun danced during the Marian Apparition in Portugal (1917)
There are plenty of Miracles go look it up.
I don’t classify hearsay, coincidences, or statistical improbabilities as miracles.

Also, I didn’t say anything about faith. I said something on the same level as magic would likely make me believe. If all you have is your own faith and assurances, that’s not good enough for me.
 
In post # 14 I said this, which relates directly to the theme of this thread.

*If you were walking down a street sidewalk and on one side of the street coming toward you there was a group of young men toting bibles and on the other side there was a group of young men in black leather jackets wielding bats and chains, on which side of the street would you rather be?

Which group is with God and which group is without Him?*

Seems to me we have all strayed from the theme.
Can we get back to it? :confused:
 
This is a good post.

Do you think I’m trying to spread hate?

Now you’ve said people have anti-God views. No athiest has anti-God views. We don’t wake up one day and go, oh goody, I’m going to die and the universe is meaningless. We ARE often against religious people, for some very good reasons. Because many religious people reject truth and seem to hate mankind. So when we see suicide bombers, when we see 12 yr old girls being married into polygomy, when we see powerful priests, created that way by a church hierachy buggering children, we are very very glad we are not religious.

To be religious is to reject love and our shared humanity.

If we were religious we would be to either accept these things or accept the belief/church and entity that leads to them. A belief that cannot be verified, but can be used to hurt humanity. We won’t hurt people for the sake of a BELIEF, no matter what it threatens us with(hell) or promises us.(heaven)

I am glad I am not religious if it means supporting what people support. I’d rather remove myself from life, than hate that badly, it’s just…not worth it. I reject Jihad in exactly the same way I reject condeming a sexual orientation. It’s not worth hurting people over a rule that can and should be challenged.

No human can decide for me, what is right or wrong.

I give it up any dream of immortality before I will go against my concsience.

That is athiesm, to me.

Cheers

P.S Yes I know you say that my “conscience” comes from God and that if I just listend to it harder, I’d agree with you and your religion. It doesn’t quite work that way. 🙂
Very good post.
 
I will now program God version 1.0 to answer your prayers.
It’s guaranteed to be correct about 50% of the time. And yes, it’s vulnerable to a stack smashing 😃

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void)
{
char[500] a;
int b;
printf(“Please enter your question for God: “);
scanf(”%s”, &a);
b = random(1);
if(b) print “Yes”;
else print “No”;
return 0;
}
lol this is even better 😃
 
This is a good post.

Do you think I’m trying to spread hate?

Now you’ve said people have anti-God views. No atheist has anti-God views. We don’t wake up one day and go, oh goody, I’m going to die and the universe is meaningless. We ARE often against religious people, for some very good reasons. Because many religious people reject truth and seem to hate mankind. So when we see suicide bombers, when we see 12 yr old girls being married into polygomy, when we see powerful priests, created that way by a church hierachy buggering children, we are very very glad we are not religious.
Dame Edna:

Are we having an ADD + PMS day today?:o I’m so sorry. What you commented about it, on another thread, must be true as your comments here are staggeringly wild:

First, you said, “No atheist has anti-God views.” Document or retract.

Second, you said, “We ARE often against religious people, for some very good reasons.” What does it take to set you off? Just tell me and I’ll be very careful to not touch on those subjects.

Third, you said, “Because many religious people reject truth and seem to hate mankind.” Document or retract.

Fourth, you said, “So when we see suicide bombers…” you mean like the godless kamakazes did during the 2nd world war?

Fifth, you said, “…when we see 12 yr old girls being married into polygomy…”, I guess you mean like the godless Nazi’s who kept naked Jewish women caged for the pleasures of their soldiers.

Sixth, you said, “…when we see powerful priests, created that way by a church hierachy buggering children.” Document or retract.
To be religious is to reject love and our shared humanity.
Please explain how?
If we were religious we would be to either accept these things or accept the belief/church and entity that leads to them. A belief that cannot be verified, but can be used to hurt humanity. We won’t hurt people for the sake of a BELIEF, no matter what it threatens us with(hell) or promises us.(heaven)
Wow! You are going through some really tough bouts today, girl! These sound like the rantings of someone seriously off their meds. I, for one, hope you get back to normal real soon!
I am glad I am not religious if it means supporting what people support. I’d rather remove myself from life, than hate that badly, it’s just…not worth it. I reject Jihad in exactly the same way I reject condemning a sexual orientation. It’s not worth hurting people over a rule that can and should be challenged.
Well, now we get to the crux of the issue. Of all of the religions and belief systems on the planet, the Catholic Church is probably the best friend the homosexual has. That does not mean that she will roll over and permit unbridled fornication, whether it’s between heterosexuals (out of wedlock) or homosexuals (perennially out of wedlock).
No human can decide for me, what is right or wrong.
If I were you I would resist saying that to a judge if you ever find yourself in court.
I give it up any dream of immortality before I will go against my concsience.
And, we will continue to pray for you.
That is athiesm, to me.
Sort of thought so.

❤️ jd
 
Dameedna
*
To be religious is to reject love and our shared humanity.*

Are you talking about the Sermon on the Mount? Are you talking about “Love one another as I have loved you”? Are you talking about forgiving our enemies “seventy times seven times”? Are you talking about “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you?” Are you talking about all those hospitals and charity organizations founded to help the poor and the sick? Are you talking about all those orphanages for abandoned children? Are you talking about all those prison ministries everywhere in the world? Are you talking about all the wicked universities founded and nurtured throughout history by the Catholic Church?

Exactly whose Gospels have you been reading, and what religion are you talking about?

Sounds like you are speaking of that damnably cruel atheist the Marquis de Sade, rather than a few buggering priests (atheists, of course, never bugger, or kill, or lie, or steal; and of course they have built oh so many hospitals and shelters for the poor and orphanages for abandoned children, and they have counseled oh so many men and women in prison and founded oh so many famous universities all through history.

Whew! 😃
Charles:

Quit confusing her with facts.

jd
 
Charlemagne II:
Sounds like you are speaking of that damnably cruel atheist the Marquis de Sade, rather than a few buggering priests (atheists, of course, never bugger, or kill, or lie, or steal;
And of course Catholics never do that either right?
and of course they have built oh so many hospitals and shelters for the poor and orphanages for abandoned children, and they have counseled oh so many men and women in prison and founded oh so many famous universities all through history.
Why is it that when a catholic builds something then all Catholics take credit for it? Look at us! We built something! Ok, good for you. Did you personally build those schools or homeless shelters or hospitals? How many people on the construction crew were catholics? All of them? Teams of people came together, sometimes thousands of people, most likely of several differen races and belief systems, to build these types of things. Then once it’s built it relies on tuition or funding from outside organizations and I know the catholic church isn’t funding every hospital or homeless shelter in the world either. If something has a St. Something in front of it that doesn’t mean that it’s because of the Catholics that it exists. I’m sure PLENTY of non-believers have had their hand in putting things together like this but they don’t put up signs saying “St. Nothing Hospital”.

Hospitals are typically funded by corporations, private foundations and individual donations. Doctors make money from the insurance companies. Many hospitals are “catholic” hospitals but that relates more to the belief system relating to health care more than anything else. The church is big but even it can’t afford to build that many hospitals unless it’s making a profit in which case the purpose of the hospital could be seen as a way to make more money rather than help people. Health care is a for profit industry in this country, not a charity because everyone cares about the less fortunate.

The quality of a university has to do with the quality of teachers at that school and the students willingness to learn. They also weed out the people who can’t cut it which keeps the overall GPA up of the school. Harvard’s reputation has to do with it’s quality as a center for learning and if you’re not a top student you get kicked out. It doesn’t have much to do with religion.
 
As an added noted, I will agree that many charities come from religious organizations such as the catholic church but that doesn’t mean catholic church is the only moral compass or has the only people that give to charity in some way.
 
And of course Catholics never do that either right?
It’s strange. Both sides do the same thing, I guess. I consider myself to be an authentic and real Catholic. As an authentic Catholic I cannot even conceive of an authentic, real Catholic “buggering” kids. It’s beyond my wildest imagination. I can imagine CINO catholics doing that. (“CINO” = Catholics In Name Only. As if you didn’t know!) But, not a real Catholic.

Likewise, I am sure that you believe the same thing about other Atheists, because you can’t conceive of you doing anything like that either. So, we’re left at an impasse. To tell the truth, I suspect that there must be degrees of Catholicism just as there are degrees of Atheism. The further one gets from one’s center of morality (for want of a better word) the easier it becomes to stray off the post, if you will.

I think name-calling is not going to ever bring us any closer, especially to the point of shaking hands. You have to admit, though, that the so-called Catholic who does do such heinous things has removed himself from any proximity to an authentic, Catholic moral compass. To some extent, I find it easier to navigate moral waters when I am given good directions and a sturdy boat. You must also admit - from your own personal experience - that most atheists you have known do not have good directions or a sturdy boat. That is not saying that You don’t.

I know that I can abstract my “Catholic” essence from myself, knowing me as a real Catholic, and re-materialize it into any “real” Catholic I meet and our two essences will combine like water into water. There will be no differences.

Can you really say that about you and some other atheist? Among your non-theist friends, are they all decent like you?

I’ll tell you a secret. When I was a practicing atheist, very few of my non-theist friends was like me. I was embarrassed to have them over to my house. Often, I was embarrassed to have them walk beside me. Later, when I checked my house, things might be missing.

I never had to worry about that with my Catholic friends. (If one of them wanted something of mine, they’d just outright tell me they were taking it!) No sneaking. No lying. So, I think you can agree that there is a difference.
Why is it that when a catholic builds something then all Catholics take credit for it? Look at us! We built something! Ok, good for you. Did you personally build those schools or homeless shelters or hospitals? How many people on the construction crew were catholics? All of them?
When we go to church, every Sunday, we put money into various collections. It is our money, from those collections that is used by the Church to build those “things”. Where Catholics can be used to do the work, often they are used. Where they can’t, such as in States that are heavily unionized, they can’t.
Teams of people came together, sometimes thousands of people, most likely of several differen races and belief systems, to build these types of things.
Yes, and they are paid by our contributions.
Then once it’s built it relies on tuition or funding from outside organizations and I know the catholic church isn’t funding every hospital or homeless shelter in the world either.
No one says we are. However, if it was not for the Catholic Church’s hospitals and homeless agencies, these United States would be an extraordinarily dismal place for a great many people.
If something has a St. Something in front of it that doesn’t mean that it’s because of the Catholics that it exists. I’m sure PLENTY of non-believers have had their hand in putting things together like this but they don’t put up signs saying “St. Nothing Hospital”.
I am afraid that if you spent the time to check out your assertion, you might be very saddened at what you might find. I’ll say no more, but, there are lots of resources for discovering who puts money into what.
Hospitals are typically funded by corporations, private foundations and individual donations.
The word I would remove is “typically”. You are herewith making an assertion that requires documentation or retraction.
Doctors make money from the insurance companies.
Doctors make money from their patients. Sometimes, insurance pays part of the bill.
Many hospitals are “catholic” hospitals but that relates more to the belief system relating to health care more than anything else. The church is big but even it can’t afford to build that many hospitals unless it’s making a profit in which case the purpose of the hospital could be seen as a way to make more money rather than help people.
If I am not mistaken, many, if not most, are run as not for profit entities.
Health care is a for profit industry in this country, not a charity because everyone cares about the less fortunate.
Again, upon spending some time looking into this matter, you might have to change your ways and join us!!
The quality of a university has to do with the quality of teachers at that school and the students willingness to learn. They also weed out the people who can’t cut it which keeps the overall GPA up of the school. Harvard’s reputation has to do with it’s quality as a center for learning and if you’re not a top student you get kicked out. It doesn’t have much to do with religion.
True, except that the Church spent its money to build it.

jd
 
Yep, and you also get those that are fed up of snowboarders telling them the have no morals, and they hate the great snowboarder in the sky, and thats the only reason they can accept the reality of this magical invisible snowboarder.
If you were fed up with religious people telling you those things, then it wouldn’t make much sense to join a religious discussion group. You would, instead, avoid religious discussions.
Then they want evolution taken out of biology class and replaced with snowboarding lessons.
If that’s what you’re worried about, how successful do you think you’ve been here on CAF, trying to convince people that your point of view is the correct one?
They don’t think their snowboarding clubs should pay tax. They dont want anyone to anything but snowboarding on a sunday bacause their in their snowboarding manual it says to stone to death anyone that does anything other then snowboarding on a sunday.
Maybe the snowboarders can’t see just how offensive they can be?
Again, we can’t be that offensive since people like yourself seem to find some enjoyment posting here. You do it quite a lot.

I also notice that just about everything you’re complaining about in the above quoted text is an exaggeration at best, and more often an outright fabrication.

So, you’re coming on the snowboarding site and claiming that snowboarders hate kittens and chocolate ice cream and then saying that this offends you.

So, I think the point stands. You’re joining a topic that you’re not interested in learning about and you have a lot of hostility towards God and religion.

If you’re trying to convince the Catholics here that they are offensive and ignorant, I think you really should try a different approach.
 
First, you said, “No atheist has anti-God views.” Document or retract.

Second, you said, “We ARE often against religious people, for some very good reasons.” What does it take to set you off? Just tell me and I’ll be very careful to not touch on those subjects.

Third, you said, “Because many religious people reject truth and seem to hate mankind.” Document or retract.

Fourth, you said, “So when we see suicide bombers…” you mean like the godless kamakazes did during the 2nd world war?

Fifth, you said, “…when we see 12 yr old girls being married into polygomy…”, I guess you mean like the godless Nazi’s who kept naked Jewish women caged for the pleasures of their soldiers.

Sixth, you said, “…when we see powerful priests, created that way by a church hierachy buggering children.” Document or retract.
I’ll second those requests for documentation or retraction.

Dame Edna may want to review the recent thread on “bad arguments that atheists often use” (I don’t have the exact title but it should be easy to find) because we’re seeing a number of those listed above.
 
j1akey

Why is it that when a catholic builds something then all Catholics take credit for it? Look at us! We built something! Ok, good for you. Did you personally build those schools or homeless shelters or hospitals?

The tradition to which Catholics belong built them in response to Christ preaching that we should tend to the sick. Likewise for orphanages, prison ministries, universities, etc. The university system that arose out of the Middle Ages, centered in Paris, was funded and built by the Catholic Church. Harvard University is a beneficiary of that tradition. This, of course, is not anything you will learn in your public schools, which are geared to focus only on those naughty Crusaders and Inquisitors, if they touch on Catholicism at all.

Where is the great tradition of atheism through the ages? There is none, for the simple reason that atheism builds nothing. It focuses only on tearing down … first God, then the Church, then every man’s hopes and dreams for life eternal.

There is a reason atheism has not gotten very far with the human race. Common sense.

What does atheism build? A big fat ZERO! 👍
 
A touching story. This is exactly what I would expect people to claim as a miracle. It’s also exactly why I don’t believe in such things. For anyone that wants to see the image in question:

http://www.wnd.com/images/angel.jpg
even if you can explain the Mysterious Light. You can’t explain the Miraculous, healing of the 14 year old girl, AFTER bieng taken off life support?(correct me if im wrong)
 
And of course Catholics never do that either right?

Why is it that when a catholic builds something then all Catholics take credit for it? Look at us! We built something! Ok, good for you. Did you personally build those schools or homeless shelters or hospitals? How many people on the construction crew were catholics? All of them? Teams of people came together, sometimes thousands of people, most likely of several differen races and belief systems, to build these types of things. Then once it’s built it relies on tuition or funding from outside organizations and I know the catholic church isn’t funding every hospital or homeless shelter in the world either. If something has a St. Something in front of it that doesn’t mean that it’s because of the Catholics that it exists. I’m sure PLENTY of non-believers have had their hand in putting things together like this but they don’t put up signs saying “St. Nothing Hospital”.

Hospitals are typically funded by corporations, private foundations and individual donations. Doctors make money from the insurance companies. Many hospitals are “catholic” hospitals but that relates more to the belief system relating to health care more than anything else. The church is big but even it can’t afford to build that many hospitals unless it’s making a profit in which case the purpose of the hospital could be seen as a way to make more money rather than help people. Health care is a for profit industry in this country, not a charity because everyone cares about the less fortunate.

The quality of a university has to do with the quality of teachers at that school and the students willingness to learn. They also weed out the people who can’t cut it which keeps the overall GPA up of the school. Harvard’s reputation has to do with it’s quality as a center for learning and if you’re not a top student you get kicked out. It doesn’t have much to do with religion.
Go ask someone from the Knights of Columbus. They actually built a sidewalk so Pro-lifers could protest at an abortion clinic. (you can’t protest on a street, onyl on sidewalk) and there was no sidewalk. They purposefully built a side walk for the sake of the pro-life movement.

Just a week ago, he youth group at my parish went to canada for a pilgrimage, and to help sick and injured people. Yes catholics do have ALOT of charity work. Charity is one of the 3 Theological Virtues.

on a 2nd point. The church is big but even it can’t afford to build that many hospitals unless it’s making a profit in which case the purpose of the hospital could be seen as a way to make more money rather than help people. Health care is a for profit industry in this country, not a charity because everyone cares about the less fortunate.

thats exactly it, we don’t make a profit. We give to Charity, thank you for proving my point.]
WE the Catholic Church, gives to Charity, to support places like these.
 
j1akey

Why is it that when a catholic builds something then all Catholics take credit for it? Look at us! We built something! Ok, good for you. Did you personally build those schools or homeless shelters or hospitals?

The tradition to which Catholics belong built them in response to Christ preaching that we should tend to the sick. Likewise for orphanages, prison ministries, universities, etc. The university system that arose out of the Middle Ages, centered in Paris, was funded and built by the Catholic Church. Harvard University is a beneficiary of that tradition. This, of course, is not anything you will learn in your public schools, which are geared to focus only on those naughty Crusaders and Inquisitors, if they touch on Catholicism at all.

Where is the great tradition of atheism through the ages? There is none, for the simple reason that atheism builds nothing. It focuses only on tearing down … first God, then the Church, then every man’s hopes and dreams for life eternal.

There is a reason atheism has not gotten very far with the human race. Common sense.

What does atheism build? A big fat ZERO! 👍
What I suspect the nonbelievers on this forum want to promote is not atheism at all, since as pretty much everyone has told you it is not a philosophy but only a lack of one particular belief. We therefore could never do anything in the name of atheism or share in the achievements of fellow atheists on the basis of being atheists. Our project is not to tear down religion though the end of religion is a byproduct of our goals. Instead our project is replace dreams of heaven for immortal souls with the hope of a better future for human beings. To the extent that Catholics or other religious people share our hope we can share in the pride of the achievement of our fellow humans in building new hospitals and the like as well as the religious can. And we can also take pride in the good work that the nonreligious achieve as well. In other words, atheists don’t draw the line in their “team-building” of good-work doers in the way you do. We draw it between working for heaven and working for humans on earth instead of between believers and disbelievers in God. Whoever works for mankind is on our side and whoever is not against us is with us. Unfortunately, those working for heaven are often against us in our work for a better earth.

Best,
Leela
 
Leela

*Whoever works for mankind is on our side and whoever is not against us is with us. Unfortunately, those working for heaven are often against us in our work for a better earth./I

Unfortunately, those working for a better earth do not realize the only way they will get it is by working for heaven. All good things come from God, and God wants us to earn all those good things by doing good for each other here on earth. All other attempts without God are vain, illusory, and sometimes downright evil (as in the notion that killing the unborn will make for a better earth).*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top