M
mVitus
Guest
Vatican II was valid. To hold it in error is to hold The Catholic Church in error which is a schismatic mindset.That must have been an after Vatican II teaching. Personally, I support only Traditional teachings.
Vatican II was valid. To hold it in error is to hold The Catholic Church in error which is a schismatic mindset.That must have been an after Vatican II teaching. Personally, I support only Traditional teachings.
It is not a doctrinal teaching. It never was. It was a disciplinary law of the church. Laws of the church can change, and do change as the times change.That must have been an after Vatican II teaching. Personally, I support only Traditional teachings.
A memorial mass and a funeral mass are not the same thing. We can offer a mass for anyone.I’ve been to the memorial Mass of somebody
Oh yes, sorry, I was thinking about just regular mass intentions.It was my understanding that the difference between a funeral and a memorial service is that the first one has a body present and the second one does not?
The fact is that the Catholic Church does not espouse the belief that cremation is only permitted under extreme circumstances. Not at all.Magart:![]()
That doesn’t mean cremation is ok. It could be a Novus Ordo cemetaryMany Catholic cemeteries have a columbarium which holds the cremation remains.
God can raise the cremated. The difference is why cremation is done. In the past some people have done cremation in snarky “try ressurecting this” kind of way. Others in a “now the spirit is freed from the body for eternity” kind of way. And other contra-Catholic ideals. So it’s not the cremation itself, but the reason behind the cremation.One thing I never understood about that ideology: if God is truly all powerful, and can resurrect our bodies, then why does it matter if they are reduced to ash or not before. When a body decays what was once part of it is used by other animals, plants, microbes, and a host of other things. Resurrecting such a body would be like IKEA furniture… some assembly required.
The Church did not prohibit cremation because of theological reason. It was a disciplinary measure due to early Christian bodies being mutilated and due to pagans destroying the body in opposition to the faith. It was to prevent scandal and confusion. Not because there is anything inherently wrong with cremation.One thing I never understood about that ideology: if God is truly all powerful, and can resurrect our bodies, then why does it matter if they are reduced to ash or not before.
Did they? Is there any evidence of this?In the past some people have done cremation in snarky “try ressurecting this” kind of way.