L
LilyM
Guest
But heaven isn’t static. God himself isn’t, on our understanding of him, so why would heaven be?I wouldn’t want a static heaven either.
But heaven isn’t static. God himself isn’t, on our understanding of him, so why would heaven be?I wouldn’t want a static heaven either.
If you think about it that’s really only 1 more hell destination than any Christian has on his (her) listLet’s suppose that atheists are wrong in their beliefs of the afterlife, and Hell exists even for them. Endless fire, suffering, demons, devils, never ever being happy – the whole shebang.
Would they be afraid of going to Hell?
As I believe in neither a heaven nor a hell nor any other concept of an afterlife, no. If I’m wrong, I’d hope to be graded on intent.Let’s suppose that atheists are wrong in their beliefs of the afterlife, and Hell exists even for them. Endless fire, suffering, demons, devils, never ever being happy – the whole shebang.
Would they be afraid of going to Hell?
The afterlife is eternal, therefore timeless or outside time; without time there is no change.But heaven isn’t static. God himself isn’t, on our understanding of him, so why would heaven be?
I think that believing in a god out of fear of eternal damnation is pretty a pretty poor reason. So no, I am no more afraid of going to your hell then you are of going to any of the hundreds or thousands of hells that you do not believe in.Would they be afraid of going to Hell?
That is correct. As a Christian, he should yearn for God out of love.I think that believing in a god out of fear of eternal damnation is pretty a pretty poor reason.
The reason a person is not afraid of going to Hell because he doesn’t know he has a soul.So no, I am no more afraid of going to your hell then you are of going to any of the hundreds or thousands of hells that you do not believe in.
What post of mine did you see?Mirdath,
I’ve got to admit, I am impressed with the way you have handled yourself here.
I only read one of your posts weeks ago and realized that your life view scared me in its darkness (for lack of a better term) so I’ve avoided you since.
But, I read this thread with interest and I wanted to tell you how reasoned and respectful you have been here, and I appreciate it. Although, not having read the other threads, I could be wrong?![]()
ThanksGod loved me,saved me even though I had done some very bad things in my life. Mirdath, I know how you feel about this subject, but when your time comes,just call out for Him.
perhaps static is a poor word for Heaven. Although static would describe hell, as growth and life and love is non existant. Unless degradation could be accounted for change, but it would be like changing around a room but the elements are the same old sofa and chairs.By the way, I’m pretty sure that to say that God is not static is a contradiction in terms for Catholics. If God is mutable, he must needs move from one state to another; yet only one state is Perfection, and God must be Perfect. If God thinks, he moves from incomplete knowledge to fuller knowledge, which is incompatible with omniscience. If God moves, he is not omnipresent because motion requires place within a larger frame of reference, and no such thing can exist for God. And if God changes, he is not omnipotent because it implies that he had a less than full range of action at some point. Mutability requires imperfection.
If so, it’s not an afterlife but a mere ‘other life’. Change implies both imperfection and an end, neither of which are attributes of heaven. This ‘other life’ is something I wouldn’t mind. Eternity, I’ll pass on.whereas Heaven would be the opposite. As the Creator God probably would not stop doing so, growth, life and love would continue.
Again, this is simply illogical and betrays a deep lack of philosophical understanding. In your world you can make up whatever source of authority you want and act accordingly. Hence Adolf Hitler’s morality was right because that’s what he created based on those things he accepted as morality. The same can be said for any individual. The concept of morality is by right a religious notion. There is no logical way to declare moral absolutes inside of atheistic world views. There is simply no rational way to declare any action “right” or “wrong.” Your little comment about having a right to life and property with the execption of marxist reveals just how non-existant atheist morality is. At best you’ve got a barbaric concept that dictates you can do whatever you want as long as you’re powerful enough to do it. In short, might makes right. Such beliefs are hostile to moral concepts, as such the best an atheist could be is amoral.Non-theistic morality need not be subjective. It’s perfectly rational to claim that all have a right to life and to property (or not if you’re Marxist) without requiring belief in a deity. Authority is what you make it, not what someone else does, as in religion – and if you disobey that which is commonly held authoritative, you’re kicked out. It’s how societies function.
I really hate to break it to you but unless your part of the .0001 percent of human elites (and you’re not) nothing you do has any ramifactions in the world while you’re alive, let alone afterwards.99.999 percent of the population spends 1/3 or more of their lives working to just get enough resources to survive and the largest bulk of the world’s population doesn’t have much success with that. Another 1/3 asleep somewhere accounting right there for the greatest bulk of a human’s existence in the atheist world view. What you really mean to say is that you find it neccessary to delude yourself into believing there is meaning to your life which in reality is pointless in the grand scheme of things because the reality is your world view requires it. I’m a realist and that requires accepting that just like everybody else this world does not require me. Getting grounded and having to dig up deluded and silly meanings from the things of this world is a pointless and illogical task. True meaning is found only when a person can rise above this pointless and brief stay in an imperfect world.If you can’t find meaning in just your own lifespan, I pity you. Even without an afterlife, there is still much good that can be done – and once again, you don’t have to believe in any higher power to do that. You don’t have to rely on others to find meaning in life, you can make it for yourself.
Actually, you’ve made some asinine statements that have no grounding in fact. So contrary to the statement that you’ll well educated in Christian theology you’ve displayed that you know little to nothing about it. Reading inane atheist rantings that profess to explain Christianity, if you even done that, hardly makes for an understanding of Christian theology. I’m sorry, but someone busy with the occassional drug overdose is hardly going to have time for study the Christian theology, or any other type. The reality is a person like you is an atheist to excuse their poor behavior, it has nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing with a faith you don’t even understand. So am I going to reexamine my understanding of Christian theology because a drug addict who admitts to repeated overdoses says I’m wrong? Of course not, that would be idiotic. It’s rather like being asked to reexamine your understanding of mutual funds because a crack whore things you’re wrong.Your understanding of how non-theists view the world betrays quite a bit in itself. I’m not arguing from a theist perspective, let alone a Christian, let alone a Catholic specifically (in which I am quite well-educated, by the way) – they’re all different, and generally mutually exclusive. It’s not in my interests to do so. I do not misrepresent, I find it wrong and argue for that. If it seems to you that my perspective is ‘too different’ to be right, might I suggest reexamining your own?
And take responsibility for it, instead of passing the buck to God or Satan. I am the author of my own actions and do not deny that. Why make up a god for your moral authority when you yourself are perfectly capable of it?In your world you can make up whatever source of authority you want and act accordingly.
If the people around Hitler had had the moral strength to be responsible themselves, he would never have come into a position where his dangerous beliefs could affect others. And don’t even try passing him over to the non-theist side; he was a Christian (and at least claimed Catholicism, starting from his youth as an altar boy) and promoted his religious as well as his secular beliefs rather vigorously in his usual way.Hence Adolf Hitler’s morality was right because that’s what he created based on those things he accepted as morality. The same can be said for any individual.
Read Kant. The Categorical Imperative does not depend on the existence of a god or on the truth of religion, and it’s excruciatingly reasoned out. And it’s not the only such philosophy of morals.The concept of morality is by right a religious notion. There is no logical way to declare moral absolutes inside of atheistic world views. There is simply no rational way to declare any action “right” or “wrong.”
Are you even capable of discussing this without resorting to ignorant ad-hominems and insults? You’ve obviously not thought this through at all, and using big words like ‘barbaric’ (Your little comment about having a right to life and property with the execption of marxist reveals just how non-existant atheist morality is. At best you’ve got a barbaric concept that dictates you can do whatever you want as long as you’re powerful enough to do it. In short, might makes right. Such beliefs are hostile to moral concepts, as such the best an atheist could be is amoral.
I’m not? That’s what you think… And even assuming I’m not, what changes I can make to the face of the earth don’t matter at all. Meaning in life is not about who can leave the biggest dent, it’s deeply personal and does not have to have any obvious effect after you’ve passed on.I really hate to break it to you but unless your part of the .0001 percent of human elites (and you’re not) nothing you do has any ramifactions in the world while you’re alive, let alone afterwards.
What grand scheme? There doesn’t have to be one. As for true meaning, I’m doing fine without your approval or a god’s. Just because I’m not looking to be raised up on eagle’s wings doesn’t mean I can’t transcend the mundane every second in my own way.What you really mean to say is that you find it neccessary to delude yourself into believing there is meaning to your life which in reality is pointless in the grand scheme of things because the reality is your world view requires it. I’m a realist and that requires accepting that just like everybody else this world does not require me. Getting grounded and having to dig up deluded and silly meanings from the things of this world is a pointless and illogical task. True meaning is found only when a person can rise above this pointless and brief stay in an imperfect world.
Junkie, Hitler, check. I’m going for the hat trick! You missed ‘queer’, try better next time.Actually, you’ve made some asinine statements that have no grounding in fact. So contrary to the statement that you’ll well educated in Christian theology you’ve displayed that you know little to nothing about it. Reading inane atheist rantings that profess to explain Christianity, if you even done that, hardly makes for an understanding of Christian theology. I’m sorry, but someone busy with the occassional drug overdose is hardly going to have time for study the Christian theology, or any other type. The reality is a person like you is an atheist to excuse their poor behavior, it has nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing with a faith you don’t even understand. So am I going to reexamine my understanding of Christian theology because a drug addict who admitts to repeated overdoses says I’m wrong? Of course not, that would be idiotic. It’s rather like being asked to reexamine your understanding of mutual funds because a crack whore things you’re wrong.
(not looking at the other conversation happening just looking at this one (just to keep this part straight hope that makes sense)If so, it’s not an afterlife but a mere ‘other life’. Change implies both imperfection and an end, neither of which are attributes of heaven. This ‘other life’ is something I wouldn’t mind. Eternity, I’ll pass on.
But a atheist or agnostic is capable of understanding Truth when it comes across their path. Truth statedAgain, this is simply illogical and betrays a deep lack of philosophical understanding. In your world you can make up whatever source of authority you want and act accordingly. Hence Adolf Hitler’s morality was right because that’s what he created based on those things he accepted as morality. The same can be said for any individual. The concept of morality is by right a religious notion. There is no logical way to declare moral absolutes inside of atheistic world views. There is simply no rational way to declare any action “right” or “wrong.” Your little comment about having a right to life and property with the execption of marxist reveals just how non-existant atheist morality is. At best you’ve got a barbaric concept that dictates you can do whatever you want as long as you’re powerful enough to do it. In short, might makes right. Such beliefs are hostile to moral concepts, as such the best an atheist could be is amoral.
Slowly dieing is a very lonely experience. Even surrounded by loved ones and prayers. No one can die for you. Jesus was the only one who did that. He is hope and trust at that time. You will have to trust your loved ones to Him. Control is taking completely away from you. I hope you find Him, TimI don’t know how I’m going to react, given that my experiences with death aren’t really comparable, but I don’t see myself getting religion so much as depending even more on my loved ones (they’re going to have so much fun with that… my sweetheart is already threatening to short-sheet my hospital bed)
I’m getting distinctly bad vibes from a certain direction, but that doesn’t particularly faze me.This thread is painful to read. I wish there was something I could say to make it click. Tim