Atheists Seek to Erect ‘No Gods’ Display at Arkansas Capitol After Ten Commandments Approved

  • Thread starter Thread starter Son_of_Niall
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Then it should be a stone or plaque with nothing on it.🙂
Kind of like blank stone tablets! 🙂 Sort of funny when you think God will just inscribe His Laws on them again! You can’t defeat God. 👍
 
Kind of like blank stone tablets! 🙂 Sort of funny when you think God will just inscribe His Laws on them again! You can’t defeat God. 👍
So, put up blank tablets and wait for God to inscribe what He wants on them.

(I hope he includes the one about not seething a kid in its mother’s milk. (Exodus 23:19) Lots of people leave that one out. 🙂 )

rossum
 
In the beginning, chance created the Heavens and the Earth”.

Something to that effect. 😛
 
So, put up blank tablets and wait for God to inscribe what He wants on them.

(I hope he includes the one about not seething a kid in its mother’s milk. (Exodus 23:19) Lots of people leave that one out. 🙂 )

rossum
Some Jewish scholars believe that specific prohibitory law, written out of context with the passages that surround it, has been seriously misinterpreted ever since to indicate there should be a separation of meat and milk products as part of the kosher laws.

There are several opposing interpretations. Two of these include not boiling a kid in its OWN mother’s milk, which stands as a specific prohibition not meant to be generalized to other animals and saying nothing about boiling a kid in ANOTHER mother’s milk. A different interpretation, this one proposed by Maimonides, is that the prohibition was really against idolatry and had little to do with dietary law. In particular, the Canaanites had a ritual practice that involved boiling goats in their mother’s milk, and Jews were forbidden to engage in similar idolatrous customs.

Besides, it has been pointed out that in Genesis 18, Abraham mixes meat with milk products when he serves his guests. However, the rebuttal to this argument is that this behavior took place before the Law was given to Moses. Nonetheless, it is said in the Talmud that Abraham instinctively obeyed the entire Law even before it was written by Moses. (The Law is thought to have existed forever, including before the creation of the universe.) Another explanation is that Abraham knew he was serving Gentiles, not Jews, so it was permissible to prepare such a meal so long as he did not partake in the event. Yet another possibility is that Abraham served the dairy food portion PRIOR to the meat, which is permissible according to kosher law (except for hard cheeses).

I realize this is all off-topic but it is you who mentioned this particular law and therefore you asked for it!
 
So, put up blank tablets and wait for God to inscribe what He wants on them.

(I hope he includes the one about not seething a kid in its mother’s milk. (Exodus 23:19) Lots of people leave that one out. 🙂 )

rossum
It must have been, what, a few hundred centuries since anyone had to look that one up as a punishment. Have you encountered many Christians who have told you they’ve punished someone in this manner??? :confused:
 
And how are they going to pay for this? Stock options? Bartering? Or use the " in God we trust " Cash:p

MJ
 
… “I don’t know and, as far as I’m aware, no one does either” …
No one? You must have a small circle of acquaintences.
I don’t know how Richard Nixon could have won. I don’t know anybody who voted for him. – New Yorker columnist Pauline Kael after Richard Nixon’s sweeping presidential victory in 1972
With the incredible popularity of recent books championing agnosticism or atheism, many people might never know that such books almost completely ignore the considerable evidence for theism uncovered in both physics and philosophy over the past four decades. New Proofs for the Existence of God responds to these glaring omissions. / From universal space-time asymmetry to cosmic coincidences to the intelligibility of reality, Robert Spitzer tackles a wealth of evidence. He considers string theory, quantum cosmology, mathematical thoughts on infinity, and much more. / This fascinating and stunning collection of evidence provides solid grounding for reasonable and responsible belief in a super-intelligent, transcendent, creative power standing at the origins of our universe.
 
No one? You must have a small circle of acquaintences.
Yeah, right… from that amazon link: “This fascinating and stunning collection of evidence provides solid grounding for reasonable and responsible belief in a super-intelligent, transcendent, creative power standing at the origins of our universe.”

(my underline)
Notice that belief is still required… in that case, knowledge is still missing.
Oh well… what’s to be expected of a philosopher/priest who knows a thing or two about physics, but has been out of touch for a while?

My circle of friends stands as not knowing about what happens prior (if this word makes sense in the context) to the Big Bang.
 
Yeah, right… from that amazon link: “This fascinating and stunning collection of evidence provides solid grounding for reasonable and responsible belief in a super-intelligent, transcendent, creative power standing at the origins of our universe.”

(my underline)
Notice that belief is still required… in that case, knowledge is still missing.
Oh well… what’s to be expected of a philosopher/priest who knows a thing or two about physics, but has been out of touch for a while?

My circle of friends stands as not knowing about what happens prior (if this word makes sense in the context) to the Big Bang.
I think you should read the book before judging.
 
So you had belief in them?
Are you wanting to equate belief in the reviews people made of a book with belief in the existence of an extraordinary being who may have kick-started the Universe, but leaving so little evidence of it that it’s practically the same as not existing, however people ~5 thousand years ago managed to get in touch with it, but mistook it for several such beings, each in charge of a different natural “force”?
 
Would you accept an “I don’t know and, as far as I’m aware, no one does either” for an answer?
I would and do accept “I don’t know” because I say this every day. This is the mystery of faith that we believe (without any scientific proof) every day. Our belief in God includes our belief that He created all things and keep us in continued existence through His Will. Yes, no one on earth today really knows how the universe started but Christians believe. We believe. God bless you. 👍
 
Are you wanting to equate belief in the reviews people made of a book with belief in the existence of an extraordinary being who may have kick-started the Universe, but leaving so little evidence of it that it’s practically the same as not existing, however people ~5 thousand years ago managed to get in touch with it, but mistook it for several such beings, each in charge of a different natural “force”?
This is exactly why the Incarnation came into the world. To explain to us the answer as to why we are here, how we should live our lives and give us a gift of redemption by demonstrating the ultimate gift of His sacrifice of Himself for our sins. Oh and He also left a community of believers behind with the instruction to teach His Word to all nations and bring them into the faith through the Sacraments. It would seem that God did not abandon His people after all. The evidence is all around you, the Body of Christ, us.
 
I would and do accept “I don’t know” because I say this every day. This is the mystery of faith that we believe (without any scientific proof) every day. Our belief in God includes our belief that He created all things and keep us in continued existence through His Will. Yes, no one on earth today really knows how the universe started but Christians believe. We believe. God bless you. 👍
Thanks for a very honest reply. 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top