Atheists:

  • Thread starter Thread starter bradwill911
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Evidence.

And I like chemicals, I think chemicals are beautiful magical and awesome. I don’t find it degrading at all. I go to class and at the end of every lecture have my mind recover from an explosion of awesomeness.

The universe is rather awesome if you give it a chance, you don’t need fairytales to make it more so. I find the known amazing enough the unknown does not do it for me, mysteries and all that jaz, well other than solving them I don’t like them. Mysteries are there to be solved.
What evidence? Please enlighten me. Even still, belief in the known does not exclude belief in the unknown. A true scholar never shuts anything out without honest study. The human mind isn’t capable of knowing everything there is to know. We aren’t that perfect.
 
It is that black and white. The church and Millions and millions of believers have a belief in GOD and the afterlife and on the other hand you have however many that deny it and say when you are dead you are gone …NOTHING! Why would you not at least WANT to believe in the afterlife. It is mind boggling.
In all honesty, I’d rather die than go to heaven. I don’t like the idea of immortality; it’s too meaningless through my eyes. :dts: In dying, at least I had finished my part in contributing to the world and its inhabitants in any way that I could have, and finally letting the next generation take the torch. 🙂
 
But the middle ages is when people were put under house arrest for discovering that we were not the center of the galaxy let alone our universe… Why would you want to go there? Plus no internet… No LCD screens…
Well, we are all sinners. Change comes hard, and some people just can’t accept good change. The internet and LCD screens are not required for happiness. I could give them up if I had to.🙂
 
In all honesty, I’d rather die than go to heaven. I don’t like the idea of immortality; it’s too meaningless through my eyes. :dts: In dying, at least I had finished my part in contributing to the world and its inhabitants in any way that I could have, and finally letting the next generation take the torch. 🙂
Depends on your definition of immortality. If you take the general meaning, it means living forever. In the Christan meaning, it means existing outside of time, living in timelessness.
To turn your back on ultimate bliss and rapture for oblivion is one of the things that I can’t understand.
 
Depends on your definition of immortality. If you take the general meaning, it means living forever. In the Christan meaning, it means existing outside of time, living in timelessness.
To turn your back on ultimate bliss and rapture for oblivion is one of the things that I can’t understand.
It simply depends on your own perceptions. That’s what makes people and their beliefs and their desires so very different. That’s step 1 to understanding it: This is a diverse world, and there’s really nothing that can change that. The only time when the world will be at peace is either when 1) The earth is under attack by meteors or aliens or 2) We finally realize that we’re just different and accept our diversity.
 
I enjoy dialoguing with people who have different views.

It’s really not that simple is it? Let’s suppose that there is a god but instead of god being the god of Christianity, he turns out to be the god of radical Islam. If you convince me to accept the god of the Catholic church you really aren’t doing me any good.

What if god is the OT god and Jesus isn’t the saviour? You would be convincing me to believe in the Trinity and I would then be commiting idolatry.

What if the Catholic view of god is all wrong and god really turns out to be the god of the Seventh Day Adventists? Convincing me to become Catholic will also doom me.

Just believing in god doesn’t seem to get someone to their heavenly reward. It appears one has to also believe the correct creeds and dogma about god in order to be able to obtain heaven.

If there is no god it is a very compassionate thing to show you the error of your faith.
I apologize for just getting to this. This thread is difficult to follow for a simpleton like myself. You ask some very good questions. I have asked myself some of these same questions. Ironically, I was a cradle Catholic who was pulled away from the RCC after attending a Bible study run by the Seventh Day Adventists. After spending several years as a non-practicing “Christian” I was eventually led back into studying Scripture by a Muslim. I have friends of almost every religious persuasion. You are right, there is some deciding and I could be wrong. I’ve accepted that I could be wrong, but I don’t think I could accept not believing at all. I’ve seen and experienced enough to know, personally, that God does indeed exist. I’ve studied enough to personally believe that the Christian God is the one, true God. I’ve studied enough Christian Salvation History and Scripture to become convinced that Catholicism is the Christian Church. It wasn’t merely an intellectual acceptance, it was done with prayer and faith, of course. Again, I realize that I could be wrong, I just don’t believe that I am.

The problem is proving it, and I’m afraid that we both know that it is not something that we can prove in a way that everyone will be satisfied. Christians believe that Jesus performed miracles, and this was not enough to prove it to the skeptics of those times. But I would ask you if you believe in love between a husband and wife? Can you reproduce it in a lab or prove it in any definitive way? Aside from acts of devotion, which also exist in religion, how do you know that spousal love exists? This exercise proves nothing, I realize, but neither position (theist or atheist) can really be proven in the sense that would make anyone 100% certain.

What I do not believe is how you consider it compassionate to convince a believer that there is no god, even if you are correct. As I’ve stated elsewhere, there are no eternal benefits or penalties if the Christian is wrong. What are you going to free a Christian from? Feeding the hungry? Anyways, I guess I just disagree with that. Peace.
 
I understand that intelligence is more complicated than my simple, vague question. My question is not about some study that you have read that suggests an inverse relationship between religiosity and IQ. My question is whether you, Abbadon, perceive yourself to be generally more intelligent (however you wish to define “intelligence”) than a person who believes in God.

Don’t, I beg, make it a more difficult question than it is. I may have well asked you whether you perceive yourself to be a better driver than the average driver. It would not need any in depth traffic studies or the like. I’m just asking your opinion.
Okay I consider intelligence the ability to work things out. I would not consider a deist unintelligent but a theist who prescribes himself to a specific religion has not been able to yet work out that it is a mythology like all others.

That said my mother who is a catholic has said many profound truths all lacking an education and without ever having read a philosophy book, all except for there probably is no god and my religion is so shamelessly made up just like all the others.

So there are many factors that contribute to what I think is someones general intelligence. Had my mother received an education and not been indoctrinated and had a harsh childhood… Many many factors. However I would still say my mother is of equal intelligence if not greater to me.

I scored within the top 5 percentile for my state (which can be extrapolated to country, Australia) so it’s safe to say I am more intelligent that most people. So by default I am more intelligent than most religious people.

Sorry but I like all my opinions to be reasoned and evidence based. That’s just the way I desire to be. I always try to never have “faith” in anything and assume as little as possible.
 
It simply depends on your own perceptions. That’s what makes people and their beliefs and their desires so very different. That’s step 1 to understanding it: This is a diverse world, and there’s really nothing that can change that. The only time when the world will be at peace is either when 1) The earth is under attack by meteors or aliens or 2) We finally realize that we’re just different and accept our diversity.
So what if the world is diverse? That only means that humans are intelligent enough to take information and interpret it in different ways. Not all beliefs are created equal, some are far more likely and logical than others, and some are just plain weird.
Humans can never be expected to find the truth without some kind of standard to go by, a standard that is strong but flexible. That is how science has worked, discovering objective truth by applying the same principles to the different situations. It has taken different beliefs, studied them, and then tossed out the trash, so to speak. There is no reason why this process could not work for religion.
 
Simple.

The moderates allow the dangerous fundamentalists, of any faith, to lurk in the shadows and plot our destruction and that of our great Western civilization, in the name of their God.
Well, I consider myself fairly moderate, but I agree that fundamentalists can be dangerous. I think religious fundamentalism can be dangerous, just like secular fundamentalism can also be dangerous. I’d be curious how you think someone like me is lurking in the shadows trying to plot the destruction of your great Western civilization.
 
What evidence? Please enlighten me. Even still, belief in the known does not exclude belief in the unknown. A true scholar never shuts anything out without honest study. The human mind isn’t capable of knowing everything there is to know. We aren’t that perfect.
If it is unknown how can you know about it?

Oh look I admit everything is possible. I continuously cross my fingers and hope faeries are real. I read many comics and fantasy novels and play and entertain my self constantly with the fictional. But without any evidence in faeries I shall leave my imaginings to rule #34 for there is no point believing in something that I cannot possibly know. It just doesn’t help me to draw an image about the world in which I live in.
 
Well, we are all sinners. Change comes hard, and some people just can’t accept good change. The internet and LCD screens are not required for happiness. I could give them up if I had to.🙂
I’m sure you could but the internet is essential to my happiness…
 
Okay I consider intelligence the ability to work things out. I would not consider a deist unintelligent but a theist who prescribes himself to a specific religion has not been able to yet work out that it is a mythology like all others.

That said my mother who is a catholic has said many profound truths all lacking an education and without ever having read a philosophy book, all except for there probably is no god and my religion is so shamelessly made up just like all the others.

So there are many factors that contribute to what I think is someones general intelligence. Had my mother received an education and not been indoctrinated and had a harsh childhood… Many many factors. However I would still say my mother is of equal intelligence if not greater to me.

I scored within the top 5 percentile for my state (which can be extrapolated to country, Australia) so it’s safe to say I am more intelligent that most people. So by default I am more intelligent than most religious people.

Sorry but I like all my opinions to be reasoned and evidence based. That’s just the way I desire to be. I always try to never have “faith” in anything and assume as little as possible.
Got it, thanks for the response. Sorry the first 2 times were too vague. My point isn’t to debate this with you, but rather just to collect data. Might I ask if you have been formally educated at the university level and also what you studied? If not, that’s fine. I appreciate your answers.
 
So what if the world is diverse? That only means that humans are intelligent enough to take information and interpret it in different ways. Not all beliefs are created equal, some are far more likely and logical than others, and **some are just plain weird.**Humans can never be expected to find the truth without some kind of standard to go by, a standard that is strong but flexible. That is how science has worked, discovering objective truth by applying the same principles to the different situations. It has taken different beliefs, studied them, and then tossed out the trash, so to speak. There is no reason why this process could not work for religion.
Yeah, you’re telling me. :rolleyes: But unfortunately, I have to deal with people who have completely different views than I do. Yeah, sometimes I may look down at them, or wonder why they would believe in something so farfetched, but the majority of the time, I just put up with it, and don’t talk. Now, I’ll carry on in a friendly debate, but I know that I have to be careful because the believers (no matter what religion) confuse belief with truth. Sincerely, that’s okay with me. :o There are just some people who need their religion, and if it helps them sleep at night, then, I won’t complain… unless they start fighting for it-- that’s when you have to put your foot down. :cool:
 
If it is unknown how can you know about it?

Oh look I admit everything is possible. I continuously cross my fingers and hope faeries are real. I read many comics and fantasy novels and play and entertain my self constantly with the fictional. But without any evidence in faeries I shall leave my imaginings to rule #34 for there is no point believing in something that I cannot possibly know. It just doesn’t help me to draw an image about the world in which I live in.
Yes, but it is important to distinguish what we can know from what we can’t.
Take God. He is supposed to be infinitely greater than us, so we are nothing compared to Him. As an analogy, take an ant. An ant could not possibly hope to understand a human being on its own, because an ant has little to no intelligence, understanding, or reasoning skills. If an ant is to know about a human, the human would have to show themselves to the ant, basically tell the ant everything. Maybe even become an ant to speak to them on their level. So it is with God. He is much greater than us than we are to an ant, and if we are to know Him, He would have to do all the work. So he did, becoming man in the person of Jesus Christ. He introduced Himself to us, knowing we couldn’t find Him ourselves. So if you are hoping for science to discover God, you’ll be waiting till the end of time. Humans aren’t capable of knowing things infinitely greater than ourselves. The only way to find God is to surrender your pride and stop looking for Him. He will find you. Easier said than done…
 
Yeah, you’re telling me. :rolleyes: But unfortunately, I have to deal with people who have completely different views than I do. Yeah, sometimes I may look down at them, or wonder why they would believe in something so farfetched, but the majority of the time, I just put up with it, and don’t talk. Now, I’ll carry on in a friendly debate, but I know that I have to be careful because the believers (no matter what religion) confuse belief with truth. Sincerely, that’s okay with me. :o There are just some people who need their religion, and if it helps them sleep at night, then, I won’t complain… unless they start fighting for it-- that’s when you have to put your foot down. :cool:
I see your point, but I don’t agree. If one has been blessed with the Truth, he/she has an obligation to spread it. Now it is up to humans to separate Truth from Lies, but you have to read by light, not by darkness, if you know what I mean.
 
I see your point, but I don’t agree. If one has been blessed with the Truth, he/she has an obligation to spread it. Now it is up to humans to separate Truth from Lies, but you have to read by light, not by darkness, if you know what I mean.
That’s the ugly part. Truth comes in different forms. Now, there are definitely lies out there, but it depends on you. What makes you comfortable, what makes you feel blessed, whatever gives you the strength to go on.

A wonderful Tuesday to all, and to all, a sinister night! ❤️

Ironically Yours, Blade and Blood

(Don’t worry, I’ll be back tomorrow. 🙂 )
 
That’s the ugly part. Truth comes in different forms. Now, there are definitely lies out there, but it depends on you. What makes you comfortable, what makes you feel blessed, whatever gives you the strength to go on.

A wonderful Tuesday to all, and to all, a sinister night! ❤️

Ironically Yours, Blade and Blood

(Don’t worry, I’ll be back tomorrow. 🙂 )
No, Truth is what IS, not what is most comfortable to each individual person. If Truth was subjective, then reality would be different for everyone. Things just aren’t like that. Everyone is affected by the law of gravity, whether they want to or not. I could be more comfortable with 2+2=5, but no amount of wishful thinking will change the answer to that equation. If Truth isn’t objective, than there is no reason to pursue it when you could simply make your own. But that is your conclusion, it can’t also be your premise without begging the question. So it is imperative then, that one gets it right, for it can have eternal consequences.
 
Got it, thanks for the response. Sorry the first 2 times were too vague. My point isn’t to debate this with you, but rather just to collect data. Might I ask if you have been formally educated at the university level and also what you studied? If not, that’s fine. I appreciate your answers.
I have a degree in Industrial (Product) Design (Bachelor of Architecture and Design)… But it may as well have been an arts degree >.< finishing uni at the begging of a recession I decided I may as well do another one since I can and I desire to avoid actually working as long as possible. So now I am studying Science (major in Genetics and Biochemistry)

If your just collecting data you should make a more simple question.

Do you think the average religious person is an idiot?
Do you think you are an idiot?

I’m sure you could replace religious with atheist and ask religious people and you would get (I am hypothesizing) statistically similar answers.

Or perhaps ask the two questions on scales of 1 - 10
Asking the question you asked me is rather vauge. Or you could ask

On a scale of 1 - 10 what do you perceive to be the intelligence of the average religious person relative to the general population?
I would answer 3.9
On a scale of 1 - 10 what do you percieve to be your intelligence compared to the general population?
I would answer > 9.2
 
As much as I would like to continue talking, I must retire for the night. I’ll be back tomorrow:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top