T
thunderboom
Guest
Have I mentioned the word “rant” before? Talk about hysterical reactionaries…You clearly didn’t even look at my link and you’ve completely lost me with that last post??
donymacmanus.com/drawings.html
Have I mentioned the word “rant” before? Talk about hysterical reactionaries…You clearly didn’t even look at my link and you’ve completely lost me with that last post??
donymacmanus.com/drawings.html
Only following God will save the world.Objection: “But back to the question of nude modeling - we don’t need more of it and draping it in the “glory of God” does not make it more palatable. There is a culture war going on and I’m not the only one talking about it. As Catholics, we need to win it. I refuse to be silent. And more nude paintings is not the answer.”
On the contrary: Dostoevsky once said, “Beauty will save the world.”
I answer that: “Those works of art which have scooped up the truth and presented it to us as a living force - they take hold of us, compel us, and nobody ever, not even in ages to come, will appear to refute them,” says Alexandr Solzhenitsyn. Because when truth and goodness have been beaten down and eliminated in the name of secularism and tolerance, “Then perhaps the fantastic, unpredictable, unexpected stems of Beauty will push through and soar to that very same place, and in so doing will fulfil the work of all three?”
So, if we listen to one of the great voices in this “culture war,” it is clear that more nude paintings IS in fact the answer. If, as you assert, art has been corrupted, we need to rescue nude paintings and indeed again drape them in the glory of God!!! We need to use art - including nude art - to bring people back to the proper idea of human dignity that the Church teaches us! The answer is not to stop making nude paintings - the answer is to make more and better nude paintings that glorify the human person, portray the correct image of human dignity, and bring glory to God the Creator! And then beauty will indeed save the world.
I don’t believe that last statement is generally true. People are celebrating a lot of things in the media - virtue is not one of them.I think you have misunderstood me and I guess I didn’t express myself very well. I didn’t say people don’t care, I know they do, I know that very well. I was referring to the way that, most of the time, a person who we know is dying is in the hospital and attached to monitors rather than at home in their own bed. There a lot of reasons for this and many of them are good reasons or just the way it is now but it does mean that, in general, we have become separated from the process of death. We don’t see it happening as we grow up, as children once did, and so it is a shock when we are confronted by even a natural ‘old age’ death. Death is seen as something to be feared and hidden rather than a natural thing that will happen to us all. That’s not everyone’s experience of course and it’s less so for those with strong faith, but it’s true for most people in the west today.
Back to nude modelling - the point I was trying to make is that we won’t get rid of pornography by banning nude modelling or art. Nude art doesn’t treat the body as a collection of parts for exploitation, it’s a celebration of the beauty of the human form.![]()
If you notice the content of what I wrote, bringing beauty to the world is clearly an act of following God.Only following God will save the world.
True, but I don’t always have that option, unless I want to draw still-lifes all the timeYou would learn a lot more by drawing from real life than from a photo. The detail of a photo is dots or pixels; you can’t get any closer (or further away) than the photographer got. There is a lot of important detail missing from most photographs. Also, the colours are only approximate - if they are accurate at all.
"If we cannot have common values, common truths, sufficient communication on the essentials of human life–how to live how to respond to the great challenges of human life–then true society becomes impossible."
The Holy Father says nothing about abandoning the quest for beauty and allowing it to shine through the arts. The artist who I posted about previously has met with the Pope and the Holy Father Shares his hope to set up a School of Art in Florence.I only ask that you ask yourself about what beauty means to the average person today. It means young women dressing like prostitutes and the same for many celebrities, or wearing less on the internet. Today, real beauty is buried under a mountain of 100% pure, unadulterated filth.
If real beauty is to return, it has certain requirements:
Respect for self.
Respect for others.
Modesty
Decency
Civility and decorum.
Standard rules for dating, courtship, engagement and marriage.
Right now, the answer is to abandon at least 95% of current media output. And a few words from Pope Benedict:
‘Society today needs clear voices which propose our right to live, not in a jungle of self-destructive and arbitrary freedoms, but in a society which works for the true welfare of its citizens and offers them guidance and protection in the face of their weakness and fragility.’
‘There are many temptations placed before you every day – drugs, money, sex, pornography, alcohol – which the world tells you will bring you happiness, yet these things are destructive and divisive. There is only one thing which lasts: the love of Jesus Christ personally for each one of you. Search for him, know him and love him, and he will set you free from slavery to the glittering but superficial existence frequently proposed by today’s society. Put aside what is worthless and learn of your own dignity as children of God.’
And I write the following with great sorry. As I was growing up, I saw many photos of smiling mothers holding their smiling babies. My mother is old now, but she is not in a home, she is living with me and other family members.
If we can be so insensitive to life to kill our own unborn children.
If we can be so insensitive to the profanity and sexuality and dysfunctionality we see on TV and in the movies. And in public.
If we can be so insensitive to seeing porn, and going to strip clubs and topless bars to see our neighbors’ children being exploited for money.
If we have become so desensitized that we spend hours seeing all these things and the feeling that it’s all in a fog which we pass through - while feeling nothing - We need to ask ourselves: Who are we?
Only then can beauty be restored. We have the answer:
"The Holy Father says:
Peace,Code:"If we cannot have common values, common truths, sufficient communication on the essentials of human life–how to live how to respond to the great challenges of human life–then true society becomes impossible."
Ed
And you endorse girls dressing this way?I agree, but when we are in a state of grace we don’t have that pull to look at a certain women, or lust, it’s like everything falls away and we can actually look at a women or man and not lust. That is the greatest feeling ever when we(or I at least) can walk down a street at a university with girls dressed in the most skimpiest clothing and not have that pull to look and lust at them.![]()
Thank you for your courageous post. As others have said, we need to regain Christian art, to find God in our depictions of the human body, male and female. We need to be a beacon for the rest of our culture that falls for the evil one’s lies about the body. In that vein, yours is a beautiful service that I hope and pray no one abuses. If you have any doubts, try to see some of the artist’s or art director’s work first to see that your body will be respected. Maybe during your session you can say a rosary with your fingers for these intentions. God bless!Since I have volunteered to model for at least one session of an upcoming figure drawing workshop, I would like to add my (name removed by moderator)ut.
I believe that nude modeling is acceptable under the premise that it is not done for purposes that are intended to incite lust (e.g.: pornography). We believe, as Catholics, that our bodies “are created in the image and likeness of God” (Genesis 1:26). That said, the (naked) human body can be portrayed in a way that represents the beauty of the person as God intended them to be through works of art, whether it be by figure drawing; a painting; or a sculpture. After all, shouldn’t we “glorifying God in our bodies” (1 Corinthians 6:20). However, the human body can also be seen in a way that is used for lustful purposes. In this case, nude modeling would not be permissible since the purpose would one that would reduce the person to an object of desire and not the way God intends. Therefore, the issue is not with the human body, but how it is portrayed and intended to be portrayed and what the intent is. If it is portrayed in a way that represents the person in God’s image, then yes, nude modeling is and should be permissible. However, if it is done in a way that will promote lust, whether it is by the model; artist; or recipient of art, then nude modeling should be avoided at all costs.
What I intend to accomplish in my figure drawing session is that the artists who are drawing me see me for who I truly am, a person created in the image and likeness of God. Sure, I may have my weaknesses; imperfections; and faults; but I am still a beautiful human being. I am truly looking forward to the experience and believe that my session will be relaxing and therapeutic to me simultaneously. Please pray that my experience goes well.
Nope, but in a state of grace when they are dressed like that you wont be bothered by what they wear or not wearing.And you endorse girls dressing this way?
Peace,
Ed
No, not at all. Most men do not have an an on and off switch regarding lust, otherwise the porn industry would not be as large as it is today. It has replaced true beauty with degradation, destruction of proper morals, and open scandal. Look at the average magazine cover that shows an attractive woman. I have a background in photography and every tiny detail about her hair, makeup, pose, lighting and amount and position of clothing is carefully planned before the shoot. Why? To achieve the maximum amount of sexual arousal in the men looking at her. She is being sold as a “sex object,” not as a human being with dignity.Nope, but in a state of grace when they are dressed like that you wont be bothered by what they wear or not wearing.
Did you not understand what I wrote?
The conclusion does not follow from the premises. You do not admit other possibilities, among which is that men choose to consume pornography with no attempt to curb that behavior.No, not at all. Most men do not have an an on and off switch regarding lust, otherwise the porn industry would not be as large as it is today.
While I agree that there is no “off” switch to being sexually aroused, I still disagree with your assertion that all nude art nowadays is immoral.No, not at all. Most men do not have an an on and off switch regarding lust, otherwise the porn industry would not be as large as it is today. It has replaced true beauty with degradation, destruction of proper morals, and open scandal. Look at the average magazine cover that shows an attractive woman. I have a background in photography and every tiny detail about her hair, makeup, pose, lighting and amount and position of clothing is carefully planned before the shoot. Why? To achieve the maximum amount of sexual arousal in the men looking at her. She is being sold as a “sex object,” not as a human being with dignity.
Peace,
Ed