P
PRmerger
Guest
So what Jcc has been positing is not consonant with Baha’i teachings?Sorry…I don’t know that I personally can comment on that… because I have yet to even approach the dust of His throne…
So what Jcc has been positing is not consonant with Baha’i teachings?Sorry…I don’t know that I personally can comment on that… because I have yet to even approach the dust of His throne…
Amen!the biggest trick the devil plays,is to make you think that he does not exist…
My main concern was that you “Merger” understood that we Baha’is don’t believe our souls can become one with the Godhead…So what Jcc has been positing is not consonant with Baha’i teachings?
Doormouse,the biggest trick the devil plays,is to make you think that he does not exist…
Steve, It seems that this has been dealt with before but not understood. It is a very profound station which Jesus holds in the sense of His being the Word through which the world was created. As mentioned before, He sometimes refers to Himself as a Prophet, so the use of that term should be acceptable on Biblical merit.What has been denied is that Jesus is only a prophet. The point being that he is like no other prophet in that he is the Son of God, the second Person of the Trinity, the Creator of the universe. This sets him apart from all others you claim as “prophets” and the point was made to do just that. He is not just one more in a line of manifestations.
All of the Old Testament points ultimately to Christ. What are you really after here? Do you wish to claim that Jesus is not the Messiah or to point out that the Jews disagree with us? Why do you ask the question?
now,the bahais on here have said that there is no evil at all…Doormouse,
. You seem to have a concern regarding what is the Baha’i understanding of that which is called satanic. Perhaps this may help:
. “O friends! It behoveth you to refresh and revive your souls through the gracious favours which in this Divine, this soul-stirring Springtime are being showered upon you. The Day-Star of His great glory hath shed its radiance upon you, and the clouds of His limitless grace have overshadowed you. How high the reward of him that hath not deprived himself of so great a bounty, nor failed to recognize the beauty of his Best-Beloved in this, His new attire. Watch over yourselves, for the Evil One is lying in wait, ready to entrap you. Gird yourselves against his wicked devices, and, led by the light of the name of the All-Seeing God, make your escape from the darkness that surroundeth you. Let your vision be world-embracing, rather than confined to your own self. The Evil One is he that hindereth the rise and obstructeth the spiritual progress of the children of men.”
Bahá’u’lláh
. “This lower nature in humans is symbolized as Satan — the evil ego within us, not an evil personality outside.” — `Abdu’l-Bahá [1
how can this be when you dont recognise the seven deadly sins, or evil???Watch over yourselves, for the Evil One is lying in wait, ready to entrap you. Gird yourselves against his wicked devices,
That may be the case but I might just ask why? As I said, I have no problem with your God setting these boundaries, but it doesn’t meld well with the idea of death being this wonderful thing we should embrace. I said it before, no matter how you die, you will receive a better outcome than if you were alive, it may be immoral for the person to do that, but the person committing the murder has ultimately helped the victim in the end by giving them ultimate happiness and experience faster, even more in the case of abortion. Im not saying you approve of this, what I am saying is that its a theology which doesn’t meld well together, its contradictory and not well defined.Ignatian,
I think that the answer to your question lies within the question. It has to do with “will”.
God gives us free will, right? Then He gives us Commandments to obey, which require our submission to His will. The soul who is willfully submissive to the Commandments of God is innocent, an necessarily “good”.
The soul who willfully disobeys the Commandments of God and kills another soul is “evil”.
So the body is a throne now? The body is something which should be preserved? From murder? My same basic question applies, murder is not okay, but natural death is. Yet both achieve hte same end and your God has made it so that death in any form, be it disease achieves the same end. It would be better that we were all killed than live in this suffering shell of a life, because this is not the real reality, as other bahais ahve said. But your God for whatever reason, and it is unclear to me, has determined we should live to however long we live for some reason. There is no punishment in bahai afterlife as far as I can tell, there is no judgement, there is no hell in which the person suffers for all eternity, so to what end is this life about? Making good on earth? Why does earth need to be good? The bahai God seems perfectly content with not interacting with his creation, not doing anything about the gross evil that is done on the earth. Again it just doesn’t add up to me,When death comes to us naturally, as a leaf falling from a tree in autumn, or by some other process, such as at the hand of one who commits murder, we retain our innocence in that context, and the premature loss of our physical life does not hinder the progress of the soul which has been submissive to God’s Will and obedient to His Commandments.
. “Let none contend with another, and let no soul slay another; this, verily, is that which was forbidden you in a Book that hath lain concealed within the Tabernacle of glory. What! Would ye kill him whom God hath quickened, whom He hath endowed with spirit through a breath from Him? Grievous then would be your trespass before His throne! Fear God, and lift not the hand of injustice and oppression to destroy what He hath Himself raised up; nay, walk ye in the way of God, the True One.”
(Bahá’u’lláh, The Kitáb-i-Aqdas, p. 46)
Um, I have never confused the two, there is a distinction between them, I do not believe the body and the soul are one single entity, however I do believe that for God to leave this world to death and destruction is something he will not tolerate as he created this world “good,” and he will not suffer this world to continue as it is forever.You keep mixing up the idea of death of the body and death of the soul. Jesus said not to fear that which can kill the body but can’t kill the soul.
Do you believe that people go to heaven or not?
Actually we don’t need a Council of Nicea as our beliefs are already pretty well defined…Bahais need their own council of Nicea to determine what they actually believe and define it, it seems.
I beg to differ.Actually we don’t need a Council of Nicea as our beliefs are already pretty well defined…![]()
You can beg and differ all you want to…!I beg to differ.
It is acceptable. My only point is that there is just a lot more to Jesus than being a prophet.Steve, It seems that this has been dealt with before but not understood. It is a very profound station which Jesus holds in the sense of His being the Word through which the world was created. As mentioned before, He sometimes refers to Himself as a Prophet, so the use of that term should be acceptable on Biblical merit.
If Jesus is the Messiah then what do we need with Baha’u’llah? That is why I dwell on this further.. We have also “repeatedly” stated our agreement that Jesus is the Messiah foretold in the Old Testament. Not sure why you are dwelling on this further.
For Baha’is anyway… I would suggest that the highest station we would envision is being in the presence of God… not being in “… union with the Godhead”
Yes, there is endless potential for growth and development. Man is imperfect, that is part of our nature, so in relation to God, we continue to be limited and imperfect even though we improve endlessly. Are all saints equally saintly? Could they not be more so?
Baha’u’llah has made that clear, He has revealed that God’s creation is endless, and man can progress endlessly within that creation.So, if God had not revealed it either affirmatively or negatively in Christianity or previous dispensations, then there is no basis in Christianity to say that Baha’u’llah was wrong about that.
No, not at all. It does not mean that creation is or could ever be equal to God.
For an example to help us conceptualize this, we know that God is both omnipresent and omnipotent. Creation is everywhere, so is limitless in extent, but not limitless in power, so can never be equal to God. This is true in every possible way, the creation is never equal to the Creator. That would be like saying that the painting could be equal to the artist who painted it.
arthra and Jcc seem to be saying contradictory things.So what Jcc has been positing is not consonant with Baha’i teachings?
PRmerger, after reading the quotes that Athra presented in response to this, I hope you have concluded that what I was saying is in agreement with the Baha’i teachings.So what Jcc has been positing is not consonant with Baha’i teachings?
I have no expertise in Baha’i teachings.PRmerger, after reading the quotes that Athra presented in response to this, I hope you have concluded that what I was saying is in agreement with the Baha’i teachings.
To the degree that what eastern religions profess is consonant with Catholicism is the degree that what they profess is true.The term, as we know, is used by some schools of Hinduism to mean actually merging with the Godhead and becoming part of it. It sounds like your concept is actually closer to that of such eastern religions, unless you could clarify the distinction?
And Jesus being the Messiah, the anointed one, the Son of God, should we not listen and obey everything that he said and reject any and everything that conflicts with what he said and taught?It is acceptable. My only point is that there is just a lot more to Jesus than being a prophet.
If Jesus is the Messiah then what do we need with Baha’u’llah? That is why I dwell on this further.