…
There’s a point that PR Merger has been making, although not explicitly, that you are missing. Your approach to the Bahai Faith is very much a Protestant one. It’s a mixture of Bahai teachings and your background, and that makes the gap between Bahai and Catholic greater than it is in fact. The Guardian wrote several times to the Canadian Bahais in particular of the need to bring Catholics into the Bahai community. Not because we need the numbers, but (in my opinion), because the English-speaking Bahai communities, which consist largely of people with a Protestant take on religion, really need a different perspective. On one occasion he wrote “on this point, [virgin birth] as on several others, the Bahá’í Teachings are in full agreement with the doctrines of the Catholic Church.” Translated, he says: “the Catholics got it right, live with it.”
Your emphasis on the Writings, and their authenticity, supposes that the Bahai Faith is a text-centred religion. But what does Baha’u’llah say:
“He Who is everlastingly hidden from the eyes of men can never be known except through His Manifestation, and His Manifestation can adduce no greater proof of the truth of His mission than the proof of His Own Person” (Gleanings, XX)
“The first and foremost testimony establishing His truth is His own Self. Next to this testimony is His Revelation. For those who fail to recognize either the one or the other He has established the words He hath revealed as proof of His reality and truth…”
The Bab and Baha’u’llah have a “high theophany” as compared to the Islamic background, or Protestant Christianity. Religious faith in their view centres on devotion to a Person, the reality of the Faith is embodied (incarnated) in a Person. The texts are useful as proofs, they point us towards that Person, but they are not what it’s all about. What is it all about? The “meeting with God” (Arabic: Liqa’) in the form of a human person. As Shoghi Effendi says, “the core of religious faith is that mystic feeling which unites Man with God.” Shoghi Effendi translates the meeting with God with terms such as “the divine Presence” “the countenance of the King” “to meet thy God” “beholding Thy face” and “attaining” or “attainment” to the Presence.
Related to this is your emphasis on “rational processes.” Fair enough, reason and scripture can give us knowledge, but there’s a chapter in Some Answered Questions in which Abdu’l-Baha talks about “four accepted methods of comprehension” - the senses, reason, scripture, and the Spirit. In my translation, he concludes: "But the Holy Spirit is the sound standard, for in it there is never the least doubt. Those [other methods], are aids to the Holy Spirit, which comes to a person: in it, he attains the stations of certitude.”
So your appeal to reason, or to the greater authenticity of the Bahai writings, or the quality of their translations, etc… aren’t going to convince PR, and they shouldn’t. He could answer that these are secondary matters, “the meeting with God” and “the stations of Certitude” are given by grace, in the Holy Spirit, and one of the places the Spirit works is in the Church as a community of the faithful that extends through time, from Christ and the Apostles to us. And he could quote Bahai writings to prove his point. Abdu’l-Baha says:
- … the breezes of Christ are still blowing; His light is still shining; His melody is still resounding; His standard is still waving; His armies are still fighting; His heavenly voice is still sweetly melodious; His clouds are still showering gems; His lightning is still flashing; His reflection is still clear and brilliant; His splendor is still radiating and luminous; and it is the same with those souls who are under His protection and are shining with His light.*
(Some Answered Questions, 152)
Various of the Catholic participants in this thread have been asking what is unique, or better, about Bahai, in other words, why would I want to become a Bahai, when I have the Church? And various Bahai respondents have taken the question up, and have been coming up with ideas about what is better or unique about Bahai. But the question should rather be deconstructed: it supposes a great deal, and it leads us towards “My God is Bigger than your god.” Rather than falling into the trap the question poses, we (the Bahai participants) should rather be saying, the Spirit is also at work here, it is doing “a new thing” as Enoch and Isaiah say. It’s exciting, and challenging. It’s like being back in the early church, with a tremendous Fact in front of your face, and a bunch of friends buzzing with ideas about what it might come to mean. Nobody who is participating in the work of the Spirit in the world can fail to be interested in this, but this is not to say that it is the path for everyone:
Every age hath its own problem, and every soul its particular aspiration.
(
Gleanings from the Writings of Baha’u’llah, p. 213)