That may be your opinion. However, the fact of the matter is, that the forceable extraction of the fruits of one person’s labor, through taxation, which is then taken and given to another person who didn’t earn it, is, by definition, slavery. What some people call “redistribution of wealth” is, in fact, a form of slavery.
Charity is voluntary. Money or property taken by force is not voluntary and therefore not charity.
So what BBarrick is saying is true. You have every right to decide for yourself what you want to do with your own money, with your own property, with your own time, and with the fruits of your own labors.
But when you start saying that someone else should pay for things that you designate as good purposes, even if it is through the ballot box, that’s still legalized theft. That’s involutary servitude on the part of the person that has to pay for what you designate as a good purpose. The wealth or lack of wealth of that purpose has no bearing on the matter. It’s the process.
This is why voluntary charity is successful and why the tyranny of Marxism and wealth redistribution has failed everywhere it has been tried.