Beck: Help us restore traditional American values

  • Thread starter Thread starter ishii
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The greatest danger to the Catholic Church comes from her own members who misrepresent the teachings of Jesus.

We’re becoming as watered down as the Protestants.😦
 
The greatest danger to the Catholic Church comes from her own members who misrepresent the teachings of Jesus.

We’re becoming as watered down as the Protestants.😦
"Enter by the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is easy, that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard, that leads to life, and those who find it are few. " (Matt 7:13-14)
 
If Black Rose’s informed conscience leads him/her to base his/her vote more on left-leaning economic policy as a means of advocating for those less fortuinate whom Jesus Himself advocated for, then so be it.
You are missing the point. The point is that it isn’t “End of story”. You can’t claim conscience, in and of itself, as “End of story.” It doesn’t work that way.
And no my political leanings are based on my faith in Christ. Naturally I throw in some human reasoning though.
Just a sprinkle of reasoning? Are you saying that you don’t usually use reason, just faith?
And no.there was a time Catholics were much more inclined to vote Democratic. Until many became more fortunate economically and they elevated one issue to such importance vs all others. But anyway, peace.
Maybe Catholics are less inclined to vote Democratic now (well, at least not in droves any more) is because the Democrats have sunk their teeth into the culture of death. Maybe it has nothing to do with economics, but with justice. Maybe many Catholics recognize murder when they see it, and refuse to support a political party that wants tax payers to pay for it.
 
Just a sprinkle of reasoning? Are you saying that you don’t usually use reason, just faith?
Suudy, No one but you said a thing about a sprinkle. I said I use some reasoning. And here I actually thought you would like that! 👍
 
… Maybe many Catholics recognize murder when they see it, and refuse to support a political party that wants tax payers to pay for it.
I hope you are right. I still know Catholics in my church are blindly supporting their pro-death party. I can only pray for them to wake up. It is actually pathetic to see people blindly being Obama supporter regardless all his wrong doings … I just don’t understand how could pious Catholics care not about killing babies. I don’t know how to make out of this…
 
Suudy, No one but you said a thing about a sprinkle. I said I use some reasoning. And here I actually thought you would like that! 👍
The word you used was “some”. And you used it again here. “Some” not “mostly”. The clear reading of that is that you use reason less than you use faith.

Why not use reason and faith? It’s not either/or. And reason should lead people to see that the Church considers right to life an issue of paramount importance. You’ve acknowledged this. So why not go one step further and apply reason to a clear reading of CCC 1783:
CCC 1783: Conscience must be informed and moral judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright and truthful. It formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator. The education of conscience is indispensable for human beings who are subjected to negative influences and tempted by sin to prefer their own judgment and to reject authoritative teachings.
So it seems that you reject what the Church considers important (you have stated several times that you think the Church has “elevated one issue to such importance vs all others”). So it seems you prefer your own judgment.

Now, if the Church considers right to life an issue of paramount importance, why do you not also?
 
I hope you are right. I still know Catholics in my church are blindly supporting their pro-death party. I can only pray for them to wake up. It is actually pathetic to see people blindly being Obama supporter regardless all his wrong doings … I just don’t understand how could pious Catholics care not about killing babies. I don’t know how to make out of this…
Part of the problem is that the priests and bishops in America have been lackluster about promoting respect for the sanctity of life. Sure they make an effort, and some do a great job, but too often the message is mixed, depending on the parish you go to. In fact, the parishes that most need the pro-life message to be drilled in to them are the most likely to have liberal pastors/priests who refuse to mention the issue. The heirarchy in the Catholic church in America contains a lot of old style dyed in the wool Democrats who, when it comes to abortion, are Democrats first and catholics second. Additionally, many of the laity in leadership positions are also dyed in the wool Democrats (atleast in my area). However, I think things are changing and the new generation of priests are staunchly and vocally pro-life. The change is slow, though, and as evidenced by some of the posts of catholics on this thread, there is a lot of educating left to do on the sanctity of life. You can’t be Catholic and pro-choice. Period. End of story.

Ishii
 
Part of the problem is that the priests and bishops in America have been lackluster about promoting respect for the sanctity of life.
Are you sure? I’ve heard someone on this thread saying that the Church has gone too far, and that the Church has “elevated one issue to such importance vs all others”. Surely you can’t be right. :rolleyes:

(I think you know what I really think. Consider that when reading above. ;))
You can’t be Catholic and pro-choice. Period. End of story.
Hey, as long as we vote our conscience, it’s all good. We can’t betray our conscience, that is the “End of story.”
 
You can’t be Catholic and pro-choice. Period. End of story.

Ishii
Sigh. Talk about topics getting old.

Again then I guess someone needs to tell the Church then to change Her definition of who She counts as Catholic. As any priest, lay person or whomever who professes to follow every single teaching but disagrees with how the Church defines who is a Catholic, can not be following every single teaching if they disagree with who the Church calls a Catholic.

Peace.
 
Again then I guess someone needs to tell the Church then to change Her definition of who She counts as Catholic.
I was searching through some older posts, and I discovered a thread where we discussed this in detail (well before this thread). The point of that thread is that when people say “You can’t be Catholic and pro-choice” they really mean “You can’t be Catholic in full communion with the Church and be pro-choice.”

You can be pedantic if you like. But please understand that this is what is meant.
 
… when people say “You can’t be Catholic and pro-choice” they really mean “You can’t be Catholic in full communion with the Church and be pro-choice.”
That is a good definition. I just don’t understand how could anyone, not just “Catholics”, think killing a baby is nothing to worry??? I once read a good email it reports about a doctor’s advice to a woman who wants to have an abortion. The doctor asked the woman how many children she already has, she said one toddler. Her reason of abortion was she could not handle another one, it was inconvenient. The doctor thought a while and made his suggestion: to kill the toddler.

The woman was horrified, but the doctor calmly said that was a better choice. Since she was going to kill one of her children to make it convenient, she might as well kill the trouble making toddler, the terrible two. This would give her close to nine month to rest and not take care of any little one…

I think that doctor gives a very wise advice. For convenience sake, why not kill the one who is already born? The mother’s body doesn’t even need to be hurt. Yea, why those pro abortion Catholics did not think about such a brilliant idea???
 
That is a good definition. I just don’t understand how could anyone, not just “Catholics”, think killing a baby is nothing to worry??? I once read a good email it reports about a doctor’s advice to a woman who wants to have an abortion. The doctor asked the woman how many children she already has, she said one toddler. Her reason of abortion was she could not handle another one, it was inconvenient. The doctor thought a while and made his suggestion: to kill the toddler.

The woman was horrified, but the doctor calmly said that was a better choice. Since she was going to kill one of her children to make it convenient, she might as well kill the trouble making toddler, the terrible two. This would give her close to nine month to rest and not take care of any little one…

I think that doctor gives a very wise advice. For convenience sake, why not kill the one who is already born? The mother’s body doesn’t even need to be hurt. Yea, why those pro abortion Catholics did not think about such a brilliant idea???
Because then those pro-abortion catholics must actually face the horror of their position.

Much better for them to stick their fingers in their ears and chant LA La LA over and over again while reciting scripture about helping the poor.:rolleyes:

Why you can’t help the poor AND fight murdering babies is beyond me!
 
I was searching through some older posts, and I discovered a thread where we discussed this in detail (well before this thread). The point of that thread is that when people say “You can’t be Catholic and pro-choice” they really mean “You can’t be Catholic in full communion with the Church and be pro-choice.”

You can be pedantic if you like. But please understand that this is what is meant.
Oh Suudy believe me I have discussed this far before you and I discussed it. So often that oft’ times I can’t help but reason I was led to CAF to explain to my fellow Catholics who the Church counts as Catholic. But if that’s what they mean then I guess that’s what they should say. I truly have to believe though they know because otherwise if they disagree with something so basic as the Church teaching of who She calls Catholic, they themselves would not be in total agreement with all they might profess to be in total agreement with.

Even someone with a properly catechized informed conscience who after much prayer, contemplation and whether with a sprinkle of reasoning or even perhaps with a lot of that reasoning you like 👍 but who might still nevertheless not be in lockstep on everything, is still Catholic. Even excommunicated Catholics, while they may be supposedly officially barred from the Sacraments or from a ministering capacity within their parish, are still Catholic.

So until the times comes when the Church no longer perceives Herself to be the one and only true Church Body of Christ… the time of which we of course both know has not yet come. As if anything She is digging her soles deeper into the sand when we hear for instance Benedict 16’s fondness for calling others mere “eccelsial communities”. And until the time comes when one baptized and even perhaps confirmed according to one of Her rites, no longer becomes a member of the Catholic Church with a permanent, indelible character upon one’s soul… then they can be as narrow in their definition as they would like. But they would be wrong. Please understand what is meant as well. And now before a mod has to issue a warning to return to the topic, let us. And God bless you Suudy in your walk of faith and may His peace and love abide within you always. Amen.
 
I just don’t understand how could pious Catholics care not about killing babies. I don’t know how to make out of this…
Hi my friend, I understand the difficulty and pain with this you are having. I can see it in your posts. Part of the problem may be the legal law of the land and your definition of killing a baby may not be the same. But I found this site which may be of help for you to better understand the American values, perhaps not Beck’s values, but those American values of which pro-choice Catholics may espouse. I’m not a donating member of this group but perhaps exploring their site, while you won’t end up agreeing, might at least be of some help to help you understand better. I at least hope so and pray. God bless you in your walk of faith and may you be at peace.

catholicsforchoice.org/
 
Even someone with a properly catechized informed conscience who after much prayer, contemplation and whether with a sprinkle of reasoning or even perhaps with a lot of that reasoning you like 👍 but who might still nevertheless not be in lockstep on everything, is still Catholic.
I think that is an impossibility. A properly catechized and informed conscience would by necessity agree with Church teaching. An informed conscience, by definition, means one that is aligned with God’s will. And since infallible Church teaching is also in line with God’s will, that means both an informed conscience and Church teaching will agree.

So, no, that can’t happen. An informed conscience will by necessity be in lockstep with the Church on everything.
Even excommunicated Catholics, while they may be supposedly officially barred from the Sacraments or from a ministering capacity within their parish, are still Catholic.
That’s true, but they are not in communion. That is the point.
So until the times comes when the Church no longer perceives Herself to be the one and only true Church Body of Christ… the time of which we of course both know has not yet come.
Nor will it ever come. Remember, “[t]he gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”
As if anything She is digging her soles deeper into the sand when we hear for instance Benedict 16’s fondness for calling others mere “eccelsial communities”. And until the time comes when one baptized and even perhaps confirmed according to one of Her rites, no longer becomes a member of the Catholic Church with a permanent, indelible character upon one’s soul… then they can be as narrow in their definition as they would like. But they would be wrong.
Having an indelible mark does not automatically mean saved. Having an indelible mark does not grant people some special status. In fact, the Church teaches that all the baptized have an indelible mark, not just those baptized as Catholic. Are you saying that all the baptized can call themselves Catholic, since they all have an indelible mark?

Look, the point is that the common use of the term Catholic means something more than just having the indelible mark of baptism. When used, it means “I am a baptized Christian and I am in communion with the Catholic Church.” That is why people object to people using the term Catholic in this sense and then supporting positions directly contrary to clear Church teaching.
 
Hi my friend, I understand the difficulty and pain with this you are having. I can see it in your posts. Part of the problem may be the legal law of the land and your definition of killing a baby may not be the same. But I found this site which may be of help for you to better understand the American values, perhaps not Beck’s values, but those American values of which pro-choice Catholics may espouse. I’m not a donating member of this group but perhaps exploring their site, while you won’t end up agreeing, might at least be of some help to help you understand better. I at least hope so and pray. God bless you in your walk of faith and may you be at peace.

catholicsforchoice.org/
And participation in such a group can lead to excommunication. From Bishop Bruskewitz’s statement (here):All Catholics in and of the Diocese of Lincoln are forbidden to be members of the organizations and groups listed below. Membership in these organizations or groups is always perilous to the Catholic Faith and most often is totally incompatible with the Catholic Faith.
Planned Parenthood
Society of Saint Pius X (Lefebvre Group)
Hemlock Society
Call to Action
Call to Action Nebraska
Saint Michael the Archangel Chapel
Freemasons
Job’s Daughters
DeMolay
Eastern Star
Rainbow Girls
Catholics for a Free Choice
Any Catholics in and of the Diocese of Lincoln who attain or retain membership in any of the above listed organizations or groups after April 15, 1996, are by that very fact (ipso facto latae sententiae) under interdict and are absolutely forbidden to receive Holy Communion. Contumacious persistence in such membership for one month following the interdict on part of any such Catholics will by that very fact (ipso facto latae sententiae) cause them to be excommunicated. Absolution from these ecclesial censures is “reserved to the Bishop.”
Catholic for Choice (formerly Catholics for a Free Choice) is not a group that one can be a member and remain in communion with the Church.

Further, CFC is a deluded organization. I’ve read their writings to try and rationalize support for abortion, and they talk in circles. For example, from their talk on Canon 1398, they say:To decide whether punishment under this canon is available or appropriate, one must consider many legal questions. Was the person capable of committing a crime? Is she eligible for sanctions? Were there mitigating factors?
What they advocate is that women are properly informed and are free to make a choice. But then they wonder if a woman can rightly be excommunicated because they are not capable of committing a crime? They talk in circles. They advocate for informed consciences and right reason, they assert that the right reason may not be present when an abortion is procured, thus a woman is not excommunicated. Which is it?

This groups is so entrenched in their ideology that they confuse themselves. This group should be avoided by all serious Catholics, and shunned by all committed Catholics.

Edit: One more crazy quote from CFC on Canon 1398 (emphasis mine):
In cases of latae sententiae punishments, the person who committed the act is, at first,** responsible for judging himself or herself according to the law’s provisions**. Most women who have abortions would probably not find themselves guilty under the law. With few exceptions, we would expect her to judge the mitigating circumstances explained above sufficient to exempt her from the penalty. Indeed, should she find even one mitigating circumstance, the law itself states that she is not bound by the penalty.
Hmmm… Those who procure abortions judge themselves. And if they don’t find themselves guilty, they aren’t excommunicated. :whacky:
 
I think that is an impossibility. A properly catechized and informed conscience would by necessity agree with Church teaching…
So, no, that can’t happen. An informed conscience will by necessity be in lockstep with the Church on everything…

That is why people object to people using the term Catholic in this sense and then supporting positions directly contrary to clear Church teaching.
That sounds like it could get awfully close to indoctrination of the brain and is scary to me actually. But then that’s me.

As to the rest of your post, looks like we’re back to square one. You’re still objecting to the Church’s definition of who is a Catholic. And that’s my point. Not who is more in communion on this vs that thing. But that’s ok Suudy if you wish to dissent on who our Church calls Catholic. I’ve tried. I might be heading off for an early dinner. So again my friend, God bless you and peace. :hug1:
 
And participation in such a group can lead to excommunication. From Bishop Bruskewitz’s statement (here):
All Catholics in and of the Diocese of Lincoln are forbidden to be members of the organizations and groups listed below. Membership in these organizations or groups is always perilous to the Catholic Faith and most often is totally incompatible with the Catholic Faith.
Planned Parenthood
Society of Saint Pius X (Lefebvre Group)
Hemlock Society
Call to Action
Call to Action Nebraska
Saint Michael the Archangel Chapel
Freemasons
Job’s Daughters
DeMolay
Eastern Star
Rainbow Girls
Catholics for a Free Choice

Any Catholics in and of the Diocese of Lincoln who attain or retain membership in any of the above listed organizations or groups after April 15, 1996, are by that very fact (ipso facto latae sententiae) under interdict and are absolutely forbidden to receive Holy Communion. Contumacious persistence in such membership for one month following the interdict on part of any such Catholics will by that very fact (ipso facto latae sententiae) cause them to be excommunicated. Absolution from these ecclesial censures is “reserved to the Bishop.”
Catholic for Choice (formerly Catholics for a Free Choice) is not a group that one can be a member and remain in communion with the Church.

Further, CFC is a deluded organization. I’ve read their writings to try and rationalize support for abortion, and they talk in circles. For example, from their talk on Canon 1398, they say:
To decide whether punishment under this canon is available or appropriate, one must consider many legal questions. Was the person capable of committing a crime? Is she eligible for sanctions? Were there mitigating factors?
What they advocate is that women are properly informed and are free to make a choice. But then they wonder if a woman can rightly be excommunicated because they are not capable of committing a crime? They talk in circles. They advocate for informed consciences and right reason, they assert that the right reason may not be present when an abortion is procured, thus a woman is not excommunicated. Which is it?

This groups is so entrenched in their ideology that they confuse themselves. This group should be avoided by all serious Catholics, and shunned by all committed Catholics.

Edit: One more crazy quote from CFC on Canon 1398 (emphasis mine):
In cases of latae sententiae punishments, the person who committed the act is, at first,** responsible for judging himself or herself according to the law’s provisions**. Most women who have abortions would probably not find themselves guilty under the law. With few exceptions, we would expect her to judge the mitigating circumstances explained above sufficient to exempt her from the penalty. Indeed, should she find even one mitigating circumstance, the law itself states that she is not bound by the penalty.
Hmmm… Those who procure abortions judge themselves. And if they don’t find themselves guilty, they aren’t excommunicated. :whacky:
I could never commit the mental contortionism necessary to be a liberal.
 
And participation in such a group can lead to excommunication. From Bishop Bruskewitz’s statement…
🤷 And yet Suudy I’m glad to know as you yourself have admitted, they would still be a Catholic. Let us have a group hug united in Him. In He Whom is far greater than any differences we might have. :grouphug: God bless and peace.
 
🤷 And yet Suudy I’m glad to know as you yourself have admitted, they would still be a Catholic. Let us have a group hug united in Him. In He Whom is far greater than any differences we might have. :grouphug: God bless and peace.
I have admitted as much in the past.

But being an excommunicated Catholic is not much different than being a baptized Christian of another faith. In fact, I would think an excommunicated Catholic to be an worse position, since the latter may be there through no fault of their own.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top