Does anyone have any thoughts on Esther De Waal’s writings in terms of quality, orthodoxy, etc.?
Jason,
I may be jumped all over for saying this, but there is some merit in reading things that you might not totally agree with. Do you know what I mean? It’s an intellectual exploration thing. I’ve been formally trained as a philosopher, which assumes that I read with my eyes open and my mind and faculties turned on. I often read things that are exploratory in nature, and people I know sometimes say, “Why on earth would you read
that?” I read it because in thinking about what I’m reading analytically and abstractly, as well as in practical terms, I come to know more about what is true when I explore the boundaries of what “true-ness” might be. Do you see what I’m saying?
For instance, with this author you’re asking about, Esther de Waal, she’s an Anglican, wife of a fairly high-profile Anglican priest. Well, what does that mean? I probably wouldn’t take her word on whether I should be Catholic or Anglican. I probably shouldn’t care what she thinks of married priests and so on. Doctrinally she may be in no-mans-land. However, she might well have something to say to me about interpretation of what it means to live a life of prayer, or live as a Christian. I won’t know that til I really read deeply anything she has to say and mull it over for its value in a bunch of different ways. Then if it’s shallow, or if it neglects important things, or if it’s just flat out wrong in some way, I’ll know it.
I can’t tell you how many authors whose books I have tossed on the floor with disgust. Maybe Esther de Waal is like that, maybe not. A small number of people really don’t have anything original to say, but most have something to say. There is an old saying that goes, “You can learn something from everyone.” Probably it’s close to being true, even if only the thing that you learn is that you don’t agree with them, or “here is how to go off the rails.”
A great example of what I’m talking about is Thomas Merton, the Trappist. I loved reading Merton, regardless of the real truth about Merton. And he taught me a lot of real value, not because he taught me anything creedal or doctrinal or even moral, no. He was in a bit of trouble from time to time, actually more than a bit. Nevertheless, after finding out all that, I didn’t deem his books I’d read some kind of a waste or anything like that. Why? He taught me things that he evoked from me as I read him and prayed about what was going on with me in my relationship with God. I learned things that are, in the final analysis, independent of Merton by reading Merton, and in a way I have Merton to thank for that. Do you see what I mean?
You know, I have a problem with the things that have happened in the Church in the last 40 years, as I think you do. I also think that there’s a problem with imposing speculative theology and speculative philosophy on people who aren’t equipped to negotiate it, and frankly speaking, the great majority of pew Catholics aren’t equipped to deal with it in any way, shape or form. It’s not bad or a negative thing to say; it’s just true. But–and this is really different–when you leave the catechesis arena where you’re teaching people who are looking for basic creedal “bites” like that because it’s all they want, or all they can do, or all they will accept, and enter an arena like genuine exploration of the spiritual life, then it’s a little different. I mean the assumption is that there is some activity going on that exceeds making lists, learning basics, getting it done and saving time, and the like. Are there mistakes a person can make? Yes, and they’re not all literal. You must learn as you go. I hope you see what I mean and take this in the spririt with which it was intended–in a completely friendly way and with much respect.
PS, I avoid the sort of confabs you were talking about earlier, the VII hold-out thing at St. Leo’s etc. That sort of thing is something else entirely, falling into an entirely different sphere of activity. Luckily I don’t have to be involved in such stuff.