Biden Enjoys Armed Protection While Fighting to Disarm Americans

[Nepperhan]

Since 2008 I have seen that conservative rhetoric presumes:

1. Any new gun law is gun confiscation
2. Democrats want to confiscate all guns
3. Any type of gun should be legal to be carried anywhere

You know, it ain’t necessarily so.

 

[Maximus1]

Are guns banned there

 

[Dr_Meinheimer]

You mean you have encountered different opinions across tens of millions of people? Shocking.

 

[RidgeSprinter]

All in on Biden taking guns away from the unstable.

 

[RidgeSprinter]

• Any new gun law is gun confiscation
• Democrats want to confiscate all guns
• Any type of gun should be legal to be carried anywhere

And all promoted by Trump supporters?

 

[Maximus1]

Right! Who is for guns for the unstable. Lol

 

[Nepperhan]

You mean you have encountered different opinions across tens of millions of people? Shocking.

No, I have encountered NRA and conservative orthodoxy. If you disagree with any of their gun views, see what names they will call you!

 

[RidgeSprinter]

Obviously it has to be Trump’s core?

 

[Maximus1]

The description does get you leaning that way

 

[RidgeSprinter]

I may tend to lean toward your opinion concerning that.

 

[Cathoholic]

RidgeSprinter . . .

All in on Biden taking guns away from the unstable.

If you really think that, start with disarming the police as they have the highest suicide rates.
ALL of them. No exceptions for politician’s and ex-presidents guards.

After you have disarmed all police give it a few years. Then come back here and let me know how it’s going.

There are already laws in place against “the unstable” having firearms. The only problem with such a nebulous definition as “the unstable” (which can mean just about anything a politician orba creative judge says it means), is it gets REDEFINED often.

 

[Maximus1]

They can come up with better words. Don’t worry

 

[Nepperhan]

That would be a weapon system not a gun.

Not to the NRA. They blocked identifiers in explosives. That’s surely not a gun.

 

[dscath]

To me, seems an utterly ridiculous pretension.

Are you comparing the Secret Service to the bullies who were at Michigan’s state capital?

Both the Secret Service and the bullies were armed, but the bullies hardly are contributing to the common good, nor do are they reflective of a well regulated militia.

Why not for once post something supportive of the President and his policies (if you can find any) rather than giving us more of the same ol’ “anyone who is not Trump is bad”.

 

[JonNC]

Hmmm…Let’s say I lived in the south side of Chicago…the risks faced there everyday are greater than Biden or possibly Trump.

Precisely the reason the MacDonald decision was handed down.

 

[JonNC]

OK, where can I order a surface to air missile? Those pesky jets from O’Hare are too noisy.

1)That is not considered a firearm by the SCOTUS.
2) the right to keep and bear arms provides no right to harm others outside of self defense.

 

[upant]

You know, it ain’t necessarily so.

you forgot beto already? biden’s point man on gun control if he wins. he wants confiscation. the votes just aren’t there. …yet

Are you comparing the Secret Service to the bullies who were at Michigan’s state capital?

did either do anything illegal?

 

[JonNC]

Dr_Meinheimer:

You mean you have encountered different opinions across tens of millions of people? Shocking.

No, I have encountered NRA and conservative orthodoxy. If you disagree with any of their gun views, see what names they will call you!

As an NRA member who happens to disagree with their positions on a few issues, that hasn’t been my experience.
On the other hand, a pro-lifer isn’t welcome in the Democrat Party, if you oppose same gender maroon religious grounds, you’re considered a hater and unwelcome.

 

[Nepperhan]

1)That is not considered a firearm by the SCOTUS.
2) the right to keep and bear arms provides no right to harm others outside of self defense.

1. Ask the NRA about explosives. It blocked indentifiers in TNT. Is that a firearm?
2. Well, there is hunting, too. The NRA says its a right for citizens to be armed to oppose the government. The second amendment says nothing about self-defense. “Self-defense”’ in the second amendment in Heller and McDonald was sort of judicial activism, but conservatives won’t admit that.

 

[Nepperhan]

As an NRA member who happens to disagree with their positions on a few issues, that hasn’t hasn’t been my experience.

Sir, I posted on a gun forum for years and “free loader” was the nicest thing said of me. The gun rights enthusiasts brook no alternative viewpoints.

Remember, Obama had a Republican and a pro-lifer (two different folks) in his administration so the Democrats seemed more open to those views. Now with Trump, he has an amalgamation of yes men and toadies who must support all of his views.