M
mschrank
Guest
reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL2043585320080320?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews&rpc=22&sp=true
Do these radical muslims only read their own revisionist historians, or are they aware that the Crusades were a defensive action because the muslims spread their faith by the sword and tried to invade Europe?
I just don’t get it- they seemed to get whipped up into a self-righetous furor when the word “crusader” is used, but in reality, they were the aggressors in those wars. It’s like the Germans getting indignant over D-Day.
If anything, the term ‘crusade’ should call shame into their own minds for their own crimes.
Do these radical muslims only read their own revisionist historians, or are they aware that the Crusades were a defensive action because the muslims spread their faith by the sword and tried to invade Europe?
I just don’t get it- they seemed to get whipped up into a self-righetous furor when the word “crusader” is used, but in reality, they were the aggressors in those wars. It’s like the Germans getting indignant over D-Day.
If anything, the term ‘crusade’ should call shame into their own minds for their own crimes.