Hello, I’m new here…but I found this thread really interesting.
A little background on myself…I’m dating a catholic (2.5 years now) and I never had a desire to really learn about his faith until I attended a seminar on tape that Christopher West had. Being protestant myself and never even knowing that people didn’t believe in contraception, I was floored. Mainly because I had always felt it wasn’t right and I didn’t know why, it just didn’t sit well with me. After that seminar, I have learned soooo much…anyways, I’m attending RCIA now and am planning to join the Church this Easter!
Anyways, from Christopher West’s books and reading “The theology of the body for beginners” (really good, since the TOTB is really heavy reading)…anyways, I noticed that no one commented on how sex in a marriage is a renewal of your wedding vows. If you were married in the catholic church, your wedding vows should all be the same: to freely, totally, faithfully and fruitfully love your spouse. You can’t have one without the other.
Artificial or natural contraception isn’t the issue. Any contracetive mentality is taking away from those wedding vows that you promised. NFP used with a contraceptive mentalilty is the same as using a condom in my opinion.
I also don’t think that I’ve heard anyone talk about how a couple needs a to have a just reason to avoid pregnancy, because if you don’t have a just reason to avoid it, than even NFP is contraceptive. Christopher West says that “NFP is acceptable not because it’s ‘natural’ as oppsed to ‘artificial’, but because it is in keeping with the nature of tsexual intercourse as a renewal of the couple’s wedding vows”
He gives an analogy of a wedding invitation. I don’t remember how he put it exactly, but I think it was something like this… If you didn’t want someone to come to your wedding and send them a “dis-invitation” and then they still showed up, you would be pretty peeved and angry with them. But if you knew that someone wouldn’t be able to make it, maybe because they lived far away and couldn’t afford it, and you sent them an invitation, knowing they wouldnt be there, if they did end up coming you could have no reason to be resentful.
If you invite God to your act at an infertile time, knowing full well your most likely will not get pregnant, you are still keeping his will in mind, and if he comes and creates that new being, you would know that it was his will. But if you specifically sent him a message saying you didn’t want him to come by using a condom, or such, then you would be pretty unhappy if pregnancy was a reasult.
It’s like the difference between a miscarriage (God’s will) and an abortion (your will). If you can’t see the severity in that, then I think you really do need to pray about it.
Concerning people who can no longer have children for whatever reason, I don’t think practicing NFP is completely nessecary, but I do think that it is benefical. It’s like fasting from food. Take that time to abstain, to strengthen your marriage in other ways, and to pray and meditate with God.
Anyways, it’s late and I’ve probably become completely incoherant