P
Peepers
Guest
There is strong evidence that left handedness is related to testosterone levels during prenatally, also there is evidence of handedness in the womb, which indicate that it is a biological condition. There are also some morphological differences in the brain which have been identified. Nothing conclusive though. With a lot of this stuff, you take the bulk of the evidence. That is why blanket statements like there is NO PROOF OF THIS, mean nothing, unless the person making the statement is an expert in the topic.There is no left-handed gene either, so there is no problem with my analogy.
I agree. That was my point. Just because I would not like it, others do and have been successful at it. To call it “harm” or the practitioner incompetent is just on opinion of those who disagree.
These discussions can go round and round with people making unfounded claims, picking and choosing quotes and statements here and there which support their views. A good friend of my family has made part of her career studying left handed people and Johns Hopkins. She holds four full professorships, and has been made a baroness in the country of Belgium for her contributions to medical science. If she were here to offer an opinion, I would be inclined to pay attention to her.
The same is true with these blanket statements about sexuality from non experts. They don’t mean much other than that person has an opinion, which is fine. But it would be silly to mistake those statements as factual or authoritative statements.
It is a changing topic. There have been a number of genetic studies which have found correlates for homosexuality among twins, among uncles and nephews. There was a researcher who found some brain differences. My take on it is that there are no conclusive answers.
I understand why this issue would be such a heated topic among gay folks. I don’t understand why it can be such a heated topic among folks whom I would think have no real stake in the question.