C
Cabin4
Guest
Bishop Burke then has inferred that they have been been—ordained?
Obviously you do not have a proper undestanding of the BIG difference between the priethood of believers, and the ministerial priesthood.We are all asked to be priestly people. All of us, regardless of our “pelvis”.
The Church will never change its mind on women being priest. NEVER going to happen.And, before you throw darts…just again rememberm the church has been known to change it’s mind when in question wth moral questions.
I give God the credit of choosing His people, all His people, to do His work. And decding what the future holds for the Church. Amen.To try and possess the faculties of the ministerial priesthood is something that the laity have already been warned against in Jude.
Start a new thread and we’ll be happy to disabuse you of this fallacious notion.And, before you throw darts…just again remember that the church has been known to change it’s position when faced with moral questions.
Archbishop Raymond Burke announced Friday that he has defrocked three priests of his archdiocese , who were accused of sexual abuse years ago. In a written statement, Archbishop Burke said he began the proceedings for laicization last year against Michael McGrath, Donald “Fr. Duck” Straub and Robert Yim in light of “credible allegations of sexual abuse of a minor against them.”
I sure He will be happy to know you approve.I give God the credit of choosing His people, all His people, to do His work. And decding what the future holds for the Church. Amen.
We are all sinners,… and we got the letter… twice…It has been changed…slavery is a good and well-documented change.
Going back to Bishop Burke and excommunicating the women, weren’t they just sinners? Then why not send letters to all the sinning priests in his diocese?
So you think it’s a **good **idea to kick people out of the Church if they are truly repentant of their sins?Defrocking is not excommunicating…sorry.
Yes, I agree.Excommunicating and defrocking are two very different acts.
You are so mistaken on what John Paul II really said. From:I was referring to being told to take the speck out of my eye. I am happy to have priests…just relax.
JPII standing on ordaining women is still a CANON LAW. He admits that it is outside of church authority. As for moral…that is where the women state their claim.
And, before you throw darts…just again remember that the church has been known to change it’s position when faced with moral questions.
This encyclical was written not just to voice an opinion, but to end the debate. The teaching of the Catholic Church is that the issue of women’s ordination is not subject to change. It is a doctrine, not a canon law, not a discipline. Women can no more be priest than a hamburger can be consecrated into the body of Christ. These women are promoting a heresy.Wherefore, in order that all doubt may be removed regarding a matter of great importance, a matter which pertains to the Church’s divine constitution itself, in virtue of my ministry of confirming the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32) I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful.