B
bknebel
Guest
Singerlady, why was it suspended?
It doesn’t seem to me that his action with St. Stans is just like every other parish. I have friends that go there and they’ve told me he has been there at least 4 or 5 times maybe more including changing the site of the respect life mass on the aniversary of Row v. Wade from the Cathedral to St. Stans.Don’t read too much into the St. Stan’s thing…I think he’s been there twice at this point for liturgies.
What? Don’t make blatant mistruths? Every bishop in the country? Are you crazy? There may be a handful of bishops that support Call to Action. Not all but Bruskewitz. Call to Action is a scourge of the Church. They don’t understand the theology or philosophy behind many of the Church’s teachings. If you don’t believe me check this out:Call to Action is ok with every bishop in the country with the exception of Bruskewitz, who felt the need to excommunicate them. He’s the only one. What I find interesting is that when a Bruskewitz is the only bishop doing something, the ‘authentic’ faithful let up a cheer…when an Untener type does it, they phone Rome and start gnashing their teeth.
Your opinions aren’t opinions, they are blatant mistruths about what has gone on.
Scary stuff. Thanks for the link.What? Don’t make blatant mistruths? Every bishop in the country? Are you crazy? There may be a handful of bishops that support Call to Action. Not all but Bruskewitz. Call to Action is a scourge of the Church. They don’t understand the theology or philosophy behind many of the Church’s teachings. If you don’t believe me check this out:
cta-usa.org/cta-ad.html
Not shockingly…you took the first comment out of context…since the man was basically saying that in a perfect world a parish would gather together at one mass to celebrate the eucharist…which is true.The following is taken from an article appearing in the Mt. Pleasant, Morning Sun Newspaper written by Constance Parten a writer for the paper. The article was titled “Catholics grapple with priest’s role”.
"Untener said one problem is that too many masses have been offered over the past 100 years. It has led to a fractured Catholic community.
‘I like to equate it to having Thanksgiving dinner with your family with sittings at 1 p.m., 2 p.m., etc.’ he said. ‘It may bring us to an appreciation of the parish as a family affair again.’
'The majority of Catholics, by a wide majority, would accept married, ordained priests and female ordained priests, Untener said. 'That’s in the United States - I don’t know what the percentages would be - in places where the perception of women is different."
The following is taken from an article in the Catholic Weekly
entitled “Michigan bishops told to explain teaching on women priests”.
Michigan bishops making their “ad limina” visits with Detroit’s Cardinal Adam J. Maida were: Kalamazoo Bishop James A. Murray, Grand Rapids Bishop Robert J. Rose, SAGINAW BISHOP KENNETH E. UNTENER, Gaylord Bishop Patrick R. Cooney, Lansing Bishop Carl F. Mengeling and Marquette Bishop James A. Garland.
"U.S. bishops must explain to their faithful why the Catholic Church CANNOT ordain women to the priesthood, Pope John Paul II, said.
Catholics in the United States also must know that the church’s practice of ordaining only men is not a matter of discrimination, but of fidelity to Christ, the pope told a group of bishops from Michigan and Ohio.
Pope John Paul told his guests, “As bishops, you must explain to the faithful why the church does not have the authority to ordain women to the ministerial priesthood, at the same time making clear why this is not a question of the equality of persons or of their God-given rights.”
Hmmm…to think I’ve made the mistake of assuming being Catholic is enough…without these loaded adjectives like ‘orthodox’ and ‘authentic’.keep up hope, all! The diocese will be orthodox again someday… refer to my post about bishop’s 11 years here!
Problems: lack of vocations and funding for Catholic schoolsWalt and All,
I have never commented on Ken. We can let his record speak for itself.
All that I really care about is what Bishop Carlson is doing now or plans to do. Of course we can’t read his mind, but:
What are the problem areas he has identified? Or what has he publicly said about the problems?
We now have 12 seminarians, 2 of whom will be ordained this JuneWhat concrete actions has he taken so far?
What actions did he take in Sioux Falls when he encountered similar problems there?
What people has he moved around? (No need to name the names.)
Has he started or ceased diocesan or parish-level programs?
don’t knowHas he announced some sort of diocesan-wide time-table to get certain goals done?
They have increased from 2 to 10How has the priestly vocations situation changed since he arrived a year ago?
Just to clarify, I was answering a question that specifically asked about priestly vocations.When you speak of vocations, please clarify priestly .
Hestia said:- Sunday eucharist with an ordained minister present being the only time it will not be permitted. .
We are not going to battle and rip apart Bishop Carlson because of changes he feels need to be implemented in our liturgy - but I don’t believe there will be as many changes as a lot of folks in this chatroom hope for or expect. Then how will you support Bishop Carlson?
Then how will you support Bishop Carlson? Doesn’t sound like a very positive comment!