Bishops remain focused on 'responsible restrictions' on gun ownership

  • Thread starter Thread starter liturgyluver
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree with Ender, and especially with the quote from Cardinal Dulles.
And what was it exactly that caused Cardinal Dulles to make such a statement, and was it specifically to separate what the Church teaches on defense and gun control?

It’s far to easy to pull out a single statement and ‘make it’ apply to any subject; it seems often to support a personal view. 😦
 
I agree with Ender, and especially with the quote from Cardinal Dulles.
It’s one thing if the Bishops were discussing the positive impact on government revenues an increase in or new tax on ammo and certain firearms. It’s another thing if the Bishops are talking about gun control in regards to the application of self defense and human life. Cardinal Dulles’s statement applies to the first, not the second.
 
They have not said anything specific, as to be considered ‘inexperienced’ or ‘liberal’ as some posters have rushed to state. The article shows them responding to the Sandy Hook shooting.
So then there is no argument to be made here aside from the “continued” position that both the Church and the State have in regards to gun control measures… There’s really nothing new to discuss.

…this is really just political debate.
 
So then there is no argument to be made here aside from the “continued” position that both the Church and the State have in regards to gun control measures… There’s really nothing new to discuss.

…this is really just political debate.
The shootings at Sandy Hook prompted the most recent statements. I don’t believe those concerns to be as much political, as I see them in concern for life, and the timing is more than just coincidence.
 
The shootings at Sandy Hook prompted the most recent statements. I don’t believe those concerns to be as much political, as I see them in concern for life, and the timing is more than just coincidence.
What about the victims? Shouldn’t that be our focus -praying for them and their families?

…all this other talk I see as primarily politically charged… I see talk of “liberal” and “conservative”. I think everybody is all worked-up, not focusing on the victims enough.
 
What about the victims? Shouldn’t that be our focus -praying for them and their families?

…all this other talk I see as primarily politically charged… I see talk of “liberal” and “conservative”. I think everybody is all worked-up, not focusing on the victims enough.
December 21, 2012

USCCB Committees Call For Action In Response To Newtown Tragedy
In the face of the horrific evil that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012, as people of faith we first and foremost turn to God and pray. We pray for those whose lives were robbed from them. As Catholic Bishops, we join together with the President of our Conference, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, who on the day of the horrible tragedy expressed his profound solidarity with and prayers for the families, friends, neighbors, and communities whose hearts have been rent by the loss of a child or loved one. No words can capture your suffering. We look to Christ, his words and deeds, and ultimately to his Cross and Resurrection. It is in Jesus that we place our hope.
With regard to the regulation of fire arms, first, the intent to protect one’s loved ones is an honorable one, but simply put, guns are too easily accessible. The Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, in their document, “The International Arms Trade (2006),” emphasized the importance of enacting concrete controls on handguns, for example, noting that “limiting the purchase of such arms would certainly not infringe on the rights of anyone.”
The events in Newtown call us to turn to our Lord in prayer and to witness more profoundly Christ’s perfect love, mercy and compassion. We must confront violence with love.
There are glimmers of hope in this tragedy. Many people, including some of the victims, made extraordinary efforts to protect life. In particular, the teachers, the principal, the children, the first responders and other leaders showed tremendous courage during the tragedy. Some sacrificed their own lives protecting others.
In their memory and for the sake of our nation, we reiterate our call made in 2000, in our statement, Responsibility, Rehabilitation and Restoration: A Catholic Perspective on Crime and Criminal Justice, for all Americans, especially legislators, to:
1.Support measures that control the sale and use of firearms
2.Support measures that make guns safer (especially efforts that prevent their unsupervised use by children and anyone other than the owner)
3.Call for sensible regulations of handguns
4.Support legislative efforts that seek to protect society from the violence associated with easy access to deadly weapons including assault weapons
5.Make a serious commitment to confront the pervasive role of addiction and mental illness in crime.
As we long for the arrival of the Prince of Peace in this Advent and Christmas season, we call on all people of goodwill to help bring about a culture of life and peace.
 
Like I said. It’s just a political statement from them that I am in no way required to agree with.
You’re not ‘required’ to agree with anything.

While it is directed more at lawmakers, it’s not a political statement.
The Sandy Hook tragedy has caused great anguish for parents and others who attempt to safeguard our children. In addition to the outpouring of prayers and support from around the nation, understandably this tragedy has given rise to discussions about national policies and steps that can be taken to foster a culture that protects the innocent and those most vulnerable among us.** It is time for our nation to renew a culture of life** in our society.
 
You’re not ‘required’ to agree with anything.
Sure I am. No sex outside of marriage, no abortion, belief in the real presence, all sorts of things. The USCCB position on gun control is not one of them however.
While it is directed more at lawmakers, it’s not a political statement.
If you can’t see that statement for what it is, a political position on gun control; then I can only assume that, in your view, the USCCB has never made a political statement on anything.
 
Sure I am. No sex outside of marriage, no abortion, belief in the real presence, all sorts of things. The USCCB position on gun control is not one of them however.

If you can’t see that statement for what it is, a political position on gun control; then I can only assume that, in your view, the USCCB has never made a political statement on anything.
Did you even read the statement?

It is a statement for our nation to return to a ‘culture of life’. It is neither conservative, or liberal.

Again, you’re not required to agree with anything.
 
Did you even read the statement?
Yes, here’s the political part of it:

1.Support measures that control the sale and use of firearms

2.Support measures that make guns safer (especially efforts that prevent their unsupervised use by children and anyone other than the owner)

3.Call for sensible regulations of handguns

4.Support legislative efforts that seek to protect society from the violence associated with easy access to deadly weapons including assault weapons

5.Make a serious commitment to confront the pervasive role of addiction and mental illness in crime.

Are you not willing to admit that at least some of those are political in nature?
Again, you’re not required to agree with anything.
If I consider myself catholic I certainly am. I’ve already listed several of them for you.
 
Yes, here’s the political part of it:

1.Support measures that control the sale and use of firearms

2.Support measures that make guns safer (especially efforts that prevent their unsupervised use by children and anyone other than the owner)

3.Call for sensible regulations of handguns

4.Support legislative efforts that seek to protect society from the violence associated with easy access to deadly weapons including assault weapons

5.Make a serious commitment to confront the pervasive role of addiction and mental illness in crime.

If I consider myself catholic I certainly am. I’ve already listed several of them for you.
I believe I’ll trust their understanding, and applications of the teachings in the Catechism, in this case referencing self defense, over anyone with a ‘vested’ political interest on these forums. They are teaching spiritually, and what is being espoused on these threads by gun right activists is secular. They seek reasonable, and gun right advocates seek nothing, except more guns. One says culture of life, the other says, ‘it’s a right.’ One is from the Church, the other is from the state.
Heb 13:17 Obey your prelates and be subject to them. For they watch as being to render an account of your souls: that they may do this with joy and not with grief. For this is not expedient for you.
 
I believe I’ll trust their understanding, and applications of the teachings in the Catechism, in this case referencing self defense, over anyone with a ‘vested’ political interest on these forums.
  1. There are no Church doctrines that identify whether the measures we currently have that regulate the sale and use of firearms are adequate or, if inadequate, in what way they should be changed.
  2. There are no Church doctrines that identify how to make guns safer.
  3. There are no Church doctrines that define what sensible hand gun regulations are.
  4. There are no… that define what laws would protect society from the violence associated with easy access to deadly weapons including assault weapons
5.There are no …
They are teaching spiritually, and what is being espoused on these threads by gun right activists is secular.
There are no spiritual solutions to the problems they’ve identified. How do you spiritually make a gun safer?
They seek reasonable, and gun right advocates seek nothing, except more guns. One says culture of life, the other says, ‘it’s a right.’ One is from the Church, the other is from the state.
This is one of the main reasons I object to the bishops’ involvement in political issues, because it encourages people to make such grossly uncharitable judgments of others as this one. When the bishops make statements like they have in this case, even though they are terribly vague, people tend to see the question not as a debate over differing views of what works and what doesn’t but as being between good people and bad people. The bishops may contribute nothing concrete to the solutions to the problems they identify but, indirectly, they do contribute a great deal to coarsening the tone of the discussion.

Ender
 
  1. There are no Church doctrines that identify whether the measures we currently have that regulate the sale and use of firearms are adequate or, if inadequate, in what way they should be changed.
  2. There are no Church doctrines that identify how to make guns safer.
  3. There are no Church doctrines that define what sensible hand gun regulations are.
  4. There are no… that define what laws would protect society from the violence associated with easy access to deadly weapons including assault weapons
5.There are no …
There are no spiritual solutions to the problems they’ve identified. How do you spiritually make a gun safer?
This is one of the main reasons I object to the bishops’ involvement in political issues, because it encourages people to make such grossly uncharitable judgments of others as this one. When the bishops make statements like they have in this case, even though they are terribly vague, people tend to see the question not as a debate over differing views of what works and what doesn’t but as being between good people and bad people. The bishops may contribute nothing concrete to the solutions to the problems they identify but, indirectly, they do contribute a great deal to coarsening the tone of the discussion.

Ender
The Bishops teachings on a culture of life are acceptable. More acceptable than people fighting for gun rights, in my opinion.

They spoke of spiritual solutions in their statement.
 
Have the Bishops expressed what exactly needs to be done in regards to “responsible restrictions”…? Have they actually said that the current restrictions are not good enough?
I am not aware if this has happened. I do not know why they are being attacked so much. I think people tend to get too defensive and start throwing around names without substance. It used to be if a thread goes on long enough, someone will be called a Nazi. Now, if a thread goes on long enough, some one will be called a liberal.

Guess what folks, we will be having this debate, like it or not. It would be irresponsible to not examine such a tragedy and see if such things can be avoided in the future. Those who do not learn from history…, and all.
 
I agree with Ender, and especially with the quote from Cardinal Dulles.
I don’t particularly care for the quote, even if it an accurate quote. First, it doesn’t apply here, as there has been not policy statement. Second, bishops do not exercise authority based on “credibility” whatever that means. Credibility is not something inherent in a bishop, or anyone. Rather it lies in the mind of the reader, or listener. Bishops exercise authority. This is something the seculare world can not diminish.
 
I believe I’ll trust their understanding, and applications of the teachings in the Catechism, in this case referencing self defense, over anyone with a ‘vested’ political interest on these forums.
In other words, even after reading their obvious political bias concerning this issue, you’re still going to pretend that their statement has no political overtones.
 
I don’t particularly care for the quote, even if it an accurate quote.
Of course you don’t. It doesn’t agree with your political views. I’d be willing to bet if Cardinal Dulles had said that “all guns should be banned and confiscated,” you would be quoting that all over the place.
 
Of course you don’t. It doesn’t agree with your political views. I’d be willing to bet if Cardinal Dulles had said that “all guns should be banned and confiscated,” you would be quoting that all over the place.
How in the heck would you know? You have no idea what my political views are. I don’t post politics too much here.
 
How in the heck would you know? You have no idea what my political views are.
I’m fairly certain I know what they are concerning guns, but perhaps I’m wrong. I’m more than willing to admit that if I am. I’ll give you a couple questions concerning firearms, I’m betting you’ll answer no to #1 and yes to #2. I’ll even give you my answers first.
  1. Should any U.S citizen, after passing a background check (including screening for serious mental illness) and some basic firearms training, be allowed to carry a concealed weapon (handgun)?
    My answer is yes.
  2. Should the congress pass an “assault weapons” ban based on how a weapon “looks” or what they deem to be “unnecessary”. An AR-15 for example. (The so-called civilian equivalent) to the military M-16?
    My answer is no.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top