T
Teelynn
Guest
Now that’s telling your congregation like it is, without any sugar coating!


Thanks!Yes, it’s the House equivalent and stalled since March 2011 in committee.
Perhaps they earn the monicker I have heard for them before: “Anti-Christian Liberties Union” or something of that sort. That does not surprise me but that doesn’t make it right.Our church created letters to our 3 house of reps and to our 2 senators and placed them in the Narthex. After Mass we were all invited to sign and place our addresses at the bottom of all 5 individual letters to be sent. I was surprised how many foks chose not to participate.
There were at least 100 of each letter that was signed, hopefully today after Massmore will be signed and sent.
I am so confused that the ACLU will be all over a municipality for putting up a nativity scene, or having a prayer before a football game, but when the President DICTATES policy to religious organizations we can hear pins dropping all over the place. Where is that super power when you need it!!!![]()
I think they probably feel they are up against a wall anyway. I mean, when your religious freedom is threatened (and this hasn’t been the first incident with this administration) and your institutions’ very existence are threatened, tax status is down on the list somewhat.I was under the impression that to keep their tax status, politics had to be kept out of the pulpit? Or do they only have to refrain from telling the congregation how to vote? This seems very political indeed.
No - to keep tax status the Church cannot tell their congregation who to vote for.I was under the impression that to keep their tax status, politics had to be kept out of the pulpit? Or do they only have to refrain from telling the congregation how to vote? This seems very political indeed.
I am so tired of this “we can’t talk about it or we will lose our tax exempt status”. If that be the case get rid of it for it is a shackle on us.I think they probably feel they are up against a wall anyway. I mean, when your religious freedom is threatened (and this hasn’t been the first incident with this administration) and your institutions’ very existence are threatened, tax status is down on the list somewhat.
They are barred from campaigning, not from political issues, although it can’t be their main activity.I was under the impression that to keep their tax status, politics had to be kept out of the pulpit? Or do they only have to refrain from telling the congregation how to vote? This seems very political indeed.
I agree completely…sometimes I think it’s a convenience so that the clergy doesn’t have to get involved. Then again, you do hear rumblings on Capital Hill about taking away their tax exemption whenever they breath a word. I used to think it would never happen regardless, that there would be too much of a backlash, but with this administration anything is possible. They seem to be dictating the rules to the rest of us.I am so tired of this “we can’t talk about it or we will lose our tax exempt status”. If that be the case get rid of it for it is a shackle on us.
I think most Americans will see it that way.Anyone see the Bishops’ rejection of the compromise as a win for the HHS mandate and the administration?
Yes, but even if 99% of Catholics wanted contraceptive coverage, it still is about freedom of conscience and something our forefathers tried to prevent government infringement upon. The bigger issue is “what’s next?” Government mandated Sabbath day to Sunday to prevent Orthodox Jews from closing on Saturday? No time off for religious services?I think most Americans will see it that way.
They will see the Bishops rejection of it as now becoming more about contraception and less about religious liberty.
And many moderate, and certainly liberal Catholics, will feel the same way.
Rasmussen poll showed on Fox News today showed that 58% of Catholics polled think that contraception showed be covered by employers.
Unfortunately that will be lost on most Americans, including many Catholics.Yes, but even if 99% of Catholics wanted contraceptive coverage, it still is about freedom of conscience and something our forefathers tried to prevent government infringement upon. .