Blog claims Pope Benedict says Luther's "faith alone" translation is correct

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jolly_Joe
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
He also said to sin as much as you can.:mad:
He did? Show me where he ever said that. It is invective like this that breaks down dialogue. He did say “Sin Boldly” once in a letter to Melancthon, his colleague in Wittenburg, because Melancthon was afraid to act. “Sin Boldly” meant for him to act and don’t be affraid of making a mistake, because there is a God of grace there for you. If you can show me where you got :confused: the above statement from Luther I will look up the context, but I have studied him for thirty years and this is new to me. If you are just throwing it in there to cast dirt on him, then you are as one who Jesus dealt with when he was pastorally dealing with the woman caught in adultry. Take your stones and go home.
 
breakingchristiannews.com/articles/display_art_pf.html?ID=6341

So after all those nasty things said here about Luther “adding” the word “alone” to his translation, Pope Benedict has now publically stated Luther’s translation was correct.

I can’t tell from the article if he’s quit believing more broadly in salvation by faith and works but then I haven’t seen him excommunicated this week so it must just be the narrow topic of the translation that the Pope disagrees with many here.
The author of the article you link to is drawing some incredibly broad strokes of interpretation of what the Pope said. This is the actual text, from the general audience of 2/4/2009
Benedict XVI says Martin Luther’s doctrine on justification is correct, if faith “is not opposed to charity.”

But in order to understand this Pauline teaching, Benedict XVI affirmed, "we must clarify what is the ‘law’ from which we have been freed and what are those ‘works of the law’ that do not justify."

He explained: “Already in the community of Corinth there was the opinion, which will return many times in history, which consisted in thinking that it was a question of the moral law, and that Christian freedom consisted therefore in being free from ethics. …] It is obvious that this interpretation is erroneous: Christian liberty is not libertinism; the freedom of which St. Paul speaks is not freedom from doing good.”

Instead, the Pope said, the law to which Paul refers is the “collection of behaviors extending from an ethical foundation to the ritual and cultural observances that substantially determined the identity of the just man – particularly circumcision, the observance regarding pure food and general ritual purity, the rules regarding observance of the Sabbath, etc.”

These observances served to protect Jewish identity and faith in God; they were “a defense shield that would protect the precious inheritance of the faith,” he remarked.

But, the Holy Father continued, at the moment of Paul’s encounter with Christ, the Apostle “understood that with Christ’s resurrection the situation had changed radically.”

“The wall – so says the Letter to the Ephesians – between Israel and the pagans was no longer necessary,” he said. “It is Christ who protects us against polytheism and all its deviations; it is Christ who unites us with and in the one God; it is Christ who guarantees our true identity in the diversity of cultures; and it is he who makes us just. To be just means simply to be with Christ and in Christ. And this suffices. Other observances are no longer necessary.”

And it is because of this, the Bishop of Rome continued, that Luther’s expression “by faith alone” is true "if faith is not opposed to charity, to love. Faith is to look at Christ, to entrust oneself to Christ, to be united to Christ, to be conformed to Christ, to his life. And the form, the life of Christ, is love; hence, to believe is to be conformed to Christ and to enter into his love."

“Paul knows,” he added, “that in the double love of God and neighbor the whole law is fulfilled. Thus the whole law is observed in communion with Christ, in faith that creates charity. We are just when we enter into communion with Christ, who is love.”
The pope is pointing out that sola fide is correct as long as it is not divorced from charity (love). God is Love (Deus est caritas). And God is pure act*. Therefore, faith cannot be passive, i.e., divorced from charity, divorced from action.* It must bear the fruit of charity if it is truly faith. And that fruit comes through entering into communion with Christ, and conforming to His Way. That Way was not one of passivity. Christ was active, performing works even on the Sabbath, because good works are the manifestations of charity, and for us, the sign of faith.
 
The author of the article you link to is drawing some incredibly broad strokes of interpretation of what the Pope said. This is the actual text, from the general audience of 2/4/2009

The pope is pointing out that sola fide is correct as long as it is not divorced from charity (love). God is Love (Deus est caritas). And God is pure act*. Therefore, faith cannot be passive, i.e., divorced from charity, divorced from action.* It must bear the fruit of charity if it is truly faith. And that fruit comes through entering into communion with Christ, and conforming to His Way. That Way was not one of passivity. Christ was active, performing works even on the Sabbath, because good works are the manifestations of charity, and for us, the sign of faith.
I agree whole-heartedly with you, and Luther did too if you read his treateses on Faith and look at his life and actions. I had already read the text of what he actually said that day. From my perspective in knowing many of the works that Luther wrote, sola fide et sola gratia to be more precise leads naturally to charity (love). Faith, Hope, and Love abide and the greatest of these is Love. They are the gifts of the spirit given to each devoted person of the Way.🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top