Boy Scouts - Gay acceptance

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffalo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I get the honesty thing 100%. In the past, I worked with gays, a lesbian and a bisexual. The fake word homophobia did not exist. I could care less what these people did on their own time and in private. It was never an issue. It was never brought up. We worked together just fine. I don’t care if half my neighbors are LGBT.

Later, it came time to mobilize the troops, and in any conflict and to raise morale among your forces, you have to demonize the ‘enemy.’ Against gays with partners? You’re homophobic. Against gay marriage? You are filled with ignorance and hate. You want to hear honest? Some years back when same-sex marriage was defeated by vote in Michigan, a letter appeared in a major Detroit newspaper where the writer called “Michigan, the great hate state.” Little 8 year old Bobby hates gays? 90 year old women in nursing homes hate gays?

Had this been an honest conversation, that would have been one thing. Instead, I’m watching a professional sports figure who has come out on TV, and he keeps repeating: “Stop being homophobic.” What, his teammates run and hide now that he’s out? They cringe in the corner whenever he walks by? They have an irrational fear of him? Give me a break.

Had the conversation started differently, this whole discussion would not be taking place, but this was forced on the scouts by who? Gay activists. People who are forced to do something generally do not respond well since force is not an argument. It’s forcing others to do not just what you want but exactly the way you want it. Let’s talk? ** crickets **

Ed
I can agree with a lot of this. It’s when certain people on here start equating gays with pederasts and the like that I start to see where some gay activists are coming from.

It’s sort of how people who aren’t even racists are being called racist now. The history of certain groups has been so sad and so crushing, that they tend to be over-sensitive now and see a slight where none exists.

Although many people on here are militant anti-gays and are spreading propaganda about he link between homosexuality a d pedophilia and all sorts of things. They are clearly not coming from a ace of compassion and love, but from a place of disgust and derision.
 
You and I well know that there is way more to it.

If they looked at their lives honestly they would be ordered toward the good, which is chastity.

Voris points out a reality in this Vortex. Show America what sodomy is and America will reject it. Even Hollywood won’t show this film because much of America bought the propaganda and would be disgusted to find out they have been snookered.

Is it really the case something can be “too gay” for modern Hollywood? Apparently so! Please watch this episode of the Vortex and pass it to your family and friends.
The only reason Hollywood doesn’t show sodomy onscreen is because straight men think it’s “icky”. Movies ABOUND with girl-on-girl sex though. Personally, i see no difference at all. All these guys get up on their high horses about how disgusting sodomy is when almost every single one of you secretly LOVES to watch two women having sex. Those of you who say you are not turned on by girl-on-girl porn are probably lying. Hypocrites.
 
No. The “point” is not to sexualize the scouts.
Yes it is. You’ve just reinforced that.
It’s you people who are rabidly terrified that the gay culture is actually becoming a part of mainstream society who are attributing sick and perverted motives to people who are just looking to live their lives with honesty.
Excuse me? Which people are “rabidly terrified?” How would have any inside information about who is “rabidly terrified” of what? Answer: None.

Second favorite Straw Man of the gay apologists: It must mean fear. :bigyikes: Must be prudes. Yeah. You definitely have us all figured out. (Not.)

Newsflash:
I have the same attitude toward heterosexual sex inappropriately a subject of youth groups whose focus is not sex, but you didn’t see that part of my earlier posts either. Why? Because you show no interest in reading what you prefer to filter out.

For some people, stereotyping and name-calling is just way more fun. 😉

Teenage scouts are by definition not adults. There’s no reason for sex to come up in casual conversation because there should be no assumption of that in the BSA, as several of us said earlier. Different category of organizaiton than the U.S. adult military.

Have a nice day. I have a date with reality. 😉
 
Yes it is. You’ve just reinforced that.

Excuse me? Which people are “rabidly terrified?” How would have any inside information about who is “rabidly terrified” of what? Answer: None.

Second favorite Straw Man of the gay apologists: It must mean fear. :bigyikes: Must be prudes. Yeah. You definitely have us all figured out. (Not.)

Newsflash:
I have the same attitude toward heterosexual sex inappropriately a subject of youth groups whose focus is not sex, but you didn’t see that part of my earlier posts either. Why? Because you have no interest in reading what you prefer to filter out.

For some people, stereotyping and name-calling is just way more fun. 😉

Teenage scouts are by definition not adults. There’s no reason for sex to come up in casual conversation because there should be no assumption of that in the BSA, as several of us said earlier. Different category of organizaiton than the U.S. adult military.

Have a nice day. I have a date with reality. 😉
Good, then you should have no problem with the current position of the Boy Scouts. A guy can come in and talk about what he and his partner did that weekend and where they took their son and how they had the filet and and potatoes at the local bistro and you should have zero problem with that. A boy should be able to say that he and his boyfriend went to a movie and you should have no problem with that. That’s all they were fighting for. The same way that a man can talk about his weekend with the wife and kids, gays can do the same about their families. Nothing inappropriate here. No sexualization here. Nobody is asking to show gay porn on movie night or to have some kind of “I had anal sex!” merit badge.

Unless you are HONESTLY saying that when I coached gymnastics and my kids would ask what I did that weekend and I would tell them that my husband and our son went to a movie, that I was “sexualizing” the situation. To which I say, grow up.
 
Good, then you should have no problem with the current position of the Boy Scouts. A guy can come in and talk about what he and his partner did that weekend and where they took their son and how they had the filet and and potatoes at the local bistro and you should have zero problem with that. A boy should be able to say that he and his boyfriend went to a movie and you should have no problem with that. That’s all they were fighting for. The same way that a man can talk about his weekend with the wife and kids, gays can do the same about their families. Nothing inappropriate here. No sexualization here. Nobody is aski g to show gay porn on movie night or to have some kind of “I like anal sex” merit badge. Sheesh.
When you want to engage in adult behavior, LaSainte, and read my posts on sexual harrassment earlier on this thread, I’ll have a conversation with you. Otherwise, the tone you are using is childish, fingerpointing, and not conducive to dialogue. My position is consistenly non-sexual with regard to non-sexual activity supervised by adults.

Again, back to reality for me. Have a nice day.
 
When you want to engage in adult behavior, LaSainte, and read my posts on sexual harrassment earlier on this thread, I’ll have a conversation with you. Otherwise, the tone you are using is childish, fingerpointing, and not conducive to dialogue. My position is consistenly non-sexual with regard to non-sexual activity supervised by adults.

Again, back to reality for me. Have a nice day.
Where is your evidence then that these groups are looking to somehow make sexuality a focus of the BSA? Where is your evidence that rather than simply being allowed to be themselves without being ejected from the group, they are actually trying to make their sexual practices the focus here? How do you see the BSA changing their everyday activities to include some type of sex-oriented practices? Do tell.

And seriously, if a boy feels “sexually harassed” by simply being present during a conversation in which another scout/scout leader’s homosexual orientation happens to be revealed, then that is practically the very definition of homophobia - being afraid of gays for no reason other than that they are gay. That kid needs to grow a pair and learn that there are different kinds of people in the world. I assume that if there was any ACTUAL harassment going on that this would be soundly addresses by any scout leader, gay or straight. People don’t have a god-given right in this world not to be made uncomfortable by other people’s choices and lifestyles.
 
Good, then you should have no problem with the current position of the Boy Scouts. A guy can come in and talk about what he and his partner did that weekend and where they took their son and how they had the filet and and potatoes at the local bistro and you should have zero problem with that. A boy should be able to say that he and his boyfriend went to a movie and you should have no problem with that. That’s all they were fighting for. The same way that a man can talk about his weekend with the wife and kids, gays can do the same about their families. Nothing inappropriate here. No sexualization here. Nobody is asking to show gay porn on movie night or to have some kind of “I had anal sex!” merit badge.

Unless you are HONESTLY saying that when I coached gymnastics and my kids would ask what I did that weekend and I would tell them that my husband and our son went to a movie, that I was “sexualizing” the situation. To which I say, grow up.
You have not said what religion, if any, you have. This is a Catholic site. According to the Catholic Church, homosexuality is intrinsically disordered and homosexual relationships are gravely sinful. Obviously, you do not share this belief. Perhaps you have other beliefs about what is right and what is wrong that others do not share. That’s your prerogative.

But telling a Catholic that he or she should have “zero problem” with something that is contrary to the teachings of the Church is entirely misplaced.

So, from a Catholic standpoint, the conversation about what X and his boyfriend did on their “date” is scandalous, whereas telling someone you and your husband and son went to a movie, is not. Telling someone what you and your husband did in bed would be another matter.
 
You have not said what religion, if any, you have. This is a Catholic site. According to the Catholic Church, homosexuality is intrinsically disordered and homosexual relationships are gravely sinful. Obviously, you do not share this belief. Perhaps you have other beliefs about what is right and what is wrong that others do not share. That’s your prerogative.

But telling a Catholic that he or she should have “zero problem” with something that is contrary to the teachings of the Church is entirely misplaced.

So, from a Catholic standpoint, the conversation about what X and his boyfriend did on their “date” is scandalous, whereas telling someone you and your husband and son went to a movie, is not. Telling someone what you and your husband did in bed would be another matter.
I am Catholic, it says so next to my name. I do believe homosexuality is wrong, as is not attending Sunday church, downloading free music, coveting a friend’s Maserati and a whole host of other things. I don’t shun people who do or don’t do these things, however. I don’t think they should be forced to hide in a hole and not belong to any clubs or be around me and my “perfect” family. The BSA is not a Catholic organization and so its members are not held to Catholic standards of behavior. I do my best to follow my faith and I let others do their own thing unless it endangers me or my loved ones or threatens us in some way.

Should the BSA also kick people out who don’t attend church? Who admit to watching the latest episode of TrueBlood on Hulu? Oh, the scandal!

Why pick on one single sin when there are SO many more people you could be shunning right now? Don’t limit yourself! Now get out there and shun some sinners!
 
I am Catholic, it says so next to my name. I do believe homosexuality is wrong, as is not attending Sunday church, downloading free music, coveting a friend’s Maserati and a whole host of other things. I don’t shun people who do or don’t do these things, however. I don’t think they should be forced to hide in a hole and not belong to any clubs or be around me and my “perfect” family. The BSA is not a Catholic organization and so its members are not held to Catholic standards of behavior. I do my best to follow my faith and I let others do their own thing unless it endangers me or my loved ones or threatens us in some way.

Should the BSA also kick people out who don’t attend church? Who admit to watching the latest episode of TrueBlood on Hulu? Oh, the scandal!

Why pick on one single sin when there are SO many more people you could be shunning right now? Don’t limit yourself! Now get out there and shun some sinners!
Odd that your religion doesn’t appear next to your name when i look at it. Perhaps a computer glitch.

The question is not whether I do or do not rule the BSA. I don’t. The organization can do what it wants to do. However, to the extent it encourages scandal, one is not amiss in pointing it out, and further pointing out that Catholics might be well advised to avoid subjecting their children to it.

Would I be okay about my son joining a group in which the official policy allows conversation that extends to admissions of theft or drug dealing or serious immorality of any kind on members’ parts with no repercussions at all? No, I would not, whether the group called itself the Boy Scouts or by some street gang name. I would consider it a severe moral failing on my part if I did, and the Church would agree with me.

I would also say that it is my guess the BSA has doomed itself to massive reduction in membership, as happened in Canada when the scouts did the same thing there. An almost immediate 50% dropoff there, as I understand it. Possibly whatever the scouts previously had to offer was of no value and it doesn’t matter whether anybody joins it or not. But if it did have value, then a membership drop-off is not a good thing.
 
Odd that your religion doesn’t appear next to your name when i look at it. Perhaps a computer glitch.

The question is not whether I do or do not rule the BSA. I don’t. The organization can do what it wants to do. However, to the extent it encourages scandal, one is not amiss in pointing it out, and further pointing out that Catholics might be well advised to avoid subjecting their children to it.

Would I be okay about my son joining a group in which the official policy allows conversation that extends to admissions of theft or drug dealing or serious immorality of any kind on members’ parts with no repercussions at all? No, I would not, whether the group called itself the Boy Scouts or by some street gang name. I would consider it a severe moral failing on my part if I did, and the Church would agree with me.

I would also say that it is my guess the BSA has doomed itself to massive reduction in membership, as happened in Canada when the scouts did the same thing there. An almost immediate 50% dropoff there, as I understand it. Possibly whatever the scouts previously had to offer was of no value and it doesn’t matter whether anybody joins it or not. But if it did have value, then a membership drop-off is not a good thing.
Personally, I think the Scouts are seriously outdated anyway. I think they are going to lose members no matter what. Kids just don’t care anymore about “merit badges” and sashes and silly little uniforms. It’s actually a good time for another group to step in and actually be cool. There is something just…OFF about a bunch of adolescent boys in tassels and kerchiefs and sashes in the woods together alone with an older man. It starts getting creepy around age 8.

So yeah, I am paranoid and I don’t personally want my boys spending huge amounts of alone time with ANY man who is not my husband. Sporting events are acceptable because they generally have an open door policy with parents for the most part. But with the scouts, if you’re not a member, you can’t really participate once your kid reaches a certain age. I don’t like that.

I just find that a lot of people on here are so worried about things like homosexuality (which, if your child is one of the 97% of boys who is NOT gay, is going to affect them minimally), but aren’t nearly as concerned about letting their kids play with people who are irreligious or who have their own computer upstairs in their room or whose dad is divorced with a girlfriend. I’m not saying I would “shun”’ these people either, but situations like these are going to have a MUCH greater impact on your child than a gay friend in the Boy Scouts.

Your teenage son going to a friend’s house and looking at porn when his parents aren’t there, talking for hours with that same friend who has no belief in God or religion, eating dinner with that friend’s dad and his girlfriend, THESE are the things that will slowly but surely pull your child away from God and the Church.

And yet I see the same people on here harping on gays like they are Satan himself. It’s EASY to tell a straight boy that homosexuality is wrong and disordered and even if the kid has a gay friend or two, just the fact of NOT being gay makes it really easy to see homosexuality as being something intrinsically wrong. 99% of the guys I know who think pre-marital sex is fine and going to church is optional and downloading porn is ok are DISGUSTED by homosexuality and believe it to be utterly wrong-and we have gay friends! Don’t believe me? Just mention the subject of gay porn to ANY straight man or boy and watch his gay reflex take immediate effect.

These people need to get off the subject of homosexuality and start worrying about the other things that creep into our lives that turn our kids away from God much faster and much more easily than a gay scoutmaster.

Everybody is all “The gay ‘agenda’ is RUINING society! Not the gays! Anything but that!” Really? Your teenage son masturbated to lesbian porn 3 times today, had sex with his girlfriend, got high on YOUR “secret” marijuana stash and then stole an IPod.
 
Precisely correct. The “point” of the whole "gay acceptance (in the BSA) " crowd is to affirm sexuality as a part of scouting.

Sick. Not because sexuality is sick, or because self-awareness is sick, but because those with an agenda want much more than mere healthy psychological integration. They want sexuality to be consciously a part of every activity, group, identifier. It is Identity Politics gone off the rails. That fact alone makes it directly oppositional to Catholic teaching, which affirms every person (Catholic or not) as a whole person not overshadowed by sexuality, by left- or right-handedness, eye color, or any other compartmentalized approach to the human person.

Teenagers are coming into acute awareness of their sexuality. That does not mean that the adults who guide them should encourage sexual awareness to be an overt identifier within non-sexual groups and activities. As I said earlier, the BSA is not a sex club or a social club/dating club, per se: It is an activity club with specific steps of accomplishment along that line of activity and purpose. It is also a fraternity. Newsflash: Fraternity does not mean a sexual fraternity. The friendships gained therein have legtimacy, but adults have no business encouraging the sexualizing of those friendships, as that potentially falls into the sexual harrassment and sexualized atmosphere which is problematic legally.

I’m waiting for some activist to sue for Lesbians of America being formally admitted to the GSA.

Sick world.
You are right. According to the Human Rights Campaign, “Today is a historic day for Boy Scouts across the country who want to be a part of this great American institution,” said HRC President Chad Griffin. “But the new policy doesn’t go far enough. Parents and adults of good moral character, regardless of sexual orientation, should be able to volunteer their time to mentor the next generation of Americans.”

Mentor? Can we decide now what gay adults will be mentoring all the boys about? No, I’m not suggesting wrongdoing or illegal activity, but Billy will be told that acting on gay feelings is perfectly fine when he becomes an adult. This is called highjacking the Boy Scouts and giving them “guidance” as a group that is inconsistent with the idea that while bullying or harassing anyone for their sexual orientation is 100% wrong, giving those affirmations to gay boys to take it to the next level when they become adults, by definition, turns those adults into advocates for a cause. Some scouts in Utah already defied orders to not march in uniform in a gay pride parade.

Discipline and respect for authority are good things to have.

Peace,
Ed
 
I can agree with a lot of this. It’s when certain people on here start equating gays with pederasts and the like that I start to see where some gay activists are coming from.

It’s sort of how people who aren’t even racists are being called racist now. The history of certain groups has been so sad and so crushing, that they tend to be over-sensitive now and see a slight where none exists.

Although many people on here are militant anti-gays and are spreading propaganda about he link between homosexuality a d pedophilia and all sorts of things. They are clearly not coming from a ace of compassion and love, but from a place of disgust and derision.
So explain the desire of the Human Rights Campaign to include homosexual adults as mentors in the Boy Scouts. As I wrote earlier, in order to start a fight, people are called bigoted, ignorant and homophobic - a word that means nothing. How do you start a conversation with a straight that you know voted against gay marriage? How would that go?

Peace,
Ed
 
The only reason Hollywood doesn’t show sodomy onscreen is because straight men think it’s “icky”. Movies ABOUND with girl-on-girl sex though. Personally, i see no difference at all. All these guys get up on their high horses about how disgusting sodomy is when almost every single one of you secretly LOVES to watch two women having sex. Those of you who say you are not turned on by girl-on-girl porn are probably lying. Hypocrites.
Please. Assumptions without facts is just name-calling.

Ed
 
Good, then you should have no problem with the current position of the Boy Scouts. A guy can come in and talk about what he and his partner did that weekend and where they took their son and how they had the filet and and potatoes at the local bistro and you should have zero problem with that. A boy should be able to say that he and his boyfriend went to a movie and you should have no problem with that. That’s all they were fighting for. The same way that a man can talk about his weekend with the wife and kids, gays can do the same about their families. Nothing inappropriate here. No sexualization here. Nobody is asking to show gay porn on movie night or to have some kind of “I had anal sex!” merit badge.

Unless you are HONESTLY saying that when I coached gymnastics and my kids would ask what I did that weekend and I would tell them that my husband and our son went to a movie, that I was “sexualizing” the situation. To which I say, grow up.
Grow up? What’s the point of gay marriage? Not having sex? A gay man is going to walk up to a straight, have one beer too many, and start complaining about his marital problems in the bedroom? Do you think straight guys care about that - at all? There would be no conversation. Whereas a straight man could go to his straight friend to get a little advice about his marital problems.

“Dad? Why can guys marry guys?”

“I don’t know son.”

“They can’t have babies, right?”

“That’s right.”

“My friend Billy has two dads who are married but they adopted him. I don’t get it.”

“When you’re older son, I’ll explain it to you. Right now, just enjoy being a boy.”

Gay Adult mentor to openly gay boy scout.

“I hear you have a boyfriend.”

“Yeah. His name is Mark. We want to get married when we get older.”

“I think me and my husband would encourage you to do that.”

Peace,
Ed
 
Personally, I think the Scouts are seriously outdated anyway. I think they are going to lose members no matter what. Kids just don’t care anymore about “merit badges” and sashes and silly little uniforms. It’s actually a good time for another group to step in and actually be cool. There is something just…OFF about a bunch of adolescent boys in tassels and kerchiefs and sashes in the woods together alone with an older man. It starts getting creepy around age 8.

So yeah, I am paranoid and I don’t personally want my boys spending huge amounts of alone time with ANY man who is not my husband. Sporting events are acceptable because they generally have an open door policy with parents for the most part. But with the scouts, if you’re not a member, you can’t really participate once your kid reaches a certain age. I don’t like that.

I just find that a lot of people on here are so worried about things like homosexuality (which, if your child is one of the 97% of boys who is NOT gay, is going to affect them minimally), but aren’t nearly as concerned about letting their kids play with people who are irreligious or who have their own computer upstairs in their room or whose dad is divorced with a girlfriend. I’m not saying I would “shun”’ these people either, but situations like these are going to have a MUCH greater impact on your child than a gay friend in the Boy Scouts.

Your teenage son going to a friend’s house and looking at porn when his parents aren’t there, talking for hours with that same friend who has no belief in God or religion, eating dinner with that friend’s dad and his girlfriend, THESE are the things that will slowly but surely pull your child away from God and the Church.

And yet I see the same people on here harping on gays like they are Satan himself. It’s EASY to tell a straight boy that homosexuality is wrong and disordered and even if the kid has a gay friend or two, just the fact of NOT being gay makes it really easy to see homosexuality as being something intrinsically wrong. 99% of the guys I know who think pre-marital sex is fine and going to church is optional and downloading porn is ok are DISGUSTED by homosexuality and believe it to be utterly wrong-and we have gay friends! Don’t believe me? Just mention the subject of gay porn to ANY straight man or boy and watch his gay reflex take immediate effect.

These people need to get off the subject of homosexuality and start worrying about the other things that creep into our lives that turn our kids away from God much faster and much more easily than a gay scoutmaster.

Everybody is all “The gay ‘agenda’ is RUINING society! Not the gays! Anything but that!” Really? Your teenage son masturbated to lesbian porn 3 times today, had sex with his girlfriend, got high on YOUR “secret” marijuana stash and then stole an IPod.
Right, let’s just accept openly drug users, openly thieves, openly blasphemers, openly liars (At this time we only vote for them), et. al. We might as well go all the way. After all, they are people too. It’s ok to expose children to these as well. Hey, it’s ok as long as there is enough people promoting and endorsing it. Forget that I don’t want my child to be exposed to these things, it doesn’t matter. It is for the common good. Heck, let’s admit openly serial killers, openly active alcoholics, openly haters, openly bullies as well. Let’s just forget laws and sins altogether and bring anarchy, survival of the fittest at its best.

Let’s make an openly bully club, after all bullies are just people with a different idea of having fun or expressing their own way of thinking.

The only gay agenda is the one of promoting it and making it as something cool. You know why? Because it sells. It is consumerism at its best.

We all sin, that doesn’t mean that we are openly and force our sin into acceptance to everybody. Sin is a struggle and something that needs to be faced - not condoned. I accept all kinds of sinners into Church and will talk about the Gospel of Christ to all of them as well. That does not mean I endorse it, that means that a sin has been identified and it needs to be taken care of. Attack the problem not the person.

We should have charity for all sinners in the same manner, not give special treatment to some sinners above others.
 
Personally, I think the Scouts are seriously outdated anyway. I think they are going to lose members no matter what. Kids just don’t care anymore about “merit badges” and sashes and silly little uniforms. It’s actually a good time for another group to step in and actually be cool. There is something just…OFF about a bunch of adolescent boys in tassels and kerchiefs and sashes in the woods together alone with an older man. It starts getting creepy around age 8.

So yeah, I am paranoid and I don’t personally want my boys spending huge amounts of alone time with ANY man who is not my husband. Sporting events are acceptable because they generally have an open door policy with parents for the most part. But with the scouts, if you’re not a member, you can’t really participate once your kid reaches a certain age. I don’t like that.

I just find that a lot of people on here are so worried about things like homosexuality (which, if your child is one of the 97% of boys who is NOT gay, is going to affect them minimally), but aren’t nearly as concerned about letting their kids play with people who are irreligious or who have their own computer upstairs in their room or whose dad is divorced with a girlfriend. I’m not saying I would “shun”’ these people either, but situations like these are going to have a MUCH greater impact on your child than a gay friend in the Boy Scouts.

Your teenage son going to a friend’s house and looking at porn when his parents aren’t there, talking for hours with that same friend who has no belief in God or religion, eating dinner with that friend’s dad and his girlfriend, THESE are the things that will slowly but surely pull your child away from God and the Church.

And yet I see the same people on here harping on gays like they are Satan himself. It’s EASY to tell a straight boy that homosexuality is wrong and disordered and even if the kid has a gay friend or two, just the fact of NOT being gay makes it really easy to see homosexuality as being something intrinsically wrong. 99% of the guys I know who think pre-marital sex is fine and going to church is optional and downloading porn is ok are DISGUSTED by homosexuality and believe it to be utterly wrong-and we have gay friends! Don’t believe me? Just mention the subject of gay porn to ANY straight man or boy and watch his gay reflex take immediate effect.

These people need to get off the subject of homosexuality and start worrying about the other things that creep into our lives that turn our kids away from God much faster and much more easily than a gay scoutmaster.

Everybody is all “The gay ‘agenda’ is RUINING society! Not the gays! Anything but that!” Really? Your teenage son masturbated to lesbian porn 3 times today, had sex with his girlfriend, got high on YOUR “secret” marijuana stash and then stole an IPod.
It’s possible the scouts might be outdated, but not because of the little symbols of achievement, I don’t think. Kids are actually very big on those. Those in wrestling wear those safety pins and their medals on their jackets. What high school freshman doesn’t proudly wear that football letter if he manages against all odds to get in enough varsity game time? Swimmers wear little symbols of even their victories in heats. Basketballers in grade school wear shirts showing their victories. Kids who advance in JROTC wear their uniforms, rank and decorations proudly. I know. I have grandchildren who do all of those things. Kids aren’t at all symbol-averse, though perhaps those things in which they take pride have changed over the years.

Personally, I did not, and would not, knowingly expose a child of mine to a morally dysfunctional family or group. My adult children to not allow their children to even watch television except carefully chosen shows on their own “Family movie night”. They do (as I did) encourage reading that may well deal with human evils, but do so in a way that imparts correct moral values and/or that informs. A lot of that exists.

That’s not to say none of them were or will be exposed to corruption. They will be, and, by living in this morally adrift society, are. But I am not obliged, by my actions, to condone it or seem to condone it. Rather, I am morally obliged to speak against it and act accordingly. Certainly, if I keep a marijuana “stash”, my words to them in condemning its use will seem hollow and unpersuasive. Therefore, I have a moral obligation not to keep a “stash”, or to use it at all. I have a moral obligation never to have pornography in my possession or presence. What was it that Jesus said about all of this? "
“But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea.”

Serious words, those. Foolish and un-modern as I may be, I actually think it’s possible to live in accordance with them.

But we’re encouraged by this increasingly pagan society to think of sexual perversion the way most pagan societies have thought of it; “something to be open and accepted even if I don’t indulge in it myself”. But when the “authorities” in a society openly condone and encourage scandal among “these little ones”, one really does have to draw the line against their message.

This whole business of “gay acceptance” is a marvel to me. We would not condone children overtly expressing sexual proclivities of other sorts, and we largely do not. We do not condone overt expression of other moral failings, and do not, by our acceptance, passively approve of them. And yet, when it comes to homosexuality, we are somehow expected to accept expression of that gravely disordered condition among children and see nothing wrong in it.

Those who promote its acceptance as “normal” are fools. We who agree with them to the extent of exposing our children to it are the greater fools.
 
Text of the repeal resolution for homosexually oriented youth:
AND WHEREAS, Scouting is a youth program, and any sexual conduct, whether homosexual or heterosexual, by youth of Scouting age is contrary to the virtues of Scouting; and
Essentially they have to be chaste heterosexual or homosexual. Please tell me how you can discriminate against a chaste teen with same-sex attraction??

Doesn’t the Catechism teach “respect and sensitivity” and oppose “unjust discrimination?” on this issue?

Why are we talking excluding them on the basis of something they had no choice over especially if they’re required to uphold themselves in a moral manner as dictated by traditional Christian sexual ethics?
 
Text of the repeal resolution for homosexually oriented youth:

Essentially they have to be chaste heterosexual or homosexual. Please tell me how you can discriminate against a chaste teen with same-sex attraction??

Doesn’t the Catechism teach “respect and sensitivity” and oppose “unjust discrimination?” on this issue?

Why are we talking excluding them on the basis of something they had no choice over especially if they’re required to uphold themselves in a moral manner as dictated by traditional Christian sexual ethics?
You’re right but gay advocacy groups, like the Human Rights Campaign, say the change does not go far enough. They would prefer adults to mentor openly gay boys and if the mentor is an openly gay and married man, what will he say to the openly gay boy who wants to marry his openly gay boyfriend?

Gay scouts were not excluded in the past. The pattern is emerging: first, openly gay boys, followed by openly gay adults mentoring all the boys. How will they answer a straight scout who believes guys marrying guys is wrong?

The rule book won’t matter since agitating for adult mentors is the stated next step.

Peace,
Ed
 
You and I well know that there is way more to it.

If they looked at their lives honestly they would be ordered toward the good, which is chastity.

Voris points out a reality in this Vortex. Show America what sodomy is and America will reject it. Even Hollywood won’t show this film because much of America bought the propaganda and would be disgusted to find out they have been snookered.

Is it really the case something can be “too gay” for modern Hollywood? Apparently so! Please watch this episode of the Vortex and pass it to your family and friends.
Yeah, I’m sure the concept of fellatio by a women will make virtually all men sick to their stomach, I’m sure the women will get totally appalled by the concept of receiving cunnilingus from a man.
The only reason Hollywood doesn’t show sodomy onscreen is because straight men think it’s “icky”. Movies ABOUND with girl-on-girl sex though. Personally, i see no difference at all. All these guys get up on their high horses about how disgusting sodomy is when almost every single one of you secretly LOVES to watch two women having sex. Those of you who say you are not turned on by girl-on-girl porn are probably lying. Hypocrites.
Ironically gays love “vanilla straight porn” only instead of the male being incidental and the female the focus it features the male being the focus and the female incidental.
You have not said what religion, if any, you have. This is a Catholic site. According to the Catholic Church, homosexuality is intrinsically disordered and homosexual relationships are gravely sinful. Obviously, you do not share this belief. Perhaps you have other beliefs about what is right and what is wrong that others do not share. That’s your prerogative.

But telling a Catholic that he or she should have “zero problem” with something that is contrary to the teachings of the Church is entirely misplaced.

So, from a Catholic standpoint, the conversation about what X and his boyfriend did on their “date” is scandalous, whereas telling someone you and your husband and son went to a movie, is not. Telling someone what you and your husband did in bed would be another matter.
Sexual relations between two people of the same sex and pretending to be married are, but homosexual relationships are not in and of themselves sinful.
Text of the repeal resolution for homosexually oriented youth:

Essentially they have to be chaste heterosexual or homosexual. Please tell me how you can discriminate against a chaste teen with same-sex attraction??

Doesn’t the Catechism teach “respect and sensitivity” and oppose “unjust discrimination?” on this issue?

Why are we talking excluding them on the basis of something they had no choice over especially if they’re required to uphold themselves in a moral manner as dictated by traditional Christian sexual ethics?
Don’t you get it? The BSA is clearly endorsing gay orgies at summer camp where they will hold a blót and sacrifice Tiger cubs while using the blood in matzos for Passover.
 
As I wrote earlier, in order to start a fight, people are called bigoted, ignorant and homophobic - a word that means nothing.
Can you explain this claim further?
Sexual relations between two people of the same sex and pretending to be married are, but homosexual relationships are not in and of themselves sinful.
Oh, boy. Heeeere we go. 🍿
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top