Some places effectively wiped it out but they responded earlier, more strongly, and they had better compliance with the guidelines issued.
I’m not convinced of this. Below is an article about Vietnam. They shut down early, were very strict, nearly eliminated Covid, and now Covid is back. It shows the limits of science.
[/quote]
I think it is less a lack of science and more of a lack of respect for the data from science plus blind, power-hungry, egotistical Left-wing Ideology.
Australia is a good example as
explained with a graph by Martenson.
They had a spike in cases and issued a draconian, Left-wing lock-down. The cases went down for quite some time. When they opened up, they got their spike, even bigger than the first one!
This virus is SO infectious that you are not going to be able to avoid it. It binds the ACE2 receptor 1000x more tightly than its closest known relative, a bat virus, says
Martenson. This is one reason why some
microbiologists think this was manipulated in a lab, not directly from the wild.
It is reasonable to have local lockdowns to avoid over-running your emergency rooms, but once a metropolis is past its spike, you gradually open up, not keep everything shut down for political reasons or to make the public more willing to accept an experimental vaccine.
The good news is that if you wear a mask
you will likely receive a smaller viral load leading to a more mild case of Covid.
Also if you avoid low vitamin D numerous studies suggest that your odds are much better. Dr Joseph Mercola and a Harvard professor explain more
here–unlike CNN.
(
Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)