E
Eliza10
Guest
Probably. I am trying very hard to understand and have decided it must be our cognitive style of thinking is conflicting.I would say the situation is vice versa.
Probably. I am trying very hard to understand and have decided it must be our cognitive style of thinking is conflicting.I would say the situation is vice versa.
The point is, Jerome, holy as he was, was capable of errors in his translation. His was a personal interpretation of an infallible Truth.Probably. I am trying very hard to understand and have decided it must be our cognitive style of thinking is conflicting.
So what??? The HOLY Spirit does NOT keep HIS Promises? Mt 16:18 & 28:20Interesting that while St Jerome is pre-schism, he holds no such appellation in the East. I have a suspicion that if more of the Eastern Fathers works were available in translation (since only a fraction have been translated from the Greek, only one third of St John Chrysostom’s works for example), the Latins would not be so quick to heap such praise on St Jerome
Ditto.So what??? The HOLY Spirit does NOT keep HIS Promises? Mt 16:18 & 28:20
Jesus DOES NOT keet his WORDS :John17:17-20???
What my friend am I missing here:shrug:
God Bless you,
The big pictureWhat my friend am I missing here:shrug:
???So what??? The HOLY Spirit does NOT keep HIS Promises? Mt 16:18 & 28:20
Jesus DOES NOT keet his WORDS :John17:17-20???
What my friend am I missing here:shrug:
God Bless you,
He was not just concerned with turning Greek to Latin but he also went back into Hebrew and Aramaic. So he had a gift that enabled him to get behind things. *.Interesting that while St Jerome is pre-schism, he holds no such appellation in the East. I have a suspicion that if more of the Eastern Fathers works were available in translation (since only a fraction have been translated from the Greek, only one third of St John Chrysostom’s works for example), the Latins would not be so quick to heap such praise on St Jerome
I want to affirm this, and these beautiful verses that you quoted. We are Catholic, of the Church that Jesus built on Peter, the Rock, and Jesus promised the Holy Spirit would be with this Church until the end of time. And Jesus keeps his Word!So what??? The HOLY Spirit does NOT keep HIS Promises? Mt 16:18 & 28:20
Jesus DOES NOT keep his WORDS :John17:17-20???
What my friend am I missing here:shrug:
God Bless you,
Yes, but what about the other Fathers?I want to affirm this, and these beautiful verses that you quoted. We are Catholic, of the Church that Jesus built on Peter, the Rock, and Jesus promised the Holy Spirit would be with this Church until the end of time. And Jesus keeps his Word!
So when the Church names St… Jerome a Saint, it is through the Holy Spirit and he is celebrated as such on earth and in all of Heaven. And such is the same when the Church defines who is a Doctor of the Church.
And when the Church says that St. Jerome is the GREATEST of all the Doctors in clarifying Divine Scripture, that, too, is inspired by the Holy Spirit. If someone in the Eastern Church did not get the title instead of St. Jerome, its probably not because the Holy Spirit was sleeping on the job.
And when Holy Mother Church venerates St. Jerome’s clarification of the Divine Word, I don’t think She is concerned about whether St. John the Baptist ate insects or roots (though I sure hope it was the latter), but I think the veneration of St. Jerome’s holy opinion is more about things like whether St. Joseph fathered a different family before/while he was head of the Holy family.
Its rock-solid ground to go with St. Jerome on such matters.:bowdown2:
- The Catholic Church regards St. Jerome as the GREATEST of all the DOCTORS in clarifying the Divine Word.
I have no doubt that St. Jerome considered the Fathers of the Church.Yes, but what about the other Fathers?
My point, you cannot simply disregard them.I have no doubt that St. Jerome considered the Fathers of the Church.
Well, why are you saying this?My point, you cannot simply disregard them.
As I said earlier, this was Jerome’s interpretation of an infallible Truth.Well, why are you saying this?
I think we are having another communication barrier…
Ah, yes, you said it earlier, and I said it earlier, and you said it earlier, and…As I said earlier, this was Jerome’s interpretation of an infallible Truth.
REALLYThe big picture![]()
But when compared with other evidence, that doesn’t mean we should take it as fact. Yes, brothers in the Semitic tongue were equivalent to cousins in our language but that doesn’t mean we should qualify it as that.Ah, yes, you said it earlier, and I said it earlier, and you said it earlier, and…
And what is … the big picture?The big picture![]()
I think St. Jerome based his opinion on much MORE than just the lack of the word “cousins” in Aramaic. That is a key point, yes, but there are SO MANY implications to the suggestion of St.Joseph being Bi-Vocation, and Jesus being a member of a Big Blended Family instead of the Holy Family we all think of him in. So many. St. Jerome would have considered all of this, as well as the origin of the various traditions existent in the 2nd century, when he judged what he saw as the truth of Sacred Scripture.But when compared with other evidence, that doesn’t mean we should take it as fact. Yes, brothers in the Semitic tongue were equivalent to cousins in our language but that doesn’t mean we should qualify it as that.
Note, “what he saw as the truth.”I think St. Jerome based his opinion on much MORE than just the lack of the word “cousins” in Aramaic. That is a key point, yes, but there are SO MANY implications to the suggestion of St.Joseph being Bi-Vocation, and Jesus being a member of a Big Blended Family instead of the Holy Family we all think of him in. So many. St. Jerome would have considered all of this, as well as the origin of the various traditions existent in the 2nd century, when he judged what he saw as the truth.
.