B
Benadam
Guest
Holy toasted whole wheat bagel, Benny!
Holy toasted whole wheat bagel, Benny!
Al has a grudge.I can’t help but see the ripples of a hidden political agenda in distinguishing the former opponent of the so labeled ‘war mongering’ Bush for such a spotlighted prize of ‘Peace making.’
Nothing to stop us from running with the ball. It may well be in a direction Al had not predicted and does not now like. Them’s the breaks, Al.but I can’t deny that Al has seized the day.
After Cain kills Abel, he becomes dissociative. He cannot ‘hear’ God. Cain feels like a stranger in a strange land – a nomad – but in fact he lives in a city and has his own family.I think it’s an observation. I even think Abel saw how Cain’s life was destructive. It’s interesting that after Cain’s estrangement he builds a town. You might think it would be called a tribe. So much for family as the nuclear society…
Holy toasted whole wheat bagel, Benny! That is a flipping awesome insight. And jibes perfectly with:
This part is so very timely, particularly in the wake of Gore’s Nobel Prize (not that I agree with it). Do you know that we are supposed by ingesting 9 sugars from our food but can only get 2 because by the time our food gets to us, it is dead? It is even dead before it comes out of the ground, because the ground is dying.
**Sorry but your off topic jibe at Gore is I find weird. What is the problem with his receiving the Nobel Prize ? Are some Catholics against doing something to save the environment now? **
Cain’s agrarian engineering gives new meaning to the derogatory term ‘tinker’ doesn’t it?
I have often wondered though if this exile is of God’s doing or only an empirical observation God is making of what sin and destruction the now thorougly dotty Cain has brought on his own head. I think God wants to save Cain. That is why he puts the mark on his forehead.
Does the presence of death in our lives not make us insane?
Gosh, I have to say that I so thoroughly identify with Cain. I have so wanted to please God that I have often ‘tinkered’. Receiving from God, being one with Creation, being a child is so difficult. Being still is so difficult. Yet that is what He asks of us, doesn’t He?
Thanks for this, Benny!
Sorry? You don’t sound sorry.Sorry but your off topic jibe at Gore is I find weird. What is the problem with his receiving the Nobel Prize ? Are some Catholics against doing something to save the environment now?
**Sorry but your off topic jibe at Gore is I find weird.
**ok I thought you might change your mind**What is the problem with his receiving the Nobel Prize ? **
****Are some Catholics against doing something to save the environment now? **
I find that something that I grew up with feeling as normal as Mrs’s Smith’s Pie’s is something now that is more often than not viewed as a bit radical.After Cain kills Abel, he becomes dissociative. He cannot ‘hear’ God. Cain feels like a stranger in a strange land – a nomad – but in fact he lives in a city and has his own family.
Abel would have been the true nomad because he was a herdsman.
7 But as to Cain, he took no pleasure in offering; but after much anger on his father’s part, he offered up his gift once; and when he did offer up, his eye was on the offering he made, and he took the smallest of his sheep for an offering, and his eye was again on it. ’
Then, in chapter LXXVIII8 Therefore God did not accept his offering, because his heart was full of murderous thoughts.
16 Then on the morrow Adam said unto Cain his son, “Take of thy sheep, young and good, and offer them up unto thy God; and I will speak to thy brother, to make unto his God an offering of corn.”
17 They both hearkened to their father Adam, and they took their offerings, and offered them up on the mountain by the altar.
18 But Cain behaved haughtily towards his brother, and thrust him from the altar, and would not let him offer up his gift upon the altar; but he offered his own upon it, with a proud heart, full of guile, and fraud.
19 But as for Abel, he set up stones that were near at hand, and upon that, he offered up his gift with a heart humble and free from guile.
20 Cain was then standing by the altar on which he had offered up his gift; and he cried unto God to accept his offering; but God did not accept it from him; neither did a divine fire come down to consume his offering.
21 But he remained standing over against the altar, out of humour and wroth, looking towards his brother Abel, to see if God would accept his offering or not.
It was not the grain offering, or that he had to till the soil but that he hated and begrudged. He was hard-hearted and proud. God’s rejection of Cain’s offering had nothing to do with ‘tinkering’ but everything to do with the disposition of his heart.22 And Abel prayed unto God to accept his offering. Then a divine fire came down and consumed his offering. And God smelled the sweet savour of his offering; because Abel loved Him and rejoiced in Him.
The bible story of Cain and Abel is very short on details and we are left to speculate. There were, however, more stories, called the pseudepigrapha, about Adam and Eve and their children that were not included in the Bible. Although not inspired, they were known to the ancient Hebrews and they can offer insights and more details.
According to these stories, Cain apparently hated Abel from the beginning. In addition, he did not like putting God first in his life. When Adam would make an offering, frequently, Cain would refuse to accompany him. Abel, on the other hand, loved making offerings to God and urged Adam to offer more frequently. When the time came for them to make their own offerings, Abel gave his best, out of love for God. Cain resented having to make an offering at all and had to be berated by his father into making it and “when he did offer it up, his eye was on the offering he made”. He did not offer from his heart, but only because he was forced to and begrudged it.
The Forgotten Books of Eden
The First Book of Adam and Eve
sacred-texts.com/bib/fbe/index.htm#section_000
Chapter LVXXVII
sacred-texts.com/bib/fbe/fbe082.htm
Then, in chapter LXXVIII
It was not the grain offering, or that he had to till the soil but that he hated and begrudged. He was hard-hearted and proud. God’s rejection of Cain’s offering had nothing to do with ‘tinkering’ but everything to do with the disposition of his heart.
Thanks for the links Linda.It was not the grain offering, or that he had to till the soil but that he hated and begrudged. He was hard-hearted and proud. God’s rejection of Cain’s offering had nothing to do with ‘tinkering’ but everything to do with the disposition of his heart.
What is your basis for these assertions?Yes, it is about the tithe. Remember that Abel was a herdsman. Before Noah came out of the flood, men were vegetarians. Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel had no idea what death was!
How is he unaware of what death is if he sacrifices animals? How can it be a sacrifice if he does not understand that the animal is no more?The animal which Abel sacrificed was likely the first born – in which case Abel would have had the longest relationship with this animal – and the best, most beautiful animal – in which case Abel would have delighted in the fullness of its life. For Abel to sacrifice this animal, took a lot faith.
Sadness and jealousy and weepeing are all aspects of our reality. Surely Cain and Abel both skinned their knees when they were boys; possibly, it hurt enough to make them weep.Now scripture says that Cain and Abel went out into the field. Likely Cain wanted to know why Abel’s gift was preferred. And Abel was probably weeping too hard to tell him. Did the first human family know what weeping was? No, I don’t think so. Neither death, nor weeping. But Abel knew both.
It’s intriguing to think that Cain was attempting to please God by sacrificing his brother, but that doesn’t seem to jive with the tone of the story. For one thing, when God asks Cain where Abel is, Cain’s first words are a lie: “I do not know.”Did Cain kill Abel from envy? Maybe. But more likely he wanted to emulate his action. If he killed his brother it would be like his brother killing the family pet. And then he would win God’s favour. Because the death would grieve Cain. It would be a true sacrifice.
When Cain says “Am I my brother’s keeper?” is that rhetorical? Is it a brushoff? Or is it a true question? Is he not saying am I the keeper of my brother like my brother was the keeper of his animal? Can I not sacrifice my brother as my brother sacrificed his animal?
I really think it’s inappropriate to say that he didn’t know what death was. Perhaps it would be better to say he didn’t understand what death truly is, because he probably recognized death when he saw it (it’s “That Thing That Happens When We Cut The Goat’s Throat”, from his perspective). Certainly he had enough experience with it to realize its finality, from a primitive point of view.We know that the Law is written on our hearts. So Cain would have known that murder is a sin even eras before Moses received the Ten Commandments. But did Cain know the difference between sacrificing an animal and murdering a brother? How? He didn’t even know what death was.
No need, if you wish to be rude, be rude…I don’t need to bother with rudeness for exactly no reason. I found it weird. I see no connection. Apparently you are too lazy to respond, just sling slurs instead. good day.Sorry? You don’t sound sorry.
What is ‘off topic’ about a response to a perfectly lucid, insightful, and legitimate interpretation of the Cain and Abel story?
For that matter what is ‘weird’ about it?
As for your questions, start another thread and I’ll answer them.
PS: The help forum or technical help forum or whatever it is called can help you to learn how to use the quote tags so that you don’t take up half a page posting a four-line statement. Ask and you shall receive. Cool eh?
you guys like to state things…do you ever explain or just be snide?
not really off topic. didn’t you recognize the Abel Gore connection?
Nope
**
**ok I thought you might change your mind****
**
now that really is off topic**
I’m sorry spiritmeadow. I was snide and reacted badly to you.No need, if you wish to be rude, be rude…I don’t need to bother with rudeness for exactly no reason. I found it weird. I see no connection. Apparently you are too lazy to respond, just sling slurs instead. good day.
you guys like to state things…do you ever explain or just be snide?
I do see the connection now, of course you are right. I apologize too. A couple of people here really push my buttons, you aren’t one of them, but you caught the reaction I’m afraid. I do apologize.I’m sorry spiritmeadow. I was snide and reacted badly to you.
I speculate that Cain’s offering is rejected because it springs from his abuse of the earth and Al Gore’s recent Nobel Peace prize for work to stop abuse of the earth provides a valid connection worth mention. Wouldn’t current day ramifications in regards of a particular view be on topic since speculation seeks valid as well as deeper understanding? I felt you reacted much to soon to treat our contribution as a threat to the topic.
Thank you for being so gracious. Apology accepted.I do see the connection now, of course you are right. I apologize too. A couple of people here really push my buttons, you aren’t one of them, but you caught the reaction I’m afraid. I do apologize.
Actually I don’t wish to be rude. Neither do I want to be treated in an overly dismissive manner simply for commenting on the environmental connection in the Cain and Abel story.No need, if you wish to be rude, be rude…
If you see no connection then your next step is to ask for clarification. Please try to remember than next time, OK?…I don’t need to bother with rudeness for exactly no reason. I found it weird. I see no connection.
I am too lazy? You do realize that you have made an ad hominem attack? You might want to consider refraining in future.Apparently you are too lazy to respond
Disagreement is not slinging slurs.just sling slurs instead.
Have a good one.good day.
‘You guys’? Of whom are you speaking? As for me, if you look at my record I often explain in extended detail with copious links to references. However, I have been more selective of late, choosing only to elaborate when there is a genuine conversation happening. As for being snide: pot, kettle?you guys like to state things…do you ever explain or just be snide?
:blushing: Ah shucks, Mr Alighieri.An Ibi, I love your posts – they’re usually very insightful and eloquent.
OK.This one, however, I feel compelled to take issue with.
Oh gosh, when I told my priest my theory he furrowed his brow and looked at me as if I were from outer space: ground control to Major Ani.First, let me admit freely that I may be speaking ignorantly here, and will welcome correction from the Catholic perspective on Scripture.
That Abel’s offering was a tithe? Genesis 4:4 – “Abel, for his part, brought on of the best firstlings of his flock.”What is your basis for these assertions?
I did not say that no human being had died at the time of Noah. I said that until the time that Noah landed on the mountain, folks had been vegetarian. The important part is that at the time of Cain and Abel the only death which they had experienced – that we are told about in Scripture – is Abel’s best firstling.To my knowledge, there is no indication that Noah’s story follows closely enough on the historical heels of Adam and Eve et. al. that no human being had yet died.
Genesis 9:3 – “Every creature that is alive shall be yours to eat; I give them all to you as I did the green plants. Only flesh with its life-blood still in it you shall not eat.”I recall no indication that men did not eat meat prior to the flood, either.
Cain did not sacrifice an animal. His brother Abel did. Cain grew crops.How is he unaware of what death is if he sacrifices animals?
I assume you are talking about Abel now. It is a sacrifice because well… imagine: It is among Abel’s firstlings. So Abel has known the animal for a long time. It is also among Abel’s best animals. So Abel has likely spent some time being proud of the animal and being fond of it. He loves his animal. You could say that it is Abel’s pet. So to cut its throat would mean that he is giving it up, sacrificing it and making him very sad.How can it be a sacrifice if he does not understand that the animal is no more?
What would cause you to weep more? A skinned knee? Or your family pet run over on the road?Sadness and jealousy and weepeing are all aspects of our reality. Surely Cain and Abel both skinned their knees when they were boys; possibly, it hurt enough to make them weep.
Are they a lie? “I don’t know” could well indicate that Cain doesn’t have a clue what this thing called death is. Only that Able is stiff and cold. Likely Cain is afraid because of not knowing. Note what he says next:It’s intriguing to think that Cain was attempting to please God by sacrificing his brother, but that doesn’t seem to jive with the tone of the story. For one thing, when God asks Cain where Abel is, Cain’s first words are a lie: “I do not know.”
Responsibility hinges on knowledge. How much knowledge does Cain have about death?In that context, the “brother’s keeper” question seems more like an attempt to shrug off responsibility for his brother’s well-being.
You know what death is. Is it fair to say that Cain knew?I really think it’s inappropriate to say that he didn’t know what death was. Perhaps it would be better to say he didn’t understand what death truly is, because he probably recognized death when he saw it (it’s “That Thing That Happens When We Cut The Goat’s Throat”, from his perspective).
Can you set out what that experience would be please? Thank you.Certainly he had enough experience with it to realize its finality, from a primitive point of view.
I think we should sacrifice a pizza. What say? Pepperoni and mushroom?I look forward to your response – be gentle!
Oh, good – then you weren’t paraphrasing some obscure Church document of which I was unaware.
of his flock."That Abel’s offering was a tithe? Genesis 4:4 – "Abel, for his part, brought on of the best firstlings
The first and best is the tithe.
No, I was primarily wondering about your assertion that all men were vegetarians before the flood. I’ll address it below.
the only death which they had experienced – that we are told about in Scripture – is Abel’s best firstling.I did not say that no human being had died at the time of Noah. I said that until the time that Noah landed on the mountain, folks had been vegetarian. The important part is that at the time of Cain and Abel
Where do you get the idea that no human being had died before the time of Noah? I don’t recall any suggestion of that – especially since Abel was dead by then.
With regard to Cain’s and Abel’s experience, they had perhaps not experienced human death, but certainly had experienced the deaths of the animals Abel had sacrificed. That they were brothers suggests to me the probability that Cain had, at some point, witnessed a holocaust or spoken with Abel about it.
of the sentence that tells us that BEFORE the flood He gave green plants (to eat); AFTER the flood He gave animals (to eat).Genesis 9:3 – “Every creature that is alive shall be yours to eat; I give them all to you as I did the green plants. Only flesh with its life-blood still in it you shall not eat.”
It is the parallel structure
Note that the prohibition is against eating flesh that still has the blood in it – i.e., raw meat. God is giving all living animals to men to be eaten, which suggests that such was done. They were not, however, to eat the raw flesh off the bone, as the animals do.
Even if this is not the true nature of the prohibition, there’s nothing in this verse to suggest that men did not eat meat until the flood.
Yes…I misspoke.Cain did not sacrifice an animal. His brother Abel did. Cain grew crops.
. So Abel has known the animal for a long time. It is also among Abel’s best animals. So Abel has likely spent some time being proud of the animal and being fond of it. He loves his animal. You could say that it is Abel’s pet. So to cut its throat would mean that he is giving it up, sacrificing it and making him very sad.I assume you are talking about Abel now. It is a sacrifice because well… imagine: It is among Abel’s firstlings
What makes it a sacrifice is that it is an irrevocable giving of something that is important. If one is not aware that it is irrevocable when one makes the sacrifice, one’s motive is not the same.
Thus, Abel (and, presumably, others) were aware that when they cut the animal’s throat, it was going away forever – even if that’s the extent of their understanding, they surely had some understanding of the irrevocable nature of death.
? A skinned knee? Or your family pet run over on the road?What would cause you to weep more
I don’t think the distinction matters here. You said that the first human family had no experience with death or weeping; I’m illustrating that since we share with them a fallen nature, it stands to reason that they experienced many of the same things we do – such as a skinned knee – that might cause involuntary weeping.
?" Implicit in this is: my brother was a keeper of an animal which is now cold and stiff. Am I a keeper of my brother who is cold and stiff? Does cutting someone’s throat make one a keeper?Are they a lie? “I don’t know” could well indicate that Cain doesn’t have a clue what this thing called death is. Only that Able is stiff and cold. Likely Cain is afraid because of not knowing. Note what he says next:
"Am I my brother’s keeper
Legitimate question for someone who knows nothing about death.
I see your point, but that’s not how the passage reads to me. Rather, it seems more like a consciously guilty party trying to deflect his guilt when he’s questioned by an authority who knows the truth: “How should I know where he is – I’m not responsible for keeping track of him.”
continued below
I think it’s fair based on the fact that his actions are framed as a heinous offense. If he had no idea what death was, could he have committed a mortal sin by killing?Responsibility hinges on knowledge. How much knowledge does Cain have about death?
You know what death is. Is it fair to say that Cain knew?
Well, since I’m not willing to concede the “vegetarian” angle, I think at the very least Cain killed animals for food, or at least saw others do it, or ate food others had killed, or heard stories about hunting. Furthermore, as I’ve pointed out, his brother offered animal sacrifices; it’s not unreasonable to expect that they talked about it or that he had witnessed it at some point. Thus, I think he had enough experience to know that violence performed on a living being can end its life, even if he had no concept of what might happen beyond that point.Can you set out what that experience would be please? Thank you.
Mushrooms on your half only, and you’ve got a deal!I think we should sacrifice a pizza. What say? Pepperoni and mushroom?
![]()