Yes he is. He admitted to it on tape, and 60+ million of you voted for him anyway.Trump’s not a sexual predator. Stop conflating the issue. And if you’re virtue-signaling to the far left, don’t bother. They’ll turn on you in the end anyways.
And that’s fine, but did he have any chance of getting to the presidency? the answer is no.I voted for Mike Maturen, a devout Catholic man who ran on a 100% Catholic political platform.
Fair enough, but as Dinesh D’Souza pointed out in regards to the abolitionists, this sort of thing can often have terrible consequences. Nevertheless, faithful Catholics can certainly vote 3rd party. Just not Clinton or most democrats.I sleep well at night knowing I voted the candidate who truly represents me and who would’ve been truly good for our country.
Only Christ is perfect, so essentially you are already doing it, nevertheless, I understand your point in regards to the big issues.I do not believe in the “lesser of two evils” concept, for to do such a thing is to still compromise with evil.
That’s good.I could not in good conscience vote for Clinton because of her history of corruption and her outspoken support of infanticide, amongst many other issues.
I was not around in Reagan’s time, but he was a wise and good man from speeches I have heard, would you have voted for him though considering he was divorced and remarried?IMO, Trump and Clinton are the worst two candidates we’ve had in my lifetime - and I was born during the Reagan administration.
True, but not really a defense for such comments either. Even if he was being truthful and not just trying to brag and talk untrue vulgar trash to this guy, he should know better and them letting him do it isn’t an excuse except for in a court of law.“They let you do it…” he said, that is the “evidence” of sexual assault.
Not necessarily if you want to be in line with Catholic teaching.You can vote for whoever you want.
Trump gave a list of pro-life judges he would choose from to the supreme court. The other candidate said she would only pick from those who considered roe v wade “settled law” It’s a no brainer.but hey he says he’s pro-life, so that’s cool I guess.
Consumer spending, mostly.“Distributing wealth to only the rich…” just where do you think wealth comes from?
1000s of babies are still dying. Abortion is still legal, and will be in many (most I’d wager) even if the SCOTUS overturns Roe v. Wade. States will decide, and most will have some form of legal abortion. Even if all 50 states make abortion illegal, women will obtain abortions. How about we, as a society, fix the underlying reason women seek abortions? It all starts with the economic standing and prospects. There are other reasons I’m sure, but money is #1.Trump has been so abysmal, Clinton would have been a much better Chief Executive, but I still couldn’t have voted for her because thousands of babies would have died. She also detests Catholics.