C
constantconvert
Guest
I do not think she is guilty. Who has she harmed? Did she acquire the car illegally? What moral law has she broken? I think ignorance of the law does indeed carry some weight, especially when it’s not a moral transgression.We cannot be reading the same document.
What she proposes does indeed tend to ‘exoneration of the guilty’.
As things currently stand she is guilty - in the sense of being rightly liable under laws which AFAICS are neither unjust nor immoral, liable for a fine for failing to fill in the paperwork which as a responsible buyer she ought to have known she needed to complete.
She was ignorant, which has never been an excuse under the law, as it is always easy to find out what the law is in regard such matters and is surely the duty of any buyer to find out. She can rightly plead for mercy based on that ignorance, which may mean she is not punished. She can rightly get the original seller to complete the paperwork, which will mean she is no longer guilty.
But she cannot rightly seek to evade the fine - exonerate her guilt - by forging someone else’s signature.
It occurs to me that this is really about money. If the fine were ten dollars she would have no problem paying it. It seems to me that having to pay thousands of dollars for one small (IMO) mistake seems excessive. Doesn’t it seem excessive to you? You may say that that is not the issue, but it’s seems like it’s not right.
Now, granted I do not have the most attuned moral compass (though believe me, I do try). I’m not saying that forging the signature is right (though if you can consider it a moral sin, I don’t see how), and no, two wrongs do not make a right, but they will keep you from being the victim of extortion