Can Protestants Be Saved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Woody87
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey Einna. Do you have faith that the holy spirit continues to guide and preserve doctrinal truth within Jesus’ church, be it the catholic church, one of the eastern orthodox churches or one of the protestant churches? Or, did that end after the apostolic age? In other words, is there a way for you and I to know, definitively, the truth regarding the Eucharist e.g. real presence or a mere symbol?
Yes I believe The Holy Spirit guide doctrinal truth Just has The Holy Spirit guides us all, but I do not believe that means every bit of it is accurate.

No there is no definite way to know about the Eucharist, but that is why it is called faith.
 
Yes I believe The Holy Spirit guide doctrinal truth Just has The Holy Spirit guides us all, but I do not believe that means every bit of it is accurate.

No there is no definite way to know about the Eucharist, but that is why it is called faith.
So the holy spirit guides Jesus’ church (by the way which one?) regarding doctrinal truth, but not truth regarding the Eucharist? It seems like Jesus would want every generation to know the truth, as opposed to just the first-century generation. 🤷
 
So the holy spirit guides Jesus’ church (by the way which one?) regarding doctrinal truth, but not truth regarding the Eucharist? It seems like Jesus would want every generation to know the truth, as opposed to just the first-century generation. 🤷
I believe that the Holy Spirit tries to guide everyone, but completely understands why some may not follow; ie loyalty to another faith like the Jews; and that He guides the truth about the Eucharist. You asked if there is a definite way to know and there is simply not, again it is faith.
 
I believe that the Holy Spirit tries to guide everyone, but completely understands why some may not follow; ie loyalty to another faith like the Jews; and that He guides the truth about the Eucharist. You asked if there is a definite way to know and there is simply not, again it is faith.
True. We cannot know definitively that Jesus even existed, or that Jesus is God or that the bible is the word of God, but we do have faith…👍
 
Joe are you trying to make an epistemological point or are you trying to be obstinate?

PJM IT’S BEEN A WHILE SINCE WE HAVE TALKED. IT WOULD BE AWESOME IF YOU WOULD REFRAIN FROM SPAMMING CAPS. I can clearly understand your position better without them. Can you please give a more concise answer to my question? I was wondering when I would find someone with your opinion.

Posted from Catholic.com App for Android
 
I believe that the Holy Spirit tries to guide everyone, but completely understands why some may not follow; ie loyalty to another faith like the Jews; and that He guides the truth about the Eucharist. You asked if there is a definite way to know and there is simply not, again it is faith.
That one of the things that is such “off putting” about “true believers”. Anyone who belongs to another faith tradition MUST of necessity be deluded or willfully refuse to listen to the Holy Spirit. Or they don’t really have the capacity to make their own religious decisions, but make their decisions not based on the guidence of the Holy Spirit, but because they have “loyalty” to another faith tradition…and even though the Holy Spirit is speaking to them…they ignore His Voice…simply out of stubborness or willfullness…or they want to make a “God” in their own image.

Seems to me believing that a person rejects the Holy Spirit’s guidence to be part of “my faith, which is the true faith” for such reasons…doesn’t speak well of those making the claim.🤷
 
This one veered way off topic, but should be handled. To say we can’t know for sure about the Eucharist is playing with your mind.

Just as someone someday taught you that the sky was blue and you went with it because you trusted that person.

Jesus who if you conclude rose from the dead after predicting it. The first and only person to do so, gave instruction no less than 4 times and then again at the last supper and gave the substance of the miracle he was pulling as bread and wine and said ‘do this in memory of me’.

We absolutely can know for sure the Eucharist’s Truth, Not because of faith but because in world history God chose to prove himself, therefore what he taught can be trusted, just like the sky’s color, only more so because He is God.
 
This one veered way off topic, but should be handled. To say we can’t know for sure about the Eucharist is playing with your mind.

Just as someone someday taught you that the sky was blue and you went with it because you trusted that person.

Jesus who if you conclude rose from the dead after predicting it. The first and only person to do so, gave instruction no less than 4 times and then again at the last supper and gave the substance of the miracle he was pulling as bread and wine and said ‘do this in memory of me’.

We absolutely can know for sure the Eucharist’s Truth, Not because of faith but because in world history God chose to prove himself, therefore what he taught can be trusted, just like the sky’s color, only more so because He is God.
I am sorry but"absolutely knowing" would only come from finding DNA of Christ body and blood in the Eucharist, which of course they could not.

We as Catholics are to have absolute FAITH of the Eucharist Truth. “We absolutely can know for sure” means it is fact, not faith. That is why we say “we BELIEVE in one God…” not there is absolutely, for sure one God.
 
This question is aimed towards Catholics answering, about protestants. I didn’t mean to make you think that I was asking protestants about your beliefs. I wrought the question in a vary passive voice. To some this may convey that I do not have strong beliefs on the subject.

In answer to the first response I think I would say that I do not think that the protestant church claims to have absolute truth on all matters. They do claim to know the truth about subject which would be required for salvation. Or I know a few people won’t like this but topics that are catholic or universal to all Christians. I have looked extensively at the RC faith and I at least for me have found the “truths” which are claimed which are not heavily rooted in scripture to be superfluous. I do agree with them on the Eucharist. I do not think that it is necessary to believe in the trans-substantiation to be saved.

To PJM about the verse you quoted were you underlined might like it was the definitive proof of your point my question to you would be why do you think that the version that you use is literal enough to make claims about words. I think you should look up a interlinear bible. If you were to research the the word that you underlined you would see that it isn’t even a word in the hebrew it is a word that we have added to adapt it to the english. Not all versions translate the verse in the manner that you have with the might some even say will or it is just implied that it will happen.

Also it isn’t right to jump on someone just because you don’t like the way someone phrased something. She said God chooses or calls I remember the exact phrasing. The bible does not have a problem with this it says God predestines and he calls. What you disagree with is the definition or the way this happens.

This thread has gone so far from its purpose. Can we come back? If you want to comment on something I said before this please message me about it. From now on can we discuss wether protestants are saved and the catholic beliefs pertaining to this subject. Thankyou if you did stay on topic
 
Woody87;10137994]
In answer to the first response I think I would say that I do not think that the protestant church claims to have absolute truth on all matters. They do claim to know the truth about subject which would be required for salvation. Or I know a few people won’t like this but topics that are catholic or universal to all Christians. I have looked extensively at the RC faith and I at least for me have found the “truths” which are claimed which are not heavily rooted in scripture to be superfluous. I do agree with them on the Eucharist. I do not think that it is necessary to believe in the trans-substantiation to be saved.
Hey Woody, in your opinion did Jesus leave us with a way to know the truth about the Eucharist i.e. are you right or is the catholic church right?
 
I don’t know who will be saved and who will be damned. Being a Christian is hard work. God is not a soft touch. We shall have to wait and see.
 
This question is confrontational in nature, but I think that it is important. Actually probably the most important question I have ever asked. I would consider myself a Christian, am I? Or am I one of those people who will say "Lord Lord"and Jesus say “I never knew you”(not exact quote just off the top of my head).

This is a general question for all NON-Catholics. I posed a question recently why aren’t you protestant. Most generally the answer was that we do not have the fullness of truth. Is what truth we have enough?

I know that a recent pope has said that if protestants have not seriously thought about or heard about the catholic church that they could be saved (just a paraphrase I didn’t feel like looking this up again). Which was a kind of adjustment from Unam Sanctum.

I did not add my own beliefs because I want this to be a general not specific question.
Jesus saves. Not the Catholic Church, or the Presbyterian Church, or the Church of Christ, or any organization or person currently on this earth.
 
Jesus saves. Not the Catholic Church, or the Presbyterian Church, or the Church of Christ, or any organization or person currently on this earth.
Very true. 👍 All saving grace comes from our Savior Jesus, the Christ. Jesus is the Savior of His Church: “Christ is the head of the church; and he is the savior of the body.”
 
=Woody87;10120937]This question is confrontational in nature, but I think that it is important. Actually probably the most important question I have ever asked. I would consider myself a Christian, am I? Or am I one of those people who will say "Lord Lord"and Jesus say “I never knew you”(not exact quote just off the top of my head).
This is a general question for all NON-Catholics. I posed a question recently why aren’t you protestant. Most generally the answer was that we do not have the fullness of truth. Is what truth we have enough?
I know that a recent pope has said that if protestants have not seriously thought about or heard about the catholic church that they could be saved (just a paraphrase I didn’t feel like looking this up again). Which was a kind of adjustment from Unam Sanctum.
I did not add my own beliefs because I want this to be a general not specific question.
Actually it’s not a change; as neither Doctrine nor Dogman can or may be “changed”

The basic teaching in the document you quotes is that “ALL salvation must [and most assuredly does] Flow THROUGH the Catholic Church”.And it remains THEE singular truth

Pope Boniface VIII issued the papal bull Unam Sanctam, the most famous papal document of the Middle Ages, on November 18th, 1302.

Protestantism really did not flourish [not meaning start] until the late 1500’s and Martin Luther et.all.

Therefore the Fathers are correct; because ours is a “Living Faith” to clarify a condition that did not exist as a FACTOR when the document and Teaching was Issued.

780 The Church in this world is the sacrament of salvation, the sign and the instrument of the communion of God and men.

846 "How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it. End Quote

**847 **This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation."End Quote

This MEANS that only those who have for reasons known and accepted by God have NEVER had the opportunity to learn the singular truth; cannot in Divine Justice be held accountable as if they had freely chosen to deny the TRUTH.

***BUT God will; because God MUST make His Judgment based not on what WE CHOOSE to accept or believe; rather on what HE HAS MADE POSSIBLE for one to know and believe. And that is why a Great many Protestants seem {IMO} to be ar Grave risk. Especially those who participate in Catholic discussion Forums. ***

This teaching does not alter the Previously defiend Doctrine. 👍

God Bless,

Pat/PJM
 
This MEANS that only those who have for reasons known and accepted by God have NEVER had the opportunity to learn the singular truth; cannot in Divine Justice be held accountable as if they had freely chosen to deny the TRUTH.
Well… stop telling us! Don’t ruin our only defense! 🙂
 
The short answer to the topic title of the thread is Yes. God chooses to save whoever he pleases.
Amen to that…

And why again all the hoopla over ‘brand names’ of the faith. At the end of the day you ought to ask…would Jesus be more concerned with a brand name faith or that you in fact HAD faith and lived accordingly?

I’m going to guess he’d go for the later…and wish that we had love and acceptance for each other despite our differences.
 
This question is confrontational in nature, but I think that it is important. Actually probably the most important question I have ever asked. I would consider myself a Christian, am I? Or am I one of those people who will say "Lord Lord"and Jesus say “I never knew you”(not exact quote just off the top of my head).

This is a general question for all NON-Catholics. I posed a question recently why aren’t you protestant. Most generally the answer was that we do not have the fullness of truth. Is what truth we have enough?

I know that a recent pope has said that if protestants have not seriously thought about or heard about the catholic church that they could be saved (just a paraphrase I didn’t feel like looking this up again). Which was a kind of adjustment from Unam Sanctum.

I did not add my own beliefs because I want this to be a general not specific question.
I’ll quote my old Presbyterian (Methodist trained) pastor here, back in the days when we used to have discussions in his office.

He once commented to me “I sometimes wonder if Protestants get into heaven.” He went on to point out that “Some of the things Luther said and did weren’t very Christian.” He also thought God wasn’t so accommodating of men’s division of HIS church as we are - we think it’s OK, just like we live everyday with news of murder, abortion, war, cruelty, injustice and all the other things that we know very well He does not think are OK.

I was a bit surprised to hear him say this, so I said, “Well, if you believe that, why are you still Protestant.” He thought for a moment, shrugged, and said, “They (Catholics) have done a lot of damage at times”. Which is true enough.

However for him to make the comment meant that sometime during his married life he’d had a seachange of opinion about Luther. His second youngest son bore the middle name Luther. I only found that out because this son, a very determined personality with physical strength to match, had been a bit of a tearaway for a while, before making a sincere commitment to Christ. He himself told me the following story.

He was booked doing 160kph on a 100kph highway for example. The cop interviewing him rang his father, the pastor. Then he got back to the son, and said, “Hmm. Your middle name is Luther. Is that correct?” The son replied he was. “Hmm” said the cop, “I don’t suppose you know where that comes from?” The cop was setting him up!😃

The point is though that at one time the pastor could give his son the middle name Luther, and at a later date state Luther was sometimes not very Christian. In fact, he said to me he sometimes wondered if Luther was the false prophet of Revelation fame (“If there is to be a false prophet” was a rider he added), stating “The Reformation was easily the most violent episode in Church history”.

For example from - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion
The major impact of the Thirty Years’ War, in which mercenary armies were extensively used, was the devastation of entire regions scavenged bare by the foraging armies. Episodes of widespread famine and disease devastated the population of the German states and, to a lesser extent, the Low Countries and Italy, while bankrupting many of the powers involved. The war ended with the Treaty of Münster, a part of the wider Peace of Westphalia.

During the war, Germany’s population was reduced by 30% on average. In the territory of Brandenburg, the losses had amounted to half, while in some areas an estimated two thirds of the population died. The population of the Czech lands declined by a third. The Swedish armies alone destroyed 2,000 castles, 18,000 villages and 1,500 towns in Germany, one-third of all German towns. Huge damage was done to monasteries, churches and other religious institutions. The war had proved disastrous for the German “Holy Roman Empire.” Germany lost population and territory, and was henceforth divided into hundreds of largely impotent semi-independent states. The Imperial power retreated to Austria and the Habsburg lands. The Netherlands and Switzerland were confirmed in independence. The peace institutionalised the Catholic, Lutheran, Calvinist religious divide in Germany, with populations either converting, or moving to areas controlled by rulers of their own faith.
Now I’ve had a fair number of spiritual experiences of one sort or another. Some time after the pastor died, he appeared to me in a brief vision, and simply said "We’re not in heaven. We’re all in purgatory. Oh, we’re not suffering any pain, so you don’t have to worry about that! In fact " (and here he looked quite impressed) “it’s pretty good around here! But we’re not in heaven!” Then he disappeared.

I take that to mean that there are no Protestants in heaven. I think they’re all in Purgatory, probably in the upper near heavenly reaches. And I think they’ll stay there until the church reunifies. I don’t think God accepts the division of HIS church, established at such great cost to HIS Son, who Himself declared Peter to be the ROCK on which HE would found HIS church.

Any opposition to that clear statement is Scripture is plain disobedience, no matter how many people try to explain it away.

Are Protestants saved? I think they are. Are they in heaven? No, I don’t think they are. I think they’ll have to wait till the churches reunify under the Pope. Christ was setting up an office in Peter (another comment the pastor made). Simple as that.

Which is one of the reasons I don’t have much time for the business of “infallibility”. As far as I’m concerned, it’s just one more unnecessary barrier to reunification.

That’s how I see it.
 
Well… stop telling us! Don’t ruin our only defense! 🙂
😦 kind of ruins your day, doesn’t it. I can’t imagine the Holy Spirit moved us to dialogue and learn from our brothers and sisters only to damn ourselves.
 
😦 kind of ruins your day, doesn’t it. I can’t imagine the Holy Spirit moved us to dialogue and learn from our brothers and sisters only to damn ourselves.
I think this Catholic teaching only comes into play if we fully accept with our hearts and minds the premise that there is only one church and that church is the Roman Catholic church then afterwards reject that idea.

As we Lutherans confess our salvation though Christ, and we profess one holy catholic church that we are part of, we’re are in no risk of accepting the Catholic premise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top