Regardless of whatever is determined as the ‘opposite’ sex of me, I still suffer from SSA, because I am bisexual. Every scientific mind I’ve talked to isn’t surprised I have bisexual thoughts because of my situation.
You’ve made a very good point, Bennie. “Homo-sex” is an action between two members of the same gender who are %100 biologically male or female and fully aware of their gender. The intent of the action is toward a member of the same sex.
I have to disagree it does take a streach, in your situation, much confusion is created by something you had no control of, unlike those that claim to be “gay” as they refuse to acknowledge their choices and refuse to act as they were intended to act by what they were given by birth. Everyone, except in rare cases such as yours, are born male or female and sometime in ther life they decide to follow impulses that go against thier physiological nature and then make a false claims that they were born that why without any scientific evidence to prove it. Then in order to justify their wrong choices they attempt to enlist others, for example persons such as youself, to justify those choices. May I emphasize the word use, because that is what the 'gay" agenda is all about, using others just to satisfy their sexual lust, despite how much it may hurt them, the people they use, the people that truly love them, or society as a whole. They are unable to prove scientifically their claims they are born that way, so they must use lies, verbal abuse, legislation, the courts, and even violence to justify their twisted logic. They reject scientific data that shows the lifstyle is harmful as all sexual promiscuity outside of marriage is. Their main goal is not simple tolerance, but have the ability to enlarge their potential pool of sexual partners by any means available. Homosexual sex is broken down basically to the level of the penatrator and the pentrated - the preditor and the prey. That is why it is so important for ‘gay’ advocates to access to the school system is to teach children ‘tolerance’ and homosexual sex is ‘normal’ and ‘natural’ - to shape young minds while they are the most vulernable and confused by their sexual feelings. It is not about equal rights but imposing an unaccepted immorality upon the majority.
That’s what I was talking about.
I disagree with you, and the level of vitriol you have towards my friends is so high I do not wish to discuss things with you further.
wow, you know technically you might be the next evolution of mankind? As our society grows more and more advanced a genderless species becomes very appropriate. I have no idea if it will actually happen, and if you think about it you kinda like an x gene mutant, which is totally cool.
HAHAHAH i saw a really funny example for this on the daily show. Someone political was using the example of pipping so jhon stewert gets a I shaped male pipe and a T shaped female pipe, and he does the instering thing then he goes ewll thats OBVIOUSLY a good example turns the T pipe to the otherside (the anus) and gasps in horror (sarcastically) as it fits in that way as well.
Pretty much all of us are sterile, as in 99%+. We don’t pass our genes on.
Yea something like a mind that made them randy over the same sex. I mean they were born with their mind weren’t they?
Ahhhh thats a pity it would have been totally cool if you did pass on your genetic imprint.
Which 'gay" person shoes would you like me to put on? the one that attempted to molest me when I was 11? the two ‘gay’ men that attempted molest me when I was 15? Ernest Rhom? the one who was a friend of my wife that died of aides in 1990?, another that was friend of both my wife and I that died of aides in 1992? the one from my parish who died of aides in 97? Or the one that wants to come to my children’s school and teach that homosexual behavior is normal?
Your mind develops with experience and use. The more you do a wrong action the easier it becomes to do it the next time. The more you concentrate on one fantasy that fantasy becomes ones own reality.
This person Pathia has expressed to us pain over a condition that is a terrible cross to bear and all you can say is it would be “cool” if he or she could pass on the gene?
pathia, don’t you believe that God is omnipotent? Don’t you think He could have createdc you with full nuts and bolts if He so desired? He chose not to, for whatever reason. Instead of being thankful to Him for creating you as He did, you seem to be upset about it. This is the root of the problem. It is between you, and your Maker.
Your statement here reflects a grave thinking error, and one that is grounded in carnality (fleshly thinking). The Church follows Jesus’ teaching that such persons are called to celibacy. If you refuse to embrace this calling, then you are rejecting God’s purpose for your life. Perhaps He knew you would miss the spiritual call, so He gave it to you physically. Who knows? In any case, to say that the “church” wants you to refrain from meaningful relationships with anyone is a grave misunderstanding. This would be the same as saying the Jesus, because He was celibate, had no meaningful relationships with anyone. Is that what you believe?!
A person cannot “ostracize” oneself. You can conduct yourself in chastity. It would help if you read the portion of the catechism on chastity, so you can understand what this means, and then I recommend the theology of the body. The Church does not “deny love”. Instead, She urges all to seek the higher forms of Divine Love exemplified by Jesus, which sometimes includes the denial of fleshly desires. These same teachings apply to married, single, and celibate people. It sounds to me like you are feeling sorry for yourself because you are being told not to chase after fleshly love.
I am not ‘chasing’ love. I have found it and been in that state for years. I have been dating and engaged to a amazingly patient man for three almost four years now. He has never pushed for ‘carnality’ of any sort that you speak of, he is willing to wait until my issues with the church are resolved.
Correct. Gay behavior is a health risk.
In the research class I took, a guaranteed question for the final presentation was “What did you proof?” The correct answer was “absolutely nothing.” The initial question asks for proof for which we can only provide evidence.
Are you asking that I disprove the idea that gay people degrade humanity as a whole, along the same lines as Fredrick Douglas disproved the idea being black means you’re less intelligent?
There is far more to romance than just the sex. Gay people, if they want to live by the Catholic understanding of homosexuality, aren’t allowed to go on dates, kiss, hold hands, cuddle, go through the struggle of breaking up, go through the process of marriage, raise a family (adopted), and - yes - have sexual contact.
