Can the single life be a vocation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlwaysCatholic3
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

AlwaysCatholic3

Guest
Hi I’m new here. And I just want to ask is the single life a vocation? Does God call people to be single for there whole life but not in religious life? The reason I am asking is because I am wondering if God is calling me to be single. I am in my early 20’s and I can’t to get a date or have a long standing relationship with a girl (I am a guy lol). And I also have a bad temper at times (not physical). And I wonder if those are signs from God that I am to be single. Could that be possible? If it is thats fine I will embrace it and live it (I am not whining about being single). I wonder if I should just live like I am called to be single but stay open to getting married if God wants me to.
 
Hi I’m new here. And I just want to ask is the single life a vocation? Does God call people to be single for there whole life but not in religious life? The reason I am asking is because I am wondering if God is calling me to be single. I am in my early 20’s and I can’t to get a date or have a long standing relationship with a girl (I am a guy lol). And I also have a bad temper at times (not physical). And I wonder if those are signs from God that I am to be single. Could that be possible? If it is thats fine I will embrace it and live it (I am not whining about being single). I wonder if I should just live like I am called to be single but stay open to getting married if God wants me to.
Well, God calls everyone which He has plan for everyone, whether there are religious life or married life or single life.Before you decide anything in your life, please discern about it and pray…let the Holy Spirit guides you in your life…
God bless
Wina
 
even if single, you can still consecrate yourself, make private vows, join lay communities, lots and lots of possibilities.

don’t beat yourself up over your shortcomings. whether or not you become a religious, you still need to overcome those. you still have a long way to go as far as deciding which vocation is for you. start by getting a spiritual director to guide you, preferably one familiar with vocations.

leave everything open, and God will slowly reveal it all to you. frequent Mass and the Sacraments, and everything will fit together like a nice puzzle. trust, and don’t worry!
 
No, the single life is not a vocation. Theology of the Body emphasizes the point that God makes us to live “spousally,” i.e. we are made to live in committed, permanent relationships of total self-giving. This kenotic, relational love finds its source and archetype in the love among the three Persons of the Trinity.

The single life is not a vocation because it lacks permanence. It is always open to change, and is therefore necessarily a prelude to another state. Marriage, priesthood, religious life, and lay consecration are vocations because they are all characterized by a permanent, spousal commitment to God.

Hope this helps.

God bless,

Chris
 
No, the single life is not a vocation. Theology of the Body emphasizes the point that God makes us to live “spousally,” i.e. we are made to live in committed, permanent relationships of total self-giving. This kenotic, relational love finds its source and archetype in the love among the three Persons of the Trinity.

The single life is not a vocation because it lacks permanence. It is always open to change, and is therefore necessarily a prelude to another state. Marriage, priesthood, religious life, and lay consecration are vocations because they are all characterized by a permanent, spousal commitment to God.

Hope this helps.

God bless,

Chris
nice! sounded harsh at first as many people teach “single, married, or religious” but in reality those single should be consecrated people living in the world, and not of the world. seems it’s more of a technicality of words that should probably be changed because people are misinterpreting it and overlooking the importance of lay consecration…
 
No, the single life is not a vocation. Theology of the Body emphasizes the point that God makes us to live “spousally,” i.e. we are made to live in committed, permanent relationships of total self-giving. This kenotic, relational love finds its source and archetype in the love among the three Persons of the Trinity.

The single life is not a vocation because it lacks permanence. It is always open to change, and is therefore necessarily a prelude to another state. Marriage, priesthood, religious life, and lay consecration are vocations because they are all characterized by a permanent, spousal commitment to God.

Hope this helps.

God bless,

Chris
What about consecrated Hermits?
 
Yes, it actually can be a vocation too.
The catechism’s section on vocations does NOT call singlehood a vocation. People mistakenly call it that, usually out of a sense of erroneous kindness or political correctness (nobody wants to feel left out).

But the reality is that being single is a state of life, NOT a vocation. That does not make a single person a bad person, so you should not take offense if someone says that you are living in the single state.

By the way, I am writing this as someone who has lived his entire life (so far) in the single state.
 
No, the single life is not a vocation. Theology of the Body emphasizes the point that God makes us to live “spousally,” i.e. we are made to live in committed, permanent relationships of total self-giving. This kenotic, relational love finds its source and archetype in the love among the three Persons of the Trinity.

The single life is not a vocation because it lacks permanence. It is always open to change, and is therefore necessarily a prelude to another state. Marriage, priesthood, religious life, and lay consecration are vocations because they are all characterized by a permanent, spousal commitment to God.

Hope this helps.

God bless,

Chris
This is one way of looking at it. Still, I would not say that a faithful Catholic who has remained single “has no vocation.” All the baptized have a vocation; that is, all have a mission within the life of the Church. Rather, a Catholic who remains single must always be open to the possibility that God may have another call in mind later in their lives, because, as you say, the single life should not be assumed to be a* permanent *vocation. The single life may turn out to have been one’s permanent vocation, though, by default, as it were. It would be wrong to suppose that a Catholic who remained single over the course of a long life in service to God simply had not been listening!

From Lumen Gentium, the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Chapter IV: The Laity
(italics and underline, mine):
“31. The term laity is here understood to mean all the faithful except those in holy orders and those in the state of religious life specially approved by the Church…they carry out for their own part the mission of the whole Christian people in the Church and in the world…”
“…the laity, by their very vocation, seek the kingdom of God by engaging in temporal affairs and by ordering them according to the plan of God…”
32. By divine institution Holy Church is ordered and governed with a wonderful diversity. “For just as in one body we have many members, yet all the members have not the same function, so we, the many, are one body in Christ, but severally members one of another”.(191) Therefore, the chosen People of God is one: “one Lord, one faith, one baptism”(192); sharing a common dignity as members from their regeneration in Christ, having the same filial grace and the same vocation to perfection; possessing in common one salvation, one hope and one undivided charity. There is, therefore, in Christ and in the Church no inequality on the basis of race or nationality, social condition or sex, because “there is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all ‘one’ in Christ Jesus”.(193)
If therefore in the Church everyone does not proceed by the same path, nevertheless all are called to sanctity and have received an equal privilege of faith through the justice of God.(194)…

As for the OP, a lack of control of one’s temper is a spiritual fault that does not become permissible because one lacks a spouse or religious congregation to be afflicted with its repercussions on a daily basis! Likewise, lack of long-standing relationships may stem from either the lack of suitable friends, a lack in the opportunity to cultivate those friendships that are available because of other legitimate duties, or a spiritual fault in the person who lacks those relationships, among other things. If one of the reasons you have not had long-standing relationships with women is due to spirtual faults within yourself, that needs to be addressed. If it is for other causes, though, these should not be assumed to be permanent.

It does not matter that God has not shown you many women, any of whom would have made suitable wife for you. God only has to find you the one, and in God’s own good time. It may be that, had your wife met you now, she would not have had the courage to take you, or you might not have had the wisdom to recognize each other. It may be that God has work left to do on both of you, before introductions are in order! Likewise, you may not be ready to be introduced to your local director of vocations, either! Every thing in its time.

IOW, strive for holiness and for every virtue, to be a loving and giving person capable of serving God within your relationships with others. That way, if God sees fit to call you to the priesthood, to the diaconate, to marriage, or to the religious life, you have not wasted the time given to you for preparation. If God calls you only to the single life, you still will have used your time on earth well.
 
What about consecrated Hermits?
If a hermit is not a priest, he is simply a consecrated laymen. Similarly, all non-ordained monks and nuns can technically be called consecrated laymen.
 
This is one way of looking at it. Still, I would not say that a faithful Catholic who has remained single “has no vocation.” All the baptized have a vocation; that is, all have a mission within the life of the Church. Rather, a Catholic who remains single must always be open to the possibility that God may have another call in mind later in their lives, because, as you say, the single life should not be assumed to be a* permanent *vocation. The single life may turn out to have been one’s permanent vocation, though, by default, as it were. It would be wrong to suppose that a Catholic who remained single over the course of a long life in service to God simply had not been listening!
Well said. I completely agree.
 
If a hermit is not a priest, he is simply a consecrated laymen. Similarly, all non-ordained monks and nuns can technically be called consecrated laymen.
where did you hear this? the hermits i’ve seen were more like monks and nuns in a cloistered community but who live more separated, rather than laymen in the world who are consecrated. afaik, the hermit follows a rule (St. Benedict, St. Francis, etc.) and obeys the Bishop. he is more like an isolated religious brother. therefore, i would not call a non-ordained hermit simply a consecrated layman.
newadvent.org/cathen/07280a.htm

what is a consecrated layman? i’m thinking they can make private vows and not have to obey anyone, or make public vows as say, a third order Franciscan while obeying the Abbot. i’m thinking of communities like Regnum Christi, Opus Dei, etc. as those in the world with private vows or “promises” rather than public vows.

now if a consecrated layman went the way of St. John the Baptist and lived in the desert, i would say he lived like a hermit, but not an official religious "H"ermit, if there is such a designation.
 
Single is a state of life. The only times I have seen the CCC refer to states of life as vocations per se are marriage and “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”, and the latter is considered a call only as pertains to priestly ministry and consecrated life (see CCC 2233). Additionally, for the most part, unless and until vows are taken, single people are not canonically prohibited from entering religious life or married life just because they are single.

If someone has something from OFFICIAL CHURCH TEACHING (CCC, canon law, etc., and NOT personal speculation) that states otehrwise, I would be interested in hearing it.
 
I’m single. Thought it could be viewed as a vocation at one time; though, rarely in any literal sense of the word; though, what is vocation anyway, but to be drawn into a deeper relationship with Jesus, not to exclude being single.

My being single recently has become an issue. I’ve prayed a novena to St. Joseph; now, I’ve been praying the peace prayer of St. Francis of Assissi. Prayer of course, must always be accompanied by action–I recently had a humourous thought concerning my own faults due either to injuries sustained, or personal foolishness, (I have been diagnosed with depression, anxiety, and a general personality disorder in addition to having a broken-back; additonally, I suspect, that I have Post-traumatic Stress Disorder as a consequence of combat experiences, and a variety of other traumas in life–all of these factors have been obstacles to marriages for other people, with divorces as the consequence–this tends to make me think, that marriage of faith, being insoluable by man, is soluable by the effects of war and therefore, war is not a man, but someone/something else.), which led me to a brief conclusion: I am incapable of loving a woman, in marriage. This quickly was interrupted with the thought, that I do at times claim, that I love God, which of these two would a person think is more difficult?
 
Single is a state of life. The only times I have seen the CCC refer to states of life as vocations per se are marriage and “virginity for the sake of the kingdom”, and the latter is considered a call only as pertains to priestly ministry and consecrated life (see CCC 2233). Additionally, for the most part, unless and until vows are taken, single people are not canonically prohibited from entering religious life or married life just because they are single.

If someone has something from OFFICIAL CHURCH TEACHING (CCC, canon law, etc., and NOT personal speculation) that states otehrwise, I would be interested in hearing it.
For the single state to be a vocation and call from God, one needs to embrace the single state in celibacy and for the sake of The Kingdom and as a call from God to do so. Two of the following links quote Vatican documents:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=3281111&postcount=9

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=3281224&postcount=10

catholicnewsagency.com/column.php?n=145
 
For the single state to be a vocation and call from God, one needs to embrace the single state in celibacy and for the sake of The Kingdom and as a call from God to do so. Two of the following links quote Vatican documents:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=3281111&postcount=9

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=3281224&postcount=10

catholicnewsagency.com/column.php?n=145
First link talks of it as a state, not a vocation.

Second link does not refer to it as a vocation.

Third link talks about the requirement of formal consecration to God.
 
First link talks of it as a state, not a vocation.

Second link does not refer to it as a vocation.

Third link talks about the requirement of formal consecration to God.
I think we need to define what in fact “vocation” means:

http://www.catholicculture.org/library/dictionary/index.cfm?id=37136
VOCATION
A call from God to a distinctive state of life, in which the person can reach holiness. The Second Vatican Council made it plain that there is a “Universal call [vocatio] to holiness in the Church” (Lumen Gentium, 39). (Etym. Latin vocatio, a calling, summoning; from vocare, to call.)
…and as I said for the single state to be a vocation or call from God, one needs to experience it as such and probably affirm it by a public or private vow of some kind. If the vow is public and therefore canonical one is not strictly in the single state but in the consecrated state. If the vow is private one retains the single state.
Obviously if one experiences a call from God to remain single and to commit oneself to this state, it is a vocation by virtue of the definition of “vocation”.

My third link you queried stating that it requires a formal consecration to God which private vows would be:

catholicnewsagency.com/column.php?n=145
Those who are single and not formally consecrated to God with a pledge of celibacy are not in the vocation to the single life. But it is an aspect of the vocation to single life if a person living the single life with dedication to God, with faithful chastity, with openness to marriage, but also with a commitment to play an active role in helping have an impact on children. As Fr. Groeschel mentioned, maybe that is by being a good aunt or uncle who is active in assisting with the raising of the nieces and nephews. Or maybe you are a good friend of a family with children. Or maybe it is having an active role in the parish with anything that helps the children of the parish. Whatever it is, it has to be something that has an impact on children.
With all due respect and realizing I may well be proved incorrect, although I do not think so, I really do think that to state that there is no such thing as a vocation and call from God to the single state is out of touch with general Church thinking.
It can be resolved I think by a question into Apolgetics. I dont have time to do this just now but will do so if necessary.

Blessings and regards…Barb:)
 
I think we need to define what in fact “vocation” means:

http://www.catholicculture.org/library/dictionary/index.cfm?id=37136

…and as I said for the single state to be a vocation or call from God, one needs to experience it as such and probably affirm it by a public or private vow of some kind. If the vow is public and therefore canonical one is not strictly in the single state but in the consecrated state. If the vow is private one retains the single state.
Obviously if one experiences a call from God to remain single and to commit oneself to this state, it is a vocation by virtue of the definition of “vocation”.

My third link you queried stating that it requires a formal consecration to God which private vows would be:

catholicnewsagency.com/column.php?n=145

With all due respect and realizing I may well be proved incorrect, although I do not think so, I really do think that to state that there is no such thing as a vocation and call from God to the single state is out of touch with general Church thinking.
It can be resolved I think by a question into Apolgetics. I dont have time to do this just now but will do so if necessary.

Blessings and regards…Barb:)
Maybe because I have always had associated vocation with religious life, my definition of “vocation” is synonymous with a lifelong commitment that will “lock you in”, so to speak, to that life until either you die or get released from your vow. In another words, there is a permanence to that committment. If you are still open to marriage while still single, then that is not a permanent committment to the single life; at most, it is a temporary vocation, if there is such a thing.
 
Maybe because I have always had associated vocation with religious life, my definition of “vocation” is synonymous with a lifelong commitment that will “lock you in”, so to speak, to that life until either you die or get released from your vow. In another words, there is a permanence to that committment. If you are still open to marriage while still single, then that is not a permanent committment to the single life; at most, it is a temporary vocation, if there is such a thing.
I get your drift and we agree in the main. I am not speaking either of the single state that is not experienced as a call and vocation, rather of the single state that is experienced as a call from God and a vocation to the single state itself embraced “for the sake of The Kingdom” in some way, and thereby (by virtue of it being a call and vocation from God) asking commitment to that call and vocation. This can be an entirely private, even secret, commitment - but commitment and eventually for life the actual single state vocation is. Although one could embrace the state on a temporary basis and as a call from God and vocation to do so and as I think the article states, while this does have elements of the single vocation per se, it is incomplete. To be the vocation per se to the single state it would ask an eventual lifelong commitment and a certain experience of “this is my vocation and call from God for my life”. By “eventual lifelong commitment” I mean under the same terms as a nun or religious sister has a trial period before embracing perpetual vows.

I think that the only reason a person who has a vocation to the single state per se remains outside of canonical consecration is simply because such does not exist for the single state other than a consecrated virgin or consecrated hermit, if one is in fact a virgin or experiences a call to the hermit state. I think also that there are some secular institutes who may have canonical consecration (The O.Carm Carmelite “Leaven” secular institute for example). There is a movement in Rome to include widows in the canonical consecrated state.

At this point in our evolution, those single people who have embraced the single state for life and for the “sake of The Kingdom” in some way are not recognized by any sort of canonical consecration to their vocation and way of life. Their only option is some sort of private or even secret vow.

As the article states, the vocation and call to the single state is relatively rare, but that it does exist and as a vocation and call from God. Any person experiencing such a call would be wise and prudent to seek spiritual advice before embracing the state as one’s vocation and certainly if one felt called to do so for life.

Blesssings and regards…Barb:)
 
" it is a temporary vocation, if there is such a thing."
If one takes vocation by definition to be a call from God to a state where holiness can be achieved, then I think that there could be such a thing as a temporary vocation and I have certainly read of “nuns who left” being defined as having been called to religious life by God *for a period and that later that call and vocation is withdrawn for some reason. *There certainly is no reason why a person who enters religious life cannot enter onto the road to holiness and then continue on that road after leaving the convent or monastery.
I haven’t read anything really official and reliable on the point of a temporary call or vocation, but it certainly sounds logical to me. If a woman enters religious life and makes final profession (for life) and later leaves, then if one takes the current theological defintion of final profession being indication and affirmation of a religious vocation…then the logical thinking would seem to me to be that the woman who later leaves has had a temporary vocation. Unless theological hair splitting takes place in The Church and a “call from God” is defined as one thing and only temporary and a “vocation” becomes defined theologically as a call for life, which to date it is not. Not as a clearly defined theological determination.
I find there is often ambiguity in Church Documents including The Catholic Catechism and one is not sure of what is actually meant and being stated, defined.

Blessings and regards…Barb:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top