A
Alex337
Guest
They rather did. If I put eggs, flour, cocoa, etc in a bowl and mix I am intentionally making a cake. Now it may not work out as I am a terrible baker. But the intent was there when I put the ingredients in and attempted to make said cake.They didn’t cause the death. They didn’t even intentionally create a child.
The couple who have unprotected sex with the intent of making a child have indeed done that intentionally.
As does the couple with the high miscarriage rate.Alex337:![]()
They know that not all of the embryos will certainly survive.In ivf they don’t specifically create life to end them, they fertilize to get viable ones
Yeah… I’ll just have to disagree with you here. That unviable foetus can endanger the mother greatly. My own mother was going to have to decide between carrying such a child to term and endangering herself and I’d have supported her decision not to die in the attempt. She miscarried before that happened but no, the danger posed to mothers when carrying unviable foetuses to term is too large.Alex337:![]()
I do. Because aborting it would be an act. I don’t believe in deliberately ending an innocent life, regardless of age. In that example I gave earlier would you shoot a man in his death bed. Or other examples: a boy with muscular dystrophy/chronic illness etcc. It’s not the perfect analogy because one would have to take into account the emotional toll, but I’m referring to the reasoning as to why it would be ethical or unethical.So you think it’s unethical to abort a foetus that won’t make it?