can we have a discussion with Muslims without getting angry

  • Thread starter Thread starter deb1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you think it’s possible that Moslems can take responsibility for their own actions or are they only capable of reacting to what others do?
What would be “taking responsibility” in your eyes?

What do you want? They condemn terrorism, bear the main brunt of terrorist violence, and generally they’re so rough on terrorists that the US ships terror supsects to Muslim countries once they’re captured.

So in terms of taking responsibility, what more do you want to see?
 
What would be “taking responsibility” in your eyes?

What do you want? They condemn terrorism, bear the main brunt of terrorist violence, and generally they’re so rough on terrorists that the US ships terror supsects to Muslim countries once they’re captured.

So in terms of taking responsibility, what more do you want to see?
  1. They give lip service to the condemnation of terrorism.
  2. They seem to love killing one another, as well as the Infidel.
  3. They are rough on terrorists from the other side.
  4. They need to be sent back to their own countries, they are treated badly because moslems are just naturally bloody-minded. The concept of justice and fair play is not a moslem concept.
 
  1. They need to be sent back to their own countries, they are treated badly because moslems are just naturally bloody-minded. The concept of justice and fair play is not a moslem concept.
wow. So would you advocate creating a police force go to and identify and arrest all Muslims, so they could be thrown out of the US!?

This is really ironic…here you are saying Muslims don’t know about justice and fair play, and you’re saying that people should be tossed out of their homes based on religion.

Sometimes I’m just beyond words at the bigotry I see.
 
wow. So would you advocate creating a police force go to and identify and arrest all Muslims, so they could be thrown out of the US!?

This is really ironic…here you are saying Muslims don’t know about justice and fair play, and you’re saying that people should be tossed out of their homes based on religion.

Sometimes I’m just beyond words at the bigotry I see.
You’ll just have to get over having the vapors, Pro.
Read your own post, Pro. Moslems who commit acts of terrorism should be sent back to their own countries to be dealt with. Although severely limiting moslem immigration into this country is not a bad idea. Any alien who commits crimes against this nation should be instantly deported. And the last time I looked, little old presbyterian ladies were not our prime terror suspects. Young moslem males seem to be in the forefront of the terror business, if the shoe fits Pro, you’ll have to wear it. Nobody says that anyone should be “tossed out of their homes based on their religion” But if their religion tells them to support jihad, then they need to be tossed into jail and then tossed out of this country.
 
What would be “taking responsibility” in your eyes?
Many things; *turn the other cheek *comes to mind

Admitting the root cause of the problem’s another one
What do you want?
20 million is used notes. But, let’s not go there.
They condemn terrorism, bear the main brunt of terrorist violence, and generally they’re so rough on terrorists that the US ships terror supsects to Muslim countries once they’re captured.
I agree that there’s hypocrisy there.
So in terms of taking responsibility, what more do you want to see?
As noted Islam supports terrorism, it’s done so for centuries before the US ever came into being.
 
wow. So would you advocate creating a police force go to and identify and arrest all Muslims, so they could be thrown out of the US!?
That’s a dilemma to all pluralistic societies; what to do with those in that society that want to destroy it.

The Nazis used ‘democratic’ means to take over Germany. The US perhaps unjustly had anti-communist witch-trials in the 1950s. Now they’re faced by Islam which despises non-Islamic government. You yourself take advantage of the freedom of speech that would be absent under Islamic rule.
This is really ironic…here you are saying Muslims don’t know about justice and fair play, and you’re saying that people should be tossed out of their homes based on religion.
The real sense of irony comes from someone screaming about a breach of rights given to them by a system they despise
Sometimes I’m just beyond words at the bigotry I see.
Stop reading the Koran, then.
 
Many things; *turn the other cheek *comes to mind
How is that taking responsibility??? That would seem to be doing the opposite when you’re talking about an entire population. It’s one thing for an individual to let someone slap him; it’s quite another for an entire race of people to allow collective abuse.
Admitting the root cause of the problem’s another one
They have no problem addressing root causes. I think what you mean by this is “agreeing with Montalban on what the root cause is.”
As noted Islam supports terrorism, it’s done so for centuries before the US ever came into being.
It never has done so, and does not do so now. Try this:

Give a coherent, general definition of terrorism. Then find me an act of terrorism committed by Muslims before 1967.
 
That’s a dilemma to all pluralistic societies; what to do with those in that society that want to destroy it.

The Nazis used ‘democratic’ means to take over Germany. The US perhaps unjustly had anti-communist witch-trials in the 1950s. Now they’re faced by Islam which despises non-Islamic government. You yourself take advantage of the freedom of speech that would be absent under Islamic rule.
The whole premise of this line of thought is absurd. There is no islamic organization even remotely capable of “threatening US democracy.”

The Nazis possessed the most technologically advanced army in the world. They also had a political party that attracted broad support in Germany.

Muslims are generally discriminated against in the US, and represent a fraction of the population. Their situation is much more comparable to the Jews of Germany during the 30’s, not the Germans.
The real sense of irony comes from someone screaming about a breach of rights given to them by a system they despise
How do you know that the people complaining despise the system?
Stop reading the Koran, then.
Since you like to talk, I’ll indulge you once in a while. But I won’t respond to childish and insulting comments about other people’s religions, and if you keep making them, I’ll just ignore you.
 
40.png
pro_universal:
How is that taking responsibility???
By making a choice not to lash out. That’s taking responsibility.
40.png
pro_universal:
That would seem to be doing the opposite when you’re talking about an entire population. It’s one thing for an individual to let someone slap him; it’s quite another for an entire race of people to allow collective abuse.
It’s been done. Gandhi, Martin Luther King etc lead such movements.
40.png
Montalban:
Admitting the root cause of the problem’s another one
40.png
pro_universal:
They have no problem addressing root causes. I think what you mean by this is “agreeing with Montalban on what the root cause is.”
As they’re synonymous, in this case, then yes that would be so.
40.png
Montalban:
As noted Islam supports terrorism, it’s done so for centuries before the US ever came into being.
40.png
pro_universal:
It never has done so, and does not do so now. Try this:

Give a coherent, general definition of terrorism. Then find me an act of terrorism committed by Muslims before 1967.
It’s hard to imagine you kept a straight face when composing this challenge
1955 in Constantinople the Turks launched a pogrom against the Greeks.
imia.cc.duth.gr/turkey/terr.e.html
and
chicago.agrino.org/turkish_pogrom_against_the_greeks.htm
and
Since 1924, the status of the Greek minority in Turkey has been ambiguous. Beginning in the 1930s, the government instituted repressive policies forcing many Greeks to emigrate. Examples are the labour battalions drafted among non-Muslims during World War II as well as the Fortune Tax (Varlık Vergisi) levied mostly on non-Muslims during the same period. These resulted in financial ruination and death for many Greeks. The exodus was given greater impetus with the Istanbul Pogrom of September 1955 when thousands of Greeks were forced to flee for their lives, eventually reducing the Greek population to about 48,000 by 1965. Although the size of the Greek minority has continued to decline, the Greek citizens of Turkey generally constitute one of the country’s wealthiest communities.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greeks_in_Turkey

There’s the massacre in Smyrna in the 1920s which terrorised many thousands into leaving.
hellenicgenocide.org/quotes/

All the way back to the time of Muhammad.
(see post #66 forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=1758617&highlight=terror+islam#post1758617)
40.png
pro_universal:
The whole premise of this line of thought is absurd. There is no Islamic organization even remotely capable of “threatening US democracy.”
It doesn’t have to be a threat from a single organisation.
40.png
pro_universal:
The Nazis possessed the most technologically advanced army in the world. They also had a political party that attracted broad support in Germany.
Good for them. You miss the point. They were an ideology against democracy that used the means of that democratic society to undermine it.
40.png
pro_universal:
Muslims are generally discriminated against in the US, and represent a fraction of the population. Their situation is much more comparable to the Jews of Germany during the 30’s, not the Germans.
Thank God for the US then. None of what you state negates the fact that Moslems seek to make the world Islamic.
40.png
pro_universal:
How do you know that the people complaining despise the system?
You for one always are happy to raise issues of the ills of America.
40.png
pro_universal:
Since you like to talk, I’ll indulge you once in a while. But I won’t respond to childish and insulting comments about other people’s religions, and if you keep making them, I’ll just ignore you.
Frankly, I don’t care if you respond or not. I am here to offer a case to those who are willing to read it and you’re responses apart from helping me are an insight to all about the double-talk and illogical nonsense synonomous with Islamic thinking. Moslems negate responsibility for their acts of terror.

You here do the same by at best trying to pin it to a reaction to western imperialism/Zionism. You further, without even accepting that Moslems use terror want to point out the evils of the USA. All the while you skip about the issue that Moslems are terrorists. (Note I don’t say ALL Moslems are terrorists, nor all terrorists are Moslems). Moslems use the Koran and the example of Muhammad in order to spread Islam through jihad. And in Islam terrorism is seen as a legitimate means to that ends. History is full of examples of the many means Moslems managed their conquered territories. From discriminatory laws, through to ethnic cleansing and the use of terror.
 
Give a coherent, general definition of terrorism. Then find me an act of terrorism committed by Muslims before 1967.
Terrorism is defined by the US Department of Defense as “the unlawful use of – or threatened use of – force or violence against individuals or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives.”

Heard of the Armenian Holocaust? Heard of Grand Mufti Amin al-Husayni?

Ever wonder why in Egypt the native population is being persecuted by the Arabs? Arabs aren’t even native to Egypt! Copts are the Egyptian natives.

How’d the Moslems get ahold of Christian lands in Palestine? Certainly wasn’t through barterring and treaties. I know we didn’t gain the lands in Palestine through just means either, but we’re not talking about Christians here… I’m just pointing out the double standards which exist when referring to Islamic terrorism now.

http://www.prophetofdoom.net/pics/Islamic_Terrorism_Timeline_Introduction/Heil_Allah.jpg

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/truth4.jpg

Look here at the Palestinian Neo-Nazis inspried by the Grand Mufti Amin al-Husayni.
 
Heard of the Nazi Holocaust i.e. the real Holocaust?.. Or so what many historians say did really happen.

Oops, I forgot, Hitler and the Nazis weren’t real Christians, were they?

Well then, by the same token, the people who commited the “Armenian Holocaust” weren’t real Muslims, were they?

You were saying something about “double standards”, weren’t you?
 
Heard of the Nazi Holocaust i.e. the real Holocaust?.. Or so what many historians say did really happen.

Oops, I forgot, Hitler and the Nazis weren’t real Christians, were they?

Well then, by the same token, the people who commited the “Armenian Holocaust” weren’t real Muslims, were they?

You were saying something about “double standards”, weren’t you?
No, Hitler denounced Christianity and in the Protestant Reich Church which he formed as a collective of all Protestant Churches in Germany he replaced the Bible with Mein Kampf.

Hitler was evil and used religion whenever it suited him best… for propaganda purposes, the same way he used Islam.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestant_Reich_Church

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Christianity

Does that sound like Christianity to you?
 
Heard of the Nazi Holocaust i.e. the real Holocaust?.. Or so what many historians say did really happen.

Oops, I forgot, Hitler and the Nazis weren’t real Christians, were they?

Well then, by the same token, the people who commited the “Armenian Holocaust” weren’t real Muslims, were they?

You were saying something about “double standards”, weren’t you?
Hitler was heavily into the occult and was not a practicing Christian. He sent priests to the concentration camps also.
 
Barbary War, the Battle of Lepanto. Recently, 911and other bombings.
Well, between the two of us, you’re the only one who has typed out what he thinks the other is thinking. So I’m confused as to why you start out with “you assume so much…”…what exaclty am I assuming here? And how is it different from you assuming what’s in my mind?

Okay, do you have any evidence of this at all? I think maybe you’re just confused. When was the last war between the West and Islam???
 
Luke 9:54 "And when His disciples James and John saw this, they said, ‘Lord, do You want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them?’ But He turned and rebuked them, and said, ‘You do not know what kind of spirit you are of; for the Son of Man did not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them.’ "
 
deb1,

I just noticed this comment from you.

“Don’t worry about winning the debate, just write the truth.”

This is one of the best nuggets of wisdom I’ve read in a long time. Thank you.

CDL
 
Moslem Apologetics is an oxymoron.

Koranic exegesis is an oxymoron.
Oddly enough, one could reasonably argue that there were very little Christian apologetics or Biblical exegesis (at least as those terms are understood today) before Islam came along. Up until that point, Christianity was the dominant religion in that part of the world and there were few single religions that could cut into Christianity’s market share.

When Islam came along it forced Christians to have to understand their own faith in a more systematic way. This was necessary because there were very good Islamic scholars who were beginning to suck the oxygen out of the debate and put Christians on the defensive in the marketplace of ideas.

Many would argue that Islam was the single most important catalyst in causing Christians to articulate exactly what their faith is about in ways that would eventually be familiar and commonplace to us.
 
Oddly enough, one could reasonably argue that there were very little Christian apologetics or Biblical exegesis (at least as those terms are understood today) before Islam came along. Up until that point, Christianity was the dominant religion in that part of the world and there were few single religions that could cut into Christianity’s market share.

When Islam came along it forced Christians to have to understand their own faith in a more systematic way. This was necessary because there were very good Islamic scholars who were beginning to suck the oxygen out of the debate and put Christians on the defensive in the marketplace of ideas.

Many would argue that Islam was the single most important catalyst in causing Christians to articulate exactly what their faith is about in ways that would eventually be familiar and commonplace to us.
That’s a good point. Sometimes it takes a tragedy to bring people out of their spiritual complacency.
 
Heard of the Nazi Holocaust i.e. the real Holocaust?.. Or so what many historians say did really happen.

Oops, I forgot, Hitler and the Nazis weren’t real Christians, were they?

Well then, by the same token, the people who commited the “Armenian Holocaust” weren’t real Muslims, were they?

You were saying something about “double standards”, weren’t you?
It’s a clear distinction. As I’ve said before, show us where Hitler’s actions were backed up by Christian doctrine and you would have a case. Conversely, we’ve been backing up everything we allege about Islam with basic teachings of Islam confirmed by the Quran and Sahih Hadiths but all you can do is keep on crying “double standard” with no substantial evidence to your claim…
 
How am I assuming this? I’m not assuming it at all. I was highlighting your claim that Muslims don’t have a right to be angry about these atrocities.

Well, it’s not just two or three atrocities. US influence has been to the detriment of everyday Muslims for decades. Your claim that they “hated the western world since their formation” really doesn’t stand up to any evidence. I think a much more likely scenario is one you can understand by just taking a look at a list of US-supported leaders in recent history:
  1. Shah Palavi: torture and murder on a scale that at the time was the worst in the middle east, bar none.
  2. Saddam Hussein: He received US support, including military, right up until he invaded Kuwait. That means the US backed him all through the gassing of the Kurds, and the million deaths in the Iran-Iraq war.
  3. Hosni Mubarak: His police routinely rape and torture political prisoners…some of these stories are making the news. Yet he continues to be one of the biggest recipients of US aid in the entire world.
Don’t you think it makes more sense to believe that these US backed criminals are more responsible for anger towards the US than anything else?
A funny thing occured to me. Have you ever noticed that the only reason most of the Islamic states (Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, and others) have moved from the 15th century to the present is because the West came in and helped them.
I have also read that Muslims in Europe have decided that living on the dole is desirable for them.
And that leads me to the concept of the caliphate. And the jizya. They move further and further into Europe so that Europe can support their ever growing numbers.
Islam lives off the production of others. Our largesse has made Islam a welfare state in spite of their oil. Without their oil and our purchase of it they have nothing.
We finance Islam. No wonder they are angry and irritable.
Another good reason to stop buying their oil.
As long as we talk about purchasing from them, giving their countries things, allowing them to be educated in Wahhabiism in our own country they are amenable to talking calmly.
But if we talk to them about their real agendas no discussion can be made without anger on their parts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top