Can we please talk about Eucharistic Adoration again...civilly?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just to clarify on this, the Eucharist is no longer bread but God, so of course we worship it.
Yes, no argument here. To those just reading the thread it sounded like AINg was claiming Jesus didn’t tell us to worship the Eucharist and thus we were somehow disobeying him by doing so, which makes no sense as God is the Eucharist.
 
Since Vatican 2, there has been an encouragement for EC to restore their traditions,
I would love to see this happen. I have read that some of the Eastern churches who decided to join the Russian Orthodox had their traditions set aside in favor of Russian traditions. Why can we not just all have our traditions? And then we can share them with other Catholics while respecting everyone. For my part I would like to see more of the old Irish and English Catholic traditions put back.
 
Last edited:
I think the answer is simple… it is simply not a tradition for many of the Eastern Catholic rites as it is not a practice for the vast majority of Latin Rite Catholics.

Why? My guess for both is that, considering it is a relatively new practice, most Catholics prefer a more traditional devotion / approach to the Eucharist. That is to say an intra-liturgical interaction versus extra-liturgical.

It is a devotion that is approved, if not encouraged by many in the Church’s hierarchy, but certainly not something that all Catholics are called to. One can be a perfectly good Catholic and never go Eucharistic Adoration.
 
My guess for both is that, considering it is a relatively new practice, most Catholics prefer a more traditional devotion / approach to the Eucharist.
Curious as to why you say it is “relatively new”? St. Basil the Great was doing a form of Eucharistic Adoration in the 300s.
Or did I misunderstand what you were referring to?
 
Last edited:
Curious as to why you say it is “relatively new”? St. Basil the Great was doing a form of Eucharistic Adoration in the 300s.
My understanding is that Eucharistic Adoration came about in the 13/14th century. I believe Basil had a practice of leaving consecrated hosts for travelers who may come by. That’s why I said kinda new )in Church terms.
 
My understanding is that Eucharistic Adoration came about in the 13/14th century. I believe Basil had a practice of leaving consecrated hosts for travelers who may come by. That’s why I said kinda new )in Church terms.
There is evidence that perpetual Adoration may have arisen as early as the sixth century in the cathedral of Lugo, Spain, and there is also evidence that individuals spontaneously practiced it at least by the 8th century. (See “In the Presence of Our Lord”, chapter 5, by Fr. Benedict J. Groeschel, C.F.R and James Monti)
 
Honestly, Tom, this has been a very civil and respectful discussion between Eastern and Latin Catholics. The only posts bring the tone down are yours.
 
Catholics kept posing questions why don’t you Latins do what we do?
The OP is questioning because they are interested in the Eastern church. They have attended recently because of this interest.

Tom, the whole purpose of this form which is named “Catholic Answers”, is for people to pose questions about Catholicism (which includes east and west) and have them answered. If you are fundamentally opposed to people with the spirit of curiosity and respect questioning Eastern Catholicism then maybe you are on the wrong website.
 
I do not understand why people criticise behaviour, but act in a similar way and then take the rather puerile step of ignoring you.
This was a good and civil discussion until you injected attitude into it. If you don’t want to participate in a civil manner feel free to drop out.
 
I think one of the problems with society today is that people far too easily take offence at things. I don’t think we should walk on eggshells around those people.
 
There is zero hypocrisy in this thread.
That may be your opinion; I do not concur. I have been accused of lecturing people yet I can list at least three fellow users now lecturing me. I am not going to accept that without defending myself.
Why do you continue to try to derail the discussion?
I am not and indeed have deleted my earlier posts from the thread. But, if you and others choose to continue posting about me rather than the topic I am going to respond.
 
I have been accused of lecturing people yet I can list at least three fellow users now lecturing me. I am not going to accept that without defending myself
People are lecturing you because you came in and turned what was a pleasant thread and discussion into something completely different. Bear asked her question respectfully and with genuine interest in Eastern Practices.
 
As a user of this forum I shall stick around and watch this thread. I’ll do my best to ignore the hypocrisy I’m seeing.
The OP asked that this thread be a civil discussion. Your attitude is disrespecting the OP.
 
So, to get back on topic…
I found the Eastern idea of “keeping mysteries hidden” to be interesting. I read somewhere that sometimes the Eucharist might be enclosed in a “diskos” (not transparent but opaque) and placed on the altar. Under what circumstances might this be done and what is the purpose?

Again, not questioning the practice, just want to understand it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top